EFTA00799605

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLED Docket 06/02/2017 Page 21 of 
176 
37. 
In mid-June 2008, Attorney Edwards contacted your Affiant to inform me that he 
represented Jane Doe 1 and another identified victim (not Jane Doe 2). Attorney Edwards asked 
to meet to provide me with information regarding Epstein. On June 19, 2008, Attorney Edwards 
sent me an email stating that he had "information and concerns that I would like to share" and that 
he wanted to meet with me to "discuss [his] plans." DE362-30. As noted in the email, he had 
one "client" at the time, who has been referred to in this suit as Jane Doe I, and he did not state 
that Jane Doe 1 wished to meet with me. (Id.) I invited Attorney Edwards to send to me any 
information that he wanted me to consider. At the time of my conversation with Attorney 
Edwards, I was still preparing to present charges against Epstein if Epstein succeeded in having 
the NPA set aside or if he failed to perform the terms of the NPA. I did not disclose the existence 
of the NPA to Edwards because I did not know whether the NPA remained viable at that time or 
whether Epstein would enter the state court guilty pleas that would trigger the NPA. I was aware 
that a final decision on Epstein's challenges to the NPA and the federal investigation was expected 
shortly, so I impressed upon Attorney Edwards that time was of the essence. Attorney Edwards 
sent nothing at that time, nor did he ever inform me that Jane Doe 1 and/or Jane Doe 2 wanted to 
confer with me before any resolution was reached. If anything had been provided by Edwards, 
Jane Doe 1, or Jane Doe 2, I would have reviewed it and shared it with my superiors. I also 
advised Attorney Edwards that he should consider contacting the State Attorney's Office. I was 
informed, however, that no contact with that office was made. At that time, attorney Edwards 
had also alluded to Jane Doe 2, so I advised him that, to my knowledge, Jane Doe 2 was still 
represented by Attorney James Eisenberg. He did not dispute or correct my understanding. 
20 
EFTA00799625

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLED Docket 06/02/2017 Page 22 of 
176 
38. 
On Friday, June 27, 2008, at approximate 4:15 p.m., I received a copy of Epstein's 
proposed state plea agreement and learned that Epstein's state court change of plea was scheduled 
for 8:30 a.m., Monday, June 30, 2008. The Palm Beach Police Department and I attempted to 
notify the victims about that hearing in the short time available to us. I specifically called attorney 
Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the hearing. I believe that it was during this 
conversation that Attorney Edwards notified me that he represented Jane Doe 2. I urged attorney 
Edwards to have his clients attend the hearing so that they could address the Court, if they wished, 
and I stressed the importance of the hearing. I never told Attorney Edwards that the state charges 
involved "other victims," and neither the state court charging instrument nor the factual proffer 
limited the procurement of prostitution charge to a specific victim. In fact, as mentioned in 1 37, 
supra, I had encouraged Attorney Edwards to contact the State Attorney's Office to discuss his 
client and the Epstein investigation with the state prosecutor. Attorney Edwards informed me that 
he could not attend the hearing but that someone would be present at the hearing. The case agents 
and I attended the hearing as members of the general public, and did not publicly announce our 
presence since we were there only as observers. Neither attorney Edwards nor any of his clients 
were present, and no one identified themselves to me, the FBI agents, or the state court as being 
present on behalf of the petitioners. 
/// 
/// 
/// 
21 
EFTA00799626

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 23 of 
176 
39. 
On July 3, 2008, attorney Edwards contacted me to discuss how the Epstein matter 
had been resolved and to raise concerns regarding that resolution. I shared the concerns that 
attorney Edwards raised with my superiors at the U.S. Attorney's Office. 
40. 
1 declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that the foregoing 
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 
Executed this 
day of June, 2017. 
Marie Villafafia, Esq. 
22 
EFTA00799627

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLED Docket 06/02/2017 Page 24 of 
176 
EXHIBITS TO 6/2/2017 VILLAFARA DECLARATION 
Exhibit Number 
Description 
1 
January 24, 2007 letter from A. Marie Villafafia to James Eisenberg with 
attachment (redacted) 
2 
February 1, 2007 letter from James Eisenberg to A. Marie ViBala& 
(redacted) 
3 
February 5, 2007 fax from A. Marie Villafafia to James Eisenberg with 
attachments (redacted) 
4 
February 6, 2007 Authorization for Reimbursement of Unusual Expenses 
(redacted) 
5 
February 12, 2007 letter from James Eisenberg to A. Marie Villafaiia 
(redacted) 
6 
April 16, 2007 Order from Judge Middlebrooks (redacted) 
7 
December 13, 2007 letter from A. Marie Villafafia to Jay Lefkowitz 
(redacted) 
8 
January 26, 2015 Declaration of Timothy R. Slater, Section Chief, Federal 
Bureau of Investigation (redacted) 
9 
February 20, 2008 Deposition Transcript, State of Florida v. Jeffley Epstein 
(redacted) 
10 
June 12, 2009 Hearing Transcript, Jane Doe, et aL v. Jeffrey Epstein, S.D. 
Fla. Case No. 08-80119-CIV-Marra 
EFTA00799628

