EFTA00227071

From: 
Sent: 
Tuesday, August 05, 2008 1:01 PM 
To: 
Roy BLACK 
Cc: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Follow-up on last week's call 
Hi Roy — Are you available late this afternoon to do a follow-up on last week's call? If today does not work, 
can you let us know about your availability tomorrow, as well? 
Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
321 
EFTA00227191

From: 
Roy BLACK [RBLACK@royblack com) 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
e e rey pstem 
I am in the mountains and the cell doesn't work well. I will get to a landline at 
4 and call you. 
 
Original Messa e 
From: ' 
To: Roy BLACK <[email protected]> 
Cc 
( 
Sent: 7/30/2008 2:43:11 PM 
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Can Karen and I call you on your cell at 4:00 Florida time? I just need your 
number. Or you can call us at Karen's desk --
Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
 
Original Message 
From: Roy BLACK [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 2:38 PM 
To: 
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein 
Ok. I am on the road in california and can call in about an hour or so. 
 
Original Message 
From: 
To: Roy BLACK <[email protected]> 
Sent: 7/30/2008 2:31:56 PM 
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Hi Roy -- It relates to the performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution 
Agreement. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
353 
EFTA00227192

West P 
33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
 
Original Message 
From: Roy BLACK [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday Jul( 30 2008 1:18 PM 
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein 
I am out of town. What is it about? 
>» " 
07/30/08 11:44 AM >>> 
Dear Roy: Are you available this afternoon to discuss the Epstein matter? 
Please let me know what time works best for you. 
Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
354 
EFTA00227193

From: 
Sent: 
Wednesday, July 30. 2008 2:43 PM 
To: 
Roy BLACK 
Cc: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Can Karen and I call you on your cell at 4:00 Florida time? I just need your 
number. Or you can call us at Karen's desk --
Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
 
Original Message 
From: Roy BLACK [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesda , Jul 
30 
2008 2:38 PM 
To 
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein 
Ok. I am on the road in california and can call in about an hour or so. 
 
Original Message 
From: 
To: Roy BLACK <[email protected]> 
Sent: 7/30/2008 2:31:56 PM 
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Hi Roy -- It relates to the performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution 
Agreement. 
A. Marie Villafaha 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
 
Original Message 
From: Roy BLACK [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: We n 
• 
PM 
To: 
355 
EFTA00227194

Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein 
I am out of town. What is it about? 
>>> 
07/3 
: 
>> > 
Dear Roy: Are you available this afternoon to discuss the Epstein matter? 
Please let me know what time works best for you. 
Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West P 
33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
356 
EFTA00227195

MS) 
From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Roy BLACK [[email protected]) 
Wednesday, July 30. 2008 2.38 PM 
Re: yr 
Ok. I am on the road in california and can call in about an hour or so. 
 
Original Message 
From: 
To: Roy BLACK <[email protected]> 
Sent: 7/30/2008 2:31:56 PM 
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Hi Roy -- It relates to the performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution 
Agreement. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
 
Original Message 
From: Roy BLACK [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008 1:18 PM 
To: 
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein 
I am out of town. What is it about? 
>>> 
07/ 
: 
>> > 
Dear Roy: Are you available this afternoon to discuss the Epstein matter? 
Please let me know what time works best for you. 
Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
357 
EFTA00227196

USAFLS) 
From: 
Sent: 
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 2:32 PM 
To: 
Roy BLACK 
Subject: 
RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Hi Roy -- It relates to the performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution 
Agreement. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
 
Original Message 
From: Roy BLACK [mailto:RBLACK®royblack.com] 
Sent: Wednesda 
Jul 30 2008 1:18 PM 
To: 
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein 
I am out of town. What is it about? 
>>> 
07/30/08 11:44 AM >» 
Dear Roy: Are you available this afternoon to discuss the Epstein matter? 
Please let me know what time works best for you. 
Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone S 
Fax 561 820-8777 
358 
EFTA00227197

