EFTA00226396

Ltd' tu0 .244CAIYU 0:r ti 
44);,U kat. 
4e.o/114,4 
c,) 
were tianctik- 
ujikun tdvr, rnd 
v..p-ctor I122 ord. ctAcciA.0044:* 
(4-ifee exual2_ 
rcu-locip4 
kincLocicat • 
(2.) 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011948 
EFTA00226736

Constitutionality 
1) Commerce else is su Mir justification 
-Harms 
U.S. , 272 
2d 478, 481 (4" Cir. 1959) (addressing 2422(a)). 
i
2) Lack of de nse re mistakeff age does not violate Due Process. 
U.S.
Ransom, 942 
2d 775 ( I0" Cir. 199I ) 
-Also .S. v. Juvenile Male, 211 I. 3d 1169 (9" Cir. 2000) 
3) Congress has the power to enact a comprehensive regulatory scheme that regulates purely 
local activities that ha 
a substantial effect on interstate commerce, including the trafficking of 
women and girls U S s, 
476 F. 3d 1176 (II" Cir. 2007) 
-where defendant used hotels that serve interstate travelers and distributed 
condoms that traveled in interstate commerce, defendant also loses has "as 
applied" challenge. 
4) Congress has the power to regulate the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, even if 
those instrumentalities are used only for interstate activities pursuant to the Commerce Clause. 
Evans.
5) Section 2422(b) is not unconstitutionally vague. U.S. I Bolen, 136 Fed. Appx. 325 (111°
Cir. 2005). 
6) Section 2422(b) is not unconstitutionally overbroad or vague. U.S.' Thomas, 410'. 
3d 1235 (10" Cir. 2005) • 
I
Also U.S. I Dhingra, 311 I. 3d 557, 161-63 (9" Cir. 2004); U.S.' Meek, 366 
3d 705, 720- 22 (9" Cir. 2004); U.S. 
Panti I, 338 
3d 1299, 1300-01 (I I" Cir. 2003); U.S. 
Bailey, 228 F. 3d 637, 639 (6" Cir. 2000). 
Case No. 08-80736-C V-MARRA 
P-011949 
EFTA00226737

eattWithentiali 
th
umse 
Ct. S.An 
r•&it EIVVY,_
LOHen 
1/66) Caaldocatitt 
2 42 2 (04)• 
afht dote rce Le jail& AAR 83:42-at 
Ise. &WS WV' Sand 
71. 5 coi
l" 
Cjes elf-j) 
r .. 
1.11 t.'
.4 3
'VI 
CU !ILI 
Cg HA Cie. ZOCA 
- 
. 
CO'llal InA4 Wt PAS. 46 artaCirtip L
cs
uniniun
Sat
 
g-ht•ta 
4rot 
fortli 
bota. 
0111- 4 4-ok hewt 
Subs/aad 
44J
-  
rkethot.+- CEPVAIWei uhdu-d 
4 La 
taibanN 
n 
Cw-
U. S v. euart,S)  ) ;tic. F34 irn at. 
. 
2001) 
rnicisitestomite Sotto-4 
4rzur0.0 5 o.ed at:eiribtat4 
uncto r ks 
_ 3Siak 
aveutyaret 
also 
/2.9..a_Jesa 1/4 4 srptact 
chator 
41) 
Co' tots kw" 
taniitrunbaday“ 
Urn -egret , 
ir 
on 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-NIARIM 1950 
EFTA00226738

.11 
;rri-msiata., or-Rviiite 
0.1,04t 
sx.fig, 
CAS v. 
v. 6o1u4 ,3c. Fed,-
32-5 tid-HIC-;/-1 2.-cos • 
• 
C.) 
2-t -12-02) 
HofcmcoY7qi 
ark-i lk-Oa a! V 
. 
LG.S. 
n 
F. '/ 
,tz35 C/ 
2.00.5) 
 