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 25 of 
176 
Exhibit 1 
EFTA00799629

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 26 of 
176 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United Slates Attorney 
Southern District of FlOrida 
DELIVERY BY BAND 
James L. Bamberg, Esq. 
250 S Australian Ave, Ste104 
West Palm Beach, FL 33.401-5007 
Dear Jim; 
500 South Attain/too Ave, &Ito 400 
act Pa& :Beach, FL 334W 
(50)1120-871 
Amniotic 0008204777 
January 24, 2007 
Re; 
Federal _Subpoena
have enclosed a new subpoena forTEM 
MS M I mentioned earlier, Ms. Millis nova target of this investigation and the United 
States ec s her testimonysolely ea avictim/wituess, Daring our last conyemationregarrling 
Ms. NiIM you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kqtigar 
letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with the Sand 
intends to invoke the 
Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please maw with her to confirm whether this remains her 
position. 'filial pleas, advise in writing. Evenif Ms. Millis inclined to invoke her Fifth 
Amendment rights, she must still appear pursuant to the subpoena so that I may ask her 
questions that would not require the invocation of the FifthAmendment. If she still invokes, 
I intend to move to compel her answers. If you oryour client is unainulahle on February 6; 
2007, plea.se lame know of another Tuesday when you are available. 
I also am concerned about a potential tonflibt 'gluten* in yourrepresentationotivIs; 
Ma In ease of future litigation regarding this lane, please provide me with information 
regarding who is paying (directly br indirectly) for yourservices on beludfof Ma; la 
the 
scope of your representatisand whether yop am taking .dlrection on this matter front 
anyone abort= Ms. MEIN If any fbtmal or infornuil joint defense agreements exist, 
Whether in writing or otherviises please provides copy of such agreements. lithe agreement 
is pUrebboral, please provide a written summary of its terms: 
GOVERNMENT 
EXHIBIT 
4  
1.
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P4303736 
EFTA00799630

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 27 of 
176 
JAWS EISENBERG, ESQ. 
JANUARY 24, 2007 
PAus 2 
I look forward to your response. 
By: 
Sincerely, 
IL Alexander Acosta 
Una States Attorney 
A. Marie Villafafla 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003737 
EFTA00799631

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 28 of 
176 
United States District Court 
AVM/ERN MISTNOT OF FLORIDA 
Ta nal 
SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY 
SUBPOENA FOR: 
Ell PERSON g DOCUMENTS OR OBJECT[S] 
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify heronsthe Grand IirryortheUnitestStates District 
Court st the place, date and time SpedifiedbeloW. 
N,ACB: 
United Stales District Courthouse 
701 Clematis Street 
West Pahn Desch, Florida $3401 
Min 
DATE AND TIME: 
February 6, P07 
1:001ase, 
YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED tit king with you the rollowing d000ment(e) or objeot(s): 
*Muse coordinate your compliance with this subpoena and confirm the date and time, and location of 
your appearance With Special Agent NesbittKuyrkendall, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Telephone: 
(S61)-822-5946. 
This subpoena shall main in effect until you are granted leave to depart by the court or by an officer acting on behalf 
of the court 
Matt 
DEPTJTY CLERK 
DATE: 
January 23, 2007 
This subpoena is *pod upon eppligetton 
of the 
led States.of Attica 
Name; Address and Thong Thirnber of Assistant U.S. Attorney 
Anulviturie C, Vilisfens AssittrtUS• Mom* 
500 So. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Nintfieach, FL 3moi-05 
'TO MI) 820-871f x3047 
_ Fax: (56I) 802-1787 
•
 
*Vim applliobla, via •nOnet 
mMs,Whisawe 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
FORKORSI27 
13-0804,88 
EFTA00799632

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 29 of 
176 
Exhibit 2 
EFTA00799633

