EFTA00066191

326 
4,i FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES 
abroad, and residing in part in Paris, 
France; there would be little to stop the 
defendant from fleeing, transferring his 
unknown assets abroad, and then continu-
ing to do whatever it is he does to earn his 
vast wealth from a computer terminal be-
yond the reach of extradition." Dkt. 11 at 5 
(emphasis omitted). The Defendant, it 
should also be noted, is already at risk of 
losing some of his real property because 
the Indictment contains a forfeiture allega-
tion regarding any property that was used 
or intended to be used to commit or to 
facilitate the sex trafficking offenses and 
that includes, but it is not limited to, the 
property located at 9 East 71st Street, 
New York, New York. 
(5) The appointment and role of "trus-
tees" who will presumably live with Mr. 
Epstein and monitor his compliance with 
bail conditions are unacceptably vague. 
They do not, for example, address the 
conflict that is created by the salary the 
"trustees" are earning from the Defendant 
and their purported role as independent 
monitors. (The same problem arises in re-
lation to private 24/7 security guards.) This 
is especially problematic where, as here, it 
is alleged that employees of the Defendant 
may have engaged in unlawful acts with 
and on behalf of the Defendant. According 
to the Government, "the defendant worked 
with others, including employees and asso-
ciates who facilitated his exploitation of 
minors, by among other things, contacting 
victims and scheduling their sexual en-
counters with the defendant, both in New 
York and in Florida." Dkt. 11, Ex 1 at 2. 
(6) "As a fallback," the Defense sug-
gests the utilization of and the funding of a 
private security guard agency to "virtually 
guarantee" Mr. Epstein's presence in court 
and, presumably, also to supervise his be-
havior. This contingency plan is not a part 
of Mr. Epstein's 14 point proposal. Never-
theless, the Court is asked by the defense 
to "revisit" its legal viewpoint as expressed 
in an earlier decision concerning 24/7 pri-
vate home security guards. 
[181 Each bail package in each case is 
considered and evaluated on its individual 
merits by the Court. And, in view of the 
Court's finding of dangerousness, a new 
bail proposal likely would be futile. See, 
g, United Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 544 ("No 
conceivable conditions could ensure the 
safety of the community."); Orena, 986 
F.2d at 632 ("We do not agree that the bail 
conditions set by the district court elimi-
nate the danger to the community or are 
superior to detention for purposes of the 
Bail Reform Act."); United States v. Co-
lombo, 777 F2d 96, 100 (2d Cir. 1985) 
("These conditions are clearly inadequate 
to protect the public from one found for 
bail purposes to be a danger to the com-
munity."). 
Conclusion & Order 
Based upon the forgoing, the Govern-
ment's motion for remand (detention) is 
granted and the Defense motion for pre-
trial release is denied. 
Attachment 
EFTA00066211

U.S. v. EPSTEIN 
Cite .s425 F.Supp3d 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 
Attachment
-Continued 
Case 9 0Scv.80736.KAM Document 361.11 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 3 
VIValens, Ann Mule C. IUSAFLS) 
ilk'T 
lea 
Jay lah on 'a pleaoactorcia-a coma 
t baton. Samernees 13. 
/ /,35 NA 
veafane. Arr vane C. t.J.SAFLSI 
190This 5004. 1 .ill Su el rare. set's talk et 9 sr. 
Already Mitts,g soma 
the sane statutes. 
Look ferharel to Speaking In the morning. 
Pest. Jag 
 
 orsµnal MCI$S$C  
From; -VIllafana. Mn merle C. 
Sent. 10/11/2007 07:20 Pit AST 
To: ley SuMuhaill 
Subject: Of: 
OS Jay .• wets, I an. 
I have Oren spending tone quality tins ulth lltle 1g looldog to-
alsdemeenors. 
Do you went to
 loos it Is USC .411 If use 1512(0), awl 4/ USG 
223(4)(1)(0) end we CIA talk ebOet thee toeorroat ; knoe tnat SCAllealt mentioned tnere be:.bg 
ivIty on a, airplane. I }1st wait to 'gate Sure Vial there IS Tactual Oasis tor the plea 
11
t
t the aunts an confirm. 
I'm rot sure exactly *extra I will loe teacrren steatite. 10 IS it alright If I call your 
Nave a gala evenieg. 
a. Marie Villain. 
sssss tent U.1. attorney 
SOO S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
Vett Pala teeth, it 33401 
---Original He sssss 
Sr..: ley 1.4110w1tx Deallt0:/tefteditiptirkleAd.CON. 
Sent: ThoaSday, Sty:genet 13. 2007 7:21 PM 
to: v111:04,4, Am Kerte c. (userts) 
Subject: 
Marie - Are you free to speak at 9 an toorrow? 
Thanlo. 
Jay 
InfOrna:10n «ntalneo in this stomunkatian is 
confidential. say be attoreurf.cliert privileged. eV/ 
COAStitute inside information. and IS intended only for 
P WA J.PYY.
327 
EFTA00066212

