EFTA00086375

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 330 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2015 Page 51 of 51 
S:14844-1485I 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
S:]4852-14864 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege; also not relevant or likely to lead to material 
relevant to this CVRA litigation. 
Involves self-reporting to OPR 
regarding Epstein's allegation 
that certain prosecutors had 
conflicts of interest. Not 
relevant to victims' CVRA 
rights. 
S:I4865 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
S:14866-I4883 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
5:14884-14886 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
S:14887-14894 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
S:14895-14900 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
5:14901-14906 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
S:14907-14911 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
S:14912-I4919 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
5:14920-14923 
Protected from discovery by opinion work product 
privilege. 
The Government notes that a 
redacted version has been 
produced to Petitioners. (DE 
329-1 at 18). Only the 
unredacted version is 
privileged. 
51 
EFTA00086495

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 4 
DECLARATION OF 
1. My name is 
• and I was born in 
2. I was paid by Jeffrey Epstein to interact sexually with him as a minor 
on dozens of occasions in his mansion in Palm Beach, Florida from 
around 2002 to 2005, and also to bring him other girls who were my 
approximate age for the same purposes. I understand that evidence 
collected from Epstein's home showed conclusively that I was there 
as a minor, along with many other underage girls. Given how many 
girls Epstein was sexually abusing, there could not have been any 
doubt in anyone's mind that had access to the testimonial and other 
evidence that Epstein sexually molested me as a minor (and many 
others). 
3. My son was very young when the FBI came to speak with me the first 
time. I did not know what to do and I was scared. I called Epstein, 
who told me not to worry and that he would hire an attorney for me. I 
believed that if I told the truth about what happened at Epstein's 
house, the policel 
 
 That made me really 
scared. 
4. Through the attorney that Jeffrey Epstein obtained for me, it was 
arranged for me to give a statement to the prosecutor investigating 
Epstein. 
5. While with the attorney Epstein obtained for me I gave a statement to 
the prosecutor that was favorable to Epstein. The prosecutors knew 
the truth because of the volume of evidence they had, and they 
continued to recognize me as a victim of Epstein's crimes. 
6. I had been greatly intimidated, which is why I could not be truthful 
initiall and I wanted to end the threat of the possibility of 
My involvement with Epstein from a very young age 
was a deep, dark secret and Epstein told me to keep it a secret. I knew 
that I was expected to keep it a secret. 
7. The more I thought about what was going on, the more I realized that 
what Epstein had done to both me and my friends was wrong and that 
anyone who was not very wealthy would be punished. At this time, I 
EFTA00086496

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 4 
wanted Epstein held accountable the same way anyone else would be. 
I spoke about this with one of m friends around May 2008. I then 
called an attorney, 
around June 2008, understanding 
that he was hired to get the prosecutors to talk to us and hear the truth 
from me. That was especially important to me because I was finally 
represented by someone other than Epstein's attorney and wanted to 
talk to the prosecutors about everything I knew. 
8. The prosecutors had a lot of information revealing the truth about the 
situation at Epstein's house. I had lot of information, too, because I 
was one of the young teenagers who had brought many other young 
teenagers to Epstein for the purpose of getting paid by Epstein. I 
wanted to assist the prosecutors in the investigation. I hired Mr. 
to let them know that I was cooperative and ready to tell 
them all of the helpful information I had. I understood that Mr. 
did that. 
9. I authorized Mr. 
to join me in the lawsuit against the U.S. 
Attorney's Office to enforce my rights and to try to get me my chance 
to confer with the prosecutors before Mr. Epstein took a plea or the 
case was resolved in any way. I just wanted to be treated fairly in the 
process. 
10. When Epstein pled guilty to a state crime at the end of June 2008, 
no one notified me that his plea had anything to do with my case 
against him. I did not know, for example, that this plea had some 
connection to a crime he committed against me particularly. In fact, 
at this young age, I had no idea what was going on and nobody tried 
to explain it to me. 
11. In Jul 2008  
• 
• 
I learned for the first time at that hearing that the 
prosecutors worked out some sort of secret deal with Epstein that 
might block his prosecution for crimes against me. It also appeared 
that there was a lot of continued communication between Epstein and 
the U.S. Attorney's Office. I was really upset that the U.S. 
Attorney's Office seemed like it would not talk with me or the other 
victims about what was going on. It was easier to get them to talk to 
me when I was represented by Epstein's attorney. 
EFTA00086497

