EFTA00233329

SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ. 
AUGUST 4, 2009 
PAGE 2 
possible federal indictment. 
For this reason, your client is not covered by the Court's Protective Order and the 
Agreement's confidentiality provision remains intact. If you are unable to get a copy of the 
Agreement via the civil discovery process in the lawsuit that you have filed against Mr. Epstein, 
please ask his counsel if they will consent to my production of the Agreement to you and I will send 
a copy to you. 
Sincerely, 
kiffir-3/ 
Cleurtian 
Acting United States Attorney 
By: 
cc: 
Karen Atkinson, Esq. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
EFTA00233469

I I) Ft) I l:s1ICI. 
'•Al 
T1 
LEOPOLD-KUVIN. 
CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS 
January 4, 2010 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 E. Broward Blvd, 7th Floor 
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 
Re: 
B.B. I JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
OUR FILE NO.: 080303 
Dear 
After taking the deposition of Police Chief, 
it came to our attention that 
apparently a computer which was initially seized dunng the search warrant conducted on Mr. 
Epstein's home was returned by the FBI to a private investigator employed by Mr. Epstein. We 
would like to determine who this computer was returned to, and when it was returned. It would 
assist us greatly if you could check your records to determine when, and if, this was ever done. 
Additionally, according to the sworn testimony of Chief es 
department was provided 
with a letter containing a list of potential victims of Mr. Epstein. This letter contained language 
pursuant to a previously unknown Federal Statute which apparently directed him to destroy the 
letter after reading it. We hereby request that your office advise what Statute or Code that letter 
was referring to. Finally, we would like to schedule the depositions of FBI Special Agents 
Please let me know who we need to direct 
our subpoenas to in order to schedule these depositions. 
I appreciate your immediate attention to this matter. Should you have any additional questions 
about these issues, please do not hesitate to contact me at once. 
STK:mlb 
CRAsl IWORTIIINESS • MANAGED CARE ABUSE • CONSUMER CLASS ACTIONS • PERSONAL INJURY • WRONGFUL DEATH 
EFTA00233470

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 1 of 19 
aglepeltel 
An 
Sealed 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
Civil Action No. 
10-80309 
JANE DOE No. 103, 
Plaintiff, 
I 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
FILED byjaD 
C 
FEB 2 3 2010 
STEVEN M. LARIMORE 
CLERK IJ S 01ST CT 
8. C. of FI.A. - MIAMI 
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103 ("Plaintiff'), brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey 
Epstein ("Defendant"), and states as follows: 
PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 
1. 
At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff was a resident of Palm Beach 
County, Florida. 
2. 
This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of 
Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then 
minor. 
3. 
At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant owned a residence located 
at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. 
4. 
Defendant is presently a citizen of the United States Virgin Islands. Pursuant to 
the plea agreement entered by the Defendant in state court and the sentencing which occurred on 
June 30, 2008, Defendant is currently under community control in Palm Beach County, Florida. 
Seakd 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
25 West Plaster Street Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami VKAS8.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.4614346 
.j\C)1‘.S()
rewre.podhunittom 
EFTA00233471

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 2 of 19 
5. 
Defendant is an adult male born on January 20, 1953. 
6. 
This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the claims set forth herein 
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. 
7. 
This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a 
substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. 
STATEMENT OF FACTS 
8. 
At all relevant times, Defendant was an adult male spanning the ages of 45 and 55 
years old. Defendant is known as a billionaire financier and money manager with a secret 
clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power, and 
influence. He owns a fleet of aircraft that includes a Gulfstream IV, a helicopter, and a Boeing 
727, as well as a fleet of motor vehicles. Until his incarceration pursuant to the plea entered and 
sentencing, which occurred on June 30, 2008, he maintained his principal place of residence in 
the largest dwelling in Manhattan, a 51,000-square-foot eight-story mansion on the Upper East 
Side. He also owns a $6.8 million mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a $30 million 7,500-acre 
ranch in New Mexico he named "Zorro," a 70-acre private island known as Little St. James in 
the U.S. Virgin Islands, a mansion in London's Westminster neighborhood, and another 
residence in the Avenue Foch area of Paris. The allegations herein concern Defendant's conduct 
while at his lavish residence in Palm Beach and numerous other locations both nationally and 
internationally. 
9. 
Defendant has a sexual preference for underage minor girls. lie engaged in a 
plan, scheme, or enterprise in which he gained access to countless vulnerable and relatively 
economically disadvantaged minor girls, and sexually assaulted, molested, and/or exploited these 
girls, and then gave them money. 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
2 
25 West Flagler Street. Suite 800. Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fat Lauderdale 954.463.4316 
www.podhurst.com 
EFTA00233472

