EFTA00596325

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
CASE NO.: 
P.C. 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, 
LPSLEY R FF 
AND 
Defendants. 
COMPLAINT 
Plaintiff P.C., by and through her undersigned counsel, sues the Defendants 
Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, 
Lesley Groff and a 
and alleges as follows: 
1. 
This cause of action arises under federal statute and jurisdiction is proper 
under 28 U.S.C. section 1331. 
2. Plaintiff files this Complaint under a pseudonym in order to protect her 
identity because this Complaint makes allegations of a sensitive sexual nature and 
disclosure of Plaintiffs name publicly will cause further harm to her. 
EFTA00596325

3. At all times material to the events alleged in this cause of action the Plaintiff 
was a citizen of South Africa residing in New York, New York. 
4. At all times material to this cause of action Defendant Jeffrey Epstein had 
multiple residences, including in New York, New York and the United States 
Virgin Islands. He is currently a citizen of the United States and a resident of the 
U.S. Virgin Islands. 
5. At all times material to this cause of action Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was an 
adult male born in 1953. 
6. At all times material to this cause of action Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell 
was residing in in New York, New York and was a citizen of Great Britain and 
France. 
7. At all times material to this cause of action_was 
residing in 
New York, New York, and, on information and belief, was a citizen of New York. 
8. At all times material to this cause of action Lesley Groff was a residing in 
New York, New York and, on information and belief, was a citizen of New York 
9. At all material times, 
was residing in New York, New 
York and, on information and belief, was a citizen of New York. 
10. Because a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to this 
cause of action occurred in the Southern District of New York, venue is proper in 
that District. 28 U.S.C. section 1391(b)b(2) 
2 
EFTA00596326

11. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendants Jeffrey Epstein, 
Ghislaine Maxwell, 
.,esley Groff, and 
owed a 
duty to Plaintiff to treat her in a non-negligent manner and not to commit or 
conspire to commit intentional or tortious illegal acts against her. 
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 
12. At all times material to this cause of action Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was an 
adult male over 50 years old. Defendant Epstein is known as a billionaire who 
uses his extraordinary wealth to commit illegal sexual crimes in violation of 
federal and state statutes and to employ numerous others, including the named 
Defendants, to conspire and assist in committing those crimes and additional torts 
as well as to protect and conceal his crimes and torts from being discovered. 
13. Defendant Epstein displays his enormous wealth, power and influence to his 
employees; to the victims procured for sexual purposes; and to the public in order 
to advance and carry out his crimes and torts. At all relevant times, Defendant 
Epstein owned and continues to own, directly or through nominee individuals used 
to conceal his interests, a fleet of airplanes, motor vehicles, boats and one or more 
helicopters. He owned and owns numerous properties and homes, including a 
51,000-square-foot mansion in Manhattan; a $30 Million, 7,500-acre ranch in New 
Mexico; a 70-acre private island formerly known as Little St. James in or near St. 
Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands; a mansion in London, England; a home in Paris, 
3 
EFTA00596327

France; and a mansion in Palm Beach County, Florida. The allegations herein 
primarily concern the defendant's conduct while at his townhouse in New York; on 
one or more of his private airplanes; and on his private island in the United States 
Virgin Islands. 
14. Defendant Epstein has a compulsive sexual preference for young females as 
young as 13 and as "old" as 25. Defendant had sex with young females virtually 
every day and assisted in the development and execution of a sex trafficking 
scheme designed to fulfill his sexual desires. 
15. Defendant Maxwell was for decades the highest-ranking employee of the 
Defendants' sex trafficking enterprise. 
She herself recruited young females; 
oversaw and trained other recruiters on how best to recruit girls for sex; developed 
and executed schemes designed to recruit young females; and ensured that all 
participants of the Defendants' sex trafficking scheme acted in certain specific 
ways in order to advance the purposes of the scheme and conceal it from law 
enforcement. 
16. Defendant 
recruited young females and maintained Epstein's sex 
schedule in order to ensure that he was not without the sexual favors of young 
females for any extended period of time. Defendant 
also handled travel 
arrangements for the various females being exploited for sexual purposes. 
4 
EFTA00596328

