Valikko
Etusivu Tilaa päivän jae Raamattu Raamatun haku Huomisen uutiset Opetukset Ensyklopedia Kirjat Veroparatiisit Epstein Files YouTube Visio Suomi Ohje

This is an FBI investigation document from the Epstein Files collection (FBI VOL00009). Text has been machine-extracted from the original PDF file. Search more documents →

FBI VOL00009

EFTA00184224

982 pages
Pages 461–480 / 982
Page 461 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 8 of 
10 
of all proposed agreements with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office prior to 
entering into those agreements. 
D
The United States reserves the right to inform the Court and the probation 
office of all facts pertinent to the sentencing process, including all relevant information 
concerning the offenses committed, whether charged or hot, as well as concerning the 
defendant and the de endant's background, and to respond to any questions from the Court 
and the Probation O 
d to any misstatements of fact or law. Subject only to the express 
terms of any agreed-upon sentencing recommendations contained in this Agreement, this 
Office further reserves the right to make any recommendation as to the quality and quantity 
of punishment. 
A 
12. 
The defendant is aware that the sentence has not yet been determined by the 
Court. The defendant also is aware that any estimate of the probable sentencing range or 
sentence that the defendant may receive, whether 
estimate comes from the defendant's 
attorney, the government, or the probation office, is a prediction, not a promise, and is not 
binding on the government, the probation office or the Court. The defendant understands 
further that any recommendation that the government makes to the Court as to sentencing, 
whether pursuant to this agreement or otherwise, is not binding 
the Court and. the Court 
may disregard the recommendation in its entirety. The defendant understands and 
acknowledges, as previously acknowledged in paragraph 2 above, that the defendant may not 
withdraw his plea based upon the Court's decision not to accept a sentencing 
recommendation made by the defendant, the government, or a recommendation made jointly 
Page 5 of 7 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RIP WPB 000072 
EFTA00184684
Page 462 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-52 Entered on PLSD. Docket 02/10/2016 Page 9 of 
10 
by both the defendant and the government. 
13. 
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO APPEAL AND COLLATERALLY ATTACK 
THE DUNCE. The defendant is aware that Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 
affords the defendant the right to appeal the sentence imposed in this case. Acknowledging 
this, in exchange for the undertakings made by the United States in this plea agreement, the 
defendant hereby w ' 
all rights conferred by Section 3742 to appeal any sentence 
imposed, including 
titution order, or to appeal the manner in which the sentence was 
imposed, unless the sentence exceeds the maximum permitted by statute or is the result of 
an upward departure or upward variance from the guideline range that the Court establishes 
at sentencing. The defendant furthAluntarily and expressly waives, to the maximum 
extent permitted by federal law, the right to collaterally attack his sentence in any post-
conviction proceeding, including a motion on any ground brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, 
28 U.S.C. § 2255, 18 U.S.C. § 3572, or 18 U.S.C. 
1. The defendant further understands 
that nothing in this agreement shall affect the government's right and/or duty to appeal as set 
forth in Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742(b). However, if the United States appeals 
the defendant's sentence pursuant to Section 3742(b), the defendant shall be released from 
the above waiver of appellate rights. By signing this agreement, thLdefendant acknowledges 
that he has discussed the appeal waiver set forth in this agreement with his attorney. 
14. 
If the defendant fails in any way to fulfill each one of his obligations under this 
Plea Agreement, the United States, and only the United States, may elect to be released from 
its commitments under this Plea Agreement. If the United States elects to void the Plea 
Page 6 of 7 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000073 
EFTA00184685
Page 463 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 10 of 
10 
Agreement because of a breach by the defendant, then the United States agrees not to use the 
defendant's guilty plea against him. However, the United States may prosecute the defendant 
for any 
Federal crimes that he has committed related to this case and may seek any 
sentence for such crimes up to and including the statutory maximums. The defendant 
expressly waives any statute of limitations defense and any constitutional or statutory speedy 
trial defense to such 
rosecution, except to the extent that such a defense exists as of the 
1
t
date he signs this Pie 
eement. Finally, the defendant understands that his violation of 
the terms of this Plea Agreement would not entitle him to withdraw his guilty plea. 
15. 
This is the entire agreement and understanding between the United States and 
the defendant. There are no other a 
ents, promises, representations, or understandings. 
Date: 
By: 
R. ALL 
ER 
UNIT 
TATES ATTORNEY 
Date:  
 
By:  
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT 
T 
Date:  
 
