EFTA00231917

A51 
Letter from Jack A. Goldberger to NYS Sex Offender Registry Regarding Florida Registration Level 
applicable to Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated August 12, 2010 
A51-A52 
ACTERBURY GOLDBERGER 
' JOSEPH R ATTERBURY 
' 1 JACK A. GOLDBERGER 
' JASON S.WEISS 
' Board Certified Crimoal TrialAttorney 
I Member cd New Jersey & Florida Bars 
August 12, 2010 
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services 
Sex Offender Registry 
4 Tower Place 
Albany, N.Y. 12203 
RE: 
Jeffrey E. Epstein 
To Whom It May Concern: 
The undersigned represented Jeffrey E. Epstein in the investigation that lead to his entry 
of a guilty plea on June 30, 2008 to a felony charge in the State of Florida that required 
sex offender registration. The purpose of this letter is to clarify the level of registration that 
was applicable to Mr. Epstein's case 
Under Florida's registration scheme there are two levels of registration available based on 
a risk assessment. Florida characterizes these two levels as sexual predator and sexual 
offender. The sexual predator designation is obviously the more serious classification. 
Mr. Epstein, based on the offense on which his guilty plea was entered, was classified as 
a sexual offender, Florida's lowest level of sexual registration. In fact, within the sexual 
offender designation there are two sub-levels of reporting requirements. One classification 
requires reporting to the local Sheriffs Office twice a year and one requires reporting four 
times a year. In Mr. Epstein's case he is required to report at the lowest level, two times 
per year. Accordingly, under the Florida registration scheme, Mr. Epstein's registration 
requirements are at the lowest level for a person for whom registration is required. 
During the incarcerative portion of Mr. Epstein's sentence, he was allowed to participate 
in the Sheriffs Office work release program, an option thatwould not have been available 
to him had he been at a higher registration level. Additionally, while Mr. Epstein was in 
probationary status, he was allowed to travel on a limited basis for business purposes. 
This would not have been available to him had he been classified as a sexual predator. 
One Clearlake Centre. Suite 1400 
250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach. ft 33401 
P 
www.agwpa.coin 
EFTA00232617

A52 
s I hope this information assists your department in determining the registration requirements 
for Mr. Epstein. Should you desire to speak to me or need any further information, please 
feel free to contact me. 
V 
JAG/slm 
s, 
Jack A. Goldberger 
EFTA00232618

A53 
Letter from Martin G. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders Regarding 
Risk Level and Designation Determination for Jeffrey Epstein, dated August 16, 2010 
[pp. A53-A571 
MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. 
ATTORNEY • 
LAW 
20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1000 
BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS 02116 
FAX 
August 16, 2010 
New York State
Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders 
4 Tower Place 
Albany, New York 12203-3764 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
NYSID # O51909 
• 
Dear Sir or Madam: 
EMAIL ADDRESSES: 
This letter and the accompanying materials are submitted to the Board pursuant to its notice 
of August 2, 2010, concerning the risk level and designation determination to be made with respect 
to Jeffrey Epstein. Their purpose is to demonstrate to the Board that, based upon Mr. Epstein's 
history and personal characteristics, the circumstances of the offense which triggered the registration 
requirement, his acceptance of responsibility, his successful completion of his sentence and 
subsequent supervision, and the extraordinary unlikelihood of his ever again reoffending, the 
appropriate risk level designation is level I. 
Overview 
Mr. Epstein, who is presently 58 years old, is a successful and respected financial advisor 
who also founded and heads a philanthropic organization, the C.O.U.Q. Foundation, Inc. which 
funds medical, educational, and advanced scientific research. The offense which led to the 
requirement that he register as a sex offender in Florida, which in turn triggered this state's reporting 
requirement, ended almost five years ago and involved an exchange of money and consensual 
conduct with a young woman who, for all but a few months of the prostitution offense charged, was 
M.
 the age of 17. Notably, as addressed in greater detail, infra, the conduct which occurred after 
reached the age of 17 would not even have been a misdemeanor under the cognate New York 
statute at the time the offense was committed. 
Mr. Epstein pled guilty to that offense in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida, 
and has fully and sincerely accepted responsibility for his conduct. There have been no subsequent 
incidents of criminal misconduct of any description. 
EFTA00232619