 
. 
-A&6LS-  
_F 34 .551  
.0,11
. 2004-0 
(A. S. >l Magi.L3 
4„. . 
705., 
 
fm.)-42-0f-FIA. 
2c0-0 U.,S. v:_esun 11 5 
,,/ 3 Y 
Ad 
/24.; i3osa 
VIA_ Cir. 
S v., 8.41, 
22-g- 
3.1 63 '7, Of CSC Cir. 2.0a1,3„_ 
-Rt \ Ciwy\r"o4-eit 
• 
„ 
, 
• 
_ 
w02, 01.4,1
\I! 
, 
, 
is ;fig
1/4
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011951 
EFTA00226739

Definitions of Inducument 
I) U.S. I Murrell, 3681. 3d 1283, 1287 (II" Cir. 2004). In a charge of violation §2422(b), 
the term "induce means to stimulate the occurrence of "or to" cause the minor the engage in sexual 
activity." 
2) Harms' U.S., 272 12d 478 (4" Cir. 1959). In a charge of violating what is now 
§2422(a) (whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in 
interstate commerce... to engage in prostitution... shall be fined, etc."), the Fourth Circuit 
ed 
that a single telephone call invitation to a former prostitute, asking him to return to 
to 
resume her prostitution, was sufficient. 
-The fact that the prostitute has previously expressed her desire to return to 
or that she paid her own fare, was immaterial. 
-"An affirmative directive act [like buying a ticket or doing the transporting) is not 
involved. The inducement in and of itself, without consideration of intent and 
with no further direct act, is the moving cause of what follows. The inducement may 
be any offer sufficient to cause the woman to respond. The inducement 
sets in motion the successive acts that constitute the crime. (p. 481) 
3) U.S.1 Reed, 96 1. 2d 785(2d Cir. 1938). Evidence was sufficient to find that defendant 
induced woman to travel in interstate commerce to engage in prostitution, even though woman 
claimed she had always wanted to go to Ncw York and she paid her own way. 
4) LaPage 1 U.S., 146 1 2d 536 (8" Cir. 1945). Evidence that defendant called victim, 
who was one of his regular prostitutes who was away (out of state) on vacation, and asked her to 
return because another prostitute was leaving was sufficient to prove inducement to travel in 
interstate commerce for the purpose of prostitution. 
5) Prdjun 1 U.S., 237 1 799 (6" Cir. 1916). Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant 
of enticing girl to travel in interstate commerce to engage in prostitution even if there "is no 
evidence" that the girl knew of the purpose for which she was entice to go [from one state to the 
other)... if the defendant put the girl in question in such a frame of mind that she wanted to go and 
did go, if coupled with it was the purpose on the part of the defendant that the girl should engage in 
prostitution [when she got to destination), then that is an offense against the statute. 
6) U.S. 
Thomas, 410 1 3d 1235 (10" Cir. 2005). Section 2422(b) requires only that the 
defendant inten to entice a minor, not that the defendant intend to commit that underlying sexual 
act. 
Entice = beguiling by arousing hope or desire; to lure. 
Induce = leading or moving by persuasion or influence; to prevail upon. 
Persuade = causing someone to do something by means of entreaty, argument, or reasoning; 
to convince. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011952 
EFTA00226740

-1..s 4  tev(44.,e,tryvz.--1-
I is 
:7 
cp.a.s„. V, Ml.,<PrO, a•A 
3A. :{2_13;(1 HP1 Ur 
2.)GLO. Ina 
4 vie io_liovt 
2-,4-2:2-CO 
uly 
41Na_ cc_c_wrren.ei cyba it
4-7) 
ryu.no-
4t, 
. - 
(2). ,{.lawns v. U.S., 2.)2_ rad ,flo (ott-, 
Cr. -I q 64) Ina 6-0..-•,/ 4, irk,/ 
v7aA., f7142-2-Cu) (CA_Jeowt, tiinowf 
aSti.042-0, 
et"..N.J2-0, 
CV C.O.e.,14.0 aryl 
t:PS.A.LO 
fp imr-cl 
ISO-SAWY_CD,Th 'Ufrek 
• 
. 411.11 ‘t 
it"10(t 
*1.4-* C,vt.u.4" c.t.da-rn4;.e.d 
a 
c,d! wwita-6a4... 4-D 
a 
fy,,D5
 
