EFTA00213048

Exhibit 23 
EFTA00213148

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 S. Australian Ave. Ste 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
(561)8204711 
Facsimile: (561)8204777 
August 15, 2008 
DELIVERY BY EL -CTRONIC MAIL 
Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP 
Citigroup Center 
153 East 53rd Street 
New York, New York 10022-4675 
Roy Black, Esq. 
Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. 
201 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 
Miami, FL 33131 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Jay and Roy: 
Thank you for your response to my earlier e-mail. Our communications with Mr. 
Black and later with Mr. Lefkowitz were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered 
to be the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. We appreciate your answering our 
question with finality. You have now made clear that Mr. Epstein did not accept the 
December modification, and accordingly, the offer to make that modification is a nullity. 
Pursuant to our Agreement, I will prepare an Amended Notification that contains the 
names of additional identified victims. As you know, Judge Davis had selected the Podhurst 
firm to serve as the attorney representative for the victims. Assuming that Mr. Josefsberg is 
still amenable to the appointment, we will provide him with the victim list so that he may 
begin his service. 
Finally, as you are aware, the United States has been ordered to produce the 
Non-Prosecution Agreement. In accordance with that Order, we will produce the September 
Agreement with the October Addendum signed by your client. We understand that Mr. 
EFTA00213149

JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. 
ROY BLACK, ESQ. 
AUGUST IS, 2008 
PAGE 2 OF 2 
Goldberger did not provide the state court with a true copy of the complete Agreement, and 
he should take steps to correct that error. 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
cc: 
EFTA00213150

Exhibit 24 
EFTA00213151

u; 
, i2.3.."01271 
P:2 
ZWItilams, Shannon R. 
From: 
sent 
To; 
Cc: 
Subject 
attachments: 
Dear Colonel Gauger: 
• (1JSAF1-8) Immillariereottaferiesdargat—
urs 
July 03, 200811:58 AM 
Epstein Agent Portion.pdi 
Thank you for taking the time to meet with us on Thesday. As we discussed, ! have attached the pertinent portion of 
Mr. Epstein's agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office. 
«Epstein Afirmt Pattiz:m.OPa. 
I also wanted to call to your attention a couple of items regarding the issue of Work Release. During the change of 
plea, Mr. Epstein stated that he would be working at the Florida Science Foundation, located at 250 Australian Avenue, 
Suite 1400, that the Foundation had been in existence for a "couple of years," and that he had been working there 
"every day" prior to the plea. The Division of Corporations' documents show that the Florida Science Foundation was 
incorporated in November 2007, not a "couple of years ago." The address provided for the "office" of the Florida 
Science Foundation is Jack Goldberger's office suite, and neither the office building directory nor the office suite door 
reflects that such a business is located there, and neither the security guard nor any building tenant that FM questioned 
knows of the existence of such a business. Mr. Epstein also could not have been working there "every day" when he 
hadn't been in Palm Beach County in the past six months. 
I would appreciate the opportunity to review the work release regulations. If Mr. Epstein truly is eligible for the 
program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated prisoner, but sitting in his 
attorney's oifice•suite making telephone calls, web-surfing, and having food delivered to him is probably not in 
accordance with the objectives of imprisonment. Obviously, the decision is left entirely within your discretion, but I 
warned to make sum that you had a complete picture before you made that decision. 
Thank you again, and have a wonderful 4ie of July. 
Marie 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, F1, 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
EFTA00213152

Exhibit 25 
EFTA00213153

•••.- 3 0.- 
-••• 
2008C2009.361a • Alt 
PERSON tINDINI•OOSIOP 
*iii ). • 
j'
•"--"•••••-•••••-.' 
•-• 
• ' 
• 
...mtPS:-•-• 
— ' 
0'; - 
' 
' 
., 
: , 
. 
: ;AA 
..4.41g 
; 
/....

