EFTA00230786

' 
06-81-'09 15:34 FliCtl-IIIRSS 8 IXICES3 
8139843670 . la 
; 
P024/037 F—815 
•••• l e
a. 
: 3 
i 
• 
r
• 
. 
. 
I 
I 
• 
 :•t 
• 
I 
' IL 
• 
I 
•• .1 
• : 
• 
' 
•
I 
• 
. 
. 
. 
• II. 
. 
1 1 I 
a 
. 
• 
:14
:  I 
f 
I 
• ."'/ II . 1: !PI 
I 
: 
•• 
• 
la 
I 
'II  • 
• 
• 
. • 
Tbe:pertiadar.documents 
er soal in this cave are 
prosecution agreement 
• lin
•J'fz ' 1 
i • '<ticketed . i" • " • • 04 • •
• 
• • 
r.; 
. . 
.. 
a... • 
0  that yi i. .  
 oaiddly 2,2 8., and an  Addendum docketed on Augtisi 25, 2008.. Together, 
pei I. ,11011 
eats' iiperentlyie,saict any fec erg prosecution of the Defe
jThvdeit
Th  for offenses related 
• ••.• 
.... . 
I It
?ol
i 
: 
• 
. • : ! . 
... ..; • I 3 . % i. 1 
• : . . 
kin 
..!; l i to thecetanet to which lie pleaded guilty in this case. Judge ?ticille'isecipied the agreement for 
— !jag 
?• 
• 7 • i 
: •• : 
• 
.' I 
••
 
• 
• 
. 
.1; .. 
f • 
:.: 
• 
• • ; filing during a bench conference on June 30, 2008. The agreement,4tidge isticillo Found, was "a 
. 
id:. i i';' : 
, 
I 
• ' • ; • 
• 
I.:I:. ; •  '.  I. signitidancinducerhein lit licceptptg !his gilea." Such agreement! and ielated docutkents typically 
• 
I 
. 
• t • • , 
I 
.. 
. 
I 
1 . • ; t I 
• 
i.._ 
• 
, 
.,• .- I ; 
I 
• I
,i,.. 
:.•
i are pabluo record. lEhigg'9regdnian Publishing Co. v, United States tifstri4 tonne 920 F.24 1462, 
ilj ; 
• ' ; I 14634O; li•96)("e.lea agreements hale typically been op entoirlutilion); united States v., 
1.14 i; 1. ..i • 
 
i 
. 
: ! i..• : 7 
- 
 
-
i .. ..." 
...• • : i 
KOWA, 7.96 tli 100, j390.91 (11th 
1th C't . 1986) (documents tel  
63 defendant s change of 
• aigi. 
is  • 
•,,., 
• 
  ti  , 
:, 
•,, plea and sentencing Gould be: lieldeollonly.0 n finding of a cempellini Intefreat that justified 
• 
, 
• it,1 1,'. . 
: 
• 
' 
•• 
1../ . !I cr. ; I &did 'if public acOekS).• '-;' : ''. I ' 
' 
• 
' I ::-, i ; 
• 
. 
' ; :II I
in I: ol g 
: art I. : 
tit 
iiiitrIpride.ecinstituiicin 
thed judicial britnoli ircliprils genekally mr„tat be 
ill' • 
'' 
• . . .I . 
• 
• - ' 
:4 :1 • 
: 
k., • :; •': 
ifs! 
. 
0.1bile i!?if.triCIIi. 09i:igt; /, f 
(a), Fla. Cana,. Closure of snit mot-dr is allowed 
' Si... . i • 
'''•i1.
••••.: ;.] 
. 
..;: 
onlyiunilet narrowolforidottinoos; such as -to "prevent a sedous anti:iiiirnitient 
: •• 
. 
E 
• 
.4 
;1 ' • 
• '' t , impardel Ind cirlerliatiMinistrtitIon of Judea," or to protect a comp.elliroxgovernmental interest. 
• , 
• 
i 1 .; • 
• : • 
: • , Sig Milt. Ind. Admin.' 2.412Q(oX9)(A). Additionally, closure IlmittbP 
. 
.: 
• 
• ; • 
: 
• 
• 
thanneceseary to acooniphsh dte desired purpose, and is lawflal: 
. 
• 
• 
g • c 
• i • 
mess
 will acicon‘lisii time pumps,. 
I 
' 
•• 
• 
• 
426 
.2dat3.: !•I; 
• , 
I • 
I.' 5.' 
.1 .014(.4siii1/4!bse4tvere 
1 ' 
• :. 
' j • 
I} 
wititoutaityorlhaneidaitafindinge. Ra 
; 
1 
" 
sealed • 
ton 
:it 
3
:014 Thereate., •. 
' : 'I; 
• 
1 4 dc*,3afideathd
•ro 
• 
,f • 
• 
' 
is ' 
I 
•
ihei hi; 
alid no biped,. 
less refrictive : • 
. 
Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 
O(o)(9)(8) 
(C): Lis; 
•• 
; . : • r • 
1 
1 
. 
1 
on agreement tairOntk-:,thri:eiddes;dnits wegolgeeled 
• 
, it appears froni the 646:11  
documents
't
i
 "i re 
represented to.Judg :Nalco that the non-. 
i 
eat" 
Plea Conference Transeiript page 38 
2 
: :it!:
I 
.o. 
I " • 
lc.: 
• ; 
EFTA00231306

