EFTA00129379

HANDLING OF INJURED 
(Be specific. Include EMS telephone numbers, local radio channels, and addresses of medical facilities and or EMS.) 
I) St Mary's Medical Center 901 45th Street, West Palm Beach, FL (sec map) 
CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS 
COMMAND POST (if utilized) 
Supervisor in Charge: ASAC 
Location: Crft-secnt A+ mm HQ 
Phone 4: 
Radio Channel: TBD 
Call Sign: 
ON SCENE COMMAND 
Agent in Charge: SA 
Location: On scene 
Phone 4. Cell 4 
Radio Channel: TBD 
Call Sign: PB209 
RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (include channel , frequencies, private, or clear mode, and call signs) 
Channel Information 
USE 
W6 
In the clear 
Secondary Comms. Cell phone 
DISTRESS SIGNALS (verbal and visual) 
Verbal: Help. Help. Help. 
Visual: Both hands in the air. 
CAUTION STATEMENT 
Subject should be considered armed and dangerous. 
10 
EFTA00129399

ATTACHMENTS 
List Applicable Attachments 
I. Hospital Location: 
Attachment A 
2. FBI Deadly Force Policy: Attachment B 
3. FLDL PHOTO ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ: Attachment C 
11 
EFTA00129400

Florida DAVID. Individual Summary Page 
FLORIii
FER
ii. 
Conditional Messages: 
Record 
View 
HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES 
Driver And Vehicle Information Database (DAVID) 
DIGITAL IMAGES ARE RESTRICTED TO LAW 
ENFORCEMENT USE PURSUANT TO 
S. 322.142(4),FLORIDA STATUTES - IMAGES INCLUDE 
PHOTOGRAPHS AND SIGNATURES 
VIN 
Individual Summary Page 
DUID Number 
Chss 
Status 
E 
VALID 
ALFIll
a
SRIGUEZ 
MIAMI FL 331734201 
Page 1 of 1 
All Addresses On File 
j 
Dated 
it h 
Sex 
Height 
Al 
6'02 
Restrictions 
Endotsements 
Issue Date Duplicate 
Expiration Date 
04-05-08 
Date 
04-12-12 
AS N 
Form Number 
X630804077684 
State Of Binh 
New Jersey 
Vehicle Intimation • 
r 
Calm  I 
Bock • 
i 
Make 
nregtdred Date 
I 
Reg 
 _I 
I AUTO I TAN 
im
MAIT 
I 
CHEVROLET
' 
08-3047 
233717592 I 
Driver License Trtmeaclions 
—^-a 
• 
, Transaction Date Issue Date ; 
Update Time 
iLio Type i 
Issue Type 
Change Typo !FL 
View 
i 
04-07-08 
04-05-08 ir—
04-10-08 07:1362 
DL 
i RenewaUCIPS I 
View 
01-26-06 
03-2544 i 01-2746 01:18:03 I 
RCT 
I Reinstatement 
None 
View 
11-2444 
/ 
03-25-04 
03-2544 I 11-2444 116166 1 
DL r Duplicate 
i 
None 
i Lost _ 
I 
IlViewji 
Y
03-25-041 03-2544 1305:47 
DL 
! 
Renewal 
I 
None 
View
01-23-98 
01-23-98 ! 01-23-9817:42:42 
DL 
I r
 Original 
i 
None 
I 
Historical Driver License Activity 
Vehicle Insurance 
Photo Array 
Previous Vehicles 
j 
Signature Array 
f Main Menu 
New Search .1 
https://www.hsmv.ficjmnethervlei/DLSummary 
10/28/2009 
EFTA00129401