Defendant 
reported directly up the enterprise's line of authority to 
Defendant Maxwell. 
17. Defendant Epstein employed many recruiters of young females. The nature 
of the Defendants' sex trafficking scheme enabled victims themselves, such as 
Defendant 
to elevate their status to that of a paid recruiter of other 
victims. Recruiters were taught by Defendants Epstein and Maxwell to inform 
targeted victims that Epstein possessed extraordinary wealth, power, resources and 
influence; that he was a philanthropist who would help female victims advance 
their careers and lives; and that the recruits needed only to provide Epstein with 
body massages in order to avail themselves of his financial assistance and 
influence. In fact, however, these representations were fraudulent. The vast 
majority of girls were required to perform intimate sexual acts at the Defendants' 
direction and the Defendants did not help or intend to help advance the victims' 
careers. 
18. Defendant Groff coordinated schedules between Defendant Epstein and the 
various young females used for sex; made travel arrangements for the girls; tended 
to their living needs; and communicated with them in order to maintain their 
compliance with the rules of behavior imposed upon them by the enterprise. 
19. The Defendants, led primarily by Defendants Epstein and Maxwell, fulfilled 
Epstein's compulsive need for sex with young females by preying on their 
5 
EFTA00596329

personal, psychological, financial and related vulnerabilities. The Defendants' 
tactics included promising the victims money, shelter, transportation, employment, 
admission into educational institutions, educational tuition, and other things of 
value in exchange for sex. 
20. Defendants' sex trafficking venture and enterprise operated in a hierarchal 
structure with Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at the top and 
underlings below. Underlings included the other named Defendants as well as 
unnamed co-conspirators such as various housekeepers and butlers; an airplane 
pilot; and various employees, assistants and associates. Wittingly and unwittingly, 
such underlings performed their respective roles with the purpose and effect of 
insuring that the enterprise maximized the number of young females made 
available for sexual purposes to Defendant Epstein and others. 
At all times 
materials to this complaint, the venture and enterprise was a group of two or more 
individuals associated in fact and deed. 
21. Defendants Epstein and Maxwell, with help from assistants, associates and 
underlings, recruited and procured hundreds of females over the decades of the 
operation of their scheme. Such recruitment and procurement included fraud, 
coercion, the threat of coercion, and a combination of these and similar tactics. 
Following the Defendants' recruitment and procurement of the females to join 
Epstein in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Defendants used fraudulent 
6 
EFTA00596330

promises, coercion, and threats of coercion in order to entice young females into 
sex and, once sexual activities ensued, to cause them to remain in the enterprise. 
The Defendants also transported females in interstate and foreign commerce and in 
ways that affected interstate and foreign commerce. 
22. Defendants specifically targeted underprivileged, emotionally vulnerable 
and/or economically disadvantaged young females to join the Defendants' 
enterprise. 
23. It is unknown exactly how long Defendant Epstein and Maxwell's 
aforementioned criminal and illegal enterprise operated, although on information 
and belief Plaintiff alleges that it was at least continuously and actively in 
operation from the mid-1990's through and including the calendar year 2007. 
24. Plaintiff also alleges on information and belief that Defendant Epstein has 
continued the scheme up to the present time. 
25. In 2005, Defendant Epstein and numerous co-conspirators within the 
enterprise were the subjects of a Palm Beach, Florida Police Department criminal 
investigation which revealed that Defendant Epstein had engaged in sexual 
activities with dozens of young teenage children. Each child was lured into 
Defendant Epstein's Palm Beach mansion with a promise that she would receive 
money for providing him with a body massage, although once there, each child 
was made to engage a sex act in order to receive the promised compensation. 
7 
EFTA00596331

Several were also made to engage in sex with another of Defendant Epstein's 
female sexual traveling companions. 
26. In 2006, the Palm Beach Police Department investigation was turned over to 
the FBI and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of 
Florida. The United States Attorney's Office investigated Defendant Epstein and 
his co-conspirators for their violations of numerous federal statutes, including 18 
U.S.C. Section 1591, one of the statutory bases for this complaint. 
27. The United States Attorney's investigation continued from 2006 through 
September 2007, at which time a Non-Prosecution Agreement was signed between 
Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Attorney's Office deferring federal 
prosecution of Defendant Epstein and his numerous co-conspirators for identified 
federal sex crimes against more than 30 minors. 
28. From late 2006 through September 2007, Epstein's team of lawyers 
negotiated with the federal government in an effort to avoid the filing of the fifty-
three-page draft indictment of Epstein. During these negotiations, Defendant 
Epstein decamped from Palm Beach to New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands in 
order to convey an image to prosecutors that he and his co-conspirators had 
stopped committing sex crimes. 
29. Remarkably, however—as this case will highlight—Defendant Epstein and 
his co-Defendants, including the other defendants named herein, did not abandon 
8 
EFTA00596332