S 
From: 
Jay Lefkowitz 
Sent: 
Frida Au ust 15 2008 10:53 AM 
To: 
Cc: 
. 
, 
CK, Martin Weinberg 
Subject: 
Re: Follow-up point 
Marie - thanks for responding to my email. You have narrowed down some of the implementation issues. 
As I told you this morning, we cannot accept your contention that Mr. Epstein is bound by an agreement he 
didn't sign as opposed to one he did sign, particularly in light of my written communications to your office 
dated December 21, 2007 and December 26, 2007. However, before we can make a determination whether to 
adopt the December language as you have now explained it, we need to confer with our client, which we will be 
able to do within the next two weeks. 
1 look forward to speaking with you soon to resolve these issues. 
Jay 
From: 
Sent: 01.1. 
To: Jay Lefkowirz 
Cc: "Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)" <Karen.Atkinson®usdoj.gov>; "Roy BLACK" 
<RBLACK®royblack.com> 
Subject: RE: Follow-up point 
Dear Jay: 
The modification contained in the December letter is clear and simple, that is why we were not surprised by Mr. 
Epstein's and his attorneys' actions affirming acceptance of the modification. Mr. Epstein's acceptance of the 
modification by pleading guilty was equally clear and simple -- it followed written communications from Mr. 
Sloman and myself that read: "Mr. Epstein has until the close of business on Monday, June 30, 2008, to comply 
with the terms and conditions of the agreement between the United States and Mr. Epstein (as modified by the 
U.S. Attorney's December 19thletter to Ms. Sanchez), including entry of a guilty plea, sentencing, and 
surrendering to begin his sentence of imprisonment." 
As clearly stated in the December letter, only those "individuals whom [the United States] was prepared to 
name in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense" are the beneficiaries of the agreement. That is the 
list of names that I provided to Messrs. Goldberger and Tein following the change of plea. Under the 
September/October agreement, all "individuals whom [the United States) has identified as victims" are the 
beneficiaries, so I would prepare a supplement to the earlier list to include identified victims whom we were not 
yet prepared to name in an indictment. 
Again, as stated in the letter, the modification replaces paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Agreement, including 
paragraphs 7A through 7C that are included in the October Addendum. This means that Mr. Epstein's waiver 
of "his right to contest damages up to an amount as agreed to between the identified individual and Epstein" 
229 
EFTA00227198

will no longer exist, nor will Mr. Epstein's obligation to pay for the victims' counsel. Paragraphs 9 and 10 are 
still in effect. This includes the statement that there is no admission of' civil or criminal liability, and that, 
lejxcept as to those individuals who elect to proceed EXCLUSIVELY under 18 USC § 2255, .. . Epstein's 
signature [cannot) be construed as admissions or evidence of civil or criminal liability." This addresses your 
question regarding exclusivity. 
I don't think that Mr. Epstein has to make any constructive admissions of conviction. He only needs to admit 
that the 32 girls whose names I have provided to Mr. Goldberger are "victims" of an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. 
2255. 
Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
From: Jay Lefkowit 
Sent: Thursday, Au 
To: 
Cc: ....... 
Subject: Re: Follow-up point 
- In reviewing your December proposal, there are a couple of things I don't understand. 
What limits are placed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted 
of an enumerated offense." In other words, what individuals would have this right? And would these individual only 
have this right if they proceeded exclusively under 2255? Also, to what enumerated offenses do you think would Mr. 
Epstein have to make constructive admissions of conviction? and how many such offenses? And against whom? 
Remember that while you may have investigated various offenses, he only plead guilty to certain state crimes. 
Finally, would paragraphs 8-10 of the September Agreement still be operative? 
I am trying hard to understand what you have intended by the December letter. Alex has says he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, 
and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. 
Thanks —Jay 
081141200612:44 PM 
cc 
Subject Follow-up point 
Iii Jay — I forgot to mention that 1 can no longer argue that the Court shouldn't force us to produce the 
agreement because we have already provided the victims with the relevant portion when 1 now understand from 
you that I have NOT provided them with the relevant portion. 
230 
EFTA00227199

Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Aye, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to postmasterOkirkland.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to postmasterekirkland.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
231 
EFTA00227200

From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Friday, August 15, 2008 11:08 AM 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Piregiciiii, 
33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
From: 
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 10:53 AM 
To: SM. 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Roy BLACK; Martin Weinberg 
Subject: Re: Follow-up point 
thanks for responding to my email. You have narrowed down some of the implementation issues. 
As I told you this morning, we cannot accept your contention that Mr. Epstein is bound by an agreement he 
223 
EFTA00227201