▪ 
ili• t: 86-01-'89 15:34 FROC-THOMAS & LCCICERO 
AIM 
1-488 P205/007 F-845 
WO  
• 't • • 
:.; , 
e 
r 
• 
it 'e: ! 
I 
: 
(June 36, 2003). Such a representation fail le well short of demonstraWitTnwe3thg
Ji 
inteiest a 
• 
• 
• 
• 
genulneneeeasity, nano* tailoring, and that no less restrictive mea
w 1 anf:ft e. 
t1 
I
• 
Jdi)
. 
; •• • C 
.," 
ollit•oVentlY, 
Was 'rapine* an ought to be sct 
15; 
• 
• t • , 
. . 
• • 
i• its aildithiP,It this time goo cause exists for Unseal 
 hfssil  
ocuments beca:use of 
• 
:f 
!::' 
?• I; : ; 
i . • 
)'' ; • 
; 
lie!!
• 1 
stgrd 
• 
•
; 
, 
• 
. Shop the Defend t pleaded guilty to 'p:Ali a minor for
I.' 
• 
• itgri;i at kast 2 civil lawsuits that r 
ges in this case — 
girls to 
e hiä home for, 8åx 1 adr' 
js."I At leas t 
• • 
I 
4. (‘ 
intuit, olte of the Defendant's a4;å 
has alleged that 
: . 
11 • 
• • 
hkr 
:uloni,faye4 lo Con•pultvdth 
regarding the diapesitleti ofpossible charges 
againtreihe Defendan.2 'State prosecutors 41so have been criticized:kite Palm Beach Police 
. 
, . 
. 
. • 
. 
: ill
•:' Lfr ' • 
Chief,* 'faulted the Slate Altorper.s hailing of these cases as uldighty;uttusual" and called fbr 
. II i 
• 1 I:i 
• vitt 
i •;'• ' • 
'' 
; 
, 
' 
polieutoksr-Ler. yi of 
le publk 
. 
mid celseltut. . 
I 
—, 1: 11: :::•::1;i
.. , • 
.. : 
: 
 