to 
tArr7lb 
11.frria. 10 reA2U•ne, 
AA-6a,, we:L/3 
kyr} ye.) vAe. 
pvtvieu-
- fixe-e4g 
(7(eau--4 tb 
yr.?kkr? •tiz ire k o i 
ihti- i 
2J 
tow31-1-0-i 
CRerniiire, dux-eine—el* ck-4.-+" 
Dike 
i
ztsra=104-- 
bevy-1 
tn_ cud 4 
Lmi-geml 
4, 
r0 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-01 I qs 
EFTA00226741

O0A4 ;5  th k niaritly 
ca 
? 4- (A.,ho- aciAx. • 
daft., .5,46ziuNt. 
acts
- 
,..ock-4,),LJ4_162 ets04 , 71fuz 
.5/az) Cezm;tiOn_-_...11na 
Wics-t co-6'13u_
a (L.S.. v Rya, qc, F',24_785/2At 
 EyokAcx 
 
BedEWevut- 
irukta. 14.4 
win-YIP-%  
4.k.t.ka 
U4 1,404Cal_tcstrfpNivW3Vhl 
rligusticvN  
evtb., IqcytvAaf'vron 
Alldt
 "47:54i4-
Ct tT2 
A.ktA, 
04-Aeltv 
u. 5
Nf6 F Zd 
5 %;"Crii °1 Cr. Pr/ 45E 
- ..6agen-c4 44f -A 
 
 IAA) cox°, 
-- ors- xt, 14i.2 PTW4 peu.--..pftztiokSAa adlo Gazo way 
ArekeAtitvg.2.(erd, euaki.d kti/- fa 31,44hy?_ 
_ 
ppoghhata. wax) ..Ria.8.
24fri....e4-4-
Jo floa_ AluxArisit 6 -frs4,4 A.A 
- --cmoeutx 
cif 4024-i4-u3scrL 
, 
IALs 2,17-F. 711 ((,f& Gr. 190.1 
Awes Euid-%t.<- _extzt_5441,6.a."4 Iospnu-c-f-
&4-*/ 
inxecZ' ott onlePs" 4-(, co+w-u.t.ft 
-eriffe* 
wuk iFAre "is no 
tuidso‘c÷ *0;1 1
 ff,spi krami- et. +V% pttrigesk 
uola
s.dAXL0 eaahti 4t) 
iitt-tb- lb *kit ode`arJ . 
114 
:an 
alien (4- twci-t 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011954 
EFTA00226742

trgistnetki-
Cg 
liar sLit a( 
-to 
avol.S0( r  •
t
, .4- car Got 
wiftk wca iin fweve. ot, -fea.. pref
411
a4
H.e4 do, 
Au' 1
4 Skulat 4...qcw_ in ty,o
to ottotl'eaT le....n 
i-' 4-'1
4
 a RS Lc -Th'vb°, 44 to r si pas ooft,,a, 
. st.ai 0A ziezza) 
- 
criatcy+ H.& 
C. ibctipd tt &at a 
I nd- itai *U icA,
irkard in (and 
ik 
cdrcaltetiiieti Pala gat 
Gan
tt\
rd-ict rbit-itii Lit3 
. 
%net ercAsq're 40 hut 
Induct:- ftaoluicl ar wiorini_ 
ffisetan or 
WeLma ; 41) prtm«Ci 
PteSuagh z clua-oae-AS:reiura <t. 
1.1,1=
11 
rielanS 4 whitall Ore, 
CTY-
ko coettirteSL . 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRN1 1955 
EFTA00226743