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 4 
12. I wanted to see this secret deal that the Government had with 
Epstein, but they would not give it to me 
Later, the 
other victims and I finally got to see the secret deal after the judge 
forced the prosecutors to show it to us. 
13. I understand that I did not initially help the investigation by 
speaking on Epstein's behalf untruthfully. But I was intimidated and 
had good reason 
— reasons that I think 
everyone who was talking to me could obviously see. Also, the 
agents and attorneys obviously had a lot of evidence that provided 
proof of what Epstein had actually done. Epstein was still supporting 
me, providing me a lawyer and in my mind protecting me, so I was in 
a position where I felt I had to say certain things. And Epstein 
expected me to say those things. 
14. Once I wanted to cooperate and tried to cooperate, I was never 
given the opportunity to confer with prosecutors from the time they 
were informed by my attorney that I was a cooperating witness. I was 
never told about the secret deal until after it was already concluded. I 
would have had my attorney object if I had been given the chance. 
15. I don't feel like I was treated fairly in this process. And I know 
Epstein got a really good plea deal because he is rich and powerful. 
That doesn't seem fair either. 
Executed this  O
h 
, day of January, 2015. 
EFTA00086498

EISENBERG & FOUTS, P.A. 
Attorneys At Law 
JAMES L EISENBERG 
Florida Bar Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer 
National Board Of Trial Advocacy Certified Criminal Trial Advocate 
KM LI ALOE FOUTS 
One Clearlake Centre, Suite 704,250 Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Fax: 
September 21, 2006 
Asst. U.S. Attorney 
500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Re: 
=Subpoena 
fora 
Dear M, 
Please allow me to confirm my latest e-mail to you. I did receive your e-mail of last week with 
attachments and pegged them on to my client. At this time, I can only say that my client does not 
want to do ei q of your suggestions. She does not want to give a statement under the irnmuni 
ed with its Kastigar exception and she does not want to test 
5'h Amendment grounds. With this client, I am sorry, but I must have a formal grant 
of 
m it 
y f.re she will say anything. 
GOVERNMENT 
EXHIBIT 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-000146 
EFTA00086499

EISENBERG & FOUTS, P.A. 
Attorneys At Law 
JAMES L EISENBERG 
0011alli Bar Board Cmilflui Criminal Thal Lawyer 
&Sakai Board Of Trial Advocacy Corilltrd Criminal Trial Advocate 
KAI LI ALOE POUTS 
OneClearlako Cenfro,Suito 704, 250 Australian Avenue So u lb, Wesi Palm Beach, FL 3340i 
Fax: 
February 12, 2007 
Asst. U.S. Attorney 
500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Palm Reach, FL 33401 
Re: 
Dear 
for 
As always, it was a pleasure speaking to you the other 
. Pursuant to out telephone conference 
I am writs 
this letter to 
ffer my concerns fo
oul she testify without immunity 
before a 
Therefore, allow me to reiterate that
U refuse to voltuttarily 
cooperate with the federal government. She has a good faith basis for 
position under the Fifth 
Amendment to the United States Constitution. 
We, of coins; do not live or work in a vacuum. We have read many inflammatory remarks the 
Town of Palm Beath Police Chief has made to the media about the state court's handling of the 
Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The police chiefs remarks frighten both myself and my client I am 
aware that the own police have prepared documents to charge at least one of Mr. Epstein's lady 
friends. in state court. If they can push to have one lady charged I remain unconvinced that they do 
not have the ability or political clout to push to have other ladies such as Ms 
charged. 
The proffered facts that raise my concerns are being provided via this proftbr letter. Pursuant to our 
telephone conference agreement, this letter and its contents cannot be used against Mr. NM 
MMIlis not at all certain of dates. She does remember meeting Mr. Epstein about three years 
ago. She is not certain of her age, it could have been when she was sixteen, A girlfriend asked her 
if she wanted a job giving massages. Ms..Magreed because she had knowledge of massages 
through her mother, who was a masseuse. 
Mt. 
went to Mr. Epstein's house via told. Ms. 
s girlfriend instructed Ms. 
hat, 
if asked, she had to tell Mr. Epstein that she 
was eighteen years old. The friend was 
nineteen years old and Illlooked old for her age, so passing for eighteen was not a problem. At 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003730 
EFTA00086500