- 
1 
12 I, ,,Iiric.,—T"' 
ilidge 
,.b ' 
!-•:<! s • ...51etr toii: ;.•3: t.:...e .a7 ',-. -r• 
4- c . iyktl.p.i., . 
ar'r..- • 
iiii • 
 
: 
.,44.f::. 
• 
.. 
` y.
p 
• 
Gllpg.. rte-/
... . 
4. 
• 
, 
- 
, 
..• 
.J, /....! :cia.. 
Lc 
•  
 
_.4.4 
WO&   ' • 
• 
w.. 
be' 
: , 
../ 
 
. 
..
• 
r M•114 10 
'• `1 0!IttatiOan • 
•' ;'''.- ' 
, 
4.1r4 . 
SA 
_ 
... 
tRei6vicri, '' 
 : elitguipriiii/jOitio, 
+SG?If 
ilt,evpItetiskRitipitAted 
• • - :' f.. .",
:gtte,TroviolikoSiitOisitibid, if B6iidOiiiipliitie;::..a.Siiiii Skt0401 *•:(14410;Widttattek  :- •• 2 
:r. 
r:/:, 
;.
4" 
itcobe 
11C:737HtttoirrfOrbir 1 
. 
.. , , 
ptorn--t  
 
 
, 
. 
.. 
. 
i 
..
0244(4. 
•••ci. PCig:N9A,IecioN940;tt: ',. 
• • ' pt:;:a.::•5:`:;:-4 • ••.: •-, -• , 
- - .• , .. 
• ./., 
 .
'..Atob 
.07
..• . A
,:sr. 
r.
e.i: 
, 
Pr,
. 
 
AtiviEsios IF  
- 
'ynthakitantoittakketC.•4*i,t. ...:::::i. .,.i ::c;fri...;/..4,:.• ',I...). ....:•,-,/,..,- 
Pe: rai 
P4a. 
:...,- 
-. 
- 
.?s. 
agat.Vngt.gr
n.l. 
•,1.0 
,.. 
•
• 
iiii• ...4. .• • • 
••• 
' • 
. 
i 
.....i... ... 
}• 
• . 
.. 
' 
• 
':;: • • ... ;P.'.  
• 
4
 
a. 
.
 
.. 
• . 
, 
Y:44 
?? 
 
JIV: 
•) 
a 
: I-
:0.:
:::.
'•:
444442.411•5,Ce7INgltiVir"---7-'V.:' 
ratlitr-R6 
•7‘
• . ....• 
 
; 
• 
• *Ste 
ed.i.fri
ti •
e 
4; 
X 1•L
- 
\" .1. A"--:• ••• • 
•:‘ 
- 
m 
k 
•''' 
•Ir' •7 iir 
' ' • 
....e 
, 
"-- 
latEti-imoigaistoirtort .Y
---[l
tr=:En±it
:tiallpiceirtiePelltdd t
vcititkifekrarri 
Sxill
.tots.. '' - 
-.k.:-.. , - -...* 
' -'''''":28,_qopt:pip.s.th
t ... 4. ..# ......V: . • •,-•;i2ta • 
7,;.,•: 
... 
.-.. 
.. • 
f
%
 
tcar.4 'avow.' sotto 
-wi!'"•P F•7*-*/ 
••^L'il".$104,104o*oompNo 
• • 
rhilleanuntini. 
erlii(it••••-• • 
400Nt..t. 
z.. 
• -  
• 
• :•-•: A 
. .. 
. 
 
• 
• 
eftVt0"ne
1" 1"18•1
1t
.
 
 et't
 
Aas 
rani
" .fip:odingsba.,
• 
• 
7.:1-4,1 
Coiftr.tt 
.5,--'
:: 4,44x1011014500:46SNyed 0140aSiaprfledde0006004!"
. "' • 4: • - -, • • " 
"r• • 1 ; 
.r• .F...: 
•,-... 
*iatiriip.0#24ailailt0,49ft • ?ttimakieilit  
 • .) h ' 
:: '• :i.: 4514: 
. 
• 
• Jsb 
_ 
, 
_
•. , 
alimatisowiamenykariakastibn•rnttifigigpfolo 
. 
. 
.
 