Map of St Mary's Medical Ctr, 901 45th St West Palm Beach, FL by MapQ 
tiAAPOVAiTo 
©TOYOTA 
• 
• 
moving forward 
4009 CAHRY, 31 HWY MPG 
• .• • • ,„,„,„„t  m,„,, LIMITED TIME DEALS 
MPG THROUGH JUNE 30. 
• • •••o repl.cs•Itigll.inpq Tanta:-
Page I of I 
CLICK HERE TO LERF:ri MORE 
A: St Mary's Medical Ctr: 901 45th St, West Palm Beach, FL 33407, 
itentk 
la 
to 2998 Iddipues{ MO: , 
All rights reserved. Use subject to LIcense/Copyright Map Legend 
Directions and maps are informational only. We make no warranties on the accuracy of their content, road conditions or 
route usability or expeditiousness. You assume all risk of use. MapOuest and its suppliers shall not be liable to you for 
any loss or delay resulting from your use of MapCluest Your use of Mapouest means you agree to our Terms 91 Use 
Stith. 
341:1:141t 
. - • 
. 
,I....7.. Pal UleackShora!
- 41 
Comae) 
-crait 
Dito 026q8 NA2.51k1)1,41 TetOi14 
http://www.mapquest.com/maps?cityr-West+Palm+Beach&state=FL&address=901+45th+Street&zipeode... 6/252008 
EFTA00129402

DEADLY FORCE POLICY 
TRAINING MATERIAL - 7/29/2004 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEADLY FORCE POLICY'
Law enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only 
when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such 
force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to 
another person. 
A. 
Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing 
suspect. 
B. 
Firearms may not be fired solely to disable moving vehicles. 
C. 
If feasible and to do so would not increase the danger to the officer or 
others, a verbal warning to submit to the authority of the officer shall be 
given prior to the use of deadly force. 
D. 
Warning shots are not permitted[
E. 
Officers will be trained in alternative methods and tactics for handling 
resisting subjects which must be used when the use of deadly force is not 
authorized by this policy. 
This policy is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive 
or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the United States, its departments, 
agencies, or other entities, its officers or employees, or any other person. 
'Department of Justice Policy Statement Use of Deadly Force (07/01/2004) in pertinent part (Language 
relating to Custodial Situations has been intentionally omitted pursuant to FBI policy. See, 66F-14Q-1312253, EC 
from the Directors Office to All Divisions, titled "REVISIONS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 
DEADLY FORCE POLICY', dated 07/07/2004). 
2Not included in the above description is the policy relating to the use of deadly force to prevent the escape 
of a prisoner committed to the custody of the Attorney General or the Bureau of Prisons. Because Agents will 
seldom find themselves in a position to apply the custodial aspect of the policy, the FBI will adhere to the policy 
decision set forth in the Airtel from the Director to All Field Offices, titled 'Deadly Force Policy Matters,' dated 
1/5/95, which states "A policy decision has been made that except in cases of prison unrest which would principally 
involve HRT and/or SWAT, FBI Agents should adhere to the policy and training principles governing the use of 
deadly force in non-custodial situations. 
1 
L_  
EFTA00129403

07/29/2004 
INSTRUCTIONAL OIM ,INF 
I.. 
INTRODUCTION 
The following general principles shall guide the interpretation and application of this 
policy: 
A. 
This policy shall not be construed to require Agents to assume 
unreasonable risks to themselves. 
B. 
The reasonableness of an Agent's decision to use deadly force must be 
viewed from the perspective of the Agent on the scene without the 
benefit of 20/20 hindsight. 
C. 
Allowance must be made for the fact that Agents are often forced to 
make split-second decisions in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, 
and rapidly evolving. 
II.. 
DEFINITIONS 
A. 
"DEADLY FORCE": Is force that is reasonably likely to cause death or 
serious physical injury. 
B. 
"REASONABLE BELIEF": Is synonymous with "Probable Cause". It is 
determined by a totality of the facts and circumstances known to Agents 
at the time, and the logical inferences that may be drawn from them. 
C. 
"NECESSARY": The necessity to use deadly force based on the 
existence of a reasonable belief that the person against whom 
such force is used poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical 
injury to the Agent or other persons. 
D. 
"IMMINENT DANGER": "Imminent" does not mean "immediate" or 
"instantaneous", but that an action is pending. Thus, a subject may pose 
an imminent danger even if he is not at that very moment pointing a 
weapon at the Agent. For example, imminent danger may exist if 
Agents have probable cause to believe any of the following: 
2 
EFTA00129404