Motive to Travel Cases 
1) U.S.' Garcia-M234 F.3d 217 (51° Cir. 2000). 
Facts: Defendant took his 13-year-old stepdaughter to Mexico and obtained fake identification dots 
to allow her to travel. Defendant raped the girl twice in Mexico and was charged and convicted of 
violating 242304. 
Issue: Defendant argues that government must prove that his dominant motive for traveling was to 
engage in sex with a minor. 
Holding: The instruction that "it was sufficient for the government to prove that one of the 
defendant's motives in traveling las to engage in a sexual act with a minor "was sufficient". 
2) U.S.' I1oschouer, 2007 WL979931 (11th Cir. Apr. 3, 2007). 
Facts: Defendant began a sexual relationship with his daughter when she was 13. In March 2003, 
the victim gave birth to defendant's son. Defendant continued to have sex with her. In Sept. 2003, 
defendant was arrested in Texas. Victim wrote a bad check to get defendant out on bond and they 
fled. Victim asked to stay behind, but defendant refused. Defendant was arrested while they were 
driving through Georgia when defendant was arrested for shoplifting. Victim testified that they were 
on their way to North Carolina where defendant was looking for work. Victim also testified that she 
believed that, if they stayed in Georgia long enough, she and defendant would have had sex. 
Defendant was charged with violating 2423(a) and 2432(b). 
Issue: Defendant raised the issue of "the purpose" instruction and the sufficiency of the evidence. 
Holding: (1) The jury was properly instructed that the government does not have to show that 
engaging in criminal sexual activity with a minor was defendant's only purpose or even his primary 
purpose, but it must have been tins of the motives or purposes of the travel. In other words, the 
government must show that the defendant's criminal purpose was not merely incidental to the travel. 
(2) Based upon the length of the sexual relationship and defendant's refusal to leave victim behind, 
the jury could reasonably infer that defendant intended to have sex with victim before the conclusion 
of their trip and that one of the motivating purposes of requiring victim to accompany him was to 
facilitate their sexual relationship. 
3) U.S. I Reiner, 397 I 
Supp. 2d 101 (D. Me. 2005). This case discusses the forfeiture 
of assets related to a "massage parlor"/ "health club" that was a front for prostitution. The Court 
wrote: "The fact that a few customers were content to have only a massage does not alter the overall 
purpose of the operation." 
4) U.S.' Hitt, 473 
3d 146 (5" Cir. 2006). Co-defendants Hitt and Causey met AV, a 
13-yr-old boy and befriendeI him. In October 2002, they took AV to dinner and touched his 
buttocks. Some time later, the defendants invited AV to a football game in Louisiana (across state 
lines). AV was to share a room with another boy, but, due to a "mix up" was made to share a room 
with Hitt and Causey. AV was sexually assaulted by the defendants that night and the sexual activity 
continued for about a year. The defendants were charged with violating 2423(h), 2423(a), and 
2422(a). 
Issue: The defendants challenged the sufficiency of the evidence. 
Holding: The government must prove that engaging in sexual activity was "one of the efficient 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011956 
EFTA00226744

Motive to Travel Cases - Page 2 
and compelling purposes of the travel." Evidence related to the "grooming process" was relevant 
to whether the defendants had the illicit intent necessary under 2423(b). 
5) U.S.' Scisum, 32' 3d 1479 (10th Cir. 1994). For a violation of 2423(a), the 
government must prove that the defendant had formed the intent to have the victim engage in 
prostitution before the defendant transported or moved a person in interstate commerce. The 
government does not have to prove that prostitution was the sole purpose of the transportation. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011957 
EFTA00226745