i 
• 
Co 
l
'
i
— the Stalk Attorney's ilisquOlci,tiont
equently, this cais 
and; ti ctieular y tlie Defendant's 
.5, t . •I ; i f 
i.
•.:., : • '4:.; ..,.. i;:. ; 
'
 ;  ..1 
2 
' The Detindaida trod-prose 
ion agreement 'With' . 
proseeu 
also 1was
I '',' Pi i''.i '.1::: ' 
- I 
• i I 1,?: l 
• 
to Jags4' Pileill4. 'As alto holed.' the NS* 2008 plies osat
' 
vim? (the. 
. I ' .• I. •'' 1 :I:. ,'' 
• 
I 
• ; . 1 
inctovisnent In 
#41142/"?. 
Flea; ' • 
I 
i : 
/: ' I 
I. 
reniiiimi • gunglal, , IIIIIt of 
to 
OW
• 
f..... I I 
with sentencing.OW §acal401 Herald Tribune: Div, 
, 3 ge4 " 
MK ' ithiti 
; ;!•••, 
till 
.;.‘ I I 
I 
. 
.11. 
:i 
I. 
' 
• 
 • . :. i• See: disii.:Vie.v.:Eititielh, dam N . 08-80069 (S.D. ii'lti. 26,08); Doe No. 2 v. patchy 
. , 
CasoNo. 08-80119 (SD..Fla. 2008): 
E 
' Case NO:08-8.0232 (S.D. Fla. 2008); 
• :, r 
. • 
D0öNbi. 4. v. %stein 
08-80380 (S,D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. p y, Bostelni Case No. 08-
.  
• i ' 
80381 <S.D. Fla. 2008); 
v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80811 (S.D ,Fla 2008); Doc v. Enst_0062, 
I. •Ifi 
: J ' 
Culp no. 08;80893 (3.D.i.Fla. 2008); lätehiniankin, caa 1,2140,993,,PP.,:n t,2,,„:29
•• 'i 
; 4 • 
Doe Md. 6 lei EP•tat Case — - 
bas 
09-80591 (SDI y442009); Abel N•• 102 v. 
14a. 08-80994 (S.D. Fla, 2008); Poe II . °stew, yes isi
o O. UnV 
1 
. 
. 
:'« 1 
(S.D. Fla. 2009); Doh No. 101..i. Epstein., .e No. 
N 8 v Enstenii, disc No. 09-80802 (S.D. 
4  
: . Bostidn‘ Casie No. 0?-80656 (831 Fla. "w)i D" c" 
' 1-- - ; i t ' i i
• ';' 
• 
• • 
Fla.. 
). ' : -. 
i . 
. I :• i• 
.:11 • • . L :. 
; 
:2 See fin ii.kh isi4stepra.ith_os acr;36 (ss. Pk iolia). 'i. }" 1:: I 
' 
..f.: - . : 
• 
. 14 ?ii 1 
• 
, 
• 
3 
 lird 
• 
. 
.  • • 
• 
 ' ' '• A ; • i 
• I:: ' 
I 
.. 
• 
• : • i • i• 
I
I .i 
a 
1. 
• • 
il • : I 
• 
▪ .1. • • 1 
' i I. % 14 
! 4.: C ;.. • :i P r: I :1! I 
. C.;
 4 g 
p r i e.:  : 
I 
EFTA00231307

I: -Ti '6 -Bilald'i5:84 in4il-11i
511% & LOCICERb 
8139843070 
1 1 
T- 88 PO?306/027 F-845 
1 
' 
P
p . ,'. hi, • 
:Ir ' ::' • . :iii 1 : , : 
• 
. 
ti • I
• ir 
:1: # !! ' ; 1. f. • r ': ! '
ro 
. ..iit  r :,.... of tits New York Times Co. v. ifoltrendori 507 So. 2d 667.668 (Fla. 12,4 D.CA 1907) ("While a 
:
i. 
.: 
: !: 1 Judge may Impose whatever legal sentence be chooses, if such sentecee # 4ased op a tangible 
i • • . • 
r 
,
 1 
, 
- -r1,.. !: 
. 
I 
•• .  proceeding or 4oettment, i is withinthe pure domain unless outermaarivileged."). In this 
: 
' 
I :1 I 
I 
4 
• 
• caseinn inierestjuatiliee dontlatied sealing. of those "significanr.dernents that fudge Poen-) 
I ,.. , 
..: . : • 
i: • coneid 
in m00,4.1116 plea
 sentencing the Defendant. '4 41 cif any sluch
:. . • ' : r 
; i 
• • • 
• • ; ; compelling interest •Jair.wreli as the parties failure to comply:with dig 
dards fOr sealing 
I 
- , documen# initialli-Iprovicio good cause i'r unsealing the dOcum 
1
• I 
: 
' 
time; 
I 
: 
t' • 
 • II i, 
- • ri: I 
Pinal.7, [email protected] of these documentsis po'. , 
becauselimany portions 
' 
; 
•• ..., I, 
r
•
 i
% irt , 
I ' of th4 ' Id '44c44i already htnie beell made public. Forexamkle t!,•co , papers quoti;Ig 
i`
 : 
7 ' :. ". • 
'7 . L..
• • 
I• ' ( ..: - 4: ' 
' i 
Pt ; r ; 
; 
1. 
ex o. ' 
cif the agrereinent haVe been madeipublic in related federaiiio0Wings.' 'As the Florida 
..: 
• 
 