1. The subject possess a weapon, or is attempting to gain access 
to a weapon, under circumstances indicating an intention to 
use it against the Agents or others; a, 
2. The subject is armed and running to gain the tactical 
advantage of cover; or. 
3. A subject with the capability of inflicting death or serious 
physical injury--or otherwise incapacitating agents--without a 
deadly weapon, is demonstrating an intention to do so; or, 
4. The subject is attempting to escape from the vicinity of a 
violent confrontation in which the suspect inflicted or 
attempted the infliction of death or serious physical injury. 
III 
APPLICATION OF DEADLY FORCE 
In assessing the necessity to use deadly force, the following practical considerations are 
relevant to its proper application: 
A. 
Inherent Limitation on Abilities to Assess the Threat and Respond. 
1. Limited Time (Action v. Reaction) - there will always be an interval of time 
between a subject's action and an Agent's ability to perceive that action, to 
assess its nature, and to formulate and initiate an appropriate response. 
The inherent disadvantage posed by the action/reaction•factor places a 
significant constraint on the time frame within which Agents must perceive, 
assess and react to a threat. 
2. Limited Means (Wound Ballistics) - When the decision is made to use deadly 
force, Agents have no guaranteed means of instantaneously stopping the 
threat. The human body can sustain grievous - even ultimately fatal - injury 
and continue to function for a period of time (from several seconds to several 
minutes) depending on the location, number, and severity of the wounds. The 
lack of a reliable means of instantaneously stopping the threat, may extend the 
time that imminent danger can persist. This factor further constrains the time 
frame within which Agents must respond to a perceived threat. 
B. Achieving Intended Purpose. 
1. Deadly force may only be applied for the intended purpose of bringing an 
imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to a timely halt either 
through the surrender of the subject or through physiological incapacitation. 
3 
EFTA00129405

S 
If the subject does not surrender, the only reliable means of achieving that 
goal is to cause physiological incapacitation of the subject(s) as quickly as 
possible. Attempts to do anything else - such as shooting to cause minor 
injury - are unrealistic and can risk exposing Agents or others to continued 
danger of death or serious physical injury. 
2. When the circumstances justify the use of deadly force, Agents should 
continue its application until the imminent danger is ended through the 
surrender or physiological incapacitation of the subject(s). 
C. 
Consideration of Risk to Other Parties. 
Even when deadly force is permissible, Agents should assess whether its 
use creates a danger to third parties that outweighs the likely benefits of 
its use. 
4 
EFTA00129406

L 
FD-302(Reu.10-6-95) 
_1_ 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Date of
 
11/04/2009
Julio Cesar Suarez, date of birth 
, Social 
Security Account Number 
, U.S. Permanent esi ent, 
em lo ed as a kitchen cabinet sales erson, cellular telephone 
, residence 
, Kendall, Florida was 
interviewed in the vicinity of the Hilton Hotel, 7920 Glades Road, 
Boca Raton, Florida. Suarez had a North Carolina Driver's License 
in his possession which reflected a previous address of 
, Charlotte, North Carolina. Suarez was a vised of 
the ide
ntity 
of the interviewing agents and purpose of the 
interview. Suarez was read an FD-395 Advice of Rights form which 
he stated he understood and signed. Suarez provided the following 
information: 
Suarez traveled to the Hilton Hotel with his friend, 
Alfredo Rodriguez. Suarez met Rodriguez through their wives. 
Rodriguez picked Suarez up near his residence in Kendall and they 
planned to have lunch together. Rodriguez told Suarez he needed to 
stop in Boca Raton but did not give a reason why. Suarez 
acknowledged that Rodriguez brought documents to the Hilton Hotel 
but he denied having any knowledge of what the documents were 
related to. Suarez advised that Rodriguez rents the El Cristo 
restaurant located at 8th Street, Miami, Florida and had been 
previously employed at another restaurant. 
At the conclusion of the interview, and at the request of 
Alfredo Rodriguez, Rodriguez' Chevrolet Trailblazer, Florida tag 
was released to Suarez. 
The original FD-395 was placed in a lA envelope of case 
file. 
Investigation on 
11/03/2009 
at Boca Raton, Florida 
File i 72-MM-113327 
Date dictated 
 
by 
SA 
311,4 —
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It Is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; 
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. 
EFTA00129407

FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95) 
FEDERAL BUREAU 
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Dateoftranscription 
11/04/2009
L 
Julio Cesar uarez date of birth March 20, 1962, Social 
_Security Account Nu
r ~, 
U.S. Permanent Resident. 
employed as a kitchIn cabinet salesperson, cellular telephone 
Kendall. Florida was 
interviewed in the vicinity o 
e i on Hotel, 7920 Glades Road, 
Boca Raton, Florida. Suarez had a North Carolina Driver's License 
in is possession which reflected a previous address of 13033 
Graymist Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina.  Suarez was advised of 
e identity of the interviewing agents and purpose of the 
interview. Suarez was read an FD-395 Advice of Rights form which 
he stated he understood and signed. Suarez provided the following 
information: 
Suarez traveled to the Hilton Hotel with his friend, 
Alfredo Rodriguez. Suarez met Rodriguez through their wives. 
Rodriguez picked Suarez up near his residence in Kendall and they 
planned to have lunch together. Rodriguez told Suarez he needed to 
stop in Boca Raton but did not give a reason why. Suarez 
acknowledged that Rodriguez brought documents to the Hilton Hotel 
but he denied having any knowledge of what the documents were 
related to. Suarez advised that Rodriguez rents the El Cristo 
restaurant located at 8th Street, Miami, Florida and had been 
previously employed at another restaurant. 
At the conclusion of the interview, and at the request of 
Alfredo Rodriguez, Rodriguez' Chevrolet Trailblazer, Florida tag 
was released to Suarez. 
The original FD-395 was placed in a lA envelope of case 
file. 
Investigation on 
11/03/2009 
at 
File 0 72-MM-113327 
 
by al 
Boca Raton, Florida 
Date dictated 
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; 
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. 
ejrr 
al 
. 
3 2- 
-tar AA.M. - 
a_g• - 
EFTA00129408

FD-302 (Rev. 104-95) 
-1-
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Date of transcription 
11/04/2009
Pursuant to consent to search provided by Alfredo 
Rodriguez date of birth 
, Social Security Account 
Number 'EMI'''. Rodriiiiiii vehicle, a tan Chevrolet 
Trailblazer Florida tag 
, Vehicle Identification Number 
(VIN) 
was searched and one AT&T Son Ericsson 
cellular telephone, 
, Serial Number 
with car 
charger was seized. Rodriguez also consented to t e searc of the 
cellular telephone seized from the vehicle as well as the cellular 
telephone he carried on his person, an I-Phone telephone, 
The original FD-26 Consent to Search Form signed by 
Rodriguez was placed in a lA envelope of case file. 
Invegipthcon 
11/03/2009 
new 72-MM-113327 
at Boca Raton, Florida 
Date dictated 
by 
SA 
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; 
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. 
mts, 
a3° -(0 
EFTA00129409

FD-302(Rev.I0-6-95) 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Dateatranscrimion 
11/04/2009
Pursuant 
odriguez, date of 
m er 
Trailblazer Florida to 
(VIN 
cellular to e• one, 
to co 
provided by Alfr?do 
Social Security Account 
uez' ye 
evrolet 
Vehicle Identification Number 
searches aria are Aacsson 
Serial Number 
with car 
charger was seized. 
riguez also consented to the search of t e 
cellular telephone seized from the vehicle as well as the cell ar 
telephone he carried on his person, an I-Phone telephone, 
i rth 
Rodri 
The original FD-26 Consent to Search Form signed by 
Rodriguez was placed in a lA envelope of case file. 1 
Investigation on 
11/03/2009 
at 
ma 72-MM-113327 
Boca Raton, Florida 
by 
SA 
Date dictated 
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; 
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. 
.7vg yr 042.3
-
EFTA00129410