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 3 of 19 
10. 
Beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant 
used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor girls to engage in a systematic pattern 
of sexually exploitative behavior. 
11. 
Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. 
Defendant coerced and enticed impressionable, vulnerable, and relatively economically less 
fortunate minor girls to participate in various acts of sexual misconduct that he committed upon 
them. Defendant's scheme involved the use of underage girls, as well as other individuals, to 
recruit underage girls. Defendant and/or an authorized agent would call and alert Defendant's 
assistants shortly before or after he arrived at his Palm Beach residence. His assistants would 
call economically disadvantaged and underage girls from West Palm Beach and surrounding 
areas who would be enticed by the money being offered and who Defendant and/or his assistants 
perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility issues if allegations of 
improper conduct were made. The then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls, some as young as 
14 years old, were transported to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion by Defendant's employees, 
agents, and/or assistants in order to provide Defendant with "massages." 
12. 
Many of the instances of illegal sexual conduct committed by Defendant were 
perpetrated with the assistance, support, and facilitation of at least three assistants who helped 
him orchestrate this child exploitation enterprise. These assistants would arrange times for 
underage girls to come to Defendant's residence, transport or cause the transportation of 
underage girls to Defendant's residence, escort the underage girls to the massage room where 
Defendant would be waiting or would enter shortly thereafter, urge the underage girls to remove 
their clothes, deliver cash from Defendant to the underage girls and/or their procurers at the 
conclusion of each "massage appointment," and assist Defendant in taking nude photographs 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
3 
25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Muni 305358.2800 Fax 306358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 
www.podhurst.corn 
EFTA00233473

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 4 of 19 
and/or videos of the underage girls with and/or without their knowledge. Defendant would pay 
the procurer of each girl's "appointment" hundreds of dollars. 
13. 
Defendant designed this scheme to secure a private place in Defendant's Palm 
Beach mansion where only persons employed and invited by Defendant would be present, so as 
to reduce the chance of detection of Defendant's sexual abuse and/or exploitation, as well as to 
make it more difficult for the minor girls to flee the premises and/or to credibly report his actions 
to law enforcement or other authorities. The girls were usually transported by his employee(s), 
agent(s), and/or assistant(s) and/or by taxicab(s) and/or motor vehicle(s) paid for by Defendant, 
which also made it difficult for the girls to flee his mansion. 
14. 
Upon her initial arrival at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, each underage 
victim would generally be introduced to one of Defendant's assistants, who would gather the 
girl's personal contact information. The minor girl would be led up a remote flight of stairs to a 
room that contained a massage table and a large shower. 
15. 
At times, if it was the girl's first "massage" appointment, another female would 
be in the room to "lead the way." Generally the other female would leave, or Defendant would 
dismiss her. Often, Defendant would start his massage wearing only a small towel, which 
eventually would be removed. Defendant and/or the other female would direct the girl to 
massage him, giving the minor girl specific instructions as to where and how he wanted to be 
touched, and then direct her to remove her clothing. Defendant would then perform one or more 
lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including masturbation; fondling the minor's breasts and/or 
sexual organs; touching the minor's vulva, vagina, and/or anus with a vibrator, back massager, 
his finger(s), and/or his penis; digitally penetrating her vagina; performing intercourse, oral sex, 
and/or anal sex; and/or coercing or attempting to coerce the girl to engage in lewd acts and/or 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
4 
25 West Resler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3053582500 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 
www.pocUsunt.coan 
EFTA00233474

