Valikko
Etusivu Tilaa päivän jae Raamattu Raamatun haku Huomisen uutiset Opetukset Ensyklopedia Kirjat Veroparatiisit Epstein Files YouTube Visio Suomi Ohje

This is an FBI investigation document from the Epstein Files collection (FBI VOL00009). Text has been machine-extracted from the original PDF file. Search more documents →

FBI VOL00009

EFTA00205964

4 pages
Page 1 / 4
Memorandum 
SubjectDate 
Re: Jeffrey Epstein Investigation 
First Assistant U.S. Attorney 
July 26, 2011 
I. Introduction 
This memorandum summarizes the conflict of interest related to the investigation by the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") of additional crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The 
memo begins with a brief overview of the original investigation of Epstein, dubbed "Operation Leap 
Year"; summarizes the resolution of Operation Leap Year by the Southern District of Florida; and 
addresses the events following the resolution of Operation Leap Year, including the basis for the 
conflict. Lastly, the memo briefly addresses the additional crimes that the FBI wants to investigate. 
II. "Operation Leapt" 
The investigation of Jeffrey Epstein initially was undertaken by the City of Palm Beach Police 
Department in response to a complaint received from the parents of a 14-year-old girl, 
from 
. Whenand another girl began fighting at school because the other girl accused 
f being a prostitute, one of the school pr. 
intervened. The principal searche 
purse and found $300 cash. The principal asked 
here the money came from. 
initially 
claimed that she earned the money working at ' 
" which no one believed. 
hen claimed 
that she made the money selling drugs; no one believed that either. 
finally admitted that she had 
been paid $300 to give a massage to a man on Palm Beach island. 
parents approached the Palm 
Beach Police Department ("PBPD") about pressing charges. 
PBPD began investi atin the recipient of the massage, Jeffrey Epstein, and 
and 
PBPD identified 27 girls who went to Epstein's house to perform 
"massage services" (not including one licensed massage therapist). The girls' ages ranged from 14 
years' old to 23 years' old. Some girls saw Epstein only once and some saw him dozens of times. The 
"massage services" performed also varied. Some girls were fully clothed while they massaged Epstein; 
some wore only their underwear;  and some were fully nude. During all of these massages, Epstein 
masturbated himself and he would 
and 
vibrator to 
more often, Epstein 
— either over their clothin 
and 
uated to 
 