4(RX.01-n4003) 
I 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Precedence: ROUTINE 
Date: 11/05/2009 
To: Miami 
Attn: UCC 
From: Miami 
Squad PB-2 
Contact: SA 
Approved By: 
Drafted By: 
Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (Pending) 
Title: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; 
OBSTRUCTION 
OO: MM 
Synopsis: Request for SAC authority to utilize non Bureau 
certified undercover employee in an undercover role. 
Details: 1 On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date 
of birt 
i 
, was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of 
birth 4/12 1954. Edwards is an attorney who is representing 
four female individuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein (FBI case 
31E-MM-10S062). Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edwards 
deposed Rodriguez and served him with a federal subpoena to 
provide any and all documents relating to the case. Rodriguez 
was trying to sell Edwards documents that he claimed were 
pertinent to the civil case. Edwards explained to Rodriguez that 
his demands were illegal and that he was obligated under the 
subpoena to turn the documents.over. Rodriguez was still 
demanding $50,000.00 for the documents. 
OPERATIONAL REQUEST: 
SAC authority is sought to utilize UCE
MIRM 
in 
an undercover role as the contact for Edwards. Edwar s as 
explained to Rodriguez that he cannot be involved in the 
transaction because of the illegal nature and that it would be 
against Edwards' ethical obligations. UCE 
will contact 
Rodriguez to collect criminal conversation an to arrange for a 
face to face meeting where the evidence can be reviewed and the 
money can be given to Rodriguez. 
and Rodriguez will meet 
face to face in a hotel room contro le by the FBI where the 
transaction will be completed. 
o'S117._ 
rDriftm 1)332_1-7-
EFTA00129411

J.
To: Miami From. Miami 
Re: 72-MM-113327, 11/05/2009 
has been Safeguarded and has applied for the 
Undercover Certification School. 
is a seasoned City of 
'ter Police Officer with many years of undercover experience. 
supervisor with the City of 
undercover activities. 
Jupiter Police Department 
concurs wi 
and encourages 
'Mill 
has been safeguarded by the FBI and has participated in 
other 
"! investigations in an undercover capacity. 
• • 
EFTA00129412

FD-759 
Revised 
10-01-2009 
Pace 1 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Notification of Authority Granted for Use of 
Electronic Monitoring Equipment - Not Requiring a Court Order 
Background Information 
To: 
Miami 
Date: 
10/28/2009 
From: 
Miami 
For FBI Field Office Use Only 
CM*: 
Contact Name: 
(MM) (FBI) 
Extension: 
Squad: 
PB-2 
R Consensual Monitoring 
r 
Other Electronic Surveillance 
Case File ID: 
72-MM-113327-ELA 
!Title Text: 
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 
OIA Authority to Consensually Monitor in a Two-Party State 
Are you seeking CIA Authority for a CHS to consensually monitor in a two-party state? 
r 
OIA Authority for CHS to consensually monitor in a two-party state? (OIA authority for CHS is only valid for 90 day 
increments - additional 90 day increments will require submission of another FD-759) 
r 
OIA Authority for an FBI employee, UCE, cooperating citizen or other party. Consensual monitoring can be authorized for 
the duration of the Investigation unless the monitoring circumstances substantially change. 
W 
No (consensual monitoring can be authorized for the duration of the Investigation unless the monitoring circumstances 
substantially change) 
OIA approval for a CHS shall be maintained in the appropriate CHS tile with a copy placed in the appropriate ELSUR file. 
Investigation Classification Level 
a Unclassified 
r 
Confidential 
r 
Secret 
-72- 
[ 133 2-7-c 
EFTA00129413

FD-759 
Revised 
10-01-X09 
Page 2 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Notification of Authority Granted for Use of 
Electronic Monitoring Equipment - Not Requiring a Court Order 
1. Reason for Proposed
Collect Evidence 
Use: 
2. Types of Equipment: 
 
