EFTA00180294

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 30 of 51 30 
1 it, it doesn't relate to our clients. 
2 
THE COURT: Okay. But, again, you're in agreement 
3 with everyone else so far that's spoken on behalf of a 
4 plaintiff that defending the case in the normal course of 
5 conducting discovery and filing motions would not be a breach? 
6 
MR. HOROWITZ: Subject to your rulings, of course, 
7 yes. 
8 
THE COURT: Thank you. 
9 
Anyone else have anything to say from the plaintiffs? 
10 
Ms. 
, if you would be so kind as to maybe 
11 help us out. I appreciate the fact that you're here, and I 
12 know you're not a party to these cases and under no obligation 
13 to respond to my inquiries. But as I indicated, it would be 
14 helpful for me to understand the Government's position. 
15 
MS. 
: Thank you, Your Honor. And we, of 
16 course, are always happy to try to help the Court as much as 
17 possible. But we are not a party to any of these lawsuits, and 
18 in some ways we are at a disadvantage because we don't have 
19 access. My access is limited to what's on Pacer. So I don't 
20 really know what positions Mr. Epstein may have taken either in 
21 correspondence or in discovery responses that aren't filed in 
22 the case file. 
23 
But your first order was really just what do you think 
24 about a stay, and then the second order related to this hearing 
25 and asked a much more specific question, which is whether we 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180334

Case9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 31 of 51 31 
1 believe that Mr. Epstein's defense was a breach of the 
2 agreement. 
3 
And I've tried to review as many of the pleadings as 
4 possible. As you know, they're extremely voluminous. And I 
5 haven't been through all of them. But we do believe that there 
6 has been a breach in the filing that Mr. Josefsberg referred 
7 to, and contrary to Mr. Critton, we do understand that we have 
8 an obligation to provide notice, and we are providing notice to 
9 Mr. Epstein today. 
10 
The pleading that we found to be in breach -- the 
11 non-prosecution agreement, sought to do one thing, which was to 
12 place the victims in the same position they would have been if 
13 Mr. Epstein had been convicted of the federal offenses for 
14 which he was investigated. 
15 
And that if he had been federally prosecuted and 
16 convicted, the victims would have been entitled to restitution, 
17 regardless of how long ago the crimes were committed, 
18 regardless of how old they were at the time, and how old they 
19 are today, or at the time of the conviction. 
20 
And it also would have made them eligible for damages 
21 under 2255. 
22 
And so our idea was, our hope was that we could set up 
23 a system that would allow these victims to get that restitution 
24 without having to go through what civil litigation will expose 
25 them to. 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180335

Case.9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 32 of 51 32 
1 
You have a number of girls who were very hesitant 
2 about even speaking to authorities about this because of the 
3 trauma that they have suffered and about the embarrassment that 
4 they were afraid would be brought upon themselves and upon 
5 their families. 
6 
So we did through the non-prosecution agreement tried 
7 to protect their rights while also protecting their privacy. 
8 So, pursuant to the non-prosecution agreement -- on the other 
9 hand, we weren't trying to hand them a jackpot or a key to a 
10 bank. It was solely to sort of put them in that same position. 
11 
So we developed this language that said if -- that 
12 provided for an attorney to represent them. Most of the 
13 victims, as you know from the pleadings, come from not wealthy 
14 circumstances, may not have known any attorneys who would be in 
15 a position to help them. 
16 
So we went through the Special Master procedure that 
17 resulted in the appointment of Mr. Josefsberg, and the goal was 
18 that they would be able to try to negotiate with Mr. Epstein 
19 for a fair amount of restitution/damages. And if Mr. Epstein 
20 took the position, which apparently he has, which is that the 
21 $50,000 or $150,000 floor under 2255 also would be a cap. That 
22 if they were to proceed to file suit in Federal Court to get 
23 fair damages under 2255, Mr. Epstein would admit liability, but 
24 he, of course, could fight the damages portion, which means 
25 that, of course, he would be entitled to depositions; of 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180336

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 33 of 51 33 
1 course, he would be entitled to take discovery, and we don't 
2 believe that any of that violates the non-prosecution 
3 agreement. 
4 
The issue with the pleading that he filed, the motion 
5 to dismiss the case, I believe it's Jane Doe 101, represented 
6 by Mr. Josefsberg, is that that is a case that was filed 
7 exclusively under 18 U.S.C., Section 2255. She met that 
8 requirement. Mr. Epstein is moving to dismiss it, not on the 
9 basis of damages, he is saying that he cannot be held liable 
10 under 2255 because he was not convicted of an offense. 
11 
The reason why he was not convicted of an offense is 
12 because he entered into the non-prosecution agreement. So that 
13 we do believe is a breach. 
14 
The issue really that was raised in the motion to stay 
15 and that I addressed in our response to the motion to stay is 
16 that Mr. Epstein's -- Mr. Epstein wants to stay the litigation 
17 in order to leave, in order to sort of attack the cases of the 
18 victims whether they are fully within the non-prosecution or 
19 not, non-prosecution agreement or not, and leave the Government 
20 without a remedy if he does, in fact, breach those terms. And 
21 that is why we opposed the stay. 
22 
THE COURT: I'm not sure what you mean by that last 
23 statement. 
24 
MS. 
: Well, because this issue related to 
25 the motion to dismiss on Mr. Josefsberg's client came up after 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180337

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 34 of 51 34 
1 we had filed that response. And what we said in the response 
2 to the motion to stay is that the reason why he wants to stay 
3 the litigation is so that the non-prosecution agreement 
4 terminates based on a period of time, as he puts it. And then 
5 afterwards he would be able to come in here and make all of 
6 these arguments that clearly violate the non-prosecution 
7 agreement but we would be without remedy. 
8 
THE COURT: But you're not taking the position that 
9 other than possibly doing something in litigation which is a 
10 violation of an express provision of the non-prosecution 
11 agreement, any other discovery, motion practice, investigations 
12 that someone would ordinarily do in the course of defending a 
13 civil case would constitute a violation of the agreement? 
14 
MS. 
: No, Your Honor. I mean, civil 
15 litigation is civil litigation, and being able to take 
16 discovery is part of what civil litigation is about. And while 
17 there may be, for example, if someone were to try to subpoena 
18 the Government, we would obviously resist under statutory 
19 reasons, all that sort of stuff. But, no, Mr. Epstein is 
20 entitled to take the deposition of a plaintiff and to subpoena 
21 records, etc. 
22 
THE COURT: And even if he seeks discovery from a 
23 Government agency, you have the right to resist it under the 
24 rules of procedure but that would not constitute a violation, 
25 again unless there's a provision in the prosecution agreement 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180338

Case '9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 35 of 51 35 
1fl that says I can't do this? 
2 
MS. 
: Correct. 
3p 
THE COURT: That's your position? 
4 
MS. 
: Yes. 
5 
THE COURT: Thank you. 
6 
MS. 
: Thank you, Your Honor. 
7 
THE COURT: Mr. Critton, did you want to add anything? 
8 
MR. CRITTON: Yes, sir. Just a few responses to some 
9 of the issues that have been raised. 
10 
The most glaring, at least from our perspective, is 
11 both Mr. Josefsberg's comments that he believes that there's a 
12 violation of the NPA as well as Ms. 
with regard to 
13 Jane Doe 101. 
14 
Mr. Josefsberg, while he was the attorney rep who was 
15 selected by Judge Davis to represent a number of individuals, 
16 alleged victims that may have been on the list, he represents 
17 many of them. And the type of response that was filed in 101 
18 would probably be very similar to what we will file if he 
19 files -- and he filed 102 as well. But if he files 103, 104 
20 and 105, or whatever number he files, we may well take that 
21 same legal position in our motions and in our response or in 
22 reply. 
23 
And what we've been, in essence, told today is we 
24 consider that to be a violation of the NPA under the 
25 circumstances. 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180339