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 5 of 19 
prostitution and/or enticing the then minor girl to engage in sexual acts with another female in 
Defendant's presence. The exact degree of molestation and frequency with which the sexual 
exploitations took place varied and is not yet completely known; however, Defendant committed 
such acts regularly on a daily basis and, in most instances, several times a day. In order to 
facilitate the daily exchanges of money for sexual assault and abuse, Defendant kept U.S. 
currency readily available. 
16. 
Defendant traveled out of Florida to Palm Beach for the purpose of luring 
minor girls to his mansion to sexually abuse and/or batter them. He used the telephone to contact 
these minor girls for the purpose of coercing them into acts of prostitution and to enable himself 
to commit sexual battery against them and/or acts of lewdness in their presence, and he conspired 
with others, including his employee(s), assistant(s), driver(s), pilot(s), and/or agent(s), to 
facilitate these acts and to avoid police detection. Defendant's systematic pattern of sexually 
exploitative behavior described above also occurred in Defendant's other domestic and/or 
international residences, places of lodging, and/or modes of transportation. 
17. 
Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Defendant used his money, 
wealth, and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff. 
A vulnerable young girl, Plaintiff was merely a seventeen year old high school student when she 
was first lured into Defendant's sexually exploitative world in or about January 2004. Plaintiff 
was recruited while at work by a co-worker, one of the minor victims Defendant paid to procure 
underage females. Plaintiff went to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion accompanied by this co-
worker. Upon arriving, Plaintiff was led by one of Defendant's assistants up a flight of stairs to a 
spa room with a shower and a massage table. Defendant entered this room wearing only a towel. 
Defendant suddenly removed his towel, exposing his naked body, and then lay on the massage 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
5 
25 Weal Flagler Street Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I 
www.podhund.com 
EFTA00233475

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 6 of 19 
table. Defendant told Plaintiff to massage his back and take off her clothing, which she refused 
to do. Defendant then began to try to touch the minor Plaintiff and/or take off her clothing. 
After Defendant's relentless pawing, she reluctantly removed some of her clothing. During this 
encounter, Defendant turned over on his back and fondled Plaintiff's breasts, despite her 
repeatedly telling him not to do so. As Plaintiff massaged Defendant, Defendant proceeded to 
masturbate until ejaculation. Defendant then paid Plaintiff two hundred dollars, and Plaintiff 
was escorted out of Defendant's mansion and left Defendant's property. 
18. 
A similar pattern of grooming continued, and the sexual exploitation 
progressively escalated, over the course of approximately seventeen months during which 
Defendant would often travel to Palm Beach. Prior to arriving and wHie in Palm Beach, 
Defendant and/or his agent(s) would frequently call Plaintiff at her home telephone number 
and/or other telephone numbers, arranging for encounters with her for Defendant, sometimes 
twice daily. While usually such contacts were made by his assistants, Defendant personally 
called Plaintiff repeatedly, despite being told to leave Plaintiff alone. After the first few 
encounters, Defendant coerced Plaintiff to remove all her clothing, and Defendant penetrated the 
minor Plaintiff's vagina digitally. Defendant sexually abused and/or battered and/or exploited 
Plaintiff at least a hundred times between approximately January 2004 and May 2005. Such 
exploitation included, but was not limited to, Defendant's sexual abuse and battery of Plaintiff 
with vibrator(s), back massager(s), his finger(s), and his penis. At times, Defendant manipulated 
Plaintiff to interact sexually with another female. During one encounter, Defendant penetrated 
the minor Plaintiff's vagina with his penis, all the while narrating and demonstrating his sexual 
battery of Plaintiff to another female present in the room. While some of the precise dates that 
Defendant's acts of sexual exploitation occurred are unknown to Plaintiff, these dates are known 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
6 
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Want FL 33130, Nang 305358.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954A63.4346 1 
www.podhurstcom 
EFTA00233476