A54 
Florida has classified Mr. Epstein as its lowest level sex offender, with the lowest level of 
reporting requirement, as verified by the attorney who represented Mr. Epstein in the Florida 
proceedings: 
Under Florida's registration scheme there are two levels of registration available based on 
a risk assessment. Florida characterizes these two levels as sexual predator and sexual 
offender. The sexual predator designation is obviously the more serious classification. 
Mr. Epstein, based on the offense on which his guilty plea was entered was classified as a 
sexual offender, Florida's lowest level of sexual registration. In fact, within the sexual 
offender designation there are two-sub-levels of reporting requirements. One classification 
requires reporting to the local Sheriff's Office twice a year and one requires reporting four 
times a year. In Mr. Epstein's case, he is required to report at the lowest level, two times per 
year. Accordingly, under the Florida registration scheme, Mr. Epstein's registration 
requirements are at the lowest level for a person for whom registration is required. 
Letter of Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Ex. A. That Florida authorities did not — and do not — believe that 
Mr. Epstein presented a risk of reoffense is evidenced not just by Mr. Epstein's lowest-level 
reporting designation but also by the fact that he was permitted, while serving his sentence in the 
West Palm Beach County Jail, to leave the jail on a daily basis on work release for most of the period 
of his 13-month incarceration and that during his subsequent year of community control supervision 
(a probationary-typesentence), both the court and his probation officer agreed to permit him to travel 
outside Florida for business purposes on a significant number of occasions. He has now completed 
his year of community control supervision, having fully complied with all the requirements and 
obligations imposed on him. 
In addition, Mr. Epstein has participated in therapy with a clinical psychologist, Stephen R. 
Alexander, Psy. D., who, based on his evaluation of, and therapy sessions with, Mr. Epstein and his 
long experience as a forensic psychologist, attests that Mr. Epstein presents no threat to the 
community and that the risk of his reoffending is "negligible": 
Since my initial assessment of Mr. Epstein he has been extremely cooperative with all of the 
services provided to him. He has spent a great deal of time and energy focusing on his 
behavior and the attitudes, beliefs and expectations that undergird his approach to life. He 
has examined his priorities and undergone a comprehensive self-exploration on more than 
one occasion, primarily because of the vast changes that have occurred in his life and the 
upheaval these events have caused. Throughout it all Mr. Epstein has remained willing to 
focus on himself and how to turn even the most dire personal circumstances into productive 
experiences to the fullest extent possible. In my opinion Mr. Epstein has been highly 
cooperative with and benefited from the treatment provided. Relying upon my 25 years of 
experience as a forensic psychologist and the plethora of data gathered by me, 1 state with 
confidence that Mr. Epstein poses no threat to himself or the community. It is abundantly 
clear that he has learned his lesson and the probability of his reoffending is negligible. Mr. 
2 
EFTA00232620

A55 
Epstein poses no threat to either himself or the general community, and he requires no 
additional intervention or treatment for his no-risk/low-risk status to be maintained into the 
future. 
Letter of Stephen R. Alexander, Psy. D., submitted herewith as Ex. B.' 
All of these circumstances — Mr. Epstein's low-risk classification in Florida, the state 
where the offense was committed, the low-risk assessment inherent in the decisions of Florida 
authorities responsible for the protection of the community, who knew him first-hand, to admit 
him to work release during his period of incarceration and to permit him to travel outside of 
Florida during his period of community control supervision, Dr. Alexander's well-supported 
judgment that Mr. Epstein presents little or no risk of reoffense, the fact that the offense ended 
almost five years ago, and there has been no subsequent criminal misconduct of any kind, and the 
fact that Mr. Epstein is a mature, responsible, professional adult who uses neither alcohol nor 
drugs all support the conclusion that the supervision which accompanies a level I designation 
will more than suffice to serve the purposes of SORA. That conclusion is supported by the 
calculation of Mr. Epstein's risk assessment guidelines score. 
The Conduct Underlying the Offense Triagerinz the Florida Registration Requirement 
Would For the Most Part Not Even Have Been a Registerable Offense in New York. Had 
the Conduct Occurred in New York 
The offense which required Mr. Epstein to register as a sex offender in the state of Florida 
was a violation of Fla. Stat. §796.03, which criminalizes procuring a 
rson under the age of 18 (the 
age of consent in Florida) for prostitution, specifically, here, one ''=" The nearest New York 
cognate among the registerable offenses listed in N.Y. Correction Law §168-a is N.Y. Penal Law 
§230.04 (patronizing a prostitute). The information to which Mr. Epstein pled guilty charged that 
the offense occurred between AusLst 1, 2004, and October 9, 2005, see Information, Ex. C, that 
latter date being the day before M's 18th birthday: Thus, for almost all of the duration of the 
charged offense, M. was over the age of 17, and the wholly consensual conduct in exchange for 
money which occurred between the two would not even have been a registerable offense in New 
York. See §168-a(2XaXi)(§230.04 a registerable offense only if "person patronized" is in fact under 
17 years old). Indeed, at the time of the offense at issue, the conduct which occurred after M. 
turned 17 years of age would not even have been a crime under that statute if the conduct had taken 
place in New York? Mr. Epstein's offense ranks among the least serious of those which trigger the 
requirement of SORA registration. The single Florida offense which required registration involved 
' Dr. Alexander's CV is included in Ex. B. 
2 In 2007, 
 
§230.04 was amended to extend its coverage to prostitution offenses involving individuals 
of any age, not just those under the age of 17, as the statute was written when Mr. Epstein's offense 
was committed in 2004-05. Under §230.04 as written in 2004-05, the offense, to the extent that M. 
was in the last three months of her 16th year, would only have been a misdemeanor had it been 
committed in New York. 
3 
EFTA00232621