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 36 of 51 36 
1 
102 is a perfect example that he filed is, we have 
2 e-mails going back and forth between the Government and my 
3 clients' attorneys at the time that suggested that 102 probably 
4 doesn't even fit within the statute of limitations. 
5 
So under Mr. Josefsberg's argument is as well, we've 
6 only brought a 2255 claim. We don't care whether she's within 
7 or is outside the statute of limitations. Because she was on 
8 the list and under the circumstances, he has to admit 
9 liability, which we contest is under that set of circumstances 
10 you're stuck with it. You can fight damages if you can, but 
11 she's a real person and you can't raise statute of limitations. 
12 
The other point that kind of strikes out is there's 
13 probably a difference. And I'm happy to provide a copy of the 
14 NPA or a redacted portion of the NPA which deals with the civil 
15 issues, which are paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10, and the entire 
16 addenda in camera for the Court to look at, if plaintiff's 
17 counsel and the Government, I guess, really, because they're 
18 not a party, is if they have no objection because they all have 
19 access based on a prior court order to the non-prosecution 
20 agreement. 
21 
So I'm happy to provide that to the Court today and 
22 show it to counsel so that the Court can review that. 
23 
But our position with regard to the 2255 claims is 
24 that -- there were two types of claims that could be filed, one 
25 was consensual litigation, the second was contested litigation. 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180340

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 37 of 51 37 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
And under the consensual, in essence, which Mr. Epstein did, is 
he's offered $50,000 of the statutory minimum for that time 
period to all of those individuals. 
THE COURT: Can I interrupt you a second? 
MR. CRITTON: Yes, sir. 
THE COURT: I'm not here, and I don't believe it's my 
role to decide whether or not there is or is not a breach of 
the agreement. I'm just trying to understand what the 
Government's position is regarding your defending these cases. 
Now, I'm just saying this as an example. If, for 
example, in the non-prosecution agreement there was a provision 
that said explicitly: Jeffrey Epstein shall not move to 
dismiss any claim brought under 2255 by any victim no matter 
how long ago the allegations or the acts took place, period. 
If that was in the agreement and you filed a motion to 
dismiss by someone who brought a claim, it might sound like it 
might be a violation. 
MR. CRITTON: I agree. 
THE COURT: So you would know that when you filed your 
motion because it was right there for you to read. 
And so to stay the case because I want to do something 
that the contract expressly prohibits me from doing, so stay 
the case until the agreement expires so then I can do something 
that the agreement said I couldn't do so you won't be in fear 
of prosecuting, I'm not sure that that is what I'm concerned 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180341

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 38 of 51 38 
1 about. 
2 
I'm concerned about discovery, investigation, motion 
3 practice, that's not prohibited by a provision of the 
4 agreement. If there's something that's prohibited by the 
5 agreement that you, knowing what the agreement says, go ahead 
6 and do, anyway, I guess that's a risk you're going to have to 
7 take. If there's a legitimate dispute about it, I guess some 
8 arbiter is going to decide whether it's a breach or not. 
9 
But, again, that's something you and Mr. Burman, 
10 Mr. Goldberger, and you are all very good lawyers, and he's got 
11 a whole list of lawyers representing him, and you've got the 
12 agreement and you're going to make legal decisions on how to 
13 proceed, and you're going to have to go and make your own 
14 decisions. 
15 
I'm concerned about things that aren't in the 
16 agreement, that aren't covered, that you're going to be accused 
17 of violating because, again, you take depositions, you send out 
18 subpoenas, you file motions that are not prohibited by the 
19 agreement. And that's what I'm concerned about. 
20 
MR. CRITTON: And I understand that, Your Honor. 
21 
But at the same time, it's as if the lawyers and the 
22 clients, based upon our interpretation of the agreement, and, 
23 believe me, we would not have filed 101, the motion to dismiss, 
24 but for believing that there was a good faith basis to do that 
25 under the circumstances. 
TOTALACCESSCOURTROOMNENVORKREM31METIVOSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180342

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 39 of 51 39
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
And now, in essence, we're being accused not only by 
-- not accused, but it's been suggested that there's a breach 
of the NPA, not only by Mr. Josefsberg on behalf of 101, but as 
well Ms. 
on behalf of the United States. 
That's the perfect example. They're basically saying 
we think you violated. We may send you notice under the 
circumstances. So does that mean that on 101 we have to back 
off of it because we think in good faith that it's a motion and 
is that something that this Court ultimately will rule? 
THE COURT: I don't know that I'm the one who is going 
to make that decision. Again, that's not the kind of thing 
that I was concerned about. I was more concerned about the 
normal, ordinary course of conducting and defending a case that 
would not otherwise expressly be covered under the agreement, 
that you're going to then have someone say, ah, he's sent a 
notice of deposition, he's harassing the plaintiffs. I don't 
know if there's a no contact provision in the agreement or no 
harassment type of provision in the agreement. Ah, this is a 
breach because you sent discovery, or he's issuing subpoenas to 
third parties trying to find out about these victims' 
backgrounds, he's breaching the agreement. 
Those are the kind of things that I was worried about. 
MR. CRITTON: The concern that we have is as part of 
doing this general civil litigation, it's not just the 
discovery process. And I understand the issues that the Court 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180343

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 40 of 51 40 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
has raised. 
But part of it is that often cases are disposed of 
either on a summary basis or certainly legal issues that come 
before the Court during the course of the case, just like in a 
criminal case. That's clearly part of the, I'd say the defense 
of the case under the circumstances; and if, in fact, an 
individual can't legally bring a cause of action for certain 
reasons, such as has been suggested in 101, and may be 
suggested in 102 when that pleading is filed, that certainly is 
a position that puts my client at risk. 
As another example that I use with C.M.A., that they 
filed this 30-count complaint. Now, they have the state court 
claims as well. But they, in essence, have said they filed 
another pleading with the Court that says depending on what the 
Court rules, in essence, on whether we can file multiple claims 
or one cause of action with multiple violations, we may dump 
the state court claims and, therefore, we'll just ride along on 
that. That's a very different --
Mr. Epstein would never have entered into, nor would 
his attorneys have allowed him to enter into that agreement 
under those circumstances where he had this unlimited 
liability. That clearly was never envisioned by any of the 
defendants -- by the defendant or any of his lawyers under the 
circumstances. 
And if that's claimed to be a violation, either by the 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180344

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 41 of 51 41 
1 attorneys; i.e., he's not recapitulating on liability under the 
2 2255, and that's all we have now. That's our exclusive remedy. 
3 
And the Government says, yeah, that's right, that's a 
4 violation of the NPA. It again chills us from moving forward, 
5 filing the necessary motion papers and taking legal positions 
6 that may put my client at risk for violating the NPA and then 
7 creating the irreparable harm of, after having been in jail, 
8 after having pled guilty to the state court counts, after 
9 registering on release as a sex offender, he's complied and 
10 done everything, taken extraordinary efforts to comply with the 
11 NPA, puts him at substantial risk. And that's what our worry 
12 is moving forward. 
13 
MR. JOSEFSBERG: Your Honor, may I be heard. May I 
14 make three comments? It will take less than a minute. 
15 
THE COURT: Yes, sir. 
16 
MR. JOSEFSBERG: Mr. Critton refers to the alleged 
17 victims. I want you to know that our position is that pursuant 
18 to the NPA they're not alleged victims. They are actual, real 
19 victims, admitted victims. 
20 
Secondly, he argues about the statute of limitations 
21 on 102. I know that you don't want to hear about that, and I'm 
22 not going to comment about it. But please don't take our lack 
23 of argument about this as being we agree with anything. 
24 
Last and most important, we totally agree with 
25 Mr. Critton in his suggestion that he hand you a copy of the 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180345