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 7 of 19 
to Defendant, as he and/or his assistants kept written records, some of which are in the custody 
of law enforcement, of each instance in which he committed lewd acts upon minor girls, 
including the then minor Plaintiff 
19. 
Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly 
procured them for him. The above-described acts of abuse began to occur during a time when 
Defendant knew that Plaintiff was a minor. Defendant, at all times material to this cause of 
action, knew and/or should have known of Plaintiffs age of minority. In fact, Defendant 
repeatedly urged the minor Plaintiff to become legally emancipated in order to accompany him 
as he traveled, both nationally and internationally. Additionally, Defendant, knowing that 
Plaintiff was merely seventeen years old, lured her by inviting her to stay with him at his 
mansion in Manhattan and arranging and/or paying for airplane tickets, theater tickets, and a 
personal chauffeur as gifts for her upcoming birthday. 
20. 
As part of Defendant's persistent process of grooming Plaintiff and immersing her 
in his lewd and abusive lifestyle, Defendant regularly showered the ado! seent Plaintiff with 
gifts, including, but not limited to lingerie, flowers, bikini bathing suit(s), art book(s), purse(s), 
envelopes of U.S. currency, use of a car, and/or other accoutrements. 
21. 
Defendant possessed photographs of nude underage girls, some of which may 
have been taken with hidden cameras set up in his residence in Palm Beach. On the day of 
Defendant's arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls in 
Defendant's mansion. Defendant took lewd photographs of Plaintiff with his hidden cameras 
and transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff and other victims elsewhere using a facility or 
means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. On one occasion, Defendant manipulated the 
minor Plaintiff to pose nude for him and photographed her using several rolls of film. One or 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
'7 
25 West Flagkr Street Suite 800, Miami FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I 
swnv.podhurstoom 
EFTA00233477

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 8 of 19 
W 
more of those nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken by the Defendant when she was a 
minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Police Department during its execution of a search 
warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. 
22. 
Defendant was particularly skillful at discerning his minor victims' respective 
hopes, dreams, and ambitions. As he did with many of his victims, Defendant lured Plaintiff 
early-on with modeling opportunities, impressing her with his modeling business and contacts 
with supermodels, indicating that he could help her with a modeling career. 
23. 
Knowing that the minor Plaintiff was an excellent student and desired to attend 
New York University or Columbia University, Defendant pretended to show great interest in her 
college admission, and offered to help her with her applications and to assist her with her 
tuition. Defendant had told Plaintiff of his substantial connections within the academic 
community, a matter about which he often bragged. Defendant took it upon himself to take 
control of Plaintiff's college application process and led Plaintiff to believe that he was sincere 
about helping her. Even though she had earned a Bright Futures Scholarship to the Florida 
college of her choice, Defendant insisted that she would not need it, and that, with his 
involvement, she would be admitted into one or both of the universities in New York. As a 
result of Defendant's manipulation, Plaintiff did not apply timely for the Bright Futures 
Scholarship or to any college, and therefore missed the fall semester of her freshman year. When 
the Palm Beach Police Department executed the search warrant on Defendant's mansion, among 
the artifacts found and confiscated were Plaintiff's high school transcript. 
24. 
In June 2008, after an investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, the 
State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Attorney's 
Office, Defendant entered pleas of "guilty" to one count of solicitation of prostitution, in 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
8 
25 West Hagler Street. Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3(6.358.2900 Fax 305358.2'182 • Fort Lauderdale 954.163.4346 
I
 
w
w
w
.
 