the home Ms anet 
Mr. Epstein and later gave him a massage. The friend had told Ms. 
I
N
 
to give the message topless. Mr. Epstein told 
that if she were at all uncomfortable being 
topless, not to do it and it was not a requireme 
employment as a masseuse. Ms 
never 
touched Mr. Epstein in a sexual way and Mr. Epstein never touched Meat 
all. At one point, 
Mr. Epstein did ask Ms. !Cher age. Ms. Minsisted that she was eighteen years old. 
Msalicontinue,d to see Mr. Epstein over time and massages were given in a similar fashion. 
She was later asked If her friend 
ted to work in a similar way and she asked some girls who did 
give Mr. Epstein massages. M 
never asked to bring girls of any age to Mr. Epstein's 
home. When she did have her friends come over, she instructed all of them that if asked, they insist 
that they were eighteen years old. She is not certain at all of any of these girls' real ages. 
In summary, our concern is that if the government believes that Mr. Epstein committed some federal 
offense, then Ms 
could he considered a co-conspirator. We believe no crime was committed.. 
The Fifth Amendment was not intended to protect the guilty, however, It was enacted to protect 
citizens who fear prosecution notwithstanding their innocence. Our fear of any prosecution, 
especially ' ligh i f the Town police chiefs public remarks, is clearly in good faith. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003731 
EFTA00086501

EISENBERG & FOUTS, P.A. 
Attorneys At Law 
JAMES L. EISENBERG 
Florida Bar Board Certified Criminal Mal Unger 
Nallonal Board Ot Trial Advocacy Certified Criminal Trial Advocate 
KM LI ALOE FOUTS 
One Clearlako Centre, Suite 704,250 Australian Avenue Soul li,West Palm Beach, F1,3340I 
February 1, 2007 
Asst U.S. Attorney 
500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Re: 
Grand Jury Subpoena fbiln 
Dear 
Ji
l 
I received your letter dated January 24, 2007 with regard t 
I must admit I forced 
myself to wait several days to respond in order to "cool o 
an 
l 
no say anything I would regret 
later. Now that time has passed, allow me to respond appropriately. 
1. If you want to force Ms. IIII 
, to come to the 
to 
personally invoke her Fifth Amendment ri its she will be there. That does remain her position. 
My o
st is that isovid 
. I will be there, but I am not 
should not have 
It is this type of attitude, that your
paid t
 and Ms. 
office refuses to accept the fact that it is Ms 
s decision not to cooperate with the government 
that u sets her. 
office fails to recognize that merely coming to court is a problem for 
like Ms 
d, under these circumstances, appears to be a waste of time at best and, in 
her mind, persona unussment 
2. Rest assured that there is no conflict of interest in my representation of Ms 
In this 
ease I have always been asked and always will exercise independent judgment to follow my client's 
independent will. The remainder of your questions as to this matter are really none of the 
Government's business. 
3. 1 will share with you that one of the reasons for our firm position that Mr 
will 
invoke her Fifth Amendment right and choose not to voluntarily cooperate with the Government is 
our concern that the Government is not exercising independent judgment in this case. 
The history of this case has been in the newspapers. The case is being prosecuted in State court. 
Despite the state court prosecution, the Town of Palm Beach Police Chief went on what can only be 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003732 
EFTA00086502