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 42 of 51 42 
1 NPA. I think that many of the questions you asked will be 
2 answered when you read the NPA, and I think it's very unfair of 
3 everyone who is sitting in front of you who have the NPA to be 
4 discussing with you whether it's being breached, whether there 
5 should be a stay when you're not that familiar with it. 
6 
If we would give you a copy of it, I think it would be 
7 much more helpful in making your ruling. 
8 
THE COURT: Maybe Judge Colvat will resolve this issue 
9 for me. 
10 
MR. JOSEFSBERG: Even if he doesn't, Your Honor, I 
11 believe we are allowed to show it to you. 
12 
THE COURT: I'll tell you what: I'll wait for Judge 
13 Colvat to rule, and then if he rules that it should remain 
14 sealed, then I'll consider whether or not I want to have it 
15 submitted to me in camera. 
16 
Anything else, Mr. Josefsberg? 
17 
MR. JOSEFSBERG: No. I thank you on behalf of myself 
18 and the other counsel on the phone for permitting us to appear 
19 by phone. 
20 
THE COURT: All right. Anyone else have anything they 
21 want to add? 
22 
MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards on behalf of Jane Doe. 
23 
I only had one issue here, and when I read your motion 
24 that you wanted to hear on the narrow issue of just defense in 
25 the civil actions filed against him violates the 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180346

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 43 of 51 43 
1 non-prosecution agreement, I was expecting that we were going 
2 to hear something from the Government similar to the affidavit 
3 that was filed by Mr. Epstein's attorneys wherein he indicates 
4 as of the day of this affidavit attached to the motion to stay, 
5 the U.S. Attorney's Office has taken the position that Epstein 
6 has breached the non-prosecution agreement and it names 
7 specifically investigation by Epstein of this plaintiff and 
8 other plaintiffs, Epstein's contesting damages in this action. 
9 Epstein, or his legal representatives, making statements to the 
10 press. And we didn't hear any of those things. 
11 
So that's what I was expecting that the U.S. 
12 Attorney's Office was going to expound on and say, yes, we've 
13 made some communications to Epstein. He's violating. 
14 
What we're hearing right now, today, just so that I'm 
15 clear, and I think the Court is clear now, is that the 
16 non-prosecution agreement is what it is. There have been no 
17 violations, but for maybe what Mr. Josefsberg brought up. 
18 
But there are very few restrictions on Mr. Epstein. 
19 He went into this eyes wide open. And whether or not I agree 
20 with the agreement, how it came to be in the first place, is 
21 neither here nor there. 
22 
But there have been no violations or breaches up to 
23 this point. And his affidavit that was filed, I'm just 
24 troubled by where it even came from. I mean, it's making 
25 specific allegations that the U.S. Attorney's Office is 
TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION 
EFTA00180347

Case9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page44of51 44 
1 threatening a breach, and this is part of the motion to stay, 
2 which we're all battling here. 
3 
So I just wanted to indicate to the Court or remind 
4 the Court that there have been specific allegations made, the 
5 United States Attorney's Office is making these allegations of 
6 breach, which we haven't heard any of the evidence of. 
7 
Thank you. 
8 
THE COURT: All right. 
9 
Ms. 
, did you want to respond to that 
10 suggestion that there were other allegations of breach besides 
11 the one that you've just mentioned today? 
12 
MS. 
: No, Your Honor. 
13 
THE COURT: Thank you. I appreciate your giving me 
14 the information, which I think has been very helpful today, and 
15 I'll try and get an order out as soon as possible. 
16 
(Court adjourned at 11:10 a.m.]. 
17 
CERTIFICATE 
18 
I hereby certify that the foregoing is an accurate 
19 transcription of proceedings in the above-entitled matter. 
20 
s/Larry Herr 
21 
DATE 
LARRY HERR, RPR-CM-RMR-FCRSC 
22 
Official United States Court Reporter 
400 N. Miami Avenue 
23 
Miami, FL 33128 - 305/523-5290 
(Fax) 305/523-5639 
24 
email: Lindsay165®aol.com 
25 
Quality Assurance by Proximity Linguibase Technologies 
EFTA00180348