p
o
d
h
u
r
s
t
r
o
m
 
EFTA00233478

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 9 of 19 
violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.07, and one count of solicitation of a minor to engage in prostitution, 
in violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.03 in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. 
25. 
As a condition of that plea, Defendant entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement, 
Addendum, and Affirmation (collectively, the "NPA") with the United States Attorney's Office 
for the Southern District of Florida on September 24, 2007, October 29, 2007, and December 7, 
2007, respectively. In so doing, Defendant acknowledged that Plaintiff was one of his victims 
and agreed to the following provisions of the NPA : 
8. If any of the [acknowledged victims] elects to file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 
§2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court 
for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and 
Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives his right to contest 
damages up to an amount agreed to between the identified individual and Epstein, 
so long as the identified individual elects to proceed exclusively under 18 U.S.C. 
§2255, and agrees to waive any other claim for damages, whether pursuant to 
state, federal or common law. 
10. Except as to those individuals who elect to proceed exclusively under 18 
U.S.C. §2255, as set forth in paragraph (8), supra, neither Epstein's signature on 
this agreement, nor its terms, nor any resulting waivers or settlements by Epstein 
are to be construed as admissions of evidence or evidence of civil or criminal 
liability or a waive of any jurisdictional or other defense as to any person, whether 
or not her name appears on the list provided by the United States (emphasis 
added). 
26. 
Plaintiff was among the individuals identified by the United States Attorney's 
Office as victims of Defendant upon whose testimony it intended to base its federal prosecution 
of Defendant for his illegal conduct. Consequently, Defendant is estopped by his state court plea 
and the Non-Prosecution Agreement from denying the acts alleged in this Complaint and must 
effectively admit liability to Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103. 
COUNT ONE 
Podhurst Orseck, RA. 
9 
75 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.3582800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.4634346 
 
www.podtturatcom 
EFTA00233479

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 
Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 10 of 19 
(Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement of Minor to Engage in Prostitution or 
Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 2422(b)) 
27. 
Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the 
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 26 above. 
28. 
Defendant used a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce to 
knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce Plaintiff, when she was under the age of 18 years, 
to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a 
criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 
2422(b). 
29. 
Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, 
and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United 
States Code. 
30. 
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, 
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, 
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, 
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 
luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical 
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and 
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in 
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
10 
25 West Flag/er Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358 2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4316 t 
wenv.podhuracom 
EFTA00233480

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 11 of 19 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available 
under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, 
attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, 
and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 
COUNT TWO 
(Cause of Action for Travel with Intent to Enaaae in Illicit Sexual Conduct pursuant 
to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 24231bn 
31. 
Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the 
allegations contained in paragraphs I through 26 above. 
32. 
Defendant traveled in interstate and/or foreign commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, 
including the then minor Plaintiff, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). 
33. 
Plaintiff was a victim of one or more oftbnses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, 
and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United 
States Code. 
34. 
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, 
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, 
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, 
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 
luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical 
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and 
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
11 
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, Fl. 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305158.2182 • Feat Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I 
www.podhunt.com 
EFTA00233481

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 12 of 19 
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injur:es are permanent in 
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available 
under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, 
attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, 
and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 
COUNT THREE 
(Cause of Action for Sexual Exploitation of Children pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in 
Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251) 
35. 
Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the 
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 26 above. 
36. 
Defendant knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced the then minor 
Plaintiff to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of 
such conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251. 
37. 
Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, 
and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United 
States Code. 
38. 
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, 
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, 
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, 
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 
luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
12 
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, F133130. Mlanti 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Port Lauderdale 954.40.4346 t 
wvo.v.podtaustcom 
EFTA00233482

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 13 of 19 
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and 
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries arc permanent in 
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available 
under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, 
attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, 
and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 
COUNT FOUR 
(Cause of Action for Transport of Visual Depiction of Minor Engaging in Sexually Explicit 
Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. §2252(a)(1)1 
39. 
Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the 
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 26 above. 
40. 
Defendant knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or 
facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce at least one visual depiction of the 
minor Plaintiff engaging in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(I). 
41. 
Defendant transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff and other victims elsewhere 
using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. 
42. 
Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, 
and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United 
States Code. 
43. 
As a direct and proximate result of the offenstes enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, 
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, 
Podhurst Orseck, RA. 
13 
25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2500 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I 
www.podhurattom 
EFTA00233483