, Asst. U.S. Attorney 
February 1, 2007 
Page Two 
described as a public rampage in the newspaper when the case was not prosecuted to his liking that 
reminded me of a small child having a public temper tantrum. In my thirty years of experience, I 
have never seen a law enforcement officer like this publicly make what appeared to be a political 
case in the newspaper for a prosecution and publicly criticize anyone who got in his way, including 
the elected State Attorney. This resulted in a federal investigation on a topic no one remembers the 
Federal Government ever being interested in prosecuting before. Although I am certain that you 
personally have not had your decision-making process compromised, the appearance that your office 
is being influenced by the Town of Palm Beach Police Chiefs agenda is very real. Under these 
circumstances.! don't see bow any lawyer could advise any client to voluntarily cooperate. Of 
special concern is that the Town of Palm Beach Police have promoted prosecuting at least one of the 
girls who allegedly gave massages. 
One final thought. My client and my fear that Ms. 
could be prosecuted is enhanced by the 
demand for the personal appearance made in your letter. Your initial Kastiger letter. fell far short 
of granting the functional equivalent of DOJ immunity. Several months ago I was given the dis 
impression through our conversations that you were going to obtain DOJ immunity for Ms 
Now the government is changing course for no apparent reason. This leads to speculation that the 
only reason for the turnabout is that prosecution in either state or federal court is being considered 
by someone. 
directed at you personally. 1 want to repeat that you have always treated us with 
ur office should advise the Town Police Chief to act in a similar fashion. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003733 
EFTA00086503

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District ofFlorida 
DELIVERY BY HAND 
James L. Eisenberg, Esq. 
250 S Australian Ave, Ste 704 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5007 
Dear Jim: 
500 South Australian Ave.. Suite 400 
Wert Palm Beach, FL 33401 
($61) 820-8711 
Facsimile: 
January 24, 2007 
Re: 
Federal- 
have enclosed a new subpoena fora 
As I mentioned earlier, Ms. 
s not a target of this investigation and the United 
Sta 
her testimony solely as a vie 'm/witness. During our last conversation regarding 
Ms 
you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar 
letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with the Mftand 
intends to invoke the 
Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her to confirm whether this remains her 
position. If it is, please advise in writing. Even if Ms. MU inclined to invoke her Fifth 
Amendment rights, she must still appear pursuant to the subpoena so that I may ask her 
questions that would not require the invocation of the Fifth Amendment. If she still invokes, 
I intend to move to compel her answers. If you or your client is unavailable on February 6, 
2007, please let me know of another Tuesday when you are available. 
I also am concerned about a potential conflict of intereatin your representation of Ms. 
In case of future litigation regarding this issue, please provide me with ilhimiation 
ng who is paying (directly Or indirectly) for your services on behalf of Ms. 
the 
scope of your representation and whether you are taking direction on this matter from 
anyone other than Ms.M. If any formal or informal:joint defense agreements exist, 
whether in writing or otherwise, please provide a copy of such agreements. lithe agreement 
is purely oral, please provide a written summer)/ of its terms. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003736 
EFTA00086504

JAMES EISEN13ERG, ESQ. 
JANUARY 24, 2007 
PAGE 2 
I look forward to your response. 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
nited States Attome 
By: 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA. 
P-003737 
EFTA00086505

This subpoena is issued upon application 
United States District Court 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
TO: a 
SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY 
SUBPOENA FOR: 
PERSON 
X 
DOCUMENTS OR OBJECTS] 
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify before the Grand Jury of the United States District 
Court at the place, date and time Specified below. 
PLACE: 
United States District Courthouse 
701 Clematis Street 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
ZOOM • 
DATE AND TIME: 
February 6, 2007 
1100Pnit 
YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following document(s) or object(s): 
*Please coordinate your compliance with this subpoena and confirm the date and time , and location of 
our a earance with Special Aget 
, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Telephone: 
This subpoena shall remain in effect until you are granted leave to depart by the court or by an officer acting on behalf 
of the court. 
DRIB: 
January 23, 2007 
Name Address and Phone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 So. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Pahnlle c FL 334014235 
Pax: 
'If not applicable, enter "none." 
Tobstsid •• PO d1Agtle
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
FORM ORD-227 
P-00,316$ 
EFTA00086506

