EMAIL THREAD
privieged
4 messages
Senders: Jeffrey Epstein · Michael Wolff
Messages are sorted chronologically when every timestamp in the thread
can be parsed; otherwise they appear in the archive's original order. Appearing in
correspondence is not an indication of involvement in any crime.
Source: Epstein Files archive (House Oversight Committee).
MESSAGE 1 / 4
Re: privieged
To: Michael Wolff
Date: Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM
lots of reporters inquiries. !. doithink that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did i speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding . I was the stalking horse bid.. never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in someones home. every girl got money. returned . most interviewed by police over 21. all public record. some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. doi have to wear a tie?
MESSAGE 2 / 4
Re: privieged
From: Michael Wolff
Date: Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM
Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with Ollie?
MESSAGE 3 / 4
Re: privieged
To: Michael Wolff
Date: Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:17 AM
hes great. he needs to get the documents from the law firms that are wholly focused on this submission to the judge. . BTW He asked for Imilllion per month . for a year. .
MESSAGE 4 / 4
Re: privieged
From: Michael Wolff
Date: 5/30/2019 11:24:24 AM
Expensive. But... In a way this new round of calls is an opportunity: reporters suddenly thinking they don’t know something or that there is a new angle—now would be a good moment to hit them with a better prepared set of responses. Somebody, Ollie or otherwise, should get started on this.