A56 
only one woman, and there was no force or violence involved at any time, nor did M. suffer from 
any mental disability, mental incapacity, or physical helplessness. The points attributable to the 
Current Offense factors (factors 1-7) total less than 70. 
Criminal History 
Prior to the offense at issue Mr. Epstein had no prior criminal history whatsoever. Mr. 
Epstein's date of birth i 
and he was, accordingly, more than twenty years of age 
when the offense at issue was committed. Mr. Epstein does not use alcohol or illegal drugs and has 
no history of either drug or alcohol abuse. Accordingly, Mr. Epstein should be scored at zero for the 
Criminal History factors (factors 8-11). 
Post-Offense Behavior 
On June 30, 2008, Mr. Epstein pled guilty to the offense which subjected him to the 
requirement that he register as a sex offender in Florida and has fully accepted responsibility for hit 
conduct. Mr. Epstein served approximately 13 months in a West Palm Beach County jail (rather than 
in a state correctional facility). During most of his period of confinement, from October 10, 2008, 
through July 22, 2009, the date of his release, Mr. Epstein participated in the jail's work release 
program, see Letter of Deputy K. Smith, Ex. D, which permitted him to leave the jail in the morning 
six days a week for his place of employment, the Florida Science Foundation, and return in the 
evening. That Mr. Epstein satisfactorily complied with the requirements of the program is evidenced 
by the fact that he remained in the work release program up to the time of his release from custody. 
After his release on July 22, 2009, Mr. Epstein was subject to a one-year period of 
community control, which required, among other conditions, that he maintain contact with the 
probation office as required, that he be confined to his residence during the hours when he was not 
working or performing public service, that he not leave his county of residence without the consent 
of his probation officer, that he commit no further violations of the law, and that he maintain 
employment. During Mr. Epstein's period of community control from July 22, 2009, through July 
21, 2010, he was permitted by the court, with the assent of his probation officer and without 
opposition by the state's attorney, to travel (including overnight stays) to New York and to the Virgin 
Islands for business purposes on a number of occasions, thus demonstrating a substantial level of 
trust by both the court and his supervising probation officer in Mr. Epstein's ability to refrain from 
unlawful conduct of any kind and to conform his conduct to the terms of his community control 
order and to the orders authorizing his travel, which he did on every such occasion? Mr. Epstein 
successfully completed his term of community control on July, 21, 2010, see Florida Department of 
Corrections Termination of Supervision notice, Ex. F, having at all times fully complied with all 
obligations and restrictions imposed upon him. 
Mr. Epstein has never refused or been expelled from any treatment since the time of his 
sentencing (factor 12(2)). See pages 2-3, supra. Based on his professional expertise and the 
' One such travel order is attached as Ex. E. 
EFTA00232622

A57 
substantial time he has spent with Mr. Epstein, Dr. Alexander is able to state unequivocally that Mr. 
Epstein has learned his lesson, that he presents no threat to the community, and that there is 
negligible risk that he will ever reoffend. Accordingly, Mr. Epstein should be scored at zero for the 
Post-Offense Behavior factors (factors 12-13). 
Release Environment 
Factor 14 contemplates that the risk level assessment will be made, as required under New 
York law, prior to the offender's release from incarceration. Here, as the preceding section shows, 
Mr. Epstein was released from jail more than a year ago and was subject to close supervision for a 
period of one year afterwards. During the same time, he continued to meet with Dr. Alexander. The 
score for factor 14 should, accordingly, be zero. 
Mr. Epstein maintains a vacation residence in Manhattan, which he owns, as well as 
residences in Florida and the Virgin Islands. Mr. Epstein's interactions in connection with both his 
employment and philanthropic work are with adult business professionals, scientists, and educators. 
There is nothing in either Mr. Epstein's living or employment situations which could even remotely 
be considered "inappropriate." The score on factor 15 too should be zero. 
Overrides
None of the listed factors are of any relevance or applicability to Mr. Epstein's risk level 
designation. 
Conclusion 
It 
Based on all the relevant factors, Mr. Epstein should be classified as a level I sex offender. 
Even should the Board somehow conclude that Mr. Epstein's risk assessment guidelines score 
exceeds 70, the circumstances addressed in this letter differentiate this case so markedly from the 
norm of level 2 sex offenders that the Board should recommend a level I classification, as it is 
empowered to do under the Sex Offender Guidelines. The ultimate issue is the risk that the offender 
will reoffend, and the information provided to the Board with this letter persuasively demonstrates 
that such a risk is virtually nonexistent in this case. 
5 
EFTA00232623

A58 
Letter from Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D. to Jack Goldberger Regarding Opinion of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 
dated August 16, 2010 
ipp. A58-A611 
Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D. 
Clinical Psychologist 
1825 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 204 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 
August 16, 2010 
Jack Goldberger, Esq. 
Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss, P.A. 
250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Re.: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Mr. Goldberger: 
Since my initial assessment of Mr. Epstein he has been extremely cooperative with all of 
the services provided to him. He has spent a great deal of time and energy focusing on 
his behavior and the attitudes, beliefs and expectations that undergird his approach to life. 
He has examined his priorities and undergone a comprehensive self-exploration on more 
than one ortssion, primarily because of the vast changes that have occurred in his life 
and the upheaval these events have caused. Throughout it all Mr. Epstein has remained 
willing to focus on himself and how to turn even the most dire personal circumstances 
into productive experiences to the fullest extent possible. In my opinion Mr. Epstein has 
been highly cooperative with and benefited from the treatment provided. Relying upon 
my 25 years of experience as a forensic psychologist and the plethora of data gathered by 
me, I state with confidence that Mr. Epstein poses no threat to himself or the community. 
his abundantly clear that he has learned his lesson and the probability of his rcoffending 
is negligible. Mr. Epstein poses no threat to either himself or the general community, and 
he requires no additional intervention or treatment for his no-risk/low-risk status to be 
maintained into the future. 
If any questions remain or I can be of additional assistance, please contact my office. 
Sincerely, 
Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D. 
Clinical Psychologist 
SRA/b1 
Epetein-06037-I2A 
EFTA00232624