• 
' t ? iF.:. 
, . • Suprenie Conn has rioted, "there would belittle justification for 010,04 'a pretrial hearing in 
I:1 je 
a 
prevent 
; . '. I
td 
 only the disclosore'of detifils which had already*" Pupublicized:
publicized:lthe 426
!
'Li 
 order t 
 
. ; 
.. z• - I; 
i. c. 1  :: So. 2d t 8.'.  Similarly; In tin:tear," the Intent that information avid, has been made 'public, 
'
F 'i l 
: 
i' . ' 
: ,H .• i LI 
— i .
. - • : 
• • • 
••• •• 
• • • 
•• 
• 
• : 
- - 
— 
r:” ! 
. : ' 
 • , oontimted plostny is pp 
see S. therefor, unconstitutional.
, 
- 
. . 
. 
. 
i 
: ,... 1
. 
. 
•
•41.ii: • i r I:" ! 
• 9. -
•The Poi has no. objection 
l!' 1 '• . I • • I I • :. ..• 
• 
• If: ' 
• '-'•' b the SalecerlailmJnis. In adci(tioh, Ins° 
; 
 
' 
I 
; 
q 
: 
•• V: 
 thr 
• I 
1*,11 
CI
rtart 
I; 
. :• 
• 
11 
  thqt; - 
cloilarlia' 
''' • 
I I 
' 
5' . :
II 
IA 
! : 
 
I is! :::# • 
• •  .;. •.
. • ., 
.ai ' 
:
I : 
• a 
) 
• 
2i 
i .: Irth
I :i 
-.• 
Hi 
I. 
I 
.•e. 
I. j 
*; 
I I . 
,.. 1 
".• I
re 
! ! I. t r • • • .i " 
See, e.g. "Defendants Jag 
figiaa Caw Nth 00-808I 
r
• 
: 
. : 
4 
: . 
r 
i
 
• 
I 
I. 
' 
. 
the redaction-ofiictimsSres (if art) that appear 
•elkhomey seek continued 
of 
t int Ir order to assess 
, 
tc 
I•iEfl1
-VI
I
• -
, 
as the Defendant 
the documerits in 
• 
• 
end Sarah Kdka i'llod°° for Stay," C.M.A. v. 
••• 
I 
• 
• 
1 
EFTA00231308

4.
06-21-'09 15:34 FRQM-THalAS & LOCI 
...F. ' . 4 • ' • ! 
gl.. itii • • 
• •i WHERniXtV, the Post resPectfiti,y requests that this Court unseal the no. -prosecution 
. . 
. 
. 
• 
• .. , 
• 
.  . 
 i. 
• i 
. 
. 
• 71i.: 11.. 
' i .. .. ! •• et I .• • • 
li 3.,! 
myisideridum'and grantthe Pot such other relief as the Court deems roper. 
: . i ..1 
• 
•'. 
• • . 
• 
- 
• 
I ' 
,.i. 
• .  • . ! . • r 
.. 
• i" 
: . 
: 
. 
• 
: 
8 
: 
I . 
I • 
! i: 
• 
• 
• 
• 
i hi I 
. 
• 
a. 
• 
. 
• 
• II 
•
•• 
• 
. 
I 
f 
' 
'
• • 
. . 
, ' 
t 
 I 
I 
I 
! 
; •
• 
I
• 
i: 
. . 
' 
i 
•• 
I .•
e. 
 