ACtive ,t) Tro,vtiCam 
u.S. 
6c4-
.—/..cpe_ , 234- F. 34. 
(54€--1 
CAr. 2000) 
r q.c)s, n took 
,i3-T-old• sic.fda÷,
:JP I' co 
qts c .to ol,na 
Aterd
1 -twice 
o44- cam 
Cini!PA4Q(
avck cAroicitot- c,F tf;olcxtv 
2423(b
Ls5,2-..• 4? ctetriA. 
44-04- 
.ry,wok 
ryptiy-c. 
invet,44,01 
evylci(ur s 
wielc-
tomhav- . 
cr6-61...civerv‘ #42.* 
,•, •0? Su-144;o..4 
CAerro-nreard-, -tb I/eve +inak tIAL. Crlz, O.' 
vnOt 
14.4 
hak.44:412 
°Jag 
:t1) 0
, 0,0,9(e. efr-• 
act 
viw-Nk•
4u. c. 
C. e. i-los&outf, .zoo 
va:ci-nci3i (1 
Cif.
Apv. 3,209,71) 
• 
rad-% 
I•opolooN, 
re.1.0-tievechk.r..64.Oteh 
V•v:. 
- 13 . 
1144,-rvin 
,kA CNNA Opre 
&S son 
WriiNv4-01- 
1/0-1,k sgx. 
6;1 
2°0 3 p, u 
o-s-re.akv. 
"fey.a.o. 
L.ocit 
look_,C--"d 4,‘) e 
(51j-
cY\ i7" 4" 
vcv‘-. 
ackuk. 31,
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011958 
EFTA00226746

:/A.IPEAiekok, 
 
4.,320(;,a4-1-
rni a
d:44f 
_ 
__4cAticuotitkiimEtuttz. 
Irsitv 
NorAt<orcl; 
Vis.E,,  AO itzhVgA_Alazi-
iteo 464,if *am trod 
eArs46, 
• 
544
_AssvA:._LN_Jm4 
1:44Pis 61, " 
ipetk_i4sa_ - s,444ti
a db. +IA•13
. 
,Aa:Lo 4atopulattaSiloAckal 4412# 
OJsto 
4Psuat_041,01 
6s!.1 .)044.1_44,4^"‘ 
frivroan 
4,44_,Afity2th-0__•
4,4dirw. of- 41444r.41_4c0m tbsfra, 
014Ak_Algh&spicktlente&__Ars_skolk) 
14_cbgakhIna
.4eAL.9= 
,APA:14_,14r.tuitAl
1.2 
,d 
i'do-ti1440 
 
 V 12/11/;44,14-44.)ni 
JO. 
 
:LigtiOrgAnkLINIKk(AAn 
ileLc. 
_ AAVAip' rt .lf^•1' a••L 4 iht-hictivekv) tx44-Fcas__Ak 
Z=t- 
A*rpc=tV 
41171,47-44-_
• 
_ 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011959 
-- -4> 0-10.0 adult uaix viotaiin4_2a13(9)_oci 
EFTA00226747

Wirt 4.6 TroJet) 
p• 
•S • v_feiru-"t  39'1 k Lief,. 
iS? .1bi • 
Kt • 
2-00.5),11uo Co.hte 
fierea tect,ecto 
cOmueog. 
_ 
_ 
;Am> hedei 
Yeuk :let° 0.....tekeye.
• ...a.Licr_Yeae. 
cgiellecéattal.' 
kreg, .≤:41 
_ 
deeLeyytt
e • "
-Fee). 4'13 
(-511,1 
avd- 
r1:141- 
/3 
o 
oecl 
le Ctizeixe !Doz.,
 /ad AV io geivo.e-
Lt!") teeikei- 1120 bu.Aeci-.S. Saw firit Mr; 
AV lb et 6elbolt ' 
Ap...;.4teéle (or-PeSS &hit. 
AVelX1O ta 
efeee 
ofreitAv-  
hµ.t,â4...t 
2/.0 
(.1,` wad, vrooto. 40 eve= e 
, 
..u.ete‘ NJ- cre4-Cimwel.. AV Lea» -SViel4-Dit` 
eelcu.a.itot._ 
Wm_ As ?tee re 
01^01` 
qie't steve0. ozhowlcoAtir›..4.d. kw- al.e0A-
114_ 
ceased u-re Vic/Afir, 
e.e623(..b), .2x#7.3(44;ed
.rd reez2-&-). 
7/m. 
At -sch•decAa.tuj dg 
imkesse...L.— 
eolce 
feerneed »awe /KM Irecaf 
let ...T4.44.4.4 arh 
to:Le 4 O's-e 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011960 
EFTA00226748

1A, *44,4- 0.4 cavy:w_,w, i-VOLtd 
riytwa -" he -vide/vex 0-cloaca( 4c, 
" 
plivey. 
MASAO"' 
 
We- 4S 
A2A v61  (11Z64-et . 
 