•
 
- 
• 
• 
• • • 
• 
r 
r.- 
. '.• 
W@1115 
AtiNi—w' 
Pr- :474
Y. 111‘44,4126,
..
f
,,dt  • • 
• -  
• 
• 
• .• • • 
7 
n 
• 
t 
• 
•
•
• 
r • ;:.',•&> z.Va: 417:1* • •• •••14,:  
• alitniiteilibt4teeet ' 
• t ...a
. • 
- 
re': 
• . 
• 
• 
• 
t: 
•• 
• 
. 
::r • C.'S 
44;
T 
. 
. 
54.1..;; 
:et;  
• 
rt:: 
" 
Erso n'th4 in a
s: • 
. 
*tins* • • •'••'• 
• 
/  
 . 
( 
OnhiloPII"••-•<A)4 
 
eroonOillurN0444. LAT: a CoproonvOnthinat TOMO* ComIN'ex- _ 
• 
A.-qt‘sit 
ie 
Parra 
WEgantlipl4e :Grade 
122 
Vie Wisttalnyli001) 
••••t 
" 
‘.4
.. „- . 
, 
cf.:
orloon:EaRtioNyouLopegriy.rtig*Se=g
arnit
isoebiaTorArrneirmeNrmorflocarman• uttritirmota Nacos'. maim me moral 
--tutor *: sr. ralks_otoctrThr? 
ArmissownvE COOCEOF:4000URT, PDaaeEAcKcolmneouamoue lom coz 
assixv 
• 
AskirfrE.(dAqtkriarOgyakspAaatimpo4NrivenoiriONoimptoroNsincion onto NCMCE:W YOUARE HEARIPK1011 VOICE 11.1PAMEIVCALI: 1 
• 
- 
• 
, 
 
 
. 
. 
EFTA00213154

; 4 f'—• 
Air 
• 
• • 
• t. 
• • a, 
• 
0 
DATE.
NAME. 
4Th 
crEll 
Prob / Sex 
_, 
/ 43 bonSec. 
CfriPru9 
wt
On I/rot/1c.°) C.C. II' 
/ 
woldi sa-as 
. 
IT Probed:66 tifiniferaid to: 
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:: 
0 Complete.Original!y, 
.0 OurfOr 
p m 
Ordered. 
, with 
Dept. 
custody; 
notify 
••• 
CondltionS 
the following exception: 
• • 
1
,
;
)
 
Deft, to Sport tofrob.. 
,a. Deft. n 
have in care, 
'0 Deft to it • mediately 
CI Restitution CF3,0 flied 
immediately .upon release
or control any. Unlawful Orill6gal mat_erial, subst., device, or object.
Prob. Officer if place of residence-CO.0lb changes. 
 