A59 
Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D. 
Clinical Psychologist 
1825 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 204 
West Palterida 
33406 
EDUCATION 
Psy.D. 
Florida Institute of Technology; Clinical Psychology, 1985 
M.S. 
Eastern Kentucky University; Clinical Psychology, 1980 
B.A. 
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 1977 
LICENSURE 
Florida Board of Psychological Examiners: Psychologist, PY0003713 
CERTIFICATIONS 
Supreme Court of Florida: Family Court Mediator 19355 CF 
Supreme Court of Florida: County Court Mediator 19355 CF 
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 
Clinical Psychologist: 
Private practice providing services to children, adolescents, 
adults and families. Specialization in psychodiagnostic evaluations (personality, forensic, 
psychoeducational), forensic psychology, and psychotherapy. July 1989 to present. 
Chief Psychologist: Juvenile and Family Divisions of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit and 
Division of Youth Affairs, Palm Beach County, Florida. September 1987 to July 1989. 
Duties: Supervise Psychological Services provided to Juvenile and Family Court 
including psychological evaluations of children, adolescents and adults 
in delinquency, dependency, custody, and sex abuse cases; testimony as 
Expert Witness. 
Program Supervision of Sable Palm Youth Service Center, a 48 bed 
residential treatment program for emotionally and behaviorally disturbed 
adolescents; family therapy approach to treatment. 
Program Supervision of te—Youth Service Bureau, a community based 
family counseling/delinquency prevention program. 
Directing program evaluation and basic research within the Division of 
Youth Affairs. 
Directing APA Approved continuing education office for profbssional 
staff under the Chief Psychologist (5 Psy.D./Ph.D. psychologists, and 20 
M.A./M.S.W. counselors). 
EFTA00232625

A60 
Court Psychologist: Juvenile and Family Divisions of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit and 
the Division of Youth Affairs, Palm Beach County, Florida. October 1985 to September 
1987. 
Duties: Psychodiagnostic evaluations of children, adolescents and adults for the 
court in delinquency, dependency, custody and sex abuse cases. Clinical 
Supervisor of the Sable Palm Youth Service Center. 
Staff Psychologist: Scotland County Mental Health Center, Laurinberg, North Carolina. 
February to August 1982. 
Duties: Individual and family psychotherapy (60% child services, 40% adult 
outpatient). Consultant to Scotland County School system. Competency 
evaluations for courts. 
Staff Psychologist: Robeson County Mental Health Center, Lumberton, North Carolina.
August 1980 to July 1981. 
Duties: Outpatient Individual and family psychotherapy (60% child services, 
40% adult outpatient). Psychodiagnostic evaluations for Center patients, 
local courts, and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. 
Program evaluation of 15 Head Start Centers in a four county area for 
HE.W. 
Consultant to Red Springs City School system, Southeastern Sheltered 
Workshop, and Robeson County Group Homes. 
INTERNSHIP 
Louisiana State University Medical School (APA Approved): 
New Orleans, 
Louisiana. September 1984 to August 1985. Training consisted of equal time 
spent in throe rotations: Adult, Child and Neuropsychology. Year long training 
in outpatient psychotherapy and community mental health services at West 
Jefferson Mental Health Center (1 day per week), psychoanalytic treatment of 
adults at LW Medical Center, weekly psychoanalytic psychotherapy seminars 
and weekly psychodiagnostics seminars. 
PRACTICUM PLACEMENTS 
Neuropsychlatry Unit: Wuesthoff Memorial Hospital, Rockledge, Florida. 20 hours 
per week (200 total hours); January to March, 1984. 
EFTA00232626

A61 
Center for Student Development Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida 
10 hours per week (200 total hours); June to December 1983. 
Melbourne Head Start Center: Melbourne, Florida. 10 hours per week (100 total 
hours); September to December 1983. 
Robeson County Mental Health Center: Lumberton, North Carolina. 40 hours per 
week (1040 total hours); January to June 1980. 
University of Kentucky Medical Center (Outpatient Psychiatry): 
Lexington, 
Kentucky. 20 hours pa week (640 total hours); January to December 1979. 
PUBLICATIONS & RESEARCH PAPERS 
Alexander, S. & Wiatrowski, M. (1989). Delinquency prevention in a Youth Service 
Bureau. Unpublished manuscript. 
Alexander, S. (1992). Choosing and using experts. In, Child Custody and Visitation in 
Florida. Eau Claire, WI: National Business Institute, Inc. 
AWARDS 
1993 Special Service Award presented by the Legal Aid Society and the Palm Beach 
County Bar Association for pro bono services to the community. 
PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 
Education Chair of the Palm Chapter of the Florida Psychological Association, 1994. 
President of the Palm Chapter of the Florida Psychological Association, 1995.
COMMUNITY SERVICE POSITIONS 
Board of Directors Fern House, West Palm Beach, Florida. Fern House is a residential 
rehabilitation center for male alcoholics and drug addicts. 2004 to present. 
EFTA00232627

