This is an FBI investigation document from the Epstein Files collection (FBI VOL00009). Text has been machine-extracted from the original PDF file. Search more documents →
FBI VOL00009
EFTA00175589
128 pages
Pages 121–128
/ 128
Page 121 / 128
Case 9:08-cC J119-KAM Docums... 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 061-_.2008 Page 5 of 6 WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that the Court enter a stay under 18 § 3509(k), coextensive with the state and federal criminal actions. Respectfully submitted, ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 Tel: Fax: By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 j [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00175709
Page 122 / 128
Case 9:08-o, , J119-KAM Docume... 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/a._ 1008 Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7 Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion. /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 20, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail. Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami Florida 33160 Fax: Is/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger 6 EFTA00175710
Page 123 / 128
9:08-cv-80119-KAN.
Document 1
Entered on . LSD D1/4—Ket 0L.d/2008
Par446
FILEDby VT If
ELECTRONIC
ebruary 6, 2008
JANE DOE NO. 2,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CLARtMCI MADDOX
CLEAN D.E. DIET. ot
E.D. OF Tµ • MIAMI
CASE NO.:
08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey
Epstein, as follows:
Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
1.
Jane Doe No. 2 is a citizen and resident of th e Commonwealth of Virginia, and is sui
juris.
2.
This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the
Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a
minor.
3.
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
4.
This is an action for damages in excess of $50 million.
5.
This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28
§1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs;
and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
6.
This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28
§1391(a) as a substantial
HERMAN 6 MEI:MEI-STEIN. P. A.
- 1 -
EFTA00175711
Page 124 / 128
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAN,
Document 1
Entered on . -SD D.,...Ket 02,-o/2008
Page 2 of 6
part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
Factual Allegations
7.
At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52
years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to
billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his
principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. Thomas and Palm Beach,
FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
8.
Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for
underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily
economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave
them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then approximately 16 years old, fell into Epstein's
trap and became one of his victims.
9.
Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted
girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. Thomas.
10.
Epstein's scheme involved the use of young girls to recruit underage girls. (Upon
information and belief, the young girl who brought Jane Doe to Epstein was herself a minor victim of
Epstein, and will therefore not be named in this Complaint). Under Epstein's plan, underage girls
were recruited ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm
Beach mansion. The recruiter would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm
Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf would direct the
recruiter to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. The recruiter, upon information and
belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from western Palm Beach
HERMAN 6i MERMELSTEIN, P. A.
www.hermanlaw.com
- 2 -
EFTA00175712
Page 125 / 128
:Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 1 Entered on . ..SD Dv,..Ket I/Leo/2008 Page 3 of 6 County who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally $200 to $300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan. 11. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, the underage victim would be introduced to . Epstein's assistant, who gathered the girl's personal information, including her name and telephone number. Ms. would then bring the girl up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. There were photographs of nude women lining the stairway hall and in the bedroom. The girl would then find herself alone in the room with Epstein, who would be wearing only a towel. He would then remove his towel and lie naked on the massage table, and direct the girl to remove her clothes. Epstein would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including ma. and 12. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Jane Doe was recruited to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. Jane was brought to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Once at the mansion, Jane was introduced to who led her up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. In this room, Epstein told Jane to take off her clothes and give him a massage. Jane kept her panties and bra on and complied with Epstein's instructions. Epstein wore only a towel around his waste. After a short period of time, Epstein removed the towel and rolled over exposing his"... Epstein began to masturbate and he sexually assaulted Jane. 13. After Epstein had completed the assault, Jane was then able to get dressed, leave the room and go back down the stairs. Jane was paid $200 by Epstein. The young girl who recruited Jane was paid $100 by Epstein for bringing Jane to him. HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. - 3 - EFTA00175713
Page 126 / 128