, 
• 
• 
• 
•• 
.. 
. , 
•
. 
. 
. 
0 Subtprtirsildifr .. 
gligniitions a4Pretngt 
• 
. . . .. ....-A-- 
—.----
-
4 .ScUliatancpause Eva!: / poychotwibel 
.44.410(646irc‘iithily-CAplelelieeddithiii:i" 
tPaithkiaiivtite$081181/estifid.::*.,•'A-tabileitipiiiiiid::: 
0 NoCondumption/Possession 
a Attend • 
' 
,AA 
- ..et 
Eyet.:/ PAydc, _ 
xual Eval. within.! by: 
—• 
••• • 
, 
' 
Iii: 4.-:"  . . - • • • : 
- 
.- •!::: • :.:.. --.; 
f:itsillociatOvai ' 
:...-,t7.,e44.!(:d54 
of Alcohol OrDrugs or intokicants without a PiescriptiOn. • ' ' .''''' a',..: ' ' 
and/or NA Meetings per. Week: 
of business whose primary purpose. Is the sale of alcohol, .‘• 
7'''..a ' 4 
'CI Deftsnot.to frequent wriy..eilace 
Ca • Complete _.•:.
HW'of CoMmunity 
. cl IIPS_Oleatelteliittatts.0.0c10ater 
Q-AgiiiiiiitIsuccessfully.complete.QUE.schbaliaadleessiodiatMittim 
Service to be done at the rate of 
,dHrs..per Wy 
o.(40Ikal 
rpe_q /±e . 
• . 
. • • 
::. ".: .1::j 
..._ . .. . .. ._. 
, . 
Impact Paital4.. 
• 
-.:. **T-
.9 •NoPriihtapt 2. No MOOS Contact / No pirect orinclirect contact wNictim(shorothers listest: ......
• 
• - 
• 
t• • 4 ,NIC: t 
: .•:.2.4,,- ;•'.••*:' ". 
i
• 
• 
• 
• 
•
. 
:Nib Contact wititilnor 
'Cost of Opervlsionyt 
•-,EriOr-OaSucceSsfully:OompleteDbC••NOwtecure-Bed 
O• koidib.40iietody, release 
O .Enter and Successfully 
I:1 Forfeit Weapon /Mbney 
. 
. , 
Chili:lion wtokiti Supetv)elonaware of this octet411d the dippeaftldny ..  
' r
. 
. . 
.
4.'" t Or iambi 
0 Waived by Court. 
• ‘• 
•• 
e.
Program-and Any Recomniended,Aftercare .
only to DOC Non-Sfebure•Bed Program Officer. 
...,, 
Complete PBSO Long/. Short_Track Drug Faun and-Any ReciAftertare% .:i:4?::;=: 
seized at the time of arrest to: 
• 
`Ifi. 
0. Enter and:Complete: 0 
' 
IA. Theft Abatement Program. . 
0 Defendant may apply for. Early 
'0 Serve , 
-• • days 
Anger Management Program 
0 Batterers InterveMioryprogram ::. 
 
0 Other: 
Tennination after 
) 
, provided all conds. are satisfied. 
. 
/ month in.P 
ivittrpredit for 
. -days /months.' . 
,.. . 
e_ frit ii*i 
ceto 
• 
.
. ...
fr  
n 
Kvii. 
•••• . .• 
. 
. 
.. 
14 
e 
, • 
v
.
. 
" 
. 
. . 
.. 
•
•
• 
• 
• 
. 
. 
. 
• 
. 
• . 
. 
. . 
• 
• 
. 
. 
, 
- 
•• 
. 
• 
. . 
• 
.. 
. 
. 
- 
• 
. 
• 
• : 
O 
. 
• " 
. . 
 • ... 
• 
. • 
ream. .r
 w. •M 
EFTA00213155

.1 sre 
••• 
•r.
••
$1120004EF0 
• 
rEf-OitY 
Oft at 
TO 
/4- 
HMO* 
I 
' • 
'In 
.. 1 
EF n. 
CPS. 
 