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 30 of 
176 
EISENBERG & FOUTS, P.A. 
Attorneys At Law 
JAMES L. EISENBERG 
*sada Bor Board Cedilla) Criminal Trial layer. 
Natlonl BOAtli CITTrial Adtoamy Certified Colinlual rrhl Advatott 
KM 
ALOE sours 
OnoClatunkaCantrat Suite704,250 Australian Avenue Saufli,Wizt Pala Beach, FL334QI 561/659-200917=561/6513 180 
February 1, 2007 
A. Marie Villefana, Asst. U.S. Attorney 
500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Re; 
Grand hay Subpoena fbr 
Dear Marie, 
I received your hitter dated January 24, 2007.with regard to ANN= 
I must admit 1 forced 
myself to wait several'days to respond in order to "cool off" and not say anything I would regret 
later. Now that time has passed, allow me to respond appropriately. 
1. If you want to force Ms. 
a single mother, to come to the 
to 
personally involo her Fifth Amendment nghts, she will be there. That does remain her position. 
My only request is that you
 a babysitter service for her' ebild. I will be there, but 1 am not 
paid to babysit and.Ms.
should not have ju ay someone. It is this type of attitude, that your 
office refuses to acceptthe fact that it is Ms. MMs decision not to cooperate withthe government 
that upsets her. Your office fails to recogaite that merely coming to courtis a problem for a single 
mother like Ms, 
d, under these circumstances, appears to be a waste of time at best and, in 
her mind, person 
assment. 
2. Rest assurcdthatthere Is no conflict °finis:west in rayrepresentation of Ms. M. 
la this.
case I have alivays been asked and-eh/Myst:11 exercise independentjydgment to follow my client's 
independent will. The remainder of your questions as to this matter are really none of the. 
Goveniment's business. 
3. 1 will share with you that one of the reasons for our firm position that Ms. Nvvill 
invoke her Fifth Amendment right and choose not tovoluntadly cooperate with the Government is 
our concern that the Government is not exercising independent judgment in this case, 
The history of this case bps been in the newspapers. The case is being prosecuted in State court,. 
Despitethe state court prosecution, the Town of Palm Beach Police Chief went on what can only be 
GOVERNMENT 
EXHIBIT 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003732 
EFTA00799634

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 31 of 
176 
A. Marie Villa.fata, Asst. U.S. Attorney 
February 1, 2007 
Page Two 
described as a public rampagein the newspaper when the case was not prosecuted to his.liking that 
reminded me of a small child having apublio temper tantrum. In ro.Y thirty years of experience, I 
have never seen a law enforcement Officer like this publicly Make what appeared to be a political 
case In the newspaper for a prosecution and publicly criticize anyone who got in his way, including 
the eleCtedStateAttorney„ This resulted in, a fedond investigation one topic no oneremembers the 
Federal:Government ever beinginterested in prosecuting before. Although I am certain that you 
PerahnallY have not badyourdecision-mak:Mg process compromised, the appearance that your office 
is being influenced by the Town of Palm Beach Police Chiefs agenda is. very real. Under these• 
cirountstancesel don't see how any lawyer could advise ay client to voluntarily cooperate. Of 
special coneernis -Rattle Town ofFahn Beach Police have promoted prosecuting at leastone of the 
girls who allegedly gaire massages. 
One. final thought. My client and my fear that Ms. balcould be prosecuted is enhanced by the 
demand for the personal appearance made in your letter. Your initial Kastiger letterifall far shrift 
of granting the functional equivalent bfD0J imniutiity. Several months ago I was given the distinct 
impression through our conversations that you were going to obtain DOJ Immunity for Ms. IA
Now the government is cbanging count for no apparent reason. This leads to speculation that the 
only reason for the turnabout is that prosecution in either state or federal cotes id being considered 
by someone, 
directed atyoupersonally. I want to repeat that youhitve always treated us with 
office should advise the TovaaPolice Chief to act in a similar fashion. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA. 
P-003733 
EFTA00799635

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 32 of 
176 
Exhibit 3 
EFTA00799636

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 33 of 
176 
U.S. Departntent of tunic° 
United States Attorney 
SoatheraDistriet of Florida 
q. Marie Villaidlia 
500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400' 
11,-..• 
n..... t, 
21401 
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET 
TO: 
JIM EISENBERG, ESO, 
 DATE: 
FAX NO. 
561 659-2380 
 # OF PAGES: 
FEDER NO.  
 RE: 
FebtuarV .5, 2007 
FROM: 
A MARIE V/LLAF 
ASSISTANT V. B. ATTORNEY 
last th 17r4-- Thee- 
(5cug 1/Le
commE 
.19(At 
izoitt a ji)tet. 
d.thk 
OV-howe_ afrua 
burs 
JO-
Todik (40-
6eppreztau 
44 GOVERNMENT 
EXHIBIT 
S'  
3 
• 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003745 
EFTA00799637