Offender Name:  JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 
NYSID th 
OS1909 
1ST Reviewer Initials: 
SObp 
The following is the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders' recommendation pursuant to Section 168-I of Article 6-C of the NYS Correction Law as to whether the offender.. be 
designated a Sexually Violent Offender, Predicate Sex Offender, or Sexual Predator as defined in subdivision seven of Section 168-a or whether the offender does not fit any of those 
categories due to his conviction. 
Please check all that apply: 
t EJ Sexually Violent Offender - a sex offender who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense defined In Correction Law section 168-a (3). 
Please check which conviction(s) apply, also please indicate whether the conviction was for an attempt at an offense: 
amino 
ammo 
130.35 -Rape 1st degree 
13030 - Sodomy 1st degree/Criminal Sexual Act 1st degree 
130.65 - Sexual Abuse In degree 
130.66 - Aggravated sexual abuse 3rd degree 
130.67- Aggravated sexual abuse 2nd degree 
130.70 - Aggravated sexual abuse I st degree 
130.15 -Course of sexual conduct against a child 1st degree 
130.80 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 2nd degree 
2. O 
Predicate Sex Offender - a sex offender who has been convicted of an offense set forth In subd 
convicted of an offense set forth in subdivision 2 or 3 of Section 168-a, regardless of the date 
required to register for the previous conviction. 
Please identify below the offenders previous qualifying conviction(s) as well as the offender's current 
offense.
Current Previous 
Aget3)18 
Current Previous Attempt 
130.20 - Sexual Misconduct 
130/5 - Rape 3rd degree 
130.30 - Rape 2nd degree 
130.40 - Sodomy 3rd degree/ 
Criminal Sexual Act 3rd 
130.45 - Sodomy 2nd degree/ 
—
Criminal Sexual Act 2nd 
130.53 - Persistent sexual abuse 
130.65-a - Aggravated =coal abuse 4th degree 
130.90 • Facilitating a sex offense with a controlled substance 
a conviction of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any provisions of the 
foregoing sections committed or attempted as a hate crime defined in sectia485.05 
of the penal law or as a crime of terronsan defined in section 490.25 of such law. 
a conviction of an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes all of the 
essential elements of any such felony provided for above or conviction of a felony 
in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is required to register as a sex 
offender in the jurisdiction which the conviction occurred. 
eses 
C. 
o. 
S CE
am 
Nc
O 
cm
mi. 1-4 
ea 
to 
1.1
co et. 
0 
O 
ow 
es
"i• es 
ers esl
x
&N) C  
Ci a,k\ 
- 
= 
ro
O. 
 •EA 
Ivision 2 or 3 of Correction Law Section 168-n when the offender has been previously 
MI• 
of the prior conviction and regardless of whether the offender was 
8. 
0O 
qualifying conviction, also please indicate whether the conviction was for an attempt at an 
' 
130.60 - Sexual Abuse 2nd degree 
255.25 - Incest 
Article 263 offense - Sexual Performance by a Child 
135.05 • Unlawful Imprisonment 2nd degree 
135.10 - Unlawful knodsonment 1st degree 
r 
> 
clatrelg Pte 
LS 
Attanot 
ba els 
w
zo 
135.20 - ICIdnapping 2nd deg 0 B 
re 
135.25 - Kidnapping 1st degree 
a 
(`Note: 133.05,135.10.13520.135.25 the 
victim must be less than I/ years old and the 
offender must not be the parent of the victim) 
Continued on the next page. 
C 
rn
O 
EFTA00232628

2. (Canted) 
Current Previous Attempt 
Current Previous 
Attempt 
230.04 Patronizing a prostitute 3rd degree (victim <17 years old) 
230.05 Patronizing a prostitute 2nd degree 
230.06 Patronizing a prostitute In degree 
230.30 (2)- Promoting prostitution 2nd degree 
230.32 -.Promoting prostitution 1st degree 
235.22 j Disseminating indecent material to minors 1st degree 
a convidtion of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any provisions of a 
— 
listed sex offense committed or attempted as a hate crime defined in section 
485.05 Qf the penal law or as a clime of terrorism defined in section 490.25 
of such law. 
130.52 Forcible touching (victim<18 years old) 
130.55 Sexual abuse 3rd degree (victirn<I 8 years old) 
Cony ictibn/Attempt to commit any provision of 130.52 or 130.55 of the 
penal law regardless of age of victim and the offender has previously been 
convicted of (i) a sex offense listed in Correction Law Section (68-a (2), or 
(i i) a sexually violent *Mose listed in Correction Law Section 168-a (3), or 
(iii) any of the provisions of section 130.52 or 130.55 of the penal law or an 
attempt I 
Aconvict n of (i) an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes all of the 
—
essential efcmcnts of any such crime provided for in Correction Law Section 
168-a (2) a), or (ii) a felony in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is 
required to register as a sex offender in the jurisdiction in which the conviction 
occurred. or (iii) any of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 2251. 18 U.S.C. 2251A. 18 
U.S.C. 2252. IS V.S.C. 2252A, or 18 V.S.C. 2260 provided the elements of 
such crime of conviction are substantially the same as those which are pan of 
such intense as of March I I. 2002. 
130.35 - Rape 1st degree 
130.50 - Sodomy 1st degredCriminal Sexual Act 1st degree 
130. 65 - Sexual Abuse 1st degree 
130.66 - Aggravated sexual abuse 3rd degree 
130.67- Aggravated sexual abuse 2nd degree 
130.70 - Aggravated sexual abuse 1st degree 
130.75 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 1st degree 
130.80 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 2nd degree 
130.53 - Persistent sexual abuse 
130.65-a - Aggravated sexual abuse 4th degree 
130.90 - Facilitating a sex offense with a controlled substance 
a conviction of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any 
provisions of a sexually violent offense as set forth in Correction 
Law Section I68-a (3) committed or attempted as a hate crime 
defined in section 485.05 of the penal law or as a crime of 
terrorism defined in section 490.25 of such law. 
a conviction of an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes 
— 
all of the essential elements of any such felony provided for 
above or conviction of a felony in any other jurisdiction for which 
the offender is required to register as a sex offender in the 
jurisdiction which the conviction occurred. 
 