. 
; 
• 
• 
• 
I. 
:I 
oi 
• 
I 
I 
• 
4I 
• i 
• 
 4 . i
I
8139843078 
t• 
• 
• 
T-138 P9i7/007 F-.845 
• 
• 
• 
 
ill; 
1 
I 
r. 
Respeotfthy submitted, 
THOMAS, LOCI131th t BRALOW PL. 
.
eth 
At: O1O1 
canna K. iSh .. 
Florida Bar No.: . 51;4462 
James B. Lake. 'i!:y 1 i .. 
Florida Bar No.; 23477 
7itn 
I
101 N. . Third Ay.eWu , 
500 
Fort Laud 
Telephone:, 
c ; • • 
: 
Facsimile: : 
• 
• • • •I :, $. . 
( 
• I i •1 
 
I
• • 4 111•1 . 'IL 
1,;!* • 
, 1• P • • • •`; 
•. ; l• 
Attorneys f
i
or 
la 
.91
1 fli each post 
r 
i 
1 i.lpi.• .i h :ii : . a., .r, ..,. 
, hys 1 . I il
l 
I • 
III:11
.: i ll 
J. 
"
I 
'HI 
• 
%.; 
HI 
. 
' 
,..
1 ; !• • : . 
r 
I.c 2) • I 
1  
i 
1 
I 
i If I . 
44 '4 
I ,  r;. • 
; 
.I I:: • •• ; re., 
; 
. 
.017 . ; I 
I: 
I 
• 
• 
l i r 
I 
a;
. 
:
r . I nERBBY dE1ITIFY that a true and correct copy of the foiegoing has been flunishad 
'. :II I. 
. 
, 
• 
I. .., ! 
' 
.,. :  '  " 17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern 
qh . . . .. •••• : 
i Thstn 
• . .. 
; . • 
. :. ..,
'.' 
1• : . 
ci, 500 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 400, 
crest
Palm Beach, FL334?1(flix:a• 
i 
• 
. 
:t 
• 
• : 
i iiI:I Michael 111 e.Anntre ,)tsq4 and Judith Ste/season Arco, Erk, StatebBilnicrs Office - Walt . 
_ 
• jo : i 
1
 
_
. 
• 
• • • ! 
; i Palm Beach, 401 Notch Dixie Highway, West Pahnl3each, EL 3.340 . Ow.: 
; 
I
. 
• 
• ; .141 
1,.0 
i 
• : 
., - 
' 
. 
. 
i
I: 
! 
. 
- 
. 
: 
• . 
• 
- .•:il : r !, 
.!• . I Alan qoldberger; EN:, Atterbuty Goldberger, et al, 250 S.:AnStrialitair;Aire., Ste; 1400, West 
IN; ... ':  ' Palm Beach, FL 33401.(4a: . 
); and Bradley .11.. Ed4cliiliq. and, WIWate J. 
. .11 • L'; 
Blvd. 
4  i 
 $ .. Berger, Esq., Rothstn 
ieRosenfeldt Adler 40 East Las Olen 131
..it'ulie .650, 
) 
PortPortLauderdale, 
: 
• 
• 
.. 
i i 040., 
• r. .. •   
1
1 
O 
.. 
l: ::41 l• FL 114(fax! 
on this 1st y °flute, 2009.! 
;4: $ j 
, 
ii iii I 
I 
.• ii 
I: 
t . 
I,  
• 
)hI
l
.i 
. 
i 
pi 
$: 
I• •$ 11 :1 
" 
b • 1'j 
..11: :•' i ' • 
:1;
li • i 'I ' 1 
• . • 
: • 1 
. 
ilt•ef :f. : 
; 
• ,t 
• 
: 
i 
" • 
• 
I 
ll 
• 
lit 
: • 
. I. 
I : p-'/ : [ii . • 
. • *i . 
I ' 
I 
I. ' i. 
! 
I . 
I : ' • I • • 4:  
• 
• 
• • it 
r. . 
. . 
• 
:1 
1 
I. 
EFTA00231309