Ltinck*: AZZ,3 Le) 
‘,.  
tA..5.--r—aisar,  3Z P. 34, 
/99q) 
_For 0-_t_o4itAta 4 
 
 
/2/ 
if‘c 
1"401. 
•  stRAvint.4&_vitsiiy, 
14,‘, 4n, Avr....2er-icat 0-• 
____Ariffkr,k
et 
* ewe 
posE.44—iku_ 
, 
• r 
yAt
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011961 
EFTA00226749

Third-Party Liability 
1) U.S. 
Pisman, 443 13d 912 (70 Cir. 2006). 
Pisman and Wilkerson were involved in asexual relationship and planned for Pisman 
to travel from Iowa to Illinois to meet Wilkerson and others to engage in sex. Wilkerson arranged 
for the other sex partners - some of whom were minors - via the Internet. Pisman was aware that 
some were minors. 
Charges: Ct. I- Conspiracy to travel interstate to have sex with minors 18 USC §§ 2423(b) & (c). 
Ct. 2 - Substantive charge of 2423(b) 
Ct. 3 - Use of interstate commerce to entice a minor 2422(b) 
Issue: The government urged a theory of co-conspirator liability as the basis of Pisman's guilty on 
the substantive offenses. Pisman was acquitted of Count I and convicted of Count 3. 
Holding: These are merely inconsistent verdicts, which is not grounds for a motion for judgement 
of acquittal. 
2) U.S. I 
Strewth 185 Fed. Appx. 841 (11th Cir. 2006): Telephone calls to Costa Rica 
Taboo Vacations to arrange trip to Costa Rica to meet with underage prostitutes is sufficient to prove 
violations of 2423(c), 1591(a), and 2422(b). 
3) U.S. I Bolen, 136 Fed. Appx. 325 (11° Cir. 2005). Defendant challenged §2422(b)'s 
applicability w crc defendant did not communicate directly with victim-child but only 
communicated (via Internet and phone) with parent of purported child. 
"We held that §2422(b) encompasses conduct where a defendant arranges to have sex with 
a minor through communications with an adult intermediary, including an adult law enforcement 
agent posing as a parent of a minor child." 
Case No. 08-80736-C V-MARRA 
P-011962 
EFTA00226750

4)UAie 
_.ltd 
-54.,tto 
dstrxe,_44 3 Fad ,9! 
(Wig Cir. .2_00‘) 
 
 
Campshot-
Picrmin 
ittako-sm-, tuck, iba= 
eruzek_,Legi64-40A 
de/1oz "tr> cl.-#24e 
tvilleau 
Yr".4_1.-./ 
Caw- 
uilbOan_ _ _ 
tue.H- ',Awl's —via 
irpy.trut ttsnauqtata. 
.414,9 witiz gemeghs.„ 
t;Ilepsht.tk. 
knee. 
cklYtt lat4iteT 6 (AK_ 
01434)4.) 
. 
44
5.11ito 
4L,rikoviz4
et "
Ilk., dT 214-2-36.9i,) 
cx inw-VSY 
_ 
: 71ne 90,0^rirrIvit
.„40.647( 
aYAWLS 
CaC,Cnisk;adav 
az) (11ta 
Pulhalk2oca,f4.1tn ztoetd214t4
lhe.
'-<
firgrar• win 
 
 
J. mat. _._ 
caszk—Ack et, 
3 
arc
7.01.i.t .:ettue9(.0
°.cztA4ztal
.
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-01 1903 
EFTA00226751

et-ti a 
_ 
_cceinRici,T2.6a)
ci  
 
 iv
 6cel- 47? ierv2J-
11) 
KArt 
 
c2E 
15g I Co.), 
. 
.„. 
. (.7 
3)-( .S_it• 40/4tqf /SG AA—A*4— 32-5 
Cir. .74sos) . 
 that-Mei-1v( t 211.22-07.) ) 
ARiathfs.- .6 oka„-AnektztV-srfx4AisaLd<-
1411/1 
- kg.4 
Gita
ltri-urria AlaniockANLIAPiYA 
pLugatt ckosk. 
 