Case.9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 45 oWde 45 
A 
abide 27:15 
ability 18:8 19:1 
able 20:14 279 
32:18 34:5,15 
about 4:24 5:25 6:10 
6:18 9:2 11:15 
13:22 20:25 21:13 
23:13 25:23 27:2 
27:11,23 28:16 
30:24 32:2,2,3 
34:16 38:1,2,7,15 
38:19 39:12,12,20 
39:22 41:20,21,22 
41:23 
above 25:3 
above-entitled 44:19 
Absolutely 29:11 
access 30:19,19 
36:19 
according 19:21 
accurate 44:18 
accused 22:23 38:16 
39:1,2 
action 7:13 8:5 9:8 
10:3,4,9,21 11:18 
15:4 17:24 18:17 
20:2 21:22 27:10 
2923 40:7,16 43:8 
actions 5:25 1323 
14:3 16:11 19:5,17 
22:16 25:4 42:25 
activities 23:7 
acts 9:11,12 37:14 
actual41:18 
actually 5:21 17:9 
Adam 1:13 3:4 
29:13 
add 29:5 35:7 42:21 
addenda 36:16 
Adderly 3:17 
additional2922 
address 29:15 
addressed 33:15 
adjourned 44:16 
Adler 1:17 
admit 20:3,18 25:11 
32:23 36:8 
admits 23:20 
admitted 23:17 249 
41:19 
ado 23:13 
advantage 20:24 
adverse 18:18 
advice 12:7 
affidavit 43:2,4,23 
afraid 32:4 
after 33:25 41:7,8,8 
afterwards 34:5 
again 9:10,18,22 
10:19,20 18:5,9 
23:18 26:130:2 
34:25 38:9,17 
39:11 41:4 
against 423,25 624 
22:15 26:4 29:1 
42:25 
agency 34:23 
ago 31:17 37:14 
agree 13:13 1723 
25:25 26:7 279 
37:18 41:23,24 
43:19 
agreed 17:9 203:2 
21:1525:16 
agreement 5:2,2,11 
5:15 6:2,23 7:16 
7:19 8:5,6 12:9 
13:24 142,19 
15:20 16:20 18:18 
18:24 19:6,11,13 
19:18,24 20:1,10 
20:18 21:7,16,23 
22:8,11,17,19,20 
22:23 23:18.19,20 
24:1,9,23 27:25 
28:2,5,19,25 29:6 
29:7,25 30:2 31:2 
31:11 32:6,8 33:3 
33:12,19 34:3,7,11 
34:13,25 3620 
37:8,11,15,23,24 
38:4,5,5,12,16,19 
38:22 39:14,17,18 
39:2140:20 43:1,6 
43:16,20 
ah 39:15,18 
ahead 28:8 38:5 
al 1:4 
allegation 5:1 15:19 
allegations 4:25 16:6 
37:14 43:25 44:4,5 
44:10 
alleged 17:17,25 
35:16 41:16,18 
allow 11:8 31:23 
allowed 40:20 42:11 
along 40:17 
already 22:5 
always 30:16 
Amendment 624 
America 5:17 
amount 17:3,20 
23:25 24:3,9,16,24 
25:3 32:19 
Amy 3:17 
Ann 2:14 4:9 
another 9:5 14:14 
18:11 40:11,14 
answer 8:7 13:10 
answered 42:2 
anybody 11:14 
anyone 14:16,19 
17:5 22:13 24:17 
24:24 29:12,24 
30:9 42:20 
anything 8:22 11:15 
13:22 14:2,7,20,25 
16:10 18:11 21:12 
30:9 35:7 41:23 
42:16,20 
anyway 38:6 
apparently 32:20 
appear 3:1925:6 
42:18 
appearances 1:12 
3:3,25 
appears 27:2 
applicable 6:13 18:3 
apply 20:6 289 
appointed 21:2 
appointment 25:15 
32:17 
appreciate 30:11 
44:13 
appropriate 19:21 
24:7 
arbiter 38:8 
argue 18:1 22:1 
argued 12:22 
argues 41:20 
argument 36:5 
41:23 
arguments 34:6 
arise 7:5 
around 12:9 2821 
articulated 29:16 
asked 5:4,4 8214:5 
3025 42:1 
asking 21:12 25:10 
asks 13:10 
aspect 28:12 
aspects 9:1,2 16:5 
assert 29:8 
asserted 17:7 
assertion 4:24 15:19 
15:22 
Assistant 2:15 
associate 10:17 
associated 18:12 
assurance 14:1 
assurances 12:5 
attached 43:4 
attack 33:17 
attention 15:1,22 
Atterbury 2:12 
attorney 2:15 7:1 
19:4 27:17,18,19 
32:12 35:14 
attorneys 5:9 10:10 
11:8 32:14 36:3 
40:20 41:143:3 
Attorney's 4:8,10 
26:19 27:4 43:5,12 
43:25 44:5 
August 12:18 
Australian 2:12 
authorities 322 
Avenue 1:21,23 2:12 
2:23 44:22 
aware 6:6 13:14 15:4 
a.m 44:16 
B 
back 12:18 362 39:7 
backgrounds 3921 
balance 12:15 
bank 32:10 
based 6:12 10:7 12:6 
13:11 17:4 34:4 
36:19 38:22 
basically 7:16 13:10 
39:5 
basis 33:9 38:24 
40:3 
battling 44:2 
Beach 1:2,4,21 2:10 
2:13 
before 1:11 6:5 
15:13,18 24:10,11 
24:13 40:4 
behalf 3:14 4:2,6 6:7 
14:16 22:10 26:10 
26:15 30:3 39:3,4 
42:17,22 
being 9:1710:6,21 
23:19 26:4 28:19 
29:19 34:15 39:1 
41:23 42:4 
believe 3:18 5:10,10 
5:14,16 6:17,17,21 
7:13,19 8:11 14:18 
21:11 31:1,5 332 
33:5,13 37:6 38:23 
42:11 
believes 35:11 
believing 3824 
beneficiaries 19:12 
beneficiary 20:1 
21:16 25:15 
Bennett 3:18 
besides 44:10 
between 8:6 923 
13:1,21 19:14 
20:11 36:2 
beyond 13:16 
Biscayne 1:14 
Bob 3:18 19:7 
Boehringer 1:20 
bond 25:22 
Boston 2:18 
both 10:10 16:25 
35:11 
bought 28:22 
Boulevard 1:14,17 
2:15 
Brad 3:74222 
BRADLEY 1:16 
breach 6:1,23 15:11 
16:3 18:24 19:6,13 
23:16 259,9 28:2 
2924 30:5 31:1,6 
31:10 33:13,20 
377 38:8 392,19 
44:1,6,10 
breached 7:19 12:24 
15:20 22:11 42:4 
43:6 
breaches 7:15,17 
19:11 21:11 22:16 
43:22 
breaching22:19,20 
22:23 39:21 
brief 15:18,23 
briefing 5:4 
briefly 27:22 
bring 29:22 40:7 
broad 29:17 
brought 15:1 20:2 
24:17,20 28:6 32:4 
36:6 37:13,16 
43:17 
Broward 2:15 
brush 29:17 
buffer 12:25 
Burman 2:8,9 4:3 
38:9 
business 13:25 
C 
C2:1 44:17,17 
came 6:5 12:18 17:6 
18:22 3325 43:20 
43:24 
camera 36:16 42:15 
cap 32:21 
capped 23:25 
care 13:20,25 25:20 
29:5 36:6 
case 1:3 5:17,20,21 
5:22 6:4,7 8:12 
9:11 10:24,24 11:4 
11:15,18 13:18,20 
14:18,22 15:1,18 
162 19:17 22:17 
2225 23:4,8,8 
24:17,20 26:3,4 
28:10 29:4,6,9 
30:4,22 33:5,6 
34:13 37:21,23 
39:13 40:4,5,6 
cases 3:2 6:9 7:3,11 
8:13,229:3,5,5,15 
10:3,11 12:1,2 
14:9 17:15,16 
21:10 24:8,11 262 
29:18 30:12 33:17 
379 402 
casts 9:13 
catastrophic 7:21 
catch 7:21 10:2 
caught 15:22 
cause 17:24 18:17 
26:5 40:7,16 
caused 15:21 
causes 2922 
cavalierly 12:13 
certain 8:22 11:18 
17:2,6 21:17 25:16 
40:7 
certainly 8:169:1 
EFTA00180349