-...—._ 
Telephone 
Body Recorder 
CCTV without Audio 
2a. Equipment Concealed: 
In a Telephone 
On a Person 
In a Motel Room 
Au..,,.......,..,,,,....urwwainwiww.imw............ 
.v....v.rtur.inw.urinrunw....,,,.. 
2. Interceptee(s): 
Name: 
F 
And others 
(If Public Official, Include Title and Entity) 
4. Consenting Party (Identify ONLY on Field Office cavil_ 
Alfredo Rodriguez 
yet unknown 
UCE 
r" Protect Identity 
Source 1: 
.. 
— 
4a. The following mandatory requirements have been or will be met 
prior to Consensual Monitoring taking place: 
r 
National Security 
( 
Criminal 
F Consenting party has agreed to testify; 
F Consenting party has agreed to execute the consent form 
prior to monitoring/recording; & 
F Recording/transmitting device will be activated only when 
consenting party is present. 
EFTA00129414

FD-759 
Revised 
10-01-2009 
Page 3 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Notification of Authority Granted for Use of 
Electronic Monitoring Equipment - Not Requiring a Court Order 
S,.Lotatign where monitoring will likely occur 
Location (City, 
Southern District of Florida 
County or Other) 
State 
Florida 
Will the monitoring occur In the territory of another division? 
r 
Yes 
4- No 
6. Duration of  proposed use: 
For the duration of Investigation 
(including OIA for FBI employees) 
r  For 90 days 
(OIA for CHS - renew every 90 days) 
Bb. Check box If verbal authority was obtained. 
17
Name: 
Date: 
10/28/2009 
(M... 
7. Chief Division Counsel (CDC)/Office of the General Counsel (OGC) has been contacted, 
foresees no entrapment, and has advised monitoring, itiai23.apprOplate. _ 
Name: 
(MM) (FBI) 
Date of Contact: 10/28/2009 
CDC Review: 
Initials: 
Date: 
Field Office: 
.... 
Miami 
Violations 
Title: 
18 
U.S.C: 
1509 & 1510 
EFTA00129415

FD-759 
Revised 
10.01-2009 
Page 4 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Notification of Authority Granted for Use of 
Electronic Monitoring Equipment - Not Requiring a Court Order 
9. 00) 
(Check 
r 
r .. 
I- 
--- r 
approval 
all that 
Monitoring 
above, 
Monitoring 
udge or 
Interest, 
onsenting/non-consenting 
involved 
---------.-------------------._ 
Consenting/non-consenting 
is required if the requested monitoring includes any of the following sensitive circumstances 
!mth_
relatesidin Investigation of a member of Congress, 
or akerson who has served in such capacity within the 
relates to an investigation of the Governor, Lieutenant 
justice of the highest court of and State or Territory, 
or extortion relating to the performance of his/her officMi 
party Is or has
 a member of 
or its officers. 
party is In the custody of the Bureau 
General, Deputy Attorney General, Associate Attorney 
in the district where an investigation is being conducted 
for making a consensual interception in a specific investigation. 
a federal judge, a member of the Executive Branch at Level IV or — 
previous 2 years. 
._—...-
Governor, or Attorn
.t
torney General of 
f. 
any state or tenitory, or a 
and the offense investigated is one involving bribery, conflict of 
duties.... 
 