328 
42s FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES 
Attachment—Continued 
Case 0:0B-cv-60736.KAM Doanent 361.11 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/102016 Page 3 cd 3 
the use of the addressee. It is the PreParte of 
Kirkland g (Ills lip or Kirkland $ Ellis Internetkeel LW. 
unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
eoter
unlcation or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
lm
say be unlawful. If you have received this 
Ration in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e.mall or by e•aeil to postfiestergkirkland.coe, zed 
destroy this cominication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
The Infonetloo contained in this conmeatication is 
confidential, say be attorney-client privileged, say 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It Is the property of 
 
mid a jilts Li, or Kirkland & kills International lip. 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or cowing of FhIS 
ttehhetrettehoranY part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and say be unlawful. If you have received this 
corinunication in error, please notify us iniediataly by 
return freell or by •-seil to posteastorilkireland.coe are 
destroy this communication awl all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
• 
• 
Pi • 1.1403.11le 
EFTA00066213

U.S. v. EPSTEIN 
Cite as 625 F.Supp_id 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 
Attachment—Continued 
Case 9 08.cv.130736 KAM Docunure 361 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10,2016 Page 2 Of 2 
Villalana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Va alone, Arn Mae* C. (USAFLS) 
Iowa). Sofwvmtter ttl. Mt eM AM 
aayLelkostr 
Oven Ateremenle,
Ili Jay - I was hoping three would be thinp (or nsc to read this morning. but I will ay to remain mime 
I believe there are only Iwo types of asseernaus that week apply to dis case (1 ) a plea aspeemno to a :kderal 
charge or charges; and 12) a non-prosecuboa agrcemeal(uthich is really a deferred prosecution agreement 
because thedefendant agrees dot if he violates the agreement. the US Can prosecute him). 
A plea agreement is part of the coon file. It is nos accessible on-line via PACER. but someone cm go to the 
Clerk's Office to obtain, copy 
A non-promeution agreement would not be made public x filed with the Coen. but it world rennin pin of oa 
case Mc. Is probably would be subject to a SUIA rupee. but it is no: winch ng that we would disIntule 
without compulsory process 
On the obstruction charges. many of the fats I included o that Erg peof%r were hypothesized based icon our 
dienneiona and the agents' tatimmutiom of
 We will need ha inlets icw her to conlins .he nrevrucy of 
those facts On a second count. we ould rdy on the incident where Mr. Epssein's private imustigatois 
followed _father. forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something mom recent related to any NM 
we could cora* nix. 
on that helps. 
.1. afwm lillafiob 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
300 S Australian Ave. Suite KU 
West Palm Beach, PL 33401 
de tne toms 
329 
EFTA00066214

330 
425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES 
Attachment—Continued 
Case 9-06-cv-80736-KAM 000.11110,11 361-9 Entitled on FLSO Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 
Vitiating, Ann Marls C. (USAFLS) 
i
uron. 
Jay Lethwea IJUthaunientritin-p coml 
at 
Wodnescay. Sapnotbet in 203? i I 38 NA 
thasisna. Am gareC 0.6AFIS/ 
bjec.i. 
Re. Pall Athesensmis 
COnkkaltial • Foe milkman perpOws only 
Still waking en :White Sot pit lank at this 
On August 
2007. FRI Spinal Aetna F. Noshin Kuyikettdall mid Jason Richards trawled to the home of 
 
 in connection with an lastest:nationsendam it. 
Southern District of Flossie. Mr. [poem was in formed unlit: send its of the 
As a 
reatel. Mr. Enna° attempted iota:ass both 
achy ad Sunda that 
manth ofa 
attend an offend] proceeding, nano granularly the -'to 
which 
Mr. Epstein. In Funicular. changed WWI pWts and flew with both 
to the landed States Virgin Islands rather than in an airport in New Jersey in order to aucmpt 
iSelay 
ttetipa of whet Mr. Epsteinthinned to be s 
Mr. Enacts tuna 
verbally harassed both 
ia canation to this attempt to delay out eultegaiy 
rat sat of lucent all in violation of IS USC S112(4)(1 ). 
 
Orier.nal Massage 
roan: "Vglafsna. Ann Alarm C 
SAFES)* 
:09.'1912007 I I lit AM AST 
To: lay Lakowne 
Subject: RE. Draft .Agreernaus9
Hi h. I Cool laws air hclual boot for the glad 
herAil.0 ar 
no ttwder.n.krti 
evident sr that. So. the assnti need In tak m Pent ar3 the, I ran frai Ins moping factual potty. I hi. c aro! ale 
owl %/Ilan and I an .4 in (tettravnt then seubthhts 
.1 Iferie Majaila 
As4tunt Ll.S Au,-ay 
The intimation contained in OW communication es 
confidential. may be wormy-cling Nivtieded. may 
tonstotne Inside information. and is intended only for 
theme of the addressee. his the property of 
. .id, 
Ellis 
LLP 
vs 
Kirkland 
& 
Ell
ilk..
is latimatanal LLP. 
nanhorince use, disclosure et copying of Ms
. mthunication or any pan thacuf is strictly whisked 
and nay be unlawful. If boa have received the 
BLAKE MARINE GROUP, 
LLC, Plaintiff, 
v. 
FRENKEL & COMPANY, Defendant. 
18-CV-10759 (AT) (CIIP) 
United States District Court, 
S.D. New York. 
EFTA00066215