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 46 of3§de 46 
29:3 40:3,9 
Certified 2:22 
certify 44:18 
change 7:25 
changes 7:8 
charges 5:3 
chilling 9:7 
chills 10:9 18:25 
41:4 
chime 26:9 
chosen 29:21 
circumstance 721 
8:18 18:4 
circumstances 9:25 
10:1,11 12:11,20 
12:21 13:8,13 16:8 
16:17 17:3,8,13,18 
18:19 32:14 35:25 
36:8,9 38:25 39:7 
40:6,21,24 
cite 17:10 
civll4:23,25 5:25 73 
7:3,11 8:5,22 9:4,7 
9:11 103,23,23 
13:23 14:3,9 15:7 
16:5,11 19:5 20:20 
22:14 26:25 27:10 
31:24 34:13,14,15 
34:16 36:14 3924 
42:25 
claim 6:1 18:19 
2321,23 25:8 36:6 
37:13,16 
claimed 40:25 
claiming 25:9 
claims 22:15 23:22 
2322 24:1,4,6 
28:6 36:23,24 
40:13,15,17 
clear 10:7 18:18 
19:19 29:16 43:15 
43:15 
clearly 9:24 11:20 
34:6 40:5,22 
client 10:21 13:5 
23:2 24:3 26:15 
28:3 3325 40:10 
41:6 
clients 11:9 2124 
22:10,24 23:3 
25:16 29:2130:1 
36:3 38:22 
client's 29:3 
cloud 9:14 
Colvat 42:8,13 
come 8:8,13 13:11 
21:1 23:6 32:13 
34:5 40:3 
comes 18:12 
coming 26:25 
comment 41:22 
comments 15:10 
35:11 41:14 
commitment 172 
committed 31:17 
communications 
43:13 
complainants 17:9 
complaining 25:11 
26:19 
complaint 28:4 
40:12 
compliance 12:14 
complied 41:9 
comply 41:10 
concern 4:24 5:10,24 
9:20 16:122:8 
25:24 26:1 3923 
concerned 1322 
23:10 27:113725 
38:2,15,19 39:12 
39:12 
concerns 6:24 
conduct 22:14 
conducting 22:13 
30:5 39:13 
confident 19:10 
consensual 16:25 
36:25 37:1 
consider 6:14 18:1 
23:16 35:24 42:14 
constitute 13:18 
16:2 19:6 34:13,24 
construed 14:18 
contact 10:17 39:17 
contending 19:4 
contention 4:24 
contentions 28:8 
contest 17:12 18:7,8 
24:18,21,23,25 
29:20 36:9 
contested 9:13 16:18 
16:25 3625 
contesting 20:6 25:2 
28:1 43:8 
context 13:18,19 
14:5 15:1 
contract 7:16 37:22 
contracting 9:23 
contrary 25:6 31:7 
control 9:2 
convicted 20:14 
31:13,16 33:10,11 
conviction 20:8,15 
20:20 31:19 
copy 28:4 36:13 
41:25 42:6 
correct 5:12 23:1 
24:5 35:2 
correspondence 
30:21 
counsel 3:3,4,7 12:7 
16:5 23:13 26:8,25 
27:22 28:11,20 
29:13 36:17,22 
42:18 
count 24:14 
counts 17:17 41:8 
course 7:5 24:25 
2621 27:12 30:4,6 
30:16 32:24,25 
33:1 34:1239:13 
40:4 
court 1:12:22 3:1,6 
3:9,12,15,20,22,24 
4:4,7,11,15,20 
5:11,14,18,19,21 
524 6:6,11,13,14 
6:18,20,21,22 7:6 
8:1 9:6 11:3,10,25 
12:19 13:1,10,16 
14:5,11 15:5,13,15 
16:10,13,2219:2,9 
21:12,25 23:18 
2523 26:1,8,13,17 
26:18,23 27:9,14 
27:16,18,20 28:1,4 
28:4,11,13,14,16 
29:4,8,12 30:2,8 
30:16 32:22 3322 
34:8,22 35:3,5,7 
36:16,19,21,22 
37:4,6,19 39:9,10 
39:25 40:4,12,14 
40:15,17 41:8,15 
42:8,12,20 43:15 
44:3,4,8,13,16,22 
court's 7:15 825 
12:14 
covered 38:16 39:14 
create 9:25 
creating 41:7 
creative 17:23 
crimes 31:17 
criminal 8:21 20:15 
26:6 2822 40:5 
criteria 17:6 
Critton 2:8,94:2,2 
4:13 5:13 65,3 
14:4 15:3,14 16:4 
16:12,15 31:7 35:7 
35:8 37:5,18 38:20 
39:23 41:16,25 
crystal29:16 
cure 8:14,17 9:21 
13:6 
cures 14:12 
current 22:5 
cut 1624 
C.M.A 1:24 3:14 
17:16 24:11 26:10 
26:15 40:11 
1) 
D 1:13 2:8 
damages 17:3 23:23 
2325 24:3,10,24 
25:2 31:20 3223 
3224 339 36:10 
43:8 
date 13:12,14 44:21 
Datura 121 
Davis 21:2 35:15 
day 43:4 
deal 923 14:13,14 
15:15 1624,24 
18:6,9 
deals 36:14 
dealt 6:191625,25 
decide 10:1122:5 
37:138:8 
decision 39:11 
decisions 38:12,14 
deem 11:19 
deemed 10:4 
defend 5:25 10:11 
11:18 12:1,2 22:17 
22:18,22,25 24:2 
26:3 
defendant 1:8 2:8 
6:23 11:13 16:16 
22:15,18 27:10 
40:23 
defendants 25:5 
40:23 
defendant's 16:23 
defending 4:25 7:24 
9:4 102,23 13:18 
13:20,23 14:3,9,18 
15:18 162,10 
25:18 299 30:4 
34:12 379 39:13 
defends 26:3 
defense 4:1,14 8:4,12 
9:3,12,14 10:9 
12:3 19:5,17 24:6 
24:18 27:22 28:11 
2820 31:140:5 
4224 
denied 22:5 
deny 22:4,7 
depending 18:2 
40:14 
depo 29:3 
depose 232 
deposition 11:11,12 
14:23 22:24 34:20 
39:16 
depositions 10:13 
14:22 19:20 22:12 
22:20 23:15 32:25 
38:17 
desired 20:12 
determine 9:8 
developed 32:11 
difference 36:13 
different 6:5 12:21 
16:19 23:7 40:18 
direction 10:20 
27:14 
disadvantage 30:18 
disagree 20:5,21 
discovery 7:2,10,11 
10:16,25 22:12 
29:4 30:5,2133:1 
34:11,16,22 38:2 
39:19,25 
discretionary 6:19 
6:21 
discuss 9:22 23:6 
discussing 42:4 
discussion 16:22 
disingenuous 19:15 
dismiss 7:22 8:18 
10:14 20:4 27:24 
33:5,8,25 37:13,16 
38:23 
disposed 40:2 
dispute 38:7 
distinct 7:9 
DISTRICT 1:1,1,11 
DIVISION 12 
docket 6:17 8:25 
12:14 
documents 11:7 
14:24 
Doe 1:4,15,18,22 2:3 
2:73:1,5,8,11 5:17 
6:8,9,16 11:12 
21:5 29:14,22 33:5 
35:13 42:22 
doing 8:9 29:9 34:9 
37:22 39:24 
done 12:3,4 13:17,19 
13:24 14:2,7,17,20 
14:25 15:6 17:14 
20:16 25:4 29:4 
41:10 
doubt 9:14 
dramatic 7:25 
dramatically 7:8 
dump 40:16 
during 40:4 
E 
,E 44:17,17 
each 17:24 18:16 
East 1:17 2:15 
Edwards 1:16 3:7,7 
5:16,20,23 42:22 
42:22 
effect 9:7 17:5 
efforts 41:10 
either 9:3 10:5 30:20 
403,25 
elected 2922 
eligible 31:20 
Elkins 1:20 
email 44:24 
embarrassment 32:3 
enforce 21:1725:17 
enforcement 7:2 
enforcing 25:10 
enter 40:20 
entered 33:12 40:19 
entire 5:15 20:25 
36:15 
entitle 11:23 
entitled 24:2 31:16 
32:25 33:I 34:20 
EFTA00180350