, usually 
or on their bare skin. Epstein often used a 
a number of them. For the girls who saw him 
Epstein sometimes brought 
into the sexual activity. One of the girls described 
as Epstein's "sex slave". 
On October 18, 2005, PBPD obtained a search warrant with the assistance of the Palm Beach 
County State Attorney's Office ("PBSAO"). By this time, PBSAO had already been contacted by 
Epstein's cadre of lawyers. When PBPD arrived at Epstein's home two days later (10/20/05) to execute 
the search warrant, they found several items conspicuously missing. For example, computer monitors 
and keyboards were found, but the CPUs were gone. Ft Similarly, surveillance cameras were found, but 
they were disconnected and the videotapes were gone. Nonetheless, the search did recover some 
evidence of value, including message pads showing messages from many girls over a two year span. 
The messages show girls returning phone calls to confirm appointments to "work." Messages were 
taken by three of Epstein's "personal assistants." 
Photographs taken inside the home showed that the girls' descriptions of the layout of the home 
and master bedroom/bathroom area were accurate. PBPD also found massage tables and oils, the high 
school transcript of one of the girls, and sex toys. 
EFTA00205964
Page 2 / 4
In sum, the PBPD investigation showed that girls from 
would be 
contacted by one of Epstein's assistants to make an appointment to "work." Up to three appointments 
each day would be made. The girls would travel to Epstein's home in Palm Beach where they would 
meet Epstein's chef and Epstein': 
An the kitchen. The assistant would 
escort the girls upstairs to the master bedroom/bathroom area and set up the massage table and massage 
oils. The girl sometimes was instructed to remove her clothing. The assistant would leave and Epstein 
would enter the room wearing a robe. He would remove the robe and lie face down and nude on the 
massage table. Epstein would then instruct the girl on what to do and would ask her to remove her 
clothing. After some time E stein would turn over so that he was lying face up. Epstein would 
masturbate himself and 
When Epstein climaxed, the massage 
was over, and the girl was instructed to get dressed and to go downstairs to the kitchen while Epstein 
showered. Epstein's assistant would be in the kitchen and the girl would be paid—usually $200-and if it 
was a "new" girl, the assistant would ask for the girl's phone number to contact her in the future. Fz 
Girls were encouraged to find other girls to bring with them. If a girl brought another girl to perform a 
"massage," each girl would receive $200. Each time a girl returned to the house, Epstein would 
pressure the girl to go further sexually, 
. Epstein would pay 
more for these acts — in the words of one girl, "the more you do, the more you make." 
The PBPD investigation consisted primarily of sworn taped statements from the girls. When 
PBPD began having problems with PBSAO, they approached the FBI. The investigation was formally 
presented to the FBI and to the U.S. Attorney's Office after PBSAO "presented" the case to a state grand 
jury and the state grand jury returned an indictment charging Epstein only with one felony count of 
solicitation of [adult] prostitution. 
After the matter was presented to the U.S. Attorney's Office and there was a determination that 
federal statutes had been violated, FBI, ICE, and the U.S. Attorney's Office opened files. The federal 
investigation focused on the interstate nexus required for all of the federal violations, so a number of 
grand jury subpoenas were issued for telephone records, flight manifests, and credit card records. The 
federal agents also re-interviewed some of the girls. The agents delved into Epstein's history and 
interviewed other girls and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also interviewed girls 
who came forward after the PBSAO indictment was reported in the papers and the additional girls 
identified through those interviews. 
The attempt to handle secretly the federal case was doomed from the start when the Chief of the 
Palm Beach Police Department gave a letter to each of the victims identified through his investigation 
telling them that, because of his disappointment in the way that the PBSAO had handled the case, the 
matter had been referred to the FBI. Almost immediately, Epstein's attorneys began calling to request a 
meeting with the U.S. Attorney's Office. When one attorney was unable to schedule a meeting, Epstein 
hired another attorney who called up the chain of command until someone agreed to a meeting. 
Between January and May 2007, an indictment package was prepared, charging Epstein and three 
of his personal assistants with a number of child exploitation offenses. The case agent made several 
appearances before the grand jury. Attorneys for Epstein made several presentations to the U.S. 
Attorney's Office to convince the Office not to prosecute, and made allegations of prosecutorial 
misconduct against the line Assistant and the First Assistant U.S. Attorney. Epstein also challenged the 
legal analysis behind the prosecution, both within the U.S. Attorney's Office (up to the U.S. Attorney) 
and to the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section at the Justice Department. All of Epstein's 
challenges were considered and rejected. 
The Resolution of "Operation Leap Year" 
On September 24, 2007, Epstein signed a Non-Prosecution Agreement wherein the U.S. 
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida promised not to prosecute Epstein for the crimes 
that were the subject of the grand jury investigation if: (1) he pled guilty to two crimes in state court - 