 250.45(2),(3)and(4) - Unlawful surveillance 2nd degree 
250.50 • Unlawful surveillance 1st degree 
3. 
Sexual Predator - a sex offender who has been convicted of a sottish violent offense defined in Correction La;vg;
, 168-a (3) and who suffers from a mental abnormality or 
personality disorder that makes him or her likely to engage in 
sexually violent offenses. 
CP\ 
(6) 
19 None of the above. 
EFTA00232629

SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ACT 
RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT 
RISK FACTOR 
VALUE 
SCORE 
I. CURRENT OFFENSES) 
I. Use of Violence 
Used forcible coo pulsioa 
+10
X 
10 
Inflicted physical injury 
+15 
Armed with a dangerous instrument 
+30 
2. Sexual Contact with Victim 
Contact over clothing 
Contact under clothing 
Sexual intercourse. deviate sexual intercourse 
of aggravated sexual abuse 
+5 
25 
+10 
+25 
X 
S. Number of Victims 
Two 
Three or more 
+20 
30 
+ 30
X 
4. Duration of offense conduct with victim 
Continuing course of sexual 
misconduct 
+20 X 
20 
5. Age of victim 
I I through 16 
to or kis. 63 or more 
+20 
X 
20 
+30 
6. Other victim characteristics 
Victim suffered from mental disability or 
• 
incapacity or from physical helplessness 
+20 
0 
20 
7. Relationship with victim 
SUanget or established for mote of 
victimizing or professional relationship 
+20 
X 
II. CRIMINAL HIS I OR% 
R. Age at first act of sexual misconduct 
20 or less 
+10 
0 
9. Number and natal+ of prior crimes 
Prior history/no sex minus or felonies 
Prior historyinomviolent felony 
Prior violent felony, or misdaneanur Sc' 
crime or endangering welfare of a child 
+5
X 
5 
+15 
' 
+30 
It Recency of prior offense 
• 
Less dun 3 years 
+10 
0 
II. Dreg or Alcohol abuse 
History of ahem.
+15 
0 
COLUMNS 1- 11 SUBTOTAL 
130 
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ACT 
RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT 
RISK FACTOR 
VALUE 
SCORE 
III. POST-OFEEN3E BLIUVIOR 
12. Acceptance of Respossibility 
Not accepted responsibility 
Not accepted responsibility I refused or 
expelled from treatment 
+10 
0
+15 
13. Conduct while confined / supervised 
Unsatisfactory 
. 
Unsatisfactory with sexual misconduct 
+10 
0 
-20 
IV. EUXLEASk. LN VIRONMEN I 
14. Supervision 
Release with specialized supervision 
Release with supervision 
Release without supervision 
0 
0 
1:5 
+15 
LI. Living/ employment situation 
Living or employment inappropriate 
+10 
0 
COLUMNS 12-13 SUBTOTAL 
COLUMNS I-It SUBTOTAL 
130 
TOTAL RISK FACTOR SCORE (add 2 subtotals) 
130 
1 
2 
X 
Offender 
Name: 
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 
NYSID #: 
0S1909 
Docket #: 
RISK LEVEL: 
3 
Assessor's 
Signature 
Date: 
- to 
A. Overrides Of any ovenide is circled, offender is piesumpuvdy 
a Level 3) 
1. Offender has a prior felony conviction foe a sex crime 
2. Offender inflicted serious physical injury or caused death 
3. Ott offender has made a recent threat that he will reoffend 
by committing a sexual or violent crime 
4 There has been n clinical assessment that the offender has 
a psychological, physical, or organic abnormality that 
decreases ability to control impulsive sexual behavior 
B. Departure 
I 
A departure from the risk level is warranted 
0 
Yes 
El No 
Level I (low) 
0 CO +70 
2. If yes, elate the appropriate risk level 
I 
2 
3 
Level 2 (moderate ) 
+73 to +105 
Level 3 (high) 
+110 w +300 
3. If yes, explain the basis for departure I See Summary) 
Note. The Sex Offender Registration Act requires the court ar 
Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders to consider any victim impact 
statement in determining a sex offender's level of risk 
EFTA00232630

