Yirah.fi
EN

ajankohtaista · tutkittua tietoa · Raamattu & teologia

Uutta Joukkovaikuttamisen keinot · kirja nyt saatavilla

SÄHKÖPOSTIKETJU

Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)

3 viestiä

Lähettäjät: Robert Kuhn Iii · Jeffrey Epstein · Robert Lawrence Kuhn

Viestit on järjestetty aikajärjestykseen, kun kaikkien viestien aikaleima on tulkittavissa; muuten ne näytetään arkiston alkuperäisjärjestyksessä. Esiintyminen kirjeenvaihdossa ei ole osoitus osallisuudesta rikoksiin. Lähde: Epstein Files -arkisto (House Oversight Committee).

VIESTI 1 / 3

Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)

Lähettäjä: Robert Kuhn iii
Aika: Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM
Terrific; looking forward.

Excited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.

Equally important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes -
see below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.

How’s late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today -
mother 102 in May.)

RADICAL BREAKTHROUGHS - Initial Revisions (working model for discussion, red is new)

Expand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes
1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance
2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories

3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry,
biology [molecular and evolutionary|, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)

4. Power Laws

5. Mathematical Biology
VIESTI 2 / 3

Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)

Lähettäjä: jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Aika: Dec 29, 2017, at 3:35 PM
it need to be about the topic and the person. some of these people are not engaging at all. Im happy to pay
for more preprduction to get it right.
VIESTI 3 / 3

Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)

Lähettäjä: Robert Lawrence Kuhn
Vastaanottajat: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Aika: 12/29/2017 10:03:58 PM
Agree! ‘Get It Right’ is singular priority - we think alike. This is the Role and Importance of pre-production.
Funds adequate.

Clarity critical, as is charisma. However, given intimacy of TV interviews, it’s not always apparent upfront who
communicates well. Usually by not always. Sometimes someone who is a great lecturer to 500 students falls flat
or off puts as arrogant. Sometimes a mousey introvert with intense eye and facial expressions sparkles and

radiates. There is no substitute, however, for clarity.

Looking forward to discussion.