SLEGAL 
RECYCLED PAPER 
tl 
TO REORDER CALL 9546/69399 
ND 
EFTA00231310

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, 
FLORIDA 
CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 
2008CF009381AXX 
STATE, 
vs. 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, 
Defendant. 
MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW 
COMES NOW, Applicant, M. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil 
Procedure 1.230, for leave to intervene as a party in Mr. Epstein's criminal matter for the 
following reasons: 
1. 
Applicant's intervention is in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety 
of the main proceeding. 
2. 
Applicant stands to either gain or lose by the court's direct legal operation and 
effect of judgment in the pending matter. 
 
3. 
Applicant is not injecting a new issue into the pending matter. 
4. 
Applicant's motion to intervene is timely. 
EFTA00231311

5. 
Defense counsel, Robert Critton, Jr. in the civil matter, does not object to 
Applicant's motion, but Plaintiff's counsel has not heard back from Defendant 
Epstein's criminal counsel, Jack Goldberger as to whether he opposes this motion. 
MEMORANDUM OF LAW 
Anyone claiming an interest in pending litigation may at any time be permitted to assert a 
right by intervention, but the intervention shall be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the 
propriety of the main proceeding, unless otherwise ordered by the court in its discretion. 
Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.230. "A person seeking leave to intervene must claim an interest of such a direct 
and immediate character that the intervenor will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation 
and effect of the judgment." Litvak v. Scylla Properties. LLC, 946 M.2d 1165, 1172 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2006). Additionally, "an intervenor my not inject a new issue into the case." 
Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida. Inc.. v. IMC Phosphates. Inc., 857 ..2d 
207, 211 (Fla.ln DCA 2003). "An intervention is thus only appropriate where the issue the 
intervenor raises are related to the case being litigated." Racina Properties. L.P.. v. Baldwin, 885 
.1.2c1881, 883 (FM. 3"1 DCA 2004). 
Once the trial court determines that the intervenor's interest is sufficient, it exercises its 
discretion to determine whether to permit intervention. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v, Carlisle, 593 
M.2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1992). "In deciding this question the court should consider a number of 
factors, including the derivation of the interest, any pertinent contractual language, the size of the 
interest, the potential for conflicts or new issues, and any other relevant circumstance." Id. 
Finally, an intervention is generally considered timely if it is made before a final decree has been 
entered. See Technical Chemicals And Products, Inc.. v. Porchester Holdings. Inc, 748 M.2d 
1090, 1091 (Ha. 4th DCA 2000). 
Page of 4 
2 
EFTA00231312

Applicant's proposed intervention is subordinate and in recognition of the propriety of 
the main proceeding. Additionally, Applicant will not inject any new issue into Mr. Epstein's 
criminal case. In fact, Applicant's intervention is for the limited purpose of joining already 
intervening parties M." and "the Palm Beach Post" in their arguments regarding the sealed 
Federal non-prosecution agreement in Mr. Epstein's criminal file. Finally, Applicant's interest is 
of such a direct and immediate character that the Applicant stands to either gain or lose by the 
court's judgment in the pending matter. The Applicant currently has a civil complaint against 
Mr. Epstien regarding allegations similar to those in this pending criminal mater. The sealed 
document may contain discoverable information or may lead to the discovery of new relevant 
information. ate Fla.R.Civ.P. I.280(b)(1). Additionally, the document may contain valuable 
impeachment information that the Applicant would intend to use if the Applicant's civil case 
proceeded to trial. 
WHEREFORE, Applicant, ■., respectfully requests the Court grant M.'s motion to 
intervene in the pending criminal matter. 
Page of 4 
3 
EFTA00231313

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished by U. S. 
Mail, postage prepaid, this EL day ofi 02, , 31504  to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian 
Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 334101; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., 250 Australian 
Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, 
515 North Flagler Drive, 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401. 
LE0P0LD—KUVIN, P.A. 
2925 PGA Boulevard 
Suite 200 
ens, FL 
T. KUVIN, Esq. 
Florida ar No.: 089737 
Prige of 4 
4 
EFTA00231314