their sex trafficking enterprise even while they were under state and federal 
investigation for crimes committed in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1591, among 
other laws, and even as Defendants and their attorneys were busy arguing Epstein's 
innocence and publicly defaming his victims as liars. Rather, Defendants merely 
changed their style. Instead of targeting local Palm Beach Florida high school 
girls, the Defendants transported young females from other places in the U.S. and 
abroad and brought them to Defendant Epstein's mansion in New York and his 
private island in the Virgin Islands. 
30. In June of 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state felony sex offenses 
for procuring a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution by minors. He 
avoided state prison and, instead, served part of an 18-month "soft" jail sentence 
consisting primarily of day-time release to a nearby private office where, among 
other liberties, he surfed the internet and communicated with past victims. 
31. Defendants Epstein and Maxwell developed and 
implemented a 
sophisticated system designed to insulate them from criminal and civil liability by 
protecting them from potential testimony of knowledgeable subordinates. The 
system included requiring subordinates to sign confidentiality agreements covering 
civil and criminal activity; requiring subordinates and victims to refrain from 
speaking with law enforcement officials; requiring them to notify Defendant 
Epstein's lawyers in the event they (subordinates and victims) were contacted by 
9 
EFTA00596333

law enforcement officials; requiring them to accept the representation of attorneys 
paid for by Defendant Epstein; requiring them to invoke the Fifth Amendment in 
response to questions they might be asked by investigators and prosecutors; 
requiring them to invoke the Fifth Amendment in order to refuse to turn over 
incriminating and non-incriminating evidence to law enforcement officers; 
requiring them to destroy evidence or refuse to reveal knowledge of destroyed 
evidence; and requiring them generally to refuse all cooperation with law 
enforcement officials or investigations. 
32. In 2005, Defendant Epstein and other co-conspirators, aware that law 
enforcement officials were preparing imminently to execute a search warrant of his 
home, removed computer systems that logged information about Epstein and his 
co-conspirators' illegal and criminal conduct; the identities of witnesses; nude 
photographs of young females; scheduling books; message pads; tangible items 
such as vibrators and toys; and other incriminating matter. 
SPECIFIC FACTS 
33. Commencing in approximately October 2006 and continuing through April 
2007, Defendants recruited Plaintiff into their sexual enterprise by promising to 
use their connections and resources to secure her admission to an institution of 
higher education at the expense of Defendant Epstein. 
I0 
EFTA00596334

34. Defendant 
was working as one of the enterprise's recruiters of 
young females when she approached and recruited Plaintiff. 
35. Defendant 
informed Plaintiff that she would introduce Plaintiff to 
Defendant Epstein, whom she described as a wealthy philanthropist who regularly 
used his wealth, influence and connections to help financially poor females like 
Plaintiff achieve their personal and professional goals and aspirations. 
36. Defendant 
reported to her superiors, Defendants 
Groff and 
Maxwell, and was paid for her recruitment of young females, including the 
recruitment of Plaintiff. 
37. Defendant 
introduced Plaintiff to Defendant Epstein, who 
confirmed to Plaintiff that he would use his wealth and influence to have Plaintiff 
admitted into The Fashion Institute of Technology, known as "F.I.T.", in New 
York City, or into a similar institute of higher learning offering a curriculum of 
fashion industry training. Defendants Maxwell, 
and Groff each confirmed 
this promise to Plaintiff many times. 
38. Defendant Maxwell told Plaintiff she would need to provide Defendant 
Epstein with body massages in order to reap the benefits of his and Maxwell's 
connections. Maxwell and Epstein also made known to Plaintiff that, while they 
had the ability to advance her education and career, they also had the ability to 
make sure that she would obtain no formal education or modeling agency contracts 
11 
EFTA00596335

if she failed to provide the sexual favors desired by Defendant Epstein or abide by 
the instructions given her by Defendants Epstein and Maxwell. 
39. Plaintiff reasonably believed that her compliance with Defendants' demands 
was crucial to her physical, psychological, financial and reputational survival. 
40. Defendant Maxwell instructed Plaintiff how to massage Epstein using the 
techniques that he preferred. During Plaintiff's first massage, Defendant Epstein 
converted it into a sexual act and made it known to Plaintiff that further sex would 
be required in order for her to obtain the assistance he promised. 
41. Maxwell and Epstein informed Plaintiff that other young females in 
Epstein's company were there not only to provide massages, but also sexual acts. 
42. Plaintiff was instructed dozens of times to provide body massages to 
Epstein, both at his townhouse in New York and on his private island in the U.S. 
Virgin Islands. Each time she was so instructed she was also required to perform a 
sexual act with Epstein. The Defendants transported Plaintiff in interstate and 
foreign commerce, and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, for these sexual 
purposes. 
43. During many sexual encounters, Defendant Epstein gave Plaintiff no option, 
opportunity or choice not to participate in the prescribed sexual acts. 
44. Defendant Maxwell frequently controlled the assignment, or "rotation," of 
Plaintiff and the other young females concerning the time, place and manner of the 
12 
EFTA00596336