Case.9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 47 014cle 47 
entry 6:17 8:25 
12:14 
enumerated 18:8,9 
envisioned 40:22 
Epstein 1:7 3:1 4:3,6 
4:22 6:7 7:13,15 
7:19 8:6,20 9:15 
9:18,24 10:1,6,10 
12:5,15 13:17,21 
14:8 17:9 19:5,14 
19:16 20:11,13 
21:8 23:13 24:21 
25:16 26:3,23 
2822 29:19,24 
30:20 31:9,13 
32:18,19,23 33:8 
33:16 34:19 37:1 
37:12 40:19 43:5,7 
439,13,18 
Epstein's 4:24 5:9,24 
8:49:1 22:731:1 
33:16 43:3,8 
equities 12:16 
error 27:7,7 
ESQ 1:13,16,20,23 
2:1,5,8,8,11,14,17 
2:20 
essence 7:9,12 8:3 
10:2 12:3 35:23 
37:1 39:1 40:13,15 
essentially 28:22 
et 1:4 
etc 2:9 34:21 
even 11:5,6,9 14:1 
15:17 16:1 17:22 
21:3,4 32:2 34:22 
36:4 42:10 43:24 
event 5:24 
ever 5:11,14 
everyone 30:3 42:3 
everything 15:7 
41:10 
evidence 25:1 44:6 
exact 21:18,22 28:20 
exactly 10:24 
example 14:20 16:21 
17:16 34:17 36:1 
37:10,11 39:5 
40:11 
except 8:20 1125 
exclusive 411 
exclusively 28:6 33:7 
exists 13:15 
expecting 43:1,11 
expires 37:23 
explicitly 37:12 
expose 5:1,25 31:24 
exposure 22:7 
expound 43:12 
express 34:10 
expressly 37:22 
39:14 
extensive 29:4 
extent 28:10 
extraordinary 9:13 
41:10 
extremely 31:4 
eyes 26:24 43:19 
Ezell 2:5 3:16,17 
e-malts 36:2 
F 
F44:17 
fact 7:1 8:11 11:19 
14:20 28:4 30:11 
33:20 40:6 
factors 11:23 
fair 27:6 32:19,23 
faith 38:24 39:8 
familiar 42:5 
famines 32:5 
far 14:25 21:17 
23:10 24:24 30:3 
fashion 8:4 
favor 12:16 
Fax 44:23 
fear 9:14 37:24 
federal 5:3 28:6 
29:21 31:13 32:22 
federally 2:22 31:15 
fees 21:8,10 25:10 
few 35:8 43:18 
field 7:8 
Fifth 6:24 
fight 32:24 36:10 
file 21:4 28:13 30:22 
32:22 35:18 38:18 
40:15 
Wed 5:11,16,21,23 
6:7,10 10:8 11:9 
15:18,23,24 20:20 
28:3 30:21 33:4,6 
34:1 35:17,19 36:1 
36:24 37:15,19 
38:23 40:9,12,13 
42:25 43:3,23 
files 35:19,19,20 
filing 30:5 31:6 41:5 
filings 7:8 
filter 11:7 
financial 23:12 
find 5:6 6:13 19:15 
19:25 23:112924 
39:20 
firm's 6:6 
first 5:9 16:14 19:3 
26:18 30:23 43:20 
fit 36:4 
FL 1:15,18,21,24 2:i 
2:6,10,13,16,23 
44:23 
Flagler 2:2,6,9 
floor 32:21 
FLORIDA 1:1,4 
focused 15:15 
forced 19:17 
foregoing 44:18 
forgot 27:23 
form 11:4 
Fort 1:18 2:16 
forth 362 
forward 9:8 13:11 
17:6 19:1 21:1 
22:17 23:6 26:2 
29:7 41:4,12 
found 31:10 
four 9:5 
frankly 5:6 
from 3:17 4:7 5:9 79 
10:20,24 13:9 
14:13 15:9 16:23 
17:10 19:2 30:9 
32:13,13 3422 
35:10 3722 41:4 
43:2,24 
front 9:5 12:19 
25:10 42:3 
fully 33:18 
further 29:10 
future 9:12 10:5 
12:5 26:21,22 
G 
G 2:17 
Garcia 1:20,20 3:10 
3:10 27:20,21 
28:15,18 29:11 
gather 22:21 
gave 16:1 
general 3924 
generally 1022 
getting 24:1125:19 
girls 20:7 23:5 25:20 
32:1 
give 12:5 14:1 42:6 
given 28:4 
giving 44:13 
glaring 18:21 35:10 
glasses 11:16 
go 12:10 15:13 22:17 
2424 26:2 28:8 
29:7 31:24 38:5,13 
goal 32:17 
going 3:18 5:25 12:4 
12:10 13:23,25 
14:11,13 15:18 
16:219:5 22:4,6,9 
22:18,23 23:10,14 
2324 26:5 28:8,11 
29:8 362 38:6,8 
38:12,13,16 39:10 
39:15 41:22 43:1 
43:12 
Goldberger 2:11,12 
4:5,6 38:10 
gone 15:7 
good 3:6,9,10,12,13 
3:15,16,22,23 4:4 
4:5,9,11,16,18,20 
17:16 38:10,24 
39:8 
Government 7:7,9 
7:18 8:1,2,7 9:21 
10:8 11:19 12:6 
13:1,2,2,9,11,13 
14:1,5 1523 16:19 
17:11 18:4,12,17 
20:11,11 21:13,14 
23:10,11 25:11 
29:9 33:19 34:18 
3423 36:2,1741:3 
43:2 
Government's 5:6,8 
7:25 9:101220,23 
15:16 18:22 25:13 
30:14 379 
grant 22:4 
granted 22:2 
great 7:23 8:20 9:19 
1022 12:17 15:15 
20:8,24 
ground 22:3 
guess 36:17 38:6,7 
guilty 17:11 41:8 
H
H1:23 
hand 32:9,9 41:25 
hanging 11:19 
happen 14:13 22:6 
happens 28:3 
happy 30:16 36:13 
36:21 
harassing 39:16 
harassment 39:18 
harm 10:1 41:7 
having 27:2,11 
31:24 41:7,8 
hear 5:9 26:12 41:21 
42:24 43:2,10 
heard 192 41:13 
44:6 
hearing 1:10 4:21 
30:24 43:14 
held 33:9 
help 30:11,16 32:15 
helpful 5:7 25:12 
30:14 42:7 44:14 
her 26:4 28:4 
Herr 2:2144:20,21 
hesitant 32:1 
hey 22:19 
him 4:23 7:20,20,22 
8:13,16,17 9:15,20 
1123 12:5 21:14 
21:15 25:10,11 
26:4,5,13 28:24 
38:11 4020 41:11 
42:25 
himself 5:1,3 
Honor 3:16,13,16,21 
42,5,9,13,17,19 
5:13,16 6:4 12:12 
19:1,7 23:124:5 
2522,25 26:7,12 
2721 30:15 34:14 
35:638:2041:13 
42:10 44:12 
!IGNORABLE 1:11 
hope 31:22 
hopefully 13:3 
Horowitz 1:13,14 
3:4,4 29:13,13 
30:6 
horrible 2123 
humWated 20:25 
hypocritical 19:25 
idea 17:1 31:22 
II 1:22 3:11 
impact 16:18 
important 41:24 
impose 27:4 
incident 24:14 
incidents 17:25 
incredible 7:21 
incredulous 19:15 
indicate 44:3 
indicated 30:13 
indicates 43:3 
indict 720,20,22 
8:13,16,17 12:10 
12:24 15:10 18:23 
21:14 
Indicted 9:17 10:6 
10:22 
indictment 8:19 10:7 
Individual 18:16 
40:7 
individuals 10:18 
17:1 35:15 37:3 
information 22:21 
44:14 
initial 12:19 15:21 
initially 15:24 
injury 102323:22 
innocent 27:5 
inquiries 30:13 
Inquiry 7:15 15:16 
instance 7:18,24 
9:18 10:10 11:3,17 
13:5 16:14 
instances 16:4 
intended 28:21 
intent 21:19 
intention 9:19 26:19 
26:20,20 27:16 
Interest 23:12 
interested 13:17 
14:3 
interpretation 1620 
38:22 
interrogatories 
14:24 19:20 
interrupt 37:4 
introduced 20:16 
intrusive 29:5 
Invasive 19:22 
investigated 31:14 
EFTA00180351