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 14 of 19 
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, 
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 
luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical 
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and 
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in 
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available 
under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, 
attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, 
and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 
COUNT FIVE 
(Cause of Action for Transport of Child Pornography pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 
in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 2252A(a)(1)) 
44. 
Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the 
allegations contained in paragraphs I through 26 above. 
45. 
Defendant knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or 
facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce child pornography, in violation of 18 
U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(I). 
46. 
Defendant transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff and other victims elsewhere 
using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. 
47. 
Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, 
and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United 
States Code. 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
14 
26 West Flagkr Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami X6.3582900 Fax 7063582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 t 
www.podhuratcout 
EFTA00233484

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 15 of 19 
48. 
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, 
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, 
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, 
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 
luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical 
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and 
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries arc permanent in 
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available 
under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, 
attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, 
and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 
COUNT SIX 
(Cause of Action for Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise pursuant to 18 
U.S.C. 42255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(2)) 
49. 
Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the 
allegations contained in paragraphs I through 26 above and Counts One through Five above. 
50. 
Defendant knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 
U.S.C. § 2252A(g)(2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g)( I ). As more fully set forth above, 
Defendant engaged in actions that constitute countless violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (sex 
trafficking of children), Chapter 110 (sexual exploitation of children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
I5 
25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, F1.33130, Miami 3053582900 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I 
www.podhurst.com 
EFTA00233485

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 16 of 19 
2251, 2252(a)(1), and 2252(A)(a)(1)), and Chapter 117 (transportation for illegal sexual activity 
in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421. 2422(b), and 2423(b)). As more fully set forth above in 
paragraphs I through 26, Defendant's actions involved countless victims and countless separate 
incidents of sexual abuse, which he committed against minors, including Plaintiff, in concert 
with at least three other persons. 
51. 
Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, 
and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United 
States Code. 
52. 
As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 
being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, 
and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, contusion, embarrassment, 
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, 
separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 
luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical 
and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and 
psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 
income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in 
nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available 
under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
16 
25 West Flagler Street Suite 800, Minµ FL 33130, Nand 305.358.2800 Fax 305358.2322 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4316 
www.podhurst.com 
EFTA00233486

Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 
Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 Page 17 of 19 
attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, 
and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 
Date:  ‘44..Art.AA-r-12)-3  , 2010. 
Respectfully Submitted, 
By: 
R-W- C. e-pecli lay 
Robert r Jose 
e g 
Katherine W. Ezell 
Attorneys or Plaintiff 
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 
17 
25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800„ Miami, FL 33130, Miami 31:6393.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954463A346 
rst 
EFTA00233487