' ;Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAN. Document 1 Entered on . LSD I--ket 02,,, 12008 Page 4 of 6 • 14. As a result of this encounter with Epstein, Jane experienced confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment, and has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries. COUNT I Sexual Assault 15. PlaintiffJane Doe repeats and rcalleges paragraphs I through 14 above. 16. Epstein tortiously assaulted Jane Doe sexually. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful. 17. Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously. 18. This sexual assault was in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes, which recognizes as a crime the lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane. 19. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 20. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above. 21. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless. 22. Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency. 23. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. - 4 - EFTA00175714
Page 127 / 128
:Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 1 Entered on . _SD 021...,/2008 Page 5 of 6 reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe. 24. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. JURY TRIAL DEMAND Plaintiffs demand a jury trial in this action. Dated: February ST2008 HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. - 5 - Respectfully submitted, HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: Fax: By: Jeffrey M. Herman lion aBar No. 5216 Stuart S. Mermelstein Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz Florida Bar No. 376980 EFTA00175715
Page 128 / 128
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAN. DocunSentig- uCtififitakih., .!'SD -Ket 02/.6/2008 Page 6 of 6 The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing, and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form: approved by the Judicial Conference of the Untied States In September 1974, Is required for the use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of Initiating the dull docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) 1(a) PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 2, (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF OUT OF STATE (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) DEFENDANTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST USTED DEFENDANT NEW YORK (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER) Herman PA, 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218, Miami, FL 33180 ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) (d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY) O 1. U.S. Government PIadM O 2. U.S. Government Defendant ill) O 3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) X 4. Diversity (Indicate Citizenship or Parte/ In Atom VC / let -Kein- )c r) vn- III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (For Diversity Case Only) Citizen of This State CO72011 02 Another Stale X 2 Citizen or Subied Of a Foreign Country O 3 PTF DEF 0 1 0 1 x2 03 PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX FOR PLAINTIFF AND ONE FOR DEFENDANT PTF DEF Incorporated of Principal Place of 0 4 CI 4 Business in This Stale Incorporated and Principal Mace of O 5 O 6 Business in Another State Foreign Nation O 8 O 6 oNiiii IV. CAUSE OF ACTION CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE. DO NOT CITE JURISDICTI TUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.) DIVERSITY ACTION UNDER . §1332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT IVa. j_ days estimated (for both sides) to try entire case 1. NATURE OF SUIT (PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX ONLY) A CONTRACT A TORTS B FORFEITURE PENA A BANKRUPTCY A OTHER STATUS o 1 kinennei 0 1703/064. O 1301ret Ad 0 140100062444641/60/0 0 4401406442010.44)0 • 1 a criorourri el ASTRA 0 III Metes AO 0 II2Rscowerf 01 Vendel 8/024/1 Len (EV deraradl O " 4 ,40„,m o chem..* el Mann era II 0 1110064•1640/4 paw 0 10006010:0441 o isSfesvo1100410 WWI/ PERSONAL INJURY 0 310 Wane 0 342 Potoreo biwylAs2 PAIpdalte o 30 Aran neestUaliffy Ole 12046614 WO 0 4400 MN" o magma ow/ 4 lora/ Ole* AsbWesPoned04 0 330 rerenr EnOthiciUalry *Rh Reed/ V044/4 0 SO /ARM 0 345 MARI Pawl Leta* PERSONAL PROPERTY 0 MIAS WOOD 034011/14, Yorldw 60262 UAW 0 370 Car Anal X MO Ober Perierenew 0 371 TAM Otweg 0 p110 Oltsr Punennel Proper Oanted 0 3416 PlowbOarai• lotaAcl UMW 0610 AerbAure ONO Celt Nod &Pup 0021 Ova Rats seer* Pearty 21 002 sewn UK LSI 0423 Wedded 70 VAC iv 400 $614/4104301114wA 410 NNW 430 04.4 flows ASO Ceined000Rsioad 13 440 reunite 00 Raeurensuinew se Casa 0/046010. 010 kWh SsrAce 1130 540.4644/044wroe60 FaNtee In Cakes CA0Nya ItUBC-1410 01 Aertulan04714 HQ Wawa* 544benced Ad NO wornness wen NA 04 Wedgy Aleeden Ad nese or 'Annan Ad ern went nu ceemouies 1.02116.01 Atom ID Jona 0 NO Cowabibidryel Had OMAN 0 KO OR401414.40/2.404ne • Awl Dedaddy AM ad RAY larders Id Olarnallee 44 USW Nil 0 00 Lem. las 0 040 RR X MAX CI MO Atird14404 ONO Oca6/0041 14114•14400 a leo eon A PROPERTY RIGHTS a 120014100 000 Pant 0 640 latlemad B SOCIAL SECURITY 0101 WA !MST A REAL PROPERTY A CIVIL RIGHTS B PRISONER PETITIONS ...., A LABOR 0 062 Mack LAM On/ 0463 00006004022)) 0164 Teo IM 0 310 us ceniesnas 0 DO 2440:0104 6 0 Ng Realm, A OS% 0 240 TRY le LAM 0 244 TM ROOM Lay 0 n0 Al OM Red 1000/444 o risveina 0 443 641140044/ 4 0443 - o 31121034610264014 Swoonce Hated 034164 0 470466/ de 0 60 IndhIseely 0 540 sunammi Gone 0 ISSOCA4 0 WM* *A a ‘ClL4 . Nelda Stwelvds Ad OM Lad leneledell 1441064 II 0 rsa Late 1002/4•441 R40/1100 A 17144144/re Ad 0740 Rs lao/ MA OM) ORR 04013.0406 Din Imderne RR We dexely Rd • RSSD 0 M6 d 010606 A FEDERAL TAX SUITS I 0«^214O. 04400M 044110/04 0 PO toes Na.Naasemerepro OW/1 1040.0•60411.15C 71)20 F EDby Si VI. ORIGIN x 1. Original O 2. Removed from O 3. Remanded from Proceeding Slate Court Appellate Court (SpeciM O 4. Refilled O 6. Wild/561cl Ullgation O 7. Appeal to District Judge from O 5. Transferred from another district Magistrate Judgment VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT CHECK IF T O CLASS ACTION DEMAND S O UNDER Fa ).1.23 O Check YE Z ihi cgatE :MAND: ONO VIII. CASE(S) I RELATED F ANY (See Instructions) (SEE JUDGE ATTACHED) DOCKET NUMBER DATE Fri r, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Receipt No. Amount: SW 1.2 REV. 9/94 Date Paid: MAfp: SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD Fit) EFTA00175716
Pages 121–128
/ 128