didn't sign as opposed to one he did sign, particularly in light of my written communications to your office 
dated December 21, 2007 and December 26, 2007. However, before we can make a determination whether to 
adopt the December language as you have now explained it, we need to confer with our client, which we will be 
able to do within the next two weeks. 
I look forward to speaking with you soon to resolve these issues. 
Jay 
From: 
Sent: 08/14/2008 03:27 PM AST 
To: Jay Leficowitz 
Cc: allingla'Roy 
BLACK" 
<RBLACK®royblack.com> 
Subject: RE: Follow-up point 
Dear Jay: 
The modification contained in the December letter is clear and simple, that is why we were not surprised by Mr. 
Epstein's and his attorneys' actions affirming acceptance of the modification. Mr. Epstein's acceptance of the 
modification by pleading guilty was equally clear and simple -- it followed written communications from Mr. 
Sloman and myself that read: "Mr. Epstein has until the close of business on Monday, June 30, 2008, to comply 
with the terms and conditions of the agreement between the United States and Mr. Epstein (as modified by the 
U.S. Attorney's December 191hletter to Ms. Sanchez), including entry of a guilty plea, sentencing, and 
surrendering to begin his sentence of imprisonment." 
As clearly stated in the December letter, only those "individuals whom [the United States] was prepared to 
name in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense" are the beneficiaries of the agreement. That is the 
list of names that I provided to Messrs. Goldberger and Tein following the change of plea. Under the 
September/October agreement, all "individuals whom [the United States] has identified as victims" are the 
beneficiaries, so I would prepare a supplement to the earlier list to include identified victims whom we were not 
yet prepared to name in an indictment. 
Again, as stated in the letter, the modification replaces paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Agreement, including 
paragraphs 7A through 7C that are included in the October Addendum. This means that Mr. Epstein's waiver 
of "his right to contest damages up to an amount as agreed to between the identified individual and Epstein" 
will no longer exist, nor will Mr. Epstein's obligation to pay for the victims' counsel. Paragraphs 9 and 10 are 
still in effect. This includes the statement that there is no admission of civil or criminal liability, and that, 
"[e]Xcept as to those individuals who elect to proceed EXCLUSIVELY under 18 USC § 2255, ... Epstein's 
signature [cannot] be construed as admissions or evidence of civil or criminal liability." This addresses your 
question regarding exclusivity. 
I don't think that Mr. Epstein has to make any constructive admissions of conviction. He only needs to admit 
that the 32 girls whose names I have provided to Mr. Goldberger arc "victims" of an.offense listed in 18 U.S.C. 
455. 
Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you. 
EFTA00227202

orney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
From: Jay Lefkowitz [ 
. 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:39 PM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
— 
Subject: Re: Follow-up point 
Marie - In reviewing your December proposal, there are a couple of things I don't understand. 
What limits are placed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted 
of an enumerated offense." In other words, what individuals would have this right? And would these individual only 
have this right if they proceeded exclusively under 2255? Also, to what enumerated offenses do you think would Mr. 
Epstein have to make constructive admissions of conviction? and how many such offenses? And against whom? 
Remember that while you may have investigated various offenses, he only plead guilty to certain state crimes. 
Finally, would paragraphs 8-10 of the September Agreement still be operative? 
I am trying hard to understand what you have intended by the December letter. Alex has says he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, 
and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. 
Thanks -- Jay 
To 
08/14/2008 12:44 PM 
cc 'SIMMIE 
Subject Follow-up point 
Hi Jay — I forgot to mention that I can no longer argue that the Court shouldn't force us to produce the 
agreement because we have already provided the victims with the relevant portion when I now understand from 
you that I have NOT provided them with the relevant portion. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone-
Fax 561 8204777 
225 
EFTA00227203

The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use Of the addressee. It is the property of 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to postmasterekirkland.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the propeity of 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to postmasterSkirkland.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
Tracking: 
226 
EFTA00227204

From: 
Sent: 
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:56 AM 
To: 
EMIIISOMposammon, 
Subject: 
Letter you requested. 
Hi Mercy — Here is the letter e 
I will e-mail the updated log to you this afternoon. 
Final Victim 
Notification -- 1.. 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone IPIPIERIPP 
• 
Fax 561 820-8777 
EFTA00227205

From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Gerald Lefcourt 
RE: Cover Letter and Subpoena 
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 18, 2007 in which, among other things, you ask if I would be willing to accept 
service on behalf of New York Strategy Group, Inc. I write to inform you that New York Strategy Group, Inc. is not Mr. 
Epstein's company and accordingly I cannot accept service on its behalf. If you have any questions please feel free to 
contact me. 
Gerald B. Lefcourt 
Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. 
148 E. 78th Street 
New York, New York 10021 
Tel. 
Fax 
ablelefcourtlaw.com 
From:. 
(USAFLS) [mailto: 
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:10 PM 
To: Gerald Lefcourt 
Cc: 
Subject: Cover Letter and Subpoena 
Gerry and Lilly — Here is the subpoena and letter that we discussed earlier. Please let me know that you have 
received these. 
Thank you. 
«070618 Lefcourt-Sanchez Itr re NES Subpoena.pdf» 
«Scanned NES LLC subpoena pdf>> 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
127 
EFTA00227206