sex acts they were told to provide to Defendant Epstein. Defendants Maxwell and 
Epstein also required Plaintiff to engage in sex acts with other females. 
45. Defendants Epstein and Maxwell intimidated, threatened, humiliated and 
verbally abused Plaintiff in order to coerce her into sexual compliance. These 
Defendants threatened Plaintiff with serious harm, including psychological, 
financial, and reputational harm, in ways and means that, under the surrounding 
circumstances, would have compelled any reasonable person of the same or similar 
background and circumstances as Plaintiff's to perform and continue performing 
the demanded commercial sexual activity. 
46. On one occasion, after suffering verbal abuse and threats by Defendants 
Epstein, Maxwell, and 
Plaintiff attempted to escape from Defendant 
Epstein's private island. A search party led by Defendant Epstein located her and 
returned her to the main house on the island. Through these and other actions, the 
Defendants intended to cause, and did cause, Plaintiff to believe that failure to 
perform the actions they requested would result in physical restraint and potential 
harm to her person, as well as harm to her reputation, employability, and stable 
state of mind. 
47. Defendant Epstein's wealth, influence, power and connections were used 
both as an inducement to provide sex (in exchange for promises of support), and as 
13 
EFTA00596337

a means of threatening punishment (should Plaintiff refuse to comply with 
Defendants' instructions). 
48. In addition to Plaintiff's being trafficked on Epstein's private plane, 
Defendants Groff, Maxwell and 
, with the knowledge of and instruction by 
Defendant Epstein, arranged Plaintiffs commercial air travel on numerous 
occasions for the purpose of causing Plaintiff to commit commercial sex acts. 
49. Defendants provided living quarters for Plaintiff at 301 East 66 Street, New 
York; a car service for Plaintiff to use as needed; a cell phone; and other valuable 
consideration in order to maintain Plaintiffs sexual compliance. 
50. The relationship between Plaintiff and Defendants Epstein and Maxwell was 
defined and characterized by Defendant Epstein's and Defendant Maxwell's 
frequent and persistent representations that they would provide Plaintiff with a 
formal education and career advancement if she provided sex to Defendant Epstein 
and others in the times, places and manners demanded by Defendants. Plaintiff 
reasonably relied on those representations. In fact, however, those representations 
were knowingly false, were not acted upon, and were made by Defendants Epstein 
and Maxwell solely for the purpose of maintaining Plaintiffs financial dependence 
on, emotional vulnerability to, and sexual compliance with Defendants Epstein and 
Maxwell and their demands. The other Defendants intentionally repeated those 
14 
EFTA00596338

representations and intentionally attempted to convince Plaintiff that the 
representations were true and could be relied upon. 
51. In January 2007, Defendants sent Plaintiff from the United States to South 
Africa in part to recruit, for a promised fee, one or more aspiring female models 
supposedly for Epstein to use as an alleged personal assistant. 
Epstein and 
Maxwell continuously and frequently demanded that Plaintiff fulfill this task as a 
condition of her receiving the education, career and related benefits promised by 
Defendants Epstein and Maxwell. 
Based upon Plaintiff's experience with 
Defendants, however, she did not believe that the requested model would be placed 
in a legitimate position of employment with Defendant Epstein but would, instead, 
be forced into sexual servitude. As a result, Plaintiff deliberately refused to 
perform the recruitment assignment. 
52. As part of their ongoing scheme, Defendants inflicted serious emotional and 
psychological harm on Plaintiff as a means of coercing her to continue engaging in 
commercial sex acts. While Plaintiff was in South Africa, Defendants Epstein and 
Maxwell informed Plaintiff that she would not be permitted to return to the United 
States to receive her promised education unless she underwent a diet and lowered 
her body weight from 57 kilograms (approximately 125 pounds) to 52 kilograms 
(approximately 114 pounds). Believing she had no practical choice in the matter, 
Plaintiff attempted to comply with the order but, given her physical height and 
15 
EFTA00596339