RECYCLED PAPER 
TO REORDER CALL 954416.9399 
I--` 
Co 
EFTA00231315

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH 
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH 
COUNTY, FLORIDA 
CASE NO. 
2008CF009381A 
DIVISION W 
STATE OF FLORIDA 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
MOTION TO MAKE COURT RECORDS CONFIDENTIAL 
Comes now the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned 
attorneys, pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the Administrative 
Orders of this Court , specifically AO 2.303 and moves this Court to treat as confidential 
the following records. 
A. A document referred to as "Non-Prosecution Agreement" filed under seal in the 
court file on July 2, 2008. 
B. A document referred to as "The Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement" 
filed under seal in the court file on August 25, 2008. 
1. The above referenced documents were Ordered Sealed at a hearing held before 
the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008. 
2. A Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records was filed 
by Non-Party EW on or about May 15, 2009. 
3. A Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access was filed by Non-party Palm 
Beach Post on June 1, 2009. 
la
4. This Court granted Non-Party M. and Palm Bea 
Motion to Intervene 
on June 10, 2009 but took no immediate action on 
Motion to Vacate 
Order Sealing Records and Unsealing Records or on Pam Beach Posts Petition 
For Access, pending a further hearing—
EFTA00231316

5.. The documents should remain confidential for the following reasons: 
a. To prevent a serious Imminent threat to the fair, impartial, and orderly 
administration of justice. 
b. To protect a compelling government interest. 
c. 
To avoid substantial injury to Innocent third parties. 
d. 
To avoid substantial injury to a party by disclosure of matters protected 
by a common law and privacy right, not generally Inherent in these 
specific type of proceedings, sought to be closed. 
WHEREFORE, Defendant moves this Honorable Court to enter an Order keeping 
the above referenced records confidential, and maintaining them under seal. 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that this motion is made in good ■ 
and supported by a 
sound and factual legal basis. 
CK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. 
WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 11 day 
of June, 2009. 
Notary Public 
Public State of Fl 
My Commission Expires 
EFTA00231317

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been 
furnished via a U.S. Mail; 0 Facsimile; o Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta, 
United States Attorney's Office-Southern District, 500 S. Australian Ave., 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Judith Stevenson Areo, Esq., State Attorney's Office-
West Palm Beach, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, William 
J Berger, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 
1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394; Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT 
ADLER, 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1850, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394; Deanna K. 
Shullman, 400 North 
Drive, Suite 1100, P.O.Box 2602 (33601) Tampa, FL 33602, 
Robert D. Clifton, BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER, & COLEMAN, 515 N. Flagler Dr. 
, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. this 11 day of June, 2009. 
BURMAN, CRITT 
IER & COLEMAN ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & 
515 N. Flagler Dr. 
WEISS, P.A. 
West Palm Beach, 
on a 3401 
250 Australian Avenue South 
Suite 1400 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
pc-
ERT D. CRITTON, ESQ. 
orlda Bar No.224162 
CK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ 
brida Bar No. 262013 
so 
most, 
cola' 
EFTA00231318

RECYCLED PAPER 
70 REORDER CALI. 96.1416-9. 
EFTA00231319

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN 
AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, 
FLORIDA 
CASE NO. 2008CF009381A 
DIVISION W 
STATE OF FLORIDA 
v. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STAY DISCLOSURE OF THE NON-
PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM PENDING REVIEW 
Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned 
counsel and pursuant to Rule 9.310, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, moves to stay 
disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum (collectively, the "NPA") 
pending review, and states: 
1. 
In the event the Court grants Nonparty M.'s Motion to Vacate Order 
Sealing Records and Unseal Records, grants Palm Beach Post's Motion to Intervene and 
Petition for Access and/or denies EPSTEIN's Motion to Make Court Records 
Confidential, EPSTEIN moves to stay the disclosure of the NPA pending review by the 
Fourth District Court of Appeals. 
2. 
Rule 9.310(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides in pertinent 
part, "...a party seeking to stay a final or non-final order pending review shall file a 
motion in the lower tribunal, which shall have continuing jurisdiction, in its discretion , to 
grant, modify or deny such relief." 
EFTA00231320