A65 
RE: 
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 
NYSID #: 0S1909 
DATE: 
8/23/2010 
CASE SUMMARY 
This assessment is based upon a review of the inmate's file which may include but is not limited to the 
pre-sentence investigation, prior criminal history and post-offense behavior. 
Jeffrey Epstein is a 57-year-old sex offender who pled guilty in the state of Florida on 6/30/2008 to two felony 
sex offenses, Procuring a Person Under I g for Prostitution and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution. He was 
sentenced tot 2 months in jail followed by 12 months of Community Control. 
It would appear he was convicted in London England of Unlawful Possession of an Offensive Weapon, a Sword 
Stick, and was sentenced to a Conditional Discharge on 1/4/1973. 
Regarding the instant offense, Epstein was approximately 51 years of age on or about the year 2005 when he 
sexuallyassaulted numerous females between the approximate ages of 14 and 17. Most of the victims were 
recruited by one of Epstein's female employees from a local high school in the Palm Beach Florida area. Some of 
the female participants were age 18 or older. The contact included vaginal intercourse, mouth to vagina sodomy, 
the touching of the breasts and vagina, placing his fingers inside the vagina and Epstein using a vibrator on the 
victim's vaginal area. The available police reports from the Palm Beach Police Department include conversations 
with numerous female victims who in most cases, did not know Epstein when they were victimized. Most of the 
females were embarrassed to speak with police regarding what had happened to them while they were at Epstein's 
home. Sworn statements were taken from at least five victims and seventeen witnesses concerning massages and 
unlawful sexual activity that took place at the residence of Jeffrey Epstein. Most of the victims were paid at least 
$200.00 each time they performed a massage. 
The victims were told they would be giving Epstein a massage and they were escorted to his bedroom. Most 
victims noted numerous pictures of naked young females, (some of the photos depicted females who would be 
--
eventually interviewed by police), on display throughout the home. The offender would enter the room only 
wearing a towel. In most cases he would remove the towel and ask the victim to remove her clothing. In some 
cases he would masturbate into a towel while receiving a massage. In other cases he would touch the breasts or 
vagina of the victim with his hands or use the vibrator. One 14 year old.described how Epstein touched her 
vaginal area with a vibrator and thereafter, when contacted by law enforcement, she had to identify the offender 
through the use of a photo array. Another 16-year-old victim described giving Epstein massages for two years 
and at times, he grabbed her buttocks and caressed her butt cheeks as she gave him a massage. Another 
16-year-old described going to the offender's home at least 100 times. He would touch her breasts, insert his 
fingers into her vagina and sometimes use the vibrator on her while masturbating. He would also pay this 
underage victim to have sex with a female friend while he watched. Occasionally, he would join both girls and 
perform oral sex on both. This 16-year-old victim described for police how one time, Epstein turned her over on 
t  Triaasaa,, talk, and 
y alp 
I 
Iv bui‘amed, "NO: tic blooml and subsetptently-apotogized-for 
his actions. 
The offenders conduct while on Community Control will be considered satisfactory and he does not have a 
history of substance abuse. Based upon his plea of guilty, Epstein will be credited with accepting responsibility 
for his actions. He will be scored for sexual and deviate sexual intercourse, forcible compulsion, numerous 
victims and their ages, a continued course of sexual misconduct, a prior misdemeanor conviction in England 
absent specific information, for his stranger relationship to most victims and for establishing a relationship with 
these underage girls for the purpose of victimization. 
The Board acknowledges correspondence received from the offender's attorney. 
EFTA00232631

A66 
RE: 
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 
NYSLD #: OS1909 
DATE: 
8/23/2010 
CASE SUMMARY 
Jeffrey Epstein used his wealth and power in such a way so that he could take advantage of many teenage girls to 
satisfy his own sexual perversions. He scores as a Level III Sex Offender with absolutely no basis for downward 
departure. 
EFTA00232632

A67 
Letter from Supreme Court attaching Notification, Recommendation and Notice of Right to Appeal, 
dated August 26, 2010 
SArperilt Calle 
of Up' 
„Stab of kitEtt 
ark 
100 CENTRE STREET 
NEW YORK. N.Y. 1000 
TO: 
PART 66 
FROM: 
CORRESPONDENCE UNIT 
SUBJECT: SEX OFFENDER RISK ASSESSMENT 
RE: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
SCID. fi 30129-2010 
Please refer to the attached: 
I) Notification to sex offender, defense attorney and D.A.'s office of the 
scheduled risk assessment; 
2.) Recommendation from Board of Examiners 
3.) Notice of Right to Appeal and Appeal Application. 
Please be advised that the above named defendant. his assigned counsel, Sex Crimes Unit ofthe D.A.'s 
office, City and State Correctional Facilities have been notified of the sex offender risk level assessment 
hearing which has been scheduled in your part. 
Upon completion of the risk assessment, you must endorse the calendar and worksheet and litmard the 
COURT FILE AND ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS to this office. 
 RE--FURTHER—ADYISEIt 
VISION OF—PAROLE MAY- nuttrrtt 
DEFENDANT UNTIL A RISK LEVEL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED. 
A REQUEST FOR 18B ASSIGNMENT HAS BEEN MADE. ONCE YOU 
END THE ATTACHED NOTIFICATION LETTER AND BOARD OF 
EXAMINER'S PACKAGE TO HIM/HER 
EFTA00232633