we.A34.4tAti. *a)" t 2s1-2,-2_(h) -e-J/Icompi2,0 
cstp
_ bokilke_ 
At451,-,610.44 
- liortzv
flA .4 .WIA.inae% 
CA'ilk-ata--a-Atat ivikErAidjaktl), 
__Lam 
pos 1,1( .1 co A 
ia_km:Alm 
chtio 
 
L .
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011964 
EFTA00226752

Knowledge of Agc Issue 
I) U.S.' Griffith, 284 13d 338 (2d Cir. 2002). Government does not have to prove 
knowledge of age of violations of 2251(a) or 2423(a). 
2) U.S.' Scott, 1993 WL 280323 (6th Cir. 1993). Knowledge that a girl is under 18 years 
of agc when transported is not part of the proof required of the goverrunent in order to sustain a 
conviction under §2423. 
3) U.S.' Taylor, 239 13d 994 (9'" Cir. 2001). Government does not have to prove 
U.S.
Hamilton, 456 
2d 171 (3d Cir. 1972). 
defendant's knowledge 
victim was and i 18 years of agc in prosecution under §2323(a). 
-also 
. 
-also U.S. 
Jones, 471 F. 3d 535 (4'" Cir. 2006). 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-0I 1965 
EFTA00226753

r5jLaaWg
.E. 2f:!IO 
,
i3,(O Y701- 4-1416._ frEforre._ 14/14014 
 
 
--4-at—fr---qnlasikos of 226 IQ dr 2423‘,). 
A its—v. sc.-0;11/3_4,x 2:037a ath 4-
Krau4k 
 
nci-po4ifLick 
els y1,1 
.00vii,e,4,, 
& ..swieu;e, _42— 
ccvivichi
_2a.231 
3. ilA•5• v T 
II
,) • 
4 6 
23/ P-3.( 94y CPA 
ot cceLot iegm
sit/W-vichal 
i•fr.) 10224.Latiri-{AinAle--_ 
§ 211 
-deo U.S. 
tionwittivl, VE4K 2d 171 (Er 
-72- • 
 
 -ago iA 
...1v4.0, *71 
53s MA G.: 
3004 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-011966 
EFTA00226754

Law Or/ iCCS or 
GERALD 13. LEFcourrr, Y.G. 
•MOt SSIONAL COORPORATIO 
NB CAST ie." 
STREET 
NEW YORK, NEW YORE 10021 
GERALD B. LCFCOURT 
WICOortaskourUari.Com 
smcnyi. C. RtiCti 
nichlatektmetra corn 
RENATO C. STABILE 
ada•Okoltostaa. corn 
FAITH A. FRIEDMAN 
Mearnageskeurstet teen 
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 
ear T essrs. 
oman, T enc e an 
July 6, 2007 
rey Epstein 
uric and Ms. Villafaila: 
 
HONE 
I/ zJ 7370400 
FAcSIMILE 
421211388.6102 
We %Tice as counsel to Jeffrey Epstein to follow-up on our meeting on June 26, 
2007. We thought the meeting was extremely productive and appreciate your giving us 
the opportunity to engage you on the facts, law and policy that will inform any decision 
you make on how and whether to proceed. 
I. 
18 U.S.C. §2422(6) Has No Applicability to the Facts Here. 
Even assuming the facts as you believe them to be, as demonstrated below, a 
prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) would violate the explicit terms of the statute, pose 
insurmountable constitutional barriers, and be unprecedented, unwise, and utterly 
inappropriate. This statute, with its mandatory minimum sentence' was designed to reach 
The statute in effect during the events at issue carries a mandatory five-year period of 
incarceration. The current ten-year mandatory minimum was instituted in 2006. 
Exhibit 33 
EFTA00226755