By:  
JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. 
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 
Page 7 of 7 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000074 
EFTA00184686
Page 464 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-53 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 4 
EXHIBIT 
53 
EFTA00184687
Page 465 / 982
&mg 9:ftpy6gp,tratildusDocument 361-53 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 
ell
b,Cat isk 
Re: JE negotiations 
1 message 
Ann 
Ann 
Sun, Sep 16,2007 at 11:41 
AM 
To: Jay Lefkowitz <JLefkowitz®kirkland.com> 
Hi Jay -- I looked up some 11th Circuit cases on simple assault and found some good 
language. I also learned that, every moment that one is aboard an enclosed civil airplane, they 
are in the "special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States," so the assault charge is really a 
violation of 49 USC 46506, which doesn't change the penalties. 
I have drafted up a factual proffer that I would use at the change of plea based upon our brief 
conversation and the agents' interaction with 
at her home. The agents and I would 
need to speak with Ms. 
briefly to confirm that these facts are true. 
Feel free to make suggestions. 
On an "avoid the press" note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of 
the a' 
telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the 
charge In the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly. 
Do you want to check that out? 
I will talk to you later. Thanks. 
fin Epstein Plea Proffer.doc 
21K 
EFTA00184688
Page 466 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-53 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 4 
UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
PLEA PROFFER 
On August 
2007, FBI Special Agents E. 
MEI 
and Jason 
a 
traveled to the home of 
to serve her with a 
subpoena in connection with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. 
works as the personal assistant of the defendant. 
began speaking 
with the agents and then excused herself to go upstairs to check on her sleeping child. 
While upstairs, 
telephoned the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and informed him 
that the FBI agents were at her home. Mr. Epstein was then aboard a civilian aircraft in 
the Southern District of Florida, and was about to return to Teterboro, New Jersey. Mr. 
Epstein instructed 
not to speak with the agents and reprimanded her for 
allowing them into her home. Mr. Epstein then re-directed his airplane, traveling to the 
C.S. Virgin Islands instead of the New York City area, thereby keeping the Special 
Agents from serving target letters on 
that flight, while in the special_ aircraft jurisdiction_ of the United_States, 
the defendant telephoned 1 
and applied pressure to keep her from complying 
with the 
that the agents had served upon her. In particular, Mr. 
Epstein warned 
against turning over documents and electronic evidence 
responsive to the 
and pressured her to delay her appearance before the federal 
in the Southern District of Florida. 
Also during that flight, while in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United 
States, the defendant became angry regarding the federal investigation and became 
verbally abusive and threatening towards his female companion, 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000125 
EFTA00184689
Page 467 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-53 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 4 
although he did not intend to strike her. 
Based upon Mr. Epstein's words, Ms. 
reasonably was in fear that Mr. Epstein was about to touch her offensively. 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000126 
EFTA00184690
Page 468 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 
EXHIBIT 
54 
EFTA00184691
Page 469 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 
"Ann MI 
Materna 
09/16/200711:41 
AM 
To "Jay Lotkowitz" <[email protected]> 
cc 
bcc 
Subject Re: JE negotiations 
_,,,,Xigredasiwtha,Wypiligpit t hasogifogo ;
RiV.Wiallar '! Lea  
egt:W*, -vat 
Iii Jay -- I looked up some 11th Circuit cases on simple assault and 
found some good language. I also learned that, every moment that 
one is aboard an enclosed civil airplane, they are in the "special 
aircraft _jurisdiction of the United States," so the assault charge is 
really a violation of 49 USC 46506, which doesn't change the 
penalties. 
I have drafted up a factual proffer that I would use at the change of 
plea based upon our brief conversation and the agents' interaction 
with Ms. 
at her home. The agents and I would need to speak 
with Ms. I 
f briefly to confirm that these 
facts are true. Feel free to make suggestions. 
On an "avoid the press" note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane 
was in Miami on the day of the 
'telephone call. If he was 
in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the 
District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press 
coverage significantly. Do you want to check that out? 
I will talk to you later. Thanks. 
«< Attachment 'Epstein Plea Proffer.doe has been archived by Haft 
tommenStore/IT/Kirklamil:filis' on '11126120Q7 01:08:17_, 
US_Atty_Cor_0029 
EFTA00184692
Page 470 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-55 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 
EXHIBIT 
55 
EFTA00184693
Page 471 / 982
Cram 9igtirojeWetrattgyk Document 361-55 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 imp ? of; 
bit :OOsk. 
Ann IM 
Re: JE negotiations 
1 message 
Jay Lefkowitz< J e [email protected]> 
Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:44 AM 
To: Ann 
Yes. Will check it out this pm. Sending you various suggested edits shortly as well. 
 