U.S. Department of J ustice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 
Wert Palm Beach, FL 33401 
(S60820-871/ 
Facsimile: 
February 5, 2007 
DELIVERY BY HAND 
do James L. Eisenberg, Esq. 
250 S Australian Ave, Ste 704 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5007 
Re: 
Testimony of 
Dear Ms... 
This letter confirms the understanding between yourself and the United States Attorney's 
Office for the Southern District of Florida. 
You have represented that you will truthfully answer questions of the federal government in 
its investigation of the procurement of prostitutes, amongst others. You will supply complete and 
truthful i o • a i o r is 
t e attorneys and law enforcement officers of the federal government and to 
any 
ich may conduct an investigation, as well as in any other proceeding 
rela 
to or growing out of this investigation. The obligation of tnithful disclosure includes your 
obligation to provide the attorneys and law enforcement officers of the federal government with any 
documents, records or other tangible evidence within your custody or control relating to the matters 
about which you are questioned. You will neither attempt to protect any person or entity through 
false information or omission, nor falsely implicate any person or entity. 
No statements provided by you on this date in this matter pursuant to this agreement will be 
offered into evidence in any eri mi nal case against you, except during aprosecution for perjury and/or 
giving a false statement. HoWever, i fit is determined that you have materially violated any provision 
of this agreement, all statements made by you shall be admissible in evidence against you in any 
proceeding. 
The federal government remains free to use information derived from the 
testimony directly or indirectly for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, whic may e 
used against you. You expressly waive any right to claim that such evidence should not be 
introduced because it was obtained as a result of the grand Jury testimony. Furthermore, the federal 
government may use statements made in the grand jury testimony and all evidence derived directly 
or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination, if you testify at any trial or if you 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003739 
EFTA00086507

FEBRUARY 5,2007 
PAGE 2 
suborn testimony that contradicts your prior statements and testimony. 
No additional promises, agreements and conditions have been entered into other than those 
set forth in this letter and none will bo entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
PY: 
Assistant United States Attorney 
have read this agreement and discussed it with my attorney, and I hereby acknowledge that it 
fully sets forth my agreement with the office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of 
Florida. I state that there have been no additional promises, agreements or representations made to me 
by any officials of the United States in connection with this matter. 
Dated: February 
2007 
West Palm Beach, Florida 
Witnessed by: 
James L Eisenber Bs . 
Attorney fo 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003740 
EFTA00086508

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District orlorida 
SOO South Australian Avo,'Suite400 
West Palm Bleach, AL 33401 
fracsItnt 
February 5, 2007 
PELIVERY BY HAND 
James L. Eisenberg, Esq. 
250.8 Australian Ave, Ste 704 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5007 
Rer 
Dear Mr. Eisenberg: 
I am writing to clarify the ground rules for• the interview with your client 
("your 
client"), to occur February 
, 2007. 
As I mentioned earlier, Ms. 
s not a target or subject of this investigation, but 
instead is being interviewed solely as a victim/vvitness. However, to address your concern 
aboµt criminal exposure, if your client complies with every provision of this agreement, then 
the United States Attorney's (Met for the Southern District of Florida ("this Office") will 
treat all statements made by your client during the interview as statements made pursuant to 
Rule 11(0 of the Fedora' Rules of Criminal Procedure. This is not a grant of immunity, 
which can be given only with approval of the Justice Department, but protects your client 
from having the statements made by her during the interview from being used against her 
directly. To guard against any misunderstandings concerning the interview of your client, 
this letter sets forth the terms of this agreement. . 
Your client agrees to be fully interviewed, that is, to provide information concerning 
your Client's knowledge of, and participation in criminal activity, including but not limited 
. to the procurenient of prostitutes: The protection, of till latter applies to an interview that 
will be conducted by this Office, Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and 
any other federal law enforcement agency this Office may require. Under this agreement, 
no information disclosed by your olient during the interView will be offered in evidence 
against her in any criminal or civil proceeding, provided that your• client complies with this 
agreement and that the information your client furnishes is truthfhlEcomplete, and accurate. 
If, however, your client gives materially false, incomplete, or misleading information; 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003741 
EFTA00086509