EFTA00205965
Page 3 / 4
the state felony prostitution charge and a state charge of procuring minors into prostitution, which would 
require Epstein to register as a sex offender; (2) he were sentenced to at least 18 months' imprisonment, 
and (3) he agreed to pay damages to the victims of his offenses. After signing this Agreement, Epstein 
and his counsel decided that they were dissatisfied with its terms, and again complained to the Justice 
Department, seeking review to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General. 
After those attempts also failed, on June 30, 2008, Epstein entered his guilty plea in state court 
and began serving his sentence. 
IV. Post-Resolution Events 
A few days before the plea and sentencing (in state court those occur on the same day), the 
Assistant U.S. Attorney handling the matter contacted counsel for three of Epstein's identified victims 
and informed him of the upcoming court date, encouraging his clients to attend and be heard. They did 
not appear. On July 7, 2008, two of those victims filed suit against the United States in federal court 
claiming that their rights had been violated under the Crime Victims' Rights Act because they had not 
been consulted before the Office entered into the Non-Prosecution Agreement. (This will be referred to 
as the "CVRA Action.") 
After an initial flurry of activity, the Petitioners obtained a copy of the confidential Non-
Prosecution Agreement, and the Court ordered that it be shared with all of the identified victims. After 
it was provided, the Petitioners and most of Epstein's victims focused on their civil suits against him. 
In 2009, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Fort Lauderdale initiated an investigation into a Pont 
scheme operated by Scott Rothstein through his law firm. As part of his Ponzi scheme, Rothstein told 
investors that his law firm represented several of Epstein's victims and that Epstein was willing to pay 
huge sums of money to avoid exposing his criminal activities. The attorney representing the victims in 
the CVRA Action, Brad Edwards ("Edwards"), worked at the Rothstein firm. Epstein sued Edwards, 
alleging that Edwards was part of the Ponzi scheme, and alleging that Edwards' attempts to subpoena 
some of Epstein's high-powered friends were done to increase the value of the Ponzi scheme, rather 
than for legitimate discovery purposes. 
In the summer of 2010, most of the civil suits against Epstein were settled, including the suits 
filed by the two victims in the CVRA Action. All of the settlements were confidential, so it is unknown 
how much each of the victims received. 
In September 2010, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra, who handled most of the civil cases and 
the CVRA Action, issued an Order closing the CVRA Action. Almost immediately thereafter, the 
Petitioners filed a Motion to Reopen, stating that they had obtained discovery through their civil suits 
against Epstein that showed that the U.S. Attorney's Office had violated their rights as victims. 
For several months, attempts were made to resolve the matter. In short, the victims have asked 
that the U.S. Attorney's Office disavow the Non-Prosecution Agreement, on the basis that the CVRA 
was violated, and bring charges against Epstein. Edwards has said that one of his clients repeatedly 
calls and asks him when Epstein is going to jail. One of the other attorneys on the case has suggested 
that emails he considers to be embarrassing to the Office will not be disclosed if we re-open our 
investigation of Epstein and prosecute him. 
Herein lies the conflict. If the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida re-
initiates a grand jury investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, it will be perceived — correctly or incorrectly — as 
having been done at the insistence of the victims in the CVRA Action. And Epstein will allege that any 
prosecution arising therefrom will have been undertaken in an effort to resolve the CVRA Action, not 
based upon the merits of the investigation itself. 
V. The FBI's Current Investigation 
The main focus of the FBI's current investigation is a victim, 
, who refused to speak with 
agents during the "Operation Leap Year" investigation. Based upon her debriefing, Epstein engaged in 
several additional crimes, in the Southern District of Florida and, more importantly, in several other 
EFTA00205966
Page 4 / 4
Districts, with 
and other minor females. Epstein transported 
in his private airplanes to 
engage in sexual activity with him. Epstein also "pimped" 
to several of his other important 
friends, and transported her to those sexual encounters. This activity was not part of the initial 
investi ation. 
also reported that, during the "Operation Leap Year" investigation, she was contacted by 
Epstein's investigators, lawyers, and Epstein himself, and offered payment to remain silent when 
contacted by the police. 
FBI agents are seeking grand jury subpoenas at this time to corroborate 
statement. 
They also are asking for permission to approach one of Epstein's "personal assistants," who was served 
with a target letter during the "Operation Leap Year" investigation, to give her a "de-target" letter and 
interview her. 
During a meeting, two of Epstein's attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that 
attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed although they insisted that those instruction 
were given well in advance of the execution of the search warrant — not in response to a "leak." 
FzSometimes Epstein made the payment and asked for the phone number, sometimes it was the assistant. 
EFTA00205967