'f R8TS3N 
;AI • 
• 
.. 
Ler PkGSTITIV(264 
• 
, 
738 
VG. 
• 
• 
sti••• ••,,i.` 
. 
r 
Pres 
titles.. 
• 
/ 
/O . cf. 
• 
elate the ly burt f0r951C
115544. 
*anted 
anied 
0 
With .(Without Prejtadi 
• 
Warant la 
Ordered 
0 
itecalled 
0 
Bo 
BondPorf 
OQR:DistathRevolied/Reastated 
Botid Porf Vacated •0 1kre;tious pond Reinstated, if 
Deft 
Indigoln‘, 
0 
Ap 
aluation fat 
15kug Parr 
• 
• 
1. 
0 
PreePlea 
0 
Referred to: PTI / SAAPi/P 
EFT ENTEREg) A 
OP 
0 
PD Pros 
' Bed 
PIM 
drawn 
0 CauSteseates Ruling 
IT Written Ord!! to Rogow 
0 
See Stay/ 
• : th erlsa Covent 
0Sp Gond 
OSOR:Disch/dievaged/Reinstared 
• • 
to file chargla OgReJeual0E. 
/ MB; 
C hfIrg ed-Cts
SW &Test 
v of Rtsi 
PSI 
••
AnJ•GUILTY,as Charged is to 
LL
CMs 
UM) wiry as Chargegl as 
Os 
WIELD as to Qs 
• I
• 
i 
POUNDANDADJUDI 
& 
JN 
t 
0 
Mg only' 
• DOCNou.S 
SI ordered by/wi 
0 
Case p 
NOT GUILTY 
ser 
• 0.:C.duitiAprttk 
the absentee doc 
0 
NO 
days 
Q, vi/inpat.frornDJkz/ Staffing 
4  
• . 1. 
al. 
R
e
i
n
s
t
a
t
 
7
7
5
:
0
8
4
 
a
r
 
•
 
0m 
e ti. 
/Comfit Central: 
0 
Stip/Pound: (violent) 
CB: 
PBCT, 
PBC.T: 
;W/Credit for  
/ Consec 
idcases 
a 
Cts• 
Less& 
Les 
Les 
BEST EgTEBRIF O1/O1,3t, 
Cliarge • 
• 
' 
• 
- 
charge  
Lesser Cits  
a SENT WtELD as to Cts  I.
0 
•
NIAle Prossb 
ed aik;s3i. AcCessfully / iUnsu 
Predator 
1 
G$ 
daft to.remain OM same 
Execution of Sentence Sts ed 
youthful Off 
0 
Habi 
Off• 
ABOMil $BICTENCETOBE PO 
DRIVERS LICENSE TO BB 
4 
CS
1)
1 i43 
Sentence 
0 
Min/Mend: 
WED By: 0 
SP$NDBD/RE
Mine serve; 
ad
tiftsets
. .• 
base 
0 
Drag 'Sex 11614b 
0  Coma, 
P cilditi
(MED
•
 
R  
. 
 InARS AS-A RIF: .
. • 
• 1..'" 
2 
  Set hRomains Se 
Reset 
 Set / Remains 
Reset 
C „Deft sip 
 
Cf Def Co 
 
 
. 
0 
A 
1 
C !Ptah 
0. Jail 
0 
DJJ . 0 
G 
• 
Notified by 
by:  
. 
. 
on 
.. 
0 County Courthouse 
• 
0 
Courtro 
i criminii Justice Barg. :.•• 
0 
CourtromnrCri 
205 N. Dixie, West Palm Beach 
38844 S 
t!Roadi SO, Belle Mae. 
.. 
 3228•Giun ChM 
at 
T. 
O Bimdsman 
Asti; Complex . 
est Pike Beach 
tftellaREAPERSON MINA INFABILITY WHO NEEDd1VIT ACCOMDATION N OMER TO PARTiCIPAISE INTHISPRCaiEDINEkOlkAREEMMED AT NO COST TO:YOU,1614REKAAstita CO. 
• 
.0ERCSII ASSISTANCE- PLEASE CONTACT MARY JAM, ADA COORCOIATOR DI RICODMINSIRATVE ORME OF THE (COURT, PAW BEACH COWRY COURTHOUSE. 
tOZIE 
NE SESCO. 
VIC-STRAW BEACH, Ft. 334CR; 'TELEPHONE (561) mom weals womattotuas OF,YOUR RECEIPT OF TICS NOME,' IRYOU ARE HESOING ON VOCE mon 
CR1114C0,9568771. 
• 
t' 
• 
, 
• 
GIG; All LIID DGG.G• I, ITIA 
EFTA00213156