.435 
A IRey. ICOR) 
Case 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010 PagDe 18 of 19 
WilD 
CIVIL COVER SHEET 
Then 44 civilcover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplanau the filingand service of pkadings or other spas as roquircd by law, except as provided 
by local rules °feast This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. is required forth 
o 
lag of Coup for the purpose of initiating 
the civil docket Acct. oat INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) 
NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indica 
led Cases Below. 
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS 
Jane Doe No. 103 
io-8U 
(b) County of Resider & of First Listed Plaintiff West Palm Beach 
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) 
(c) Attorney's (Firm Nets*. Addrtu. one Tapirs/ Number) 
Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, F.sq. 
Podhurst °meek, P.A. 
My.
stein 
M
n 
NTS 
e 
FILED by rp__ D C. 
County of Residence of First Listed Dcfcriam 
Unite . tales Virgin 
(IN U.S. PLAINT F CASES ONLY) 
20*
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION OASES. fay. 24, 
THE 7 
LAND 'IWO/val. 
SYEVEm R4 LARluODE 
AC I 
Attorneys Or Keen) 
CLERK U.S. DIST. CT. 
Robert D. Critton, Esq., Burman, (..sitioltaataCaitIL.L...p, 
• 
303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
WI Check County Whine Mien &OM CI MIAMI. OAHE 
O MONROE fl BROW AR D 16 PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 
0 SI. LUCIE 
3 INDIAN RIVER 
0 OKEECHOBEE 
HIGHLANDS 
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION 
O I 
V. S. Dovoramom 
PNWIr 
O 2 
LI S.COPT/10CM 
Dekndani 
/13 
(Place en - X' • Ott Bist Osyl 
Carol portion 
(U.S. 0 ***** meal Nolo Party) 
3 4 
Onenky 
Undicer cieuissaip of Praia. • IOUS III) 
IV. NATURE 
' 
Pis 
not 0.1
I 
CONTRACT 
TORTS 
POTIFEITURECITNALTY 
BANKRUPTCY 
OTHER STATUTES 
I 
0 110 tolerance 
0 Ill Manse 
0 U0 Miller Act 
0 
140 Nogonabk Insiniesei 
3 
ISO Recovery of 0 ye:payers* 
& Ceferemer of nufroect 
O 151 Madame. Art 
0 IS) Recovery of De(aoned 
Student Loans 
Mod Veterans) 
0 133 Remarry of Overpayment 
of Velerio'• Sea41114 
0 160 Slockbolden' Suitt 
0190 Other Centro 
O 19S Contract Prodwif Liability 
0 106 trencher 
PERSONAL INJURY 
PERSONAL INJURY 
0 310 Aitylsoe 
3 
36:terser I fejury • 
O 113 Airflow Product 
Med. Maserlke 
Lethality 
3 
365 teleran tarry • 
O31O Assert. Libel • 
Proctor, Liability 
Slander 
0 
364 Asbeslos Parris' 
0130 Federal Emplorts. 
latery Prod.., 
Liobilny 
Lisbilry 
0 140 Marine 
PERSONAL PROPERTY 
0 )45 Merin Proud 
0 
370 Other Ford 
Liabitiry 
0 
37i Tomb In Eerier 
0 350 Manor Vehicle 
0 
Ito Oilet Personal 
0 155 Motor Vehicle 
Properly Damage 
hydro LIMOMY 
3 
355 Propeny Demise 
• 360 Other Personal 
Product trability 
IWorY 
0 
610 Remotion 
0 
620 Other Food • Dr. 
0 
615 Drug Related Seiniee 
of Prow, 21 USC III 
0 
630 LWeee Laws 
0 
640 R.R. • Truck 
0 
630 A KWH Rest 
n 640 Oreoprional 
Sereiffifealch 
o 
690 Other 
0 422 Appeal 21 USC 151 
0 423 Willtdrowsl 
25 USC I)/ 
3 
400 Sloe RcepporSool 
3 
410 Amore 
3 
430 Hanks and Seabing 
0 
450 Comment 
0 
460 09poneloa 
0 
470 Rat (deer lathered NW 
Court Orpoilailer 
3 
IRO Coruna C NCI 
0 
490 CeblOSsi TV 
0 
410 Selective Service 
0 1St Setettles/Coalstothlet/ 
fl are. 