From: 
Sent: 
Thursday, July 05, 2007 7:13 AM 
To: 
Ball, Shawn (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
FW: Jeffrey Epstein 
Hi Shawn -- I got a message from Lilly that she is out of the office. Can you 
give her a call on her cell phone 
and just give her the gist of 
this e-mail? 
Thanks. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
Original Message 
From: 
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 4:07 PM 
To: 'Lilly Ann Sanchez' 
Cc: Gerald Lefcourt 
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Lilly and Gerry: Thank you for your e-mail and your message. This e-mail 
was supposed to have gone out yesterday while I was in trial. I have no 
objection to the two-week extension with respect to NES, New York Strategy Group, 
and Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation. 
With respect to the subpoena to the investigator, I would like to get the 
computer equipment as soon as possible. If you prefer to simply turn over the 
equipment without anyone appearing before the grand jury that is fine. If we 
proceed that way, we can defer litigating the issue of the applicability of the 
attorney-client and/or work product privilege to information related to how and 
why the equipment was removed. I will be in trial this week, so please contact 
Jason Richards at the FBI directly at 561 833-7517. 
I look forward to your July 11th submission. If you would like to discuss the 
possibility of a federal resolution of Mr. Epstein's case that could run 
concurrently with any state resolution, please leave a message on my voicemail at 
the office (561 209-1047) and I will get back to you after trial has ended for 
the day. 
Thank you. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
92 
EFTA00227207

 
Original Message 
From: Lilly Ann Sanchez (mailto 
Sent 
To: 
Cc: Gerald Lefcourt 
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein 
As i stated in my earlier voicemail today, we were calling to request a two-week 
extension on the return date of the following outstanding subpoenas: 
1. NES 
2. NY Strategy 
3. Investigator Riley 
4. Certification for St. Thomas entity 
We will be providing an additional submission to the Office by July 11 and hope 
to be able to reach a state-based resolution shortly thereafter. 
as your voicemail to me indicted, you would not oppose a one to two-week 
extension. accordingly, we would like to extend the return date two weeks-- to 
July 24. 
regards 
Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. 
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 
Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 
1395 Brickell Avenue 
Miami, Flor' 
Telephone: 
Direct Dial 
Facsimile: 
[email protected] 
93 
EFTA00227208

From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
FW: Jeffrey Epstein 
Assistant US. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 
West Palm Beach. FL 33401 
Phone 
lax 561 g20-8777 
From: Laurie, Andrew (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:33 PM 
To: 
Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein 
fyi 
From: Laurie, Andrew (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:32 PM 
To: 'Gerald Lefcourt' 
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
have your letter. I think we are on the same page, but to be sure I do want to clarify that we spoke the other week and 
I did say that if you want to meet with me again, I am ready to do so. The wording of your letter, however, suggests 
implicitly that I agreed to contact you before a decision is made to seek an indictment of Mr. Epstein. If that was your 
understanding, then please allow me to clarify. Our investigation is ongoing and if we decide to seek an indictment, we 
don't intend to call Mr. Epstein's representatives to let him know that. Of course, in the interim, if you would like to 
make a presentation to us, we are willing to listen. 
Along those lines, given the fact that we have already met once, with schedules being what they are, it makes sense for 
our criminal chief, I 
I, to be included when you make another presentation, rather than working up the 
chain incrementally. I realize you were being respectful in not attempting to leapfrog over me, which I appreciate. I 
will pass on your request to meet with the U.S. Attorney as well, but can't commit for him one way or another. When 
you have some dates in mind, let me know and I will try to set up a meeting in Miami. 
From: Gerald Lefcourt [mailto: 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:05 PM 
To: Laurie' Andrew (USAFLS) 
Cc: pilialoff(7, MOH, ria. IC 
L...11, Lilly mini „xi, &net 
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein 
149 
EFTA00227209

Andy, attached is a letter seeking meetings, as discussed with you, but with others if it is not resolved. Thanks for your 
attention. Could you email back so that I know you have received this letter? 
Gerald B. Lefcourt 
Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. 
148 E. 78th Street 
New York. New York 10021 
Tel. 
Fax 
ablelefcourtlaw.corn 
Tracking: 
150 
EFTA00227210