Case:9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 48 oftlj e 48
investigation 10:18 
38:2 43:7 
investigations 22:13 
34:11 
invited 27:6 
involvement 6:6 
irreparable 9:16 
10:1 41:7 
ISIDRO 1:20 
issue 4:23 6:5,11,19 
7:4 11:25 12:18,22 
14:14 15:25 16:2 
16:13,22 18:12,22 
21:18 28:10,16 
33:4,14,24 42:8,23 
42:24 
issued 14:25 
issues 4:21 24:10,13 
25:21,23 35:9 
36:15 39:25 40:3 
issuing 22:20 39:19 
Le 41:1 
J 
J 1:16 
Jack 2:114:5 
jackpot 32:9 
jail 41:7 
Jane 1:4,15,18,22 
2:3,7 3:5,5,7,11 
5:17 6:8,9,16 
11:12 21:4 29:14 
29:22 33:5 35:13 
42:22 
Jay 2:20 4:18 
Jeffrey 1/ 37:12 
jeopardize 9:15 
Jeopardy 15:17 
join 26:11,15 
Josefsberg 2:1,2,5 
3:18,20,21,23 19:7 
19:7,1021:25 23:1 
24:5 25:25 26:7,11 
26:12,16 27:13 
31:6 32:17 33:6 
35:14 39:3 41:13 
41:16 42:10,16,17 
43:17 
Josefsberg's 33:25 
35:11 36:5 
JR 2:8 
Judge 1:11 15:12 
21:2 29:13 35:15 
42:8,12 
judgment 22:16 
June 1:5 13:12 
jurisdiction 28:1,6 
just 1823 20:15,16 
22:3,6 24:20 26:1 
29:15,16 30:23 
35:8 37:8,10 39:24 
40:4,17 4224 
43:14,23 44:3,11 
K 
Katherine 2:5 3:16 
keep 24:21 
KENNETH 1:11 
key 32:9 
kind 30:10 36:12 
39:11,22 
knew 27:1 
know 4:22 6:17 8:21 
11:14 12:2 13:9,17 
14:21 15:5,7 1622 
19:23 22:6 23:12 
25:9 27:130:12,20 
31:4 32:13 37:19 
39:10,17 41:17,21 
knowing 2625 38:5 
knowledge 5:13 
13:11 
known 21:4 32:14 
knows 11:3 13:2 
lack 41O2 
ladles 20:23 21:3,20 
Lake 124 
language 18:14 
32:11 
LARRY 2:21 44:21 
Las 1:17 
last 33:22 41:24 
Lauderdale 1:18 
2:16 
law 7:127:24 28:9 
lawsuit 25:18,19 
lawsuits 30:17 
lawyers 8:21 9:4,7 
10:23,23 17:22 
27:138:10,11,21 
40:23 
lay 8:10 
least 35:10 
leave 33:17,19 
Lelicowitz 2:20 4:18 
4:18 
left 102 
legal 10:13 24:10,13 
35:21 38:12 40:3 
41:5 43:9 
legally 40:7 
legitimate 38:7 
less 41:14 
let 5:9 13:10 19:19 
letter 17:10 21:19 
letters 16:6 
liability 17:12 18:7,7 
20:3,6,16,19 23:16 
23:17,20 24:8,18 
24:22,23 25:6,11 
29:20 32:23 36:9 
40:22 41:1 
liable 33:9 
like 7:16139 25:21 
37:16 40:4 
limit 23:23 24:2 
limitation 25:2 
limitations 36:4,7,11 
41:20 
limited 4:218:3 14:5 
17:1220:19 23:25 
30:19 
limits 28:5 
[email protected]... 
44:24 
list 17:1,2,6 35:16 
36:8 38:11 
litigation 7:4,5 9:13 
15:8 16:18,25 
21:18 22:14 23:12 
3124 33:16 34:3,9 
34:15,15,16 36:25 
36:25 39:24 
lives 21:21 
long 31:17 37:14 
longer 20:7 
look 12:14 18:6 
36:16 
looked 6:11 
M 
M 1:20 
MA 2:18 
made 15:10,17 16:6 
20:12 31:20 43:13 
44:4 
major 11:25 
make 821 13:4 
15:21 19:19 23:8 
23:13 26:2,18 
2724 29:1,16 34:5 
38:12,13 39:11 
41:14 
malting 42:7 43:9,24 
44:5 
man 12:24 
mandate 7:24 8:20 
8:21 10:3 
many 20:23 31:3 
35:17 42:1 
Marie 2:14 4:9 
MARRA 1:11 
Martin 2:17 4:16 
Master 21:2 32:16 
matter 20:15 37:13 
44:19 
matters 21:11 
may 3:3 5:1 72,10 
9:9,12 10:4,17 
11:19 13:17,18 
14:18 15:12 16:18 
16:19 17:12 19:8 
19:16 20:4 21:11 
21:17,2123:6 
2722 3020 32:14 
34:17 35:16,20 
39:6 40:8,16 41:6 
41:13,13 
maybe 12:17 13:10 
17:20 30:10 42:8 
43:17 
mean 18:10 33:22 
34:14 39:74324 
means 32:24 
members 4:13 
memo 7:14 28:9 
memorandum 27:23 
mentioned 44:11 
merits 22:1 
Nlermelsteln 1:14 
met 17:633:7 
Miami 1:15 2:3,6,23 
2:23 44:22,23 
Michael 2:8 4:3 
microphone 26:13 
might 14:2,12 22:14 
29:5 37:16,17 
million 17:21 
minimum 17:3 25:3 
37:2 
minimums 24:25 
minors 20:7 
minute 18:13 41:14 
mistakes 13:4 
money 17:20 
more 8:3 17:23 
23:25 3025 39:12 
42:7 
morning 3:6,9,10,12 
3:13,15,16,22,23 
4:4,5,9,11,16,18 
4:20 
most 7:7 13:3 15:24 
1821 32:12 35:10 
41:24 
motion 1:10 4:22 6:7 
12:22 15:24 20:4 
22:6 27:24 33:4,14 
33:15,25 34:2,11 
37:15,20 38:2,23 
39:8 41:5 4223 
43:4 44:1 
motions 10:14 17:15 
21:5 30:5 35:21 
38:18 
move 7:22 8:18 19:1 
19:20 21:17,21 
37:12 
moving 9:7 33:8 
41:4,12 
much 23:13 30:16 
30:25 42:7 
multiple 18:15 40:15 
40:16 
multitude 8:12 
myself 16:5 42:17 
N 
N 4422 
names 11:923:5 
43:6 
narrow 42:24 
nature 27:6 
necessary 22:22 41:5 
need 24:22 25:23 
negotiate 32:18 
negotiated 27:3,3 
neither 4321 
never 119 26:20 
40:19,22 
newspapers 23:5 
nobody 11:14 
none 13:25 
non-contesting 28:5 
non-position 9:10 
non-prosecution 5:2 
5:11 6:2 8:6 13:24 
14:19 15:20 19:6 
22:8 24:127:25 
28:2,5,19,25 29:25 
31:11 32:6,8 332 
33:12,18,19 34:3,6 
34:10 36:19 37:11 
43:1,6,16 
non-2255 24:4,6 
normal 30:4 39:13 
North 1:23 2:9,23 
nothing 13:15 24:12 
24:15 
notice 8:13,16 9:21 
13:6 14:23 22:24 
31:8,8 39:6,16 
noticed 14:22 
notification 15:3,4 
16:8 
NPA 8:5,11,15,24 
9:1,9,16,19,22 
10:4,19,22 11:20 
12:8,15,24 13:7,15 
14:10 16:8 18:14 
20:22 21:19,19 
23:924:12,15,16 
24:18,20 25:2,7 
35:12,24 36:14,14 
39:3 41:4,6,11,18 
42:1,2,3 
number 15:9 16:21 
17:7,9,14,21,24 
32:1 35:15,20 
numerous 2321 
0 
object 7:2,10,10 
objection 36:18 
objections 11:5,6 
obligation 21:9 
30:12 31:8 
obtain 11:7 
obviously 1020 
34:18 
occurred 1725 
occurs 26:21 
off 39:8 
offender 4k9 
offense 18:8,10,15 
33:10,11 
offenses 18:16 31:13 
offend 37:2 
• 
EFTA00180352