0 
575 Comm. Challenge 
12 USC 3410 
0 
590 [Other Parlor Action. 
0 
691 Agrieurral Acts 
0 
692 Economic Slabilhation Act 
3 
103 E9990:666Nomi Malta. 
0 
(94 [orgy Alloralon Act 
0 
195 Freedom of lafeesellon Ace 
D 900 Appeal of Fee Determinatio• 
Under Equal Access to Janice 
0  150 Constitutionality of Stoic 
Siatas 
PROPERTY RIGHTS 
O *20 Copyrights 
0 130 Patent 
O IA0 /radian& 
L 
LABOR 
SOCIAL SECURITY 
5 710 Fair Labor Sialiderde 
Act 
3 
720 Lebellki gait Reletiorn 
0 
730 LaboralgeoLlteporeing 
a Dbrlorro Act 
0 
740 Railway Leber Ad 
3 790 Other Labor Litigate* 
0 
79) Foga Roe In. Scrorler 
Ail 
0561 141A (I 391f11 
0 162 Black Lunt:1423) 
0161 DIWODIWW 1405(g)) 
3 564 *SID Thlo X VI 
0 461151146,1.)) 
I 
REAL PROPERTY 
CIVIL RIGHTS 
PRISONER PETITIONS 
FEDERAL TAX SUITS 
3 210 Lem, Coarleilleallea 
0 220 Foreclosure 
0 230 Rem Lease • Ejeclarl 
0 240 Tons to Load 
0 245 Ton Prawn 'Ability 
O 290 All Other Real Propiery 
0 441 Verlag 
0 442 Employers 
0 44) Horlagr 
Accommodations 
3 444 Welfare 
445 Ante 
wrthubilkka ..... 
3 
t
mployers, 
0  446 Amer. ia/Dlashiliams - 3 
Orr 
3 440 Orber Cent R4),, 
0 
510 Motion* to Vacate 
semen* 
Rohm's Corpus: 
.1 $30 I:lewd 
0 
535 Death Perky 
I 
340 Mastellive a Other 
5511C Wil Ishii 
0  
sss „ son cosies. 
0 470 ttttt (U.S. Plaintiff 
or Ocke4sai) 
O 1171 IRS —Turd Party 
26 CSC 7609 
I 
ms4trgATmN 
O 142 Witr ahrni* 
Application 
463 Haber C 
Aro 
5 
Demises 
0  445,0therlinm•rolioa 
Ac Ins 
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PAR TIES(russ se 
ia 0•4 Br foe Plelmiff 
for Unruly Corr Only) 
is One Bee fee Deferadaoll 
PT. 
0EV 
MP 
DE? 
Celt n of This Sim 
I 
I 
0 
I 
Incorporatcd or Pall( ben Plate 
0 
4 
0 4 
of IIIIIS410 In This Slaw 
; Chun of Another Sure 
3 
a fa 2 
Ineorpomied and Prinelpil Plage 
or Rosiness In A soar Stow 
Cilacn or Subject of a 
0 
1 
0 
3 
FOIere• Nellie 
total.. COyerrY 
O 
S 
0 
$ 
O 
6 
3 
6 
I
ORIGIN 
(Mess - X" is Or 
Oely) 
47) I Original 
Cl 2 Removed from 
CI 3 Re-fitcd-
Proceeding 
State Court 
(see VI below) 
Trans erred from 
O 4 Reinstated or ti 5 another district 
CJ 4 health:KUM 
Reopened 
(specify) 
Litigation 
Appall." District 
O 7 ludge from 
Magistrate 
hxlsnau 
VI. RELATED/RE-FILED 
CASE(S). 
(See instructor 
nerd page) 
a) Re-fikd Case OYES 83 NO 
b) Related Casts 01 YES ONO 
JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra 
DOCKET NUMBER Sec Attached. 
VII. CAUSE OF ACTION 
Ci c the U.S. Civil Statute under which you arc filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (De Not die Jarhdialonal statutes aimless 
diversity): 
18 U.S.C. 2255 (Predicate Statutes 18 U.S.C. 2422(b), 2423(b), 2423(e), 2251,2252, 2252A(a)(I), 2252A(g)(1) 
LENGTH OF TRIAL vie I 
 days estimated (for both sides 10 try entire case) 
VIII. REQUESTED IN 
0 CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION 
DEMANDS 
CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: 
COMPLAINT: 
UNDER F.R.C.P. 21 
2 -9 eyne cc- DC gt 'ZS--Mee. JURY DEMAND: 
f i a
t? No 
SIGNATURE Of ATTORNEY OF RECORD 
i 
D ATE 
Si FSLS-j:
14
-• 
lA • 
Eadat--- 
07 :37/0 
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 
AMOUNT 3S P •,f) 0 
RECEIPT 4 (Of 1Not,,p__ IF. 
ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO 
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE 
EFTA00233488