 Original 
sa e 
From: "Ann 
Sent: 09/16/2,63.  :
S 
To: Jay Lefkowitz 
Subject: Re: JE negotiations 
Ili Jay -- I looked up some 11th Circuit cases on simple assault and found some good 
language. I also learned that, every moment that one is aboard an enclosed civil airplane, they 
are in the "special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States," so the assault charge is really a 
violation of 49 USC 46506, which doesn't change the penalties. 
I have drafted up a factual proffer that I would use at the change of plea based upon our brief 
conversation and the agents' interaction with Ms. —f at her home. The agents and I would 
need to speak with 
 briefly to confirm that these facts are true. 
Feel free to make suggestions. 
On an "avoid the press" note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of 
the 
telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the 
charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly. 
Do you want to check that out? 
I will talk to you later. Thanks. 
****** ******** ********** *********** *le** ****** *A* ***** *Ott** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
 
Sri 
EFTA00184694
Page 472 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-56 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 3 
EXHIBIT 
56 
EFTA00184695
Page 473 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-56 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 3 
UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
PLEA PROFFER 
On August 
2007, FBI Special Agents E. 
and Jason 
traveled to the home of 
to serve her with a 
subpoena in connection with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. 
works as the personal assistant of the defendant. 
began speaking 
with the agents and then excused herself to go upstairs to check on her sleeping child. 
While upstairs, 
telephoned the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and informed him 
that the FBI agents were at her home. Mr. Epstein was then aboard a civilian aircraft in 
the Southern District of Florida, and was about to return to Teterboro, New Jersey. Mr. 
Epstein instructed 
not to speak with the agents and reprimanded her for 
allowing them into her home. Mr. Epstein then re-directed his airplane, traveling to the 
U.S. Virgin Islands instead of the New York City area, thereby keeping the Special 
Agents from serving target letters on 
During that flight, while in the special.aifcraft jurisdiction_ of the United_Stafes., 
the defendant telephoned 
with the 
Epstein warned 
responsive to the 
and applied pressure to keep her from complying 
that the agents had served upon her. In particular, Mr. 
against turning over documents and electronic evidence 
and pressured her to delay her appearance before the federal 
in the Southern District of Florida. 
Also during that flight, while in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United 
States, the defendant became angry regarding the federal investigation and became 
verbally abusive and threatening towards his female companion, 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000125 
EFTA00184696
Page 474 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-56 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 3 
although he did not intend to strike her. 
Based upon Mr. Epstein's words, Ms. 
reasonably was in fear that Mr. Epstein was about to touch her offensively. 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000126 
EFTA00184697
Page 475 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-57 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 
( 
( 
E XHIBIT 
57 
EFTA00184698
Page 476 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-57 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 
mi 
(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
art: 
on ay, September 24, 2007 4:32 PM 
Jay Lefkowit7 
.,ubject: 
RE: Do you have a signed copy? 
Thank you, Jay. I have forwarded your message only to 
a 
and Rolando. I don't anticipate it going any further 
than that. When I receive the originals, I will sign and return one copy to you. The other will be placed in the case file, 
which will be kept confidential since it also contains identifying information about the girls. 
When we reach an agreement about the attorney representative for the girls, we can discuss what I can tell him and the 
girls about the agreement. I know that 
=
 
promised Chief 
an update when a resolution was achieved. 
(Somethiniauldn't have promised in light of what happened last year.) Rolando is calling, but Rolando knows not to 
tell Chief 
about the money issue, just about what crimes Mr. Epstein is pleading guilty to and the amount of time 
that has been agreed to. Rolando also is telling Chief 
not to disclose the outcome to anyone. 
From: Jay Lefkowitz ([email protected] 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 4:06 PM 
To: 1  
 (USAFLS) 
Subject: Re: Do you have a signed copy? 
- Please do whatever you can to keep this from becoming public. 
thanks -- Jay 
• 
09124/2007 04:04 PM 
To "Jay tamable 41..elkceistatilkinthinclesco,
cc 
Subject Do you have a signed copy? 
Hi Jay - Sorry to be a bother, but do you have a copy that at least contains Mr. Epstein's signature? I need to 
pass it along to the powcrs that bc. Thanks. 
• 
RFP MIA 000281 
EFTA00184699
Page 477 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-58 Entered on FLED Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 
EXHIBIT 
58 
EFTA00184700
Page 478 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-58 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 
10/11/2007 02:31 
PM 
To <[email protected]> 
cc 
bcc 
Subject Fw WPB Marriott 1001 Okeechobee Blvd. Weal Pak 
Beach, FL 33401 
Jay - see you at 7. Address is below. 
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 
 
Original Message 
From: Castillo, Annette (USAFLS) 
To: 
(2890) 
SentilillOcli!! 12:49:09 2007 
Subject: WPB Marriott 1001 Okeechobee Blvd. West Palm 
Beach, FL 33401 
US_Atty_Cor_00196 
EFTA00184701
Page 479 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-59 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 
EXHIBIT 
59 
EFTA00184702
Page 480 / 982
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-59 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 
(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
on ay, september 1 , 2007 1:09 PM 
To: 
[email protected] 
Cc: 
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
My whereabouts 
Hi Jay — I am headed home. If a document is ready to be reviewed later today, can you send a copy to me and also to 
Rolando (who is stepping In for And 
Please send to my home e-mall address 
 
 nd 
give me a call on my cell 
so I can be ready for some discussions tomorrow, If anything else comes up, 
please don't hesitate to call. 
6 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 001709 
EFTA00184703
Pages 461–480 / 982