structure and her existing low body weight, the diet imposed upon her placed her in 
serious physical jeopardy, including kidney malfunction and extreme emotional 
and psychological distress. 
53. Epstein and Maxwell called Plaintiffs parents in South Africa to tell them 
that Defendants would take good care of Plaintiff when she returned to the United 
States and that they would use their connections and influence to have her admitted 
to F.I.T. or another well-regarded fashion school. 
54. In February of 2007, Plaintiff returned to New York and was promptly 
ordered by Defendant Maxwell to have sex with Defendant Epstein. Defendants 
Maxwell and Epstein fraudulently promised her again that her sexual compliance 
would be rewarded with admission to F.I.T. or a comparable college, a promise 
which they knew to be false. Plaintiff knew that if she did not comply, Defendants 
Maxwell and Epstein would use their power, influence and connections in order to 
ensure that Plaintiff was unable to gain admission to F.I.T. or a comparable school, 
and that they would destroy her career as they had destroyed the careers of others 
who had failed to comply. 
55. Defendants Epstein and Maxwell continued to provide Plaintiff with things 
of value in exchange for Plaintiffs continued compliance with Epstein's sexual 
demands; however, they failed and refused to perform their promises to help 
Plaintiff be admitted to F.I.T. or another school, or to provide financial support for 
16 
EFTA00596340

college admission or on-going education, false promises they repeatedly made in 
order to coerce her into commercial sex acts. 
56. Defendants Epstein and Maxwell's sexual demands on Plaintiff continued 
while she was in New York or other geographic proximity to the Defendants. In 
addition to their requiring Plaintiff to provide Defendant Epstein with sex acts, 
Defendants continued to pressure her to lose excessive amounts of body weight 
and offered her no opportunity to decline or resist their instructions. 
57. In May, 2007, Plaintiff left the United States and did not return. 
58. Defendants' representations and promises were all false and fraudulent. 
Their threats were considered by Plaintiff to be real and credible. All such 
representations, promises and threats were made solely for the purpose of coercing 
and otherwise inducing Plaintiff into prolonged sexual compliance. Defendants 
knowingly benefitted financially and received things of value as a result of their 
participating in their illegal enterprise. 
COUNT I 
CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 
1595 
59. Plaintiff adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 58 above. 
60. Defendants individually and together, within the special maritime and 
territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in interstate and foreign commerce 
17 
EFTA00596341

and/or affecting interstate and foreign commerce, knowingly recruited, enticed, 
harbored, transported, provided, maintained, patronized, solicited, threatened, 
forced, and coerced Plaintiff to engage in commercial sex acts. Such actions by 
Defendants were undertaken with knowledge and/or reckless disregard of the fact 
that their threats of force, fraud, coercion, and combinations of such means would 
be used, and were in fact used, in order to cause Plaintiff to engage in commercial 
sex acts. In so doing, Defendants violated 18 U.S.C. §§1591 through 1594 and are 
subject to civil causes of action under 18 U.S.C. § 1595. 
61. Defendants additionally profited from the sex trafficking of Plaintiff; 
obstructed investigations of the violations; attempted and conspired to violate, and 
succeeded in violating, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591 through 1594, by the commission of the 
torts and crimes described in this complaint. 
62. Certain property of Defendant Epstein's was essential to the commission of 
the federal crimes and torts described herein, including the use of multiple private 
aircraft including a Boeing aircraft (of make and model B-727-31H with tail 
number N908JE) and a Gulfstream aircraft (of make and model G-1159B with tail 
number N909JE). Such aircraft, along with other of Defendants' property, were 
used as means and instruments of Defendants' tortious and criminal offenses and, 
as such, are subject to forfeiture. 
18 
EFTA00596342

63. Additionally, Defendant Epstein's New York mansion, located at 9 East 71st 
street, New York, New York, and his private island located in the United States 
Virgin Islands, were used as means and instruments of Defendants' tortious and 
criminal offenses and, as such, are subject to forfeiture. 
64. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' commission of the 
aforementioned criminal offenses enumerated in Title 18 U.S.C. § 1591 et. seq. 
and the civil remedies provided in § 1595, Plaintiff has in the past suffered and will 
continue to suffer injury and pain; emotional distress; psychological and psychi-
atric trauma; mental anguish; humiliation; confusion; embarrassment; loss of self-
esteem; loss of dignity; loss of enjoyment of life; invasion of privacy; and other 
damages associated with Defendants' actions. Plaintiff will incur medical and 
psychological expenses. These injuries are permanent in nature and Plaintiff will 
continue to suffer from them in the future. In addition to these losses, Plaintiff has 
incurred attorneys' fees and will do so in the future. 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants for 
compensatory damages, attorney's fees, punitive damages and such other and 
further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Plaintiff hereby demands trial by 
jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 
Dated: January 
2016. 
Respectfully Submitted, 
19 
EFTA00596343

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 
By: /s/ David Boies 
David Boies 
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 
333 Main Street 
Armonk, NY 10504 
20 
EFTA00596344