A68 
Letter from Supreme Court to Jeffrey E. Epstein Informing of SORA Level Determination Hearing, 
dated August 26, 2010 
Supreme Qintrit 
of 
Putt of !Seto 'fork 
August 26. 2011) • 
MO CENTRE STREET 
NEW YORK. N.Y. 60013 
Mr. Jeffrey Epstein 
9 East 711 Street 
New York. N.Y. 10021 
Re: SCID #30129-2010 
Dear Mr. Epstein: 
Please be advised that pursuant to the 1996 Sex Offender Registration Act. the court must conduct a 
hearing to determine whether you will be classi lied as a level I , 2 or 3 sex offender and i Fyne will he 
designated as a sexual predator. a sexually violent offender or a predicate sex offender. The court's 
decision will determine how long you must register as a sex offenderand howmuch information can he 
provided to the public concerning your mgistration. The court'sdetermination may be higher. lower or the 
same as the one recommended by the Board of Examiners.
Your hearing has been scheduled for September 15,2010 at 9:30 a.m.. before the Hon. Ruth Pickholz 
in part 66 located at 111 Centre Street. New York, N.Y. You have a right to attend this hearing. I fyou 
wish to waive your appearance tin• the hearing enclosed is a waiver form which must be notarived and 
returned to this office within ten days of receipt. A request has been made for an attorney to 
represent you t this heari_L 
If you fail to appear at this proceeding, without sufficient excuse, it shall be held in your absence. Failure 
to appalr may result in a longer period ofregistration or a higher level of comma! iity notification because 
you are not present to offer evidence or contest evidence offered by the District Attorney. 
Enclosed please find the Board o Mxaminers summary with their recommendation that ”iti be assigned 
a risk level of3 and a document which describes what yourduties will be alleryou are assigned a risk level. 
At the conclusion onhedetennination hearing you will receive acopyolIN:tout-1s final rccammcndalinn
with a notice to appeal. 
Very truly yours. 
Mary A. Price. CCS 
encs. 
Supreme Court - Criminal Tent Nem York 1 
EFTA00232634

A69 
Order Sheet for Jeffrey Epstein, dated August 26, 2010 
A69-A70] 
ORDER SHEET 
Court 
Supreme Court, Criminal Tenn 
Date 
August 26, 2010 
County 
New York 
Part 
Correxpondatce Unit 
People of the State of New York, 
• 
Docker ind.fl 
301 29-20 10 
Jeffrey I Mimi it 
I k ft it a et 
Highest 
(l'eml law) 
flomicide 
Li
Felony 
Alisdctneattor 
Special Proceeding 
Sex Offender Nearing 
■ 
Vii)611. 
Fl
Being satisfied arty a review of the financial status of the defendant named, that he is financially unal,lr no obtain 
counsel, and upon his request for the :appointment of counsel. it is, 
/rdered that the folkiwingtitcmlx:r of die Bar be and hereby is -appointed to rcprescur such defendant in all 
matter, pertaining to this *Minn: 
gZ;l —
assaikiv 4 414t-se...- tsi
sCijeakietatata-
.\djottmed Date 
tivrt. 
Defendant's Stann: 
I kfentlaites Address: 
Comments: 
.1djourned l'arr 
rd. 
Assigningpas 
Ruth Rickholt 
Pa min I 
Incarcerated
Boiled 11
9 East 71' Sweet, New link, N.Y 
t 
Name: 
•'• 
Mary A. Price, CCS 
tvicrIblific 
EFTA00232635

A70 
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION F£ppRi 
TIME : 88/26/2810 10:58 
NAME : CORRESP INIT 
FAX 
: 
TEL
SER.11 : BROK53356431 
DATE .TIME 
FAX Ml. /NAME 
DURATION 
PAGE C.) 
RESULT 
MODE 
08/26 10.58 
188 ASSIGNED 
88:90:18 
01 
OK 
STANDARD 
ECM 
ORDER SHEET 
Colin 
Supreme Court. Criminal Term 
County 
New York 
The People or the State of :Icy York 
va. 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Defender 
Homicide 
Highest Chew: (Penal Law) 
Felony 
Dale 
Algatst26.2010 
Pari 
Correspondence Unit 
Docket Ind.# 
30129.2010 
ttdc me n 
Special Pniceeding 
l-jra Offender Heating 
I 1 
ltinlativu F-1
Tieing satisfied after a review of the horndal flatus of the defendant named, tiler he is financially unable to obtain 
counsel. and upon his teasen fot the appointment of counsel, it is, 
hdeted that the following member of the Rar he and betel:7 it appointed to represent such defendant in .11 
natters pertaining to this action: 
Åtemai;di simeitm‘atitasial-
r 
1'/4".t 
7.01n 
Adjourned Part 
(16 
EFTA00232636