Exhibit 26 
EFTA00213157

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 
ANC MASA= IALTNISSMITS 
Jay P. telkovelz, P.C. 
To 
• 
. 
Cidgroup Center 
153 East 53rd Street 
New York, New 'fink 10022-4611 
www.kirkland.com 
June 15, 2009 
VIA FACSIMILE 
Ms. 
Esq. 
United States Attorney's Office 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Re: Jeffiey Epstein 
Dear Marie: 
Facsimile: 
I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It 
represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ezell indicated in a letter dated June 8, 2009 
would be fully acceptable to her and Bob Josefsberg as a means to resolve expeditiously all 
outstanding fee issues regarding the attorney representative. Mr. Epstein has directed his counsel 
to take immediate steps to address and resolve the attorney representative's outstanding fee-
related issues and we are doing so without delay. The suggestion of a Special Master, agreed to 
by both parties, to resolve the issues in the immediate future, will assure all parties that there will 
be no delay and no need for adversarial litigation regarding fees. 
More generally, I want to assure you that Mr. Epstein has directed all counsel to make 
sure that there is no filing that could constitute a breach of the NPA. Accordingly, a new internal 
screening process has been established to provide focused decision-making on each filing. To 
the extent we believe any filing may be perceived as implicating any of the issues generically 
addressed in the NPA (a document including sentences within paragraph 8 that even Mr. Acosta 
agreed were "far from simple"), we intend to address such issues with you prior to any filing and 
hope that you will agree to review the draft filing and inform us whether or not from your 
perspective it would, if filed, constitute a "breach". This will be especially important regarding 
issues that we believe fall at the intersection of Section 2255 and the civil litigation. We reserve 
our right, if you believe a proposed filing to conflict with the NPA or if you wish not to address 
these issues with us, thereafter to address such substantive issues with the Court. 
Chicago 
Hong Kong 
London 
Los Angeles 
Munich 
San Francisco 
Washington, O.C. 
EFTA00213158

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 
ISIMINiallia 
9• 
June 15, 2009 
Page 2 
We hope that these proposals—in combination with our immediate withdrawal of the 
previously filed Motion to Dismiss—resolve all outstanding issues at the intersection of the NPA 
and 2255. Please advise if any remain. 
Sincerely, 
P. Leflcowitz 
Enclosure 
cc: 
Karen Atkinson, Esq. 
EFTA00213159

Exhibit 27 
EFTA00213160

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM 
Document 9 
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 
Page 1 of 22 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
JANE DOE No. 101, 
Civil Action No. 9:09-cv-80591-KAM 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 
Defendant. 
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 101, brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, 
and states as follows: 
PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 
I. 
At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 101, was a 
resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. 
2. 
This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of 
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 101, because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault 
and abuse of a then minor, 
3. 
At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had a 
residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. 
4. 
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is currently a citizen of the State of Florida, as he is 
currently incarcerated in the Palm Beach County Stockade. 
5. 
At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an 
adult male born in 1953. 
EFTA00213161

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM 
Document 9 
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 
Page 2 of 22 
6. 
This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant 
to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. 
7. 
This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a 
substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this District 
STATEMENT OF FACTS 
8. 
At all relevant times, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male, 
approximately 50 years old. Epstein is known as a billionaire financier and money manager with 
a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power, 
and influence. He owns a fleet of aircraft that includes a Gulfstream W, a helicopter, and a 
Boeing 727, as well as a fleet of motor vehicles. Until his incarceration, he maintained his 
principal place of residence in the largest home in Manhattan, a 51,000-square-foot eight-story 
mansion on the Upper East Side. Upon information and belief, he also owns a $6.8 million 
mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a $30 million 7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico he named 
"Zorro," and a 70-acre private island known as Little St James in St Thomas, U.S. Virgin 
Islands, a mansion in London's Westminster neighborhood, and a home in the Avenue Foch area 
of Paris. The allegations herein concern Defendant's conduct while at his lavish homes and/or 
numerous other locations both nationally and internationally. 
9. 
Upon information and belief, Defendant has a sexual preference for underage 
minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, or enterprise in which he gained access in his home 
to countless relatively economically disadvantaged minor girls, sexually assaulted, molested, 
and/or exploited these girls, and then gave them money. 
10. 
Beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant 
used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor children to engage in a systematic 
pattern of sexually exploitative behavior. 
2 
EFTA00213162