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 34 of 
176 
11.$,Department of Justice 
United StarCs. Attorney 
Southern District ofFlorida 
shOWouth AmamiIlan Ave, Suite 400 
February 5, 2007 
nnuv0ix BY }WO 
148/1M MEI 
c/o lames I,. RiSenberg, Sgq, 
250 S Australian Aye, Ste704 
West Palm Beach, FIM401-5007 
Re: 
Dear Ms, lv
This letter confirms thvunderstanding between yourself and the United States Attorney's 
Office /brute Southern District•of Florida. 
You have represented that you till truthfully answer questions of the federal government in 
its investigation of the procurement of prostitutes, amongst others. You Will supply complete and 
netball 1 OIM -0 • 0 the attorneys and law eadbrcement °effects of the federal government and to 
any 
Molt may conduct an investigation, as well as in any other proceeding 
related to or growing out of this investigation. The obligation of borthitil disclosure includes your 
obligation to provide the attorneys and law enforcement Officers of the federalgovernment with any 
demo:bents, records or other tangible evidence within your.custody or Control relating in the matters 
about ithich you are questioned. IL'Ouwill neither attempt to protect Any person or entity through 
/hiss information pr omission, nor falsely iniplicate any person or entity. 
No statements provided by you on this date in this matter pursuant to this agreement will be 
offered into evidence in snyetirninal case against you, exceptduring aprosecntion forperj toy and/or 
iivinga false statement. &Weyer, ifit determined that you have tnaboriallyviolated any provision 
• 
of tine agteomeut, all statements made by you shall be admissible in evidence against you in auy.
proceeding, 
The federal government remains 'free to use information derived from the 
testimony dire.ctly or indirectly for the purpose of obtaining leads to other Oldie's*, Wbicl 'may 
need against you. You expressly Waive any right to aim that. mob evidence should not be 
introdueed because it was obtained as a result of the grand jury tosfilminy. Furthermore, the federal 
govenuilent may use statements made in the grand jury testimony and all evidence derived directly 
or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-exataination, ifyOu testify daily trial or if.You 
Case No. 0g-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003739 
EFTA00799638

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 35 of 
176 
1Y18.11.4111 
FBBIWARY 5,2007 
?Akin 2 
suborn testimony that contradicts your prior Statements and testiniony!
No additional promises, agreements and conditions havebeen entexedisto otherthanthose 
set forth in this letter and none Will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all patties. 
Since*, 
Aletitnnsier Acosta 
United States Attorney 
A. Mario Villareal 
Assistant United States:Aitomey 
T have read this agreement and discussed it with•ply attorney, and T hereby acknowledge that it 
fhlly sets -font my agreement with the office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of 
Florida. I state that there have been no additional promises, agreements pt representations-made to me 
by any officiala ofthe United States in connection with this matter. 
Dated: February 
, 2007 
'West Palm Beach, Florida 
witnessed by: 
lames la limber 
Attorney feel= 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003740 
EFTA00799639

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 36 of 
176 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
SoutheitrDistrictof Florida 
.500 South Australian Ave45)ibe-400.
;I'm; fiabliBiach. Pt j3401 
February 5, 2007 
DELIVERY rir HAND
Ames L. Eisenberg, Esq. 
250 t Australian Ave, Stc 704 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5007 
Rer 
Dear Mr. Eisenberg: 
I am writing to• clarify the ground rules for the interview with your pliant, TM 
Ivaryour olienr), to occur February 
, 2007. 
As I mentioned earlier, MS. lvillis not a target 0t sUbject of this investigation, but 
instead is being interviewed solely is a victim/Witness, Homier, to address your concern 
aboµt criminal exposure, if your (silent complies with rieryprOviSion of this agreement, then 
the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (".this (gibe s) will 
treat all statements made by your clientduring the interview as statements made pursuant to 
Rule 11(i) of the Federal Rules of Criminal itooechnie. This is not a grant of immunity, 
Which can be given only with approval of the Iustice Department, but protect? your client 
from having the statements made by her during the interview ftpm being used against her 
directly. To guard against anymisunderstandings onnearning the interview of your O0114 
this letter sets feath the terms of this agreement. . 
Your client agrees to be fully interviewed, that is, to provide information Correcting 
your client's knowledge of, and participation in criminal aetivity, including but not limited 
. to the procurement of prostitutes. Theprotection$ this letter applies to an interview that 
will be conchieted by this Office, Special Agents ofthelleclerall3ureau ofinvegtigafton, and 
any other federal law enforcement agency this Office may require. Under this agreement, 
no. information disclosed by your client during The interview will be offered in evidence 
against her in any criminal or thin proceeding, proVided that your client complies with.this 
sgrednent and that the information your client finishes is truthfldrcomplete, and accurate: 
If, however, y.our 'Aleut gives materially false, incomplete, or misleading information; 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003741 
EFTA00799640