'Case'9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 180 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 
Page 49 of tije 49 
office 4:8,10 26:20 
27:4 43:5,12,25 
44:5 
Official 2:22 44:22 
officials 72 
often 40:2 
okay 3:25 5:19,21 
18:10 30:2 
Ohs 1:17 
old 31:18,18 
once 22:5 
one 4:23 7:17 11:25 
17:24 18:5,16,20 
18:21 20:1,8 22:24 
31:11 36:24 39:10 
40:16 42:23 44:11 
only 13:22 14:3 
17:24 23:20 25:4 
29:20 36:6 39:1,3 
42:23 
open 26:24 43:19 
opportunity 8:14,17 
9:21 
opposed 3321 
opposite 20:22 21:18 
21:22 28:20 
opposition 2724 
option 7:23 
order 6:16 12:14 
22:21 30:23,24 
33:17,17 36:19 
44:15 
ordinarily 26:3 
34:12 
ordinary 27:10 
39:13 
originally 6:5 
Orseck 2:2,5 3:17 
other 7:1,17 16:4,5 
17:22 22:13,18 
23:6,21,22 24:1 
25:21 26:8 32:8 
34:9,11 36:12 
42:18 43:8 44:10 
otherwise 39:14 
out 8:8 10:16 22:24 
26:16,23 2822 
30:11 36:12 38:17 
39:20 44:15 
outside 13:18,19 
24:17 36:7 
over 11:19 24:24 
own 12:21 38:13 
P 
Pacer 30:19 
pages 7:14 27:23 
28:9 
paint 29:17 
Palm 1:2,4,21 2:10 
2:13 
paper 10:16 13:7 
papers 8:10,16 9:25 
10:8 11:21 12:20 
15:6,10 41:5 
paragraphs 36:15 
paraphrasing 6:20 
Park 2:18 
part 10:18 18:9 
20:23 21:7 23:9,20 
34:16 39:23 40:2,5 
44:1 
particular 6:15,18 
7:24 8:22 9:18 
11:17 13:5 
parties 9:23 11:6 
16:21 22:21 3920 
partner 3:18 4:3 
parts 19:25 21:17 
party 11:11 1425 
30:12,17 36:18 
past 9:11 10:5 12:3,4 
pay 17:321:8,10 
25:5 
pending 6:15 9:5 
17:15 21:6 
people 23:6 
per 24:14,14,14,14 
perception 28:21 
perfect 36:1 39:5 
perhaps 20:24 27:22 
period 9:21 34:4 
37:3,14 
permitted 24:6,18 
permitting 42:18 
person 36:11 
personal 10:23 
23:21 
perspective 1623 
35:10 
pertains 29:20 
phone 4:12,14,15 
42:18,19 
pkkIng 12:13 
place 31:12 37:14 
43:20 
plaintiff 3:7,14 
24:15 30:4 3420 
43:7 
plaintiffs 1:5,13 3:4 
3:2411:8 17:8,14 
17:22 19:3 22:14 
23:7,24 27:5 29:1 
29:12,14,20 30:9 
39:16 43:8 
plaintiffs 19:426:8 
36:16 
playing 7:8 
Plaza 2:18 
plead 17:11 18:10,11 
pleading 7:14 31:10 
33:4 40:9,14 
pleadings 23:4 31:3 
32:13 
please 41:22 
pled 17:8,16 20:14 
41:8 
Podhurst 2:2,5 3:17 
point 6:18 14:12 
26:16,23 28:14 
29:15 36:12 43:23 
pointed 14:20 
portion 32:24 36:14 
portions 5:15 
posed 11:25 
posing 8:4 
position 5:5,8 6:4 7:7 
7:25 9:16,20 10:12 
10:13 11:21,22 
12:12,17,23 14:8,8 
14:15 15:16 16:16 
16:17 17:4,7 18:13 
18:17 19:19 20:13 
22:1,11 25:8 30:14 
31:12 32:10,15,20 
34:8 35:3,213623 
37:9 40:10 41:17 
43:5 
positions 30:20 41:5 
possible 30:17 31:4 
44:15 
possibly 349 
posting 2522 
potential 5:3 15:2 
28:2 
potentially 10:18 
15:19 
power 132 
practical 10:25 15:9 
practice 34:11 38:3 
predicate 20:8,15 
prepared 20:5 27:15 
present 5:5 11:15 
presents 9:7 
press 43:10 
pressure21:15 
presume 23:24 
pretty 8:1 
prior 6:6 825 12:14 
36:19 
privacy 19:22 32:7 
probably 35:18 36:3 
36:13 
problem 14:12 22:22 
23:2,3 28:18 
procedure 32:16 
3424 
proceed 12:10 1823 
32:22 38:13 
proceeding 6:15,15 
proceedings 423,25 
44:19 
process 39:25 
production 14:24 
19:20 
prohibited 38:3,4,18 
prohibits 37:22 
proof 20:16 
proper 25:127:14 
27:15 
prosecuted 20:13 
26:4 27:11 29:10 
31:15 
prosecuting 37:25 
prosecution 26:6 
28:23 29:6,7 34:25 
prospect 16:15 
protect 32:7 
protecting 32:7 
provide 31:8 36:13 
36:21 
provided 16:9 32:12 
provides 9:22 
providing 31:8 
provision 6:12 8:11 
29:19,25 34:10,25 
37:11 38:3 39:17 
39:18 
provisions 13:6,7 
psychologically 
21:24 
publish 23:5 
pure 24:8 
purpose 21:19,23 
28:20 
pursuant 25:15 32:8 
41:17 
pursue 23:12 
pursuing 22:12,15 
put 9:15 1821 32:10 
41:6 
puts 18:25 34:4 
40:10 41:11 
0
question 8:3,7 9:2 
12:1 30:25 
questions 42:1 
quite 19:10 
R 
R44:17 
raise 162 36:11 
raised 15:25 16:13 
18:5,21 19:13 
28:10 33:14 35:9 
40:1 
read 37:20 42:2,23 
reading 18:18 23:19 
ready 29:7 
real 9:6 10:8 36:11 
41:18 
really 12:2 18:11 
30:20,23 33:14 
36:17 
Realtime 2:22 
reason 6:14 7:3 
29:23 33:11 342 
reasons 18:5,20 
34:19 40:8 
recapitulating 41:1 
received 5:5 15:3,4 
20:4 
recent 7:7 15:24 
records 34:21 
redacted 36:14 
reference 27:25 
referred 31:6 
refers 41:16 
efusal9:10 
refuses 8:7 
refusing 25:5 
regard 9:11,12,13 
10:12,13,14,14 
11:4 12:19 14:9 
16:18 18:23 35:12 
36:23 
regarding 6:24 
23:15 37:9 
regardless 31:17,18 
registering 41:9 
relate 9:3 30:1 
related 3024 33:24 
relates 8:12 
relating 29:19 
release 41:9 
relevant 19:22 
remain 42:13 
remedy 7:20 8:17 
29:21 33:20 34:7 
41:2 
remember 23:19 
remind 44:3 
remote 10:8 
rep 35:14 
replies 10:15 
reply 35:22 
REPORTED 2:21 
Reporter 2:22,22 
44:22 
represent 21:3 32:12 
35:15 
representation 
26:18 
representatives 4:7 
43:9 
represented 2 I :7 
26:24 33:5 
representing 38:11 
represents 18:16 
35:16 
requests 14:23 
required 17:3 
requirement 33:8 
resist 34:18,23 
resolve 42:8 
resolved 7:4 19:12 
24:16 
respect 22:14 
respectfully 7:6 14:4 
respond 20:5 30:13 
44:9 
response 5:6 7:14 
8:2 11:20 15:16,23 
18:22 33:15 34:1,1 
35:17,21 
responses 10:14 
3021 35:8 
restitution 29:2 
31:16,23 
EFTA00180353