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM 
Document 9 
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 
Page 3 of 22 
11. 
Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. 
Defendant coerced and enticed impressionable, vulnerable, and relatively economically less 
fortunate minors to participate in various acts of sexual misconduct that he committed upon 
them. Defendant's scheme involved the use of underage girls as well as other individuals to 
recruit other underage girls. Upon information and belief, Defendant or an authorized agent 
would call and alert Defendant's assistants shortly before or after he arrived at his Palm Beach 
residence. His assistants would seek out economically disadvantaged and underage girls from 
West Palm Beach and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered—
generally $200 to $300 per "massage" session—and who Defendant and/or his assistants 
perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility issues if allegations of 
improper conduct were made. The then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls, some as young as 
14 years old, were transported to Defendant's Palm Beach county mansion by Defendant's 
employees, agents, and/or assistants in order to provide Defendant with "massages." 
12. 
Many of the instances of illegal sexual conduct committed by Defendant were 
perpetrated with the assistance, support, and facilitation of at least three assistants who helped 
him orchestrate this child exploitation enterprise. These assistants would often arrange times for 
underage girls to come to Defendant's residence, transport or cause the transportation of 
underage girls to Defendant's residence, escort the underage girls to the massage room where 
Defendant would be waiting or would enter shortly thereafter, urge the underage girls to remove 
their clothes, deliver cash from Defendant to the underage girls and/or their procurers at the 
conclusion of each "massage appointment," and, upon information and belief, take sexually 
explicit photographs and/or videos of the underage girls' for Defendant without their knowledge. 
Defendant would pay the procurer of each girl's "appointment" hundreds of dollars. 
3 
EFTA00213163

4 
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM 
Document 9 
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 
Page 4 of 22 
13. 
Epstein designed the scheme to secure a private place in Defendant's mansion 
where only persons employed and invited by Epstein would be present, so as to reduce the 
chance of detection of Defendant's sexual abuse and prostitution as well as to make it more 
difficult for the minor girls to flee the premises and/or to credibly report his actions to law 
enforcement or other authorities. The girls were usually transported by his employees, agents, 
and/or assistants or by a taxicab paid for by Defendant in order to make it difficult for the girls to 
flee his mansion. 
14. 
Upon arrival at Defendant's mansion, each underage victim would generally be 
introduced to one of Defendant's assistants, who would gather the girl's personal contact 
information. The minor girl would then be led up a flight of stairs to a room that contained a 
massage table and a large shower. The staircase leading to the room was plastered with 
photographs of nude young girls, including some photographs depicting two or more young girls 
engaged in lewd acts. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had such 
photographs in each of his four homes and on his computer. 
15. 
At times, if it was the girl's first "massage" appointment, another female would 
be in the room to "lead the way" until Defendant would have her leave. Generally, Defendant 
would start his massage wearing only a small towel, which eventually would be removed. 
Defendant and/or the other female would direct the girl to massage him, giving the minor girl 
an
ew 
he wanted to be touched, and then direct her to remove 
EFTA00213164