JAM 
MEER°, Pao. 
PAGE 2 
then this Office may use such information in any matter or• proceeding and your client is 
subject to prosecution for perjury, obstruction of. justice, and making. false statements to. 
government agencies. Any such prosecution maybe based upon infoimation prOvided by 
your client during the course of the interview, and such infertnation, including your client's 
statements, will be admissible against your client in any grand jury or other proceeding. 
• The government also may use statements made by your client in the interview and all 
evidence derived directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of impeachment or 
cross-examination if she testifies at any trial or hearing, and/or in any rebuttal case against 
your client in a criminal trial in which she is a defendant or a witness. These provisions are 
necessary to ensure that your client does not make or offer any false representation or 
statement in any proceeding or to a government agency or commit perjury during any 
testimony. 
Your .client further agrees that attorneys for the United States may be present at the 
interview, and agrees not to seek.disqualification of any such government attorney from any 
proceeding or trial because'of their participation at the interview. ' 
The entire agreement. between the United States and your client is set forth in this 
letter. No additional promises, agreements, or conditions have been entered into and none 
will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. 
If the foregoing accurately reflects- the understanding and •agreement between this 
Office and your client, it is requested that you and your client execute this letter as provided 
below. 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander AcOsta 
United States Attorney 
By: 
Assistant United. States Attorney 
I have received this letter from my attorney, lames.L. Eisenberg, Esquire, have read 
it and discussed it with my attorney, and I hereby acknowledge that it fully sets forth my 
understanding andagreerbent with the Office of the United States Attorney for.the Southern 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003742 
EFTA00086510

James L. EISENBERG ESQ. 
RE: 
FEBRUARY 2, 
PAGE .3 
District of Florida. I state that there have been no additional promises or representations 
made to me by any official of the United States Government or by my attorney in connection 
with this matter. 
Dated: 
Witnessed by: 
James L. Eisenberg, Esquire 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003743 
EFTA00086511

U.S. Department of Justice 
Authorization for Reimbursement 
of Unusual Expenses of Fact Witnesses 
Request for Unusual Expense(s) of Fact Witness 
(For United Stales Attorneys Office Use Only) 
Control if 
2. Court Docket Number 
Peen Illitfiriti Al LOA 
OU 
rig S. Contact Prim 
tms Pam 
1:1• ••••••••••• 
7. Witness Name & 
one 0. SSN 
8. Vendor Name & Address, Phone It, TIN/SSN 
9. Payment t6 be made to: 
10. Recelpt/invoice Is: 
11. Type of Unusual Expense: 
12. Explanation: 
K Medically Necessary Item 
(Attached Supporting Statement) 
ID Excess Lodging/Per Diem 
K Travel & Transportation 
K Pretrial Conference Waiver 
K Other 
18. Start Date of Service (dOlDANR) 
2 41O 7 
18. Juslifidabon: 
14. End Date of Service (MO/DANR) 
2-4 
/0 7 
15. Amount 
17.1 hereby certify that the expenses and services listed on this docuMent are appropriate and are within the Federal laws 
and regulations. I fully understand that I can be held personally gable or besubject to disciplinary action for Improperly using 
government funds or services that exceed delegated authority or that violate Federal laws or regulations. 
Signature of Requesting AUSA 
Data 
18. Nellie& Title of Approving Official 19. Date (MO/DANR) 
20. Signature of Approving Official 
Case No, 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
—
CIFWE Form 
P-003744 
EFTA00086512

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400- 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Facsimile 
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET 
TO: 
JIM EISENBERG, ESQ. 
DATE: 
February 5, 2007 
FAX NO. 
561 659-2380 
# OF PAGES: 
PHONE NO. 
RE: 
U.S. ATTORNEY 
FROM: 
ASSISTANT 
PHONE NO. 
commugNTsc EH 17in 
f pc' 
(
 14-e 
cjae1
x/Aili- a 
d 6 it' L 
htive_ 
chwr 
inaink (4,1}—&- 
fil/tia 
/ 
PAL. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003745 
EFTA00086513

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
NORTHERN (WEST PALM BEACH) DIVISION 
IN RE: 
SEALED ORDER 
On Application of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and it 
appearing to the satisfaction of the Court: 
1. 
That 
has been called to testify and to provide other information before 
. the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 
and 
2. 
That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney, 'as 
refused 
to testify and provide other information on the basis of her privilege against self-incrimination; and 
3. 
That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney, the testimony and other 
information from 
may be necessary to the public interest; and 
4. 
That the aforesaid Application has been made with the approval of the Assistant 
Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice or a duly 
. 
. 
designated Acting Assistant Attorney General, pursuant to the authority vested in him by Title 18, 
United States Code, Section 6003, and Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 0.175 and 
0.132(e). 
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 6002, 
that
I give testimony and provide other information which she refus • 
•
el. 
EFTA00086514