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 37 of 
176 
James 
04.,. SENBIllte, ESQ. 
EIMIWARY 2, 2007 
PAGE 2. 
then this Office may use such information in any matter or proceeding and your Client is 
subject tO prosecution for perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false Statements 
government agencies. Any such Prosecution maybe based UpOrrinfoimatiOn provided by 
your client during the course of the interview, and such Mfortnation, belittling your client's • 
statements, will be admissible against your client it any grand jury or other proceeding. 
• ThegoVetement also may use statements made by your Client in the interview and all 
evidence derived directly or hi:tiredly therefrom for the purpose of' iMpetiohment or 
cross-ccamination if she testifies at any trial-or hearing,' and/or-in any rebuttal case-against 
your' client in a criminal trial in whic4h she is a defendant. or a witness, These provisions are 
necessary to ensure that your client does not make or offer any false representation at 
statement in an?' proeCoding. or to a government agency or ooxmnit perjury during any 
testintony, 
Yourclient further agrees that attorneys for the United States may be present at the 
interview, and agrees not to seek.disqualiflcation of any such government attorney from any 
proteeding or trial her-Ruse of their participation at the interview. • 
The entire agreement between the 'nited States and your client is set forth in this 
letter. No additional promises, agreements, or conditions have been entered into and none 
will be entered into unleis in writing and signed by all parties. 
If the fbmgoing accurately reflects the understanding and agreement between this 
Offlceandyour client, it is requested that you and your nitwit exectite this letter as provided 
below, 
Sincerely, 
it Alexander Acosta 
'United States AttOniey 
BY: 
A. Marie ViilafhPia
• . 
Assistant United States Attorney 
I taivereceived this letter from my.attorney, Iranes.L. liisertberg, Iisquire, have read 
it end discussed it with thy attorney, and I hereby acknowledge that it fidly sets forth my 
understanding and agteendant with the Office oftheThitedStates Attorney forte Southern 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003742 
EFTA00799641

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 38 of 
176 
,Lithiss L. BISENBERO ESq. 
RI ;
P 
2, 
PAGES' 
District of Florida, I state that there have been no additional promises or representations 
made to me by any official of the United States Govermtent or by my attorney in connection 
with this matter, 
Dated: 
Witnessed by: 
Mims t", Eisenberg, Batlike 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-003743 
EFTA00799642

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 39 of 
176 
Exhibit 4 
EFTA00799643

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 40 of 
176 
U.S. Department of Justice 
Authorization for Reimbursement 
of Unueual Expenses of Fact Wit:desires 
Request for Unusual Expense(o) of Fact Witness 
(For United States Attorney's Office Use Only) 
Control# 
. 
a on o 
our 
West- Palm 
2. Court boded Nurfiber 
3. Requesting AUSA 
A. M04  Vitarta, 
5. °intact Person 
6. Contact Person Ntimber 
90 zoq - /041- "7 
7. Witness Name& 
,
agm 
a 
one
• t. tyl,c
sfh 
#, SSN 
Ma 
. 
& Vendor Name & Address, Phone it, TIN/S$N 
9. Paytnent to hepatic' to: 
a 
M-
10. Recsiptfinvolce Is: 
11. Type of Unusual Expense: 
Medically Necessary Item 
(Attached SuppodIng Statement) 
lapopendeet Care 
Excess Leda Ing/Per Diem 
El Travel &Transportation 
K Pretrial Conference Waiver 
K other 
12. Explanation: 
Tht. f.A))5" 44 41:LO a- StYiall 
tomic6Lpteei- had. no &rya 
ti?i*Ctell fe-e CICA-41 co/AAie
kAhfi ted-
CELLS x'10" 
Gulta C. Ca. 
18.Start 
Date 
of
-Seivide imo/DANS) 
ZIG /0 "7
14. End Date of Service (MO/DA/YR) 
2 —/to 107 
IS:Amount 
16. JustlfiCation: 
GOVERNMENT 
I 
EXHIBIT 
17. I hereby certify thatthe expenses and Semites listed on.thls document are.approPriate and are within the Federal laws 
and regulations. I fully understand that I can be held personally liable or be subject to casetfilnaty action for Inipropedy using 
government funds or services that exceed delegated authority or that violate Federal laws or regulations, 
signaium of Requesting AUSA 
18. Name & Tale of Approving Official 
Date 
19, Dale (MO/DA/YR) 
20. Signature of Approving Official 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
Form 
P-003744 
EFTA00799644