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM 
Document 9 
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 
Page 5 of 22 
presence. The exact degree of molestation and frequency with which the sexual crimes took 
place varied and is not yet completely known; however, at least when Defendant was in Palm 
Beach, Florida, such acts occurred usually on a daily basis and, in most instances, several times a 
day, In order to facilitate the daily exchanges of money for sexual assault and abuse, Defendant 
kept U.S. currency readily available. 
16. 
As previously stated in paragraph 14, Defendant displayed photographs of nude 
underage girls throughout his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. 
Virgin Islands. Upon information and belief, some of the photographs Defendant's possession of 
Defendant were taken with hidden cameras set up in his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his 
arrest, police found two bidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in 
Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, may have taken 
lewd photographs of Plaintiff; Jane Doe No. 101, with his hidden cameras and may have 
transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and 
elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information 
and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were 
confiscated by the Palm Beach Police Department during its execution of a search warrant of 
Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those 
photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement 
17. 
Defendant, Epstein, traveled to his mansion in Palm Beach for the purpose of 
luring minor girls to his mansion to sexually abuse and/or batter them. He used the telephone to 
contact these minor girls for the purpose of coercing them into acts of prostitution and to enable 
himself to commit sexual battery against them and/or acts of lewdness in their presence, and he 
conspired with others, including assistants and/or his driver(s) and/or pilot(s), and his socialite 
5 
EFTA00213165

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM 
Document 9 
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 
Page 6 of 22 
friend/partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, to further these acts and to avoid police detection. 
Defendant's systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior referred to in paragraph 10 and 
described in paragraphs 11 through the present paragraph occurred at all of Defendant's 
domestic and international residences and/or places of lodging and/or modes of transportation. 
18. 
Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Defendant used his money, 
wealth, and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff. 
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 101, was recruited by one of Defendant's agents to give Defendant a 
massage for compensation. Plaintiff was apprehensive, but needed the money and finally agreed 
to go. Plaintiff was first brought to Defendant's mansion in or about the spring of 2003, when 
she was merely 17 years old and in high school. Epstein's procurer drove her to Jeffrey 
Epstein's mansion. Plaintiff was led up a flight of stairs by a blonde woman to a spa room with a 
shower and a massage table, where she was left alone. A woman with dark hair, an accent, and 
naked from the waist up entered and tried to coax Plaintiff to remove her shirt, but Plaintiff 
refused. After the woman showed Plaintiff how to use the lotions that were there, the woman 
left. Defendant walked in wearing only a small towel. He lay down on the massage table still 
wearing the small towel, and Plaintiff began to massage his shoulders and neck Nervously, she 
asked him what he did for a living. Defendant responded that he was a scientist. Defendant 
asked Plaintiff what year she would graduate high school, to which Plaintiff honestly replied that 
she would graduate in 2004. Plaintiff massaged Defendant's lower back and calves. Defendant 
told her to remove his towel. Defendant told her that he had just worked out and wanted his 
buttocks massaged. Although disgusted, she was afraid to refuse and did it. At some point, 
Defendant ordered Plaintiff to remove her clothes. In shock, fear, and trepidation, Plaintiff partly 
6 
EFTA00213166

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM 
Document 9 
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 
Page 7 of 22 
OSCT to 
19. 
Defendant thereafter lured the then minor Plaintiff to the Epstein mansion on at 
least one and perhaps two other occasions in the spring and/or summer of 2003. The procurer 
made another appointment for her to return, but Plaintiff didn't want to see Defendant. By 
having his assistants continue to contact Plaintiff and attempt to lure her to the mansion for other 
sexual acts, Defendant engaged in a continuous course of conduct that injured Plaintiff upon 
each instance of contact and/or abuse. 
20. 
In addition to the direct sexual abuse and molestation of the then minor Plaintiff, 
Defendant used his money, wealth, and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and 
influence the then minor Plaintiff to bring him another minor girl in a promised exchange for 
money. Rather than go herself, Plaintiff and the procurer took another girl there one time. 
21. 
As a result of these encounters with Defendant, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 101, has in 
the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, 
emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, 
confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, 
invasion of her privacy, and other damages associated with Defendant's controlling and 
manipulating her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. 
22. 
Any assertions by Defendant that he was unaware of the age of the then minor 
Plaintiff are belied by her telling him her high school graduation year, as well as his own actions, 
and are rendered irrelevant by the provision of applicable federal statutes concerning the sexual 
7 
EFTA00213167