Tämä on FBI:n tutkinta-asiakirja Epstein Files -aineistosta (FBI VOL00009). Teksti on purettu koneellisesti alkuperäisestä PDF-tiedostosta. Hae lisää asiakirjoja →
FBI VOL00009
EFTA00180921
102 sivua
Sivu 61 / 102
A55 Epstein poses no threat to either himself or the general community, and he requires no additional intervention or treatment for his no-risk/low-risk status to be maintained into the future. Letter of Stephen R. Alexander, Psy. D., submitted herewith as Ex. B.' All of these circumstances — Mr. Epstein's low-risk classification in Florida, the state where the offense was committed, the low-risk scsrscment inherent in the decisions of Florida authorities responsible for the protection of the community, who knew him first-hand, to admit him to work release during his period of incarceration and to permit him to travel outside of Florida during his period of community control supervision, Dr. Alexander's well-supported judgment that Mr. Epstein presents little or no risk of reoffense, the fact that the offense ended almost five years ago, and there has been no subsequent criminal misconduct of any kind, and the fact that Mr. Epstein is a mature, responsible, professional adult who uses neither alcohol nor drugs all support the conclusion that the supervision which accompanies a level I designation will more than suffice to serve the purposes of SORA. That conclusion is supported by the calculation of Mr. Epstein's risk assessment guidelines score. The Conduct Underlying the Offense Triggering the Florida Registration Requirement Would For the Most Part Not Even Have Been a Registerable Offense in New York. Had the Conduct Occurred in New York The offense which required Mr. Epstein to register as a sex offender in the state of Florida was a violation of Fla. Stat. §796.03, which criminalizes procuring a person under the age of 18 (the age of consent in Florida) for prostitution, specifically, here, one "A.D." The nearest New York cognate among the registerable offenses listed in N.Y. Correction Law §168-a is N.Y. Penal Law §230.04 (patronizing a prostitute). The information to which Mr. Epstein pled guilty charged that the offense occurred between August 1, 2004, and October 9, 2005, see Information, Ex. C, that latter date being the day before A.D.'s 18th birthday: Thus, for *tiniest all of the duration of the charged offense, A.D. was over the age of 17, and the wholly consensual conduct in exchange for money which occurred between the two would not even have been a registerable offense in New York. See §168-a(2Xa)(i)(§230 .04 a registerable offense only if "person patronized" is in fact under 17 years old). Indeed, at the time of the offense at issue, the conduct which occurred after A.D. turned 17 years of age would not even have been a crime under that statute if the conduct had taken place in New York' Mr. Epstein's offense ranks among the least serious of those which trigger the requirement of SORA registration. The single Florida offense which required registration involved ' Dr. Alexander's CV is included in Ex. B. 'in 2007, §230.04 was amended to extend its coverage to prostitution offenses involving individuals of any age, not just those under the age of 17, as the statute was written when Mr. Epstein's offense was committed in 2004-05. Under §230.04 as written in 2004-05, the offense, to the extent that A.D. was in the last three months of her 16th year, would only have been a misdemeanor had it been committed in New York. 3 EFTA00180981
Sivu 62 / 102
A56 only one woman, and there was no force or violence involved at any time, nor did A.D. stiffer from any mental disability, mental incapacity, or physical helplessness. The points attributable to the Current Offense factors (factors 1-7) total less than 70. Criminal History Prior to the offense at issue, Mr. Epstein had no prior criminal history whatsoever. Mr. Epstein's date of birth is January 20, 1953, and he was, accordingly, more than twenty years of age when the offense at issue was committed. Mr. Epstein does not use alcohol or illegal drugs and has no history of either drug or alcohol abuse. Accordingly, Mr. Epstein should be scored at zero for the Criminal History factors (factors 8-11). Post-Offense Behavior On June 30, 2008, Mr. Epstein pled guilty to the offense which subjected him to the requirement that he register as a sex offender in Florida and has fully accepted responsibility for his conduct. Mr. Epstein served approximately 13 months in a West Palm Beach County jail (rather than in a state correctional facility). During most of his period of confinement, from October 10, 2008, through July 22, 2009, the date of his release, Mr. Epstein participated in the jail's work release program, see Letter of Deputy K. Smith, Ex. D, which permitted him to leave the jail in the morning six days a week for his place of employment, the Florida Science Foundation, and return in the evening. That Mr. Epstein satisfactorily complied with the requirements of the program is evidenced by the fact that he remained in the work release program up to the time of his release from custody. After his release on July 22, 2009, Mr. Epstein was subject to a one-year period of community control, which required, among other conditions, that he maintain contact with the probation office as required, that he be confined to his residence during the hours when he was not working or performing public service, that he not leave his county of residence without the consent of his probation officer, that he commit no further violations of the law, and that he maintain employment. During Mr. Epstein's period of community control from July 22, 2009, through July 21, 2010, he was permitted by the court, with the assent of his probation officer and without opposition by the state's attorney, to travel (including overnight stays) to New York and to the Virgin Islands for business purposes on a number of occasions, thus demonstrating a substantial level of trust by both the court and his supervising probation officer in Mr. Epstein's ability to refrain from unlawful conduct of any kind and to conform his conduct to the terms of his community control order and to the orders authorizing his travel, which he did on every such occasion.' Mr. Epstein successfully completed his term of community control on July, 21, 2010, see Florida Department of Corrections Termination of Supervision notice, Ex. F, having at all times fully complied with all obligations and restrictions imposed upon him. Mr. Epstein has never refused or been expelled from any treatment since the time of his sentencing (factor 12(2)): See pages 2-3, supra. Based on his professional expertise and the One such travel order is attached as Ex. E. 4 EFTA00