3. 
A stay pending review is warranted under the circumstances because of 
the irreparable harm that would be caused by disclosure of the NPA including, but not 
limited to, substantial injury to a party by disclosing matters protected by common law 
and privacy rights, substantial injury to a compelling government interest, substantial 
injury to innocent third parties and a serious imminent threat to the fair, impartial and 
orderly administration of justice as set forth in the hearing record date June 25, 2009. 
4. 
In Mariner Health Care of Nashville. Inc. v. Baker, 739.. 2d 608, 609 
(Fla. 1st DCA 1999), defendant Mariner filed a petition for writ of certiorari after the trial 
court compelled it to produce certain incident reports. Mariner also moved for a stay 
pending review pursuant to Fla. R. App. Pro. 9.310. The trial court advised the parties 
that Mariner would be required to submit the incident reports to the court under seal as a 
prerequisite to a stay. Mariner refused to produce the documents under seal and the trial 
court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were 
produced. 14„, The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and 
noted 
Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the 
reports under seal would result in any prejudice. To the 
contrary, the records will be protected from disclosure 
during the entire course of the certiorari proceeding before 
this court. No harm can be done if this court ultimately 
determines that the reports are protected by the work 
product privilege. 
Id. at 610. 
5. 
In the instant case the NPA is already filed under seal. Should the Court 
grant Nonparty M's Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records, 
grant Palm Beach Post's Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access and/or deny 
2 
EFTA00231321

EPSTEIN's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential, EPSTEIN requests the Court 
exercise its discretion under Fla. R. App. Pro. 9.310(a) and enter a stay pending review 
by the 4111DCA. 
6. 
No harm will be done if the NPA remains under seal pending appellate 
review. To the contrary, EPSTEIN will suffer irreparable harm if a stay is not entered 
and the NPA is disclosed to the public. 
WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests that if the 
Court grants Nonparty M.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal 
Records, grants Palm Beach Post's Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access and/or 
denies EPSTEIN's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential, the Court enter a stay 
pending review and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. 
Certificate of Service 
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been 
furnished by Hand Delivery to 
., United States Attorney's 
Office — Southern District, 500 S. Australian Avenue, 
, West Palm Beach, FL 
33401, JUDITH STEVENSON AREO, ESQ., State Attorney's Office — West Palm 
Beach, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, WILLIAM J. BERGER, 
ESQ., and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas 
Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394, JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ., 
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West 
Palm Beach, FL 33401, SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA 
Blvd., Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410, and DEANNA K. SHULLMAN, 
3 
EFTA00231322

400 North 
Drive, Suite 1100, P.O. Box 2602 (33601) Tampa, FL 33602, this 25th 
day of June,  2009. 
BURMAN, CR1TTON, LUTTIER & 
COLEMAN, LLP 
515 N. Flagler Drive, 
West Palm Beach, FL 
401 
F 
By: 
Robert D. Cri on, Jr. 
Florida Bar 
24162 
Michael J. Pike 
Florida Bar #617296 
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) 
and 
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. 
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 
250 Australian Avenue South 
Suite 1400 
West Palm Beac FL 33401-5012 
Fax: 
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 
4 
EFTA00231323

RECYCLED PAPER 
TO REORDER CALA, 9M-846-9399 
EFTA00231324

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, 
FLORIDA 
CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 
2008CF009381AXX 
STATE, 
vs. 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY 
INTERVENER'S 
AND S 
ON TO STAY 
OF LAW 
COMES NOW, Intervener, M. and fil 
's Response 
ndant Jeffrey Epstein's 
Motion to Stay, and states: 
In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it 
mg on the production of the NPA 
agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the 
first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has 
been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is 
likely to succeed on the merits of his appeal or describe how he will be harmed by this 
disclosure, Intervener M. respectfully requests the Court deny their Motion. 
-Pursuant niPlorida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(a), a trial court has the discretion 
to enter a stay pending interlocutory review of a non-final order. The burden to satisfy the 
EFTA00231325