•—•—..—
the iiiiness Security Program and that fact ;Gown to the agency 
of Prisons of the U.S. Marshals Service. 
General, Assistant Attonn
—Wearrel.for Me Criminal
 or the
has requested the investigating agency obtain prior written 
rney 
U.S. Attorney 
consent 
10. Synopsis and predicate of Case (the synopsis Of the investigation should articulate pertinent, timely facts and predication for which the 
Wi se of the consensual monitoratis requestedli 
......-..-----.....--..--..—. 
On or about August of 2 
lames Edwards, date of birth 
was 
conta
cted by Alfredo 
Rodriguez, date of birth 
Edwards is an attorney who is representing four female individuals who are 
suing Jeffrey Epstein. Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed Rodriguez and served him with a 
federal subpoena to provide any and all documents relating to the case. Rodriguez is trying to sell Edwards 
documents that he claims are pertinent to the civil case. Edwards explained to Rodriguez that his demands are 
Illegal and that he was obligated under the subpoena to turn the documents over. Rodriguez Is still demanding 
$50,000.00 for the documents. Edwards will make a consensual call to Rodriguez and introduce an Under Cover 
Employee (UCE) to complete the transaction. The UCE will call Rodriguez to collect criminal conversation and set 
up a meeting. UCE will meet with Rodriguez to collect criminal conversation and complete the transaction. 
Some states, by law, do not authorize one party consensual recording of conversations nor provide for a law enforcement exception 
r  tootireisnvi sroehlitibegitiaolnA. cUtnivdietyr.thBye sAieG
gnatom
ure ,beolnoewparty 
the SAC,
no  onrsr diesIg
neeinagpof coyea
mmtgenlec:ntlae
onsnutnop, fpraortmy,.sorowthithenvin 
ise 
such
Iliesral Activity
tes 
is
 in 
conducting one party conSensual recordings of communications when one or both parties are in a state requiring two party consent. 
Approval /Review 
11 
-S- • 
pate: 
-- 
lb 28(6)
 
12. ASAC kif npplicable.) 
Signature: 
pate: 
13:. Ac.Of EPPIr-9.M.) 
Signature: 
— 
7
--  iiire 
— — — --- — 
I 
FBI HQ Approvals 
14. Unit Chiefly sensitive Urcumstances exist) 
pate: 
Signature: 
EFTA00129416

FD-759 
Revised 
10-01-20o9 
Page 1 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
. Notification of Authority Granted for Use of 
Electronic Monitoring Equipment - Not Requiring a Court Order 
Background Information 
To: 
Miami 
Date: 
10/28/2009 
From: 
Miami 
For FBI Held ante use Only 
CM*: 
Contact Name: 
Illi
= 
(MM) (FBI) 
Extension: 
Squad: 
P6-2 
6 
Consensual Monitoring 
r 
Other Electronic Surveillance 
Case File ID: 
itie Text: 
72-MM-113327-ELA 
rALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 
OIA Authority to Consensually Monitor in a Two-Party State 
Are you seeking 01A Authority for a CI-IS to consensually monitor In a two-party state? 
r 
OIA Authority for CHS to consensually monitor in a two-party state? (OIA authority for CHS is only valid for 90 day 
Increments - additional 90 day Increments will require submission of another F0-759) 
r 
OIA Authority for an FBI employee, UCE, cooperating citizen or other party. Consensual monitoring can be authorized for 
the duration of the Investigation unless the monitoring circumstances substantially change. 
6. 
NO (consensual monitoring can be authorized for the duration of the investigation unless the monitoring circumstances 
substantially change) 
OIA approval for a CHS shall be maintained in the appropriate CHS file with a copy placed in the appropriate ELSUR file. 
Investigation Classification Level 
(I Unclassified 
C Confidential 
C Secret 
72-11,--1-033-227-q 
EFTA00129417

F6-759 
Revised 
10.01-2009 
Page 2 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Notification of Authority Granted for Use of 
Electronic Monitoring Equipment - Not Requiring a Court Order 
lagson for Proposed Use: 
Collect Evidence 
2. Types of Equipment: 
............. 
............ 
Telephone 
2a. Equipment Concealed: 
•
•
 
In a Telephone 
3. Interceptee(s): (If Public Official, Include Title and Entity) 
  
Name: Alfredo Rodriguez 
F And others yet unknown 
4. Consenting Party (Identify ONLY on Field Office Copy): 
Nonconfidential Party 
r 
Protect Identity 
Name: 
Bradley 3. Edwards 
98. The following mandatory requirements have been or will be met 
prior to Consensual Monitoring taking place: 
r 
National Security 
G Criminal 
F Consenting party has agreed to testify; 
F  Consenting party has agreed to execute the consent form 
prior to monitoring/recording; & 
Recording/transmitting device will be activated only when 
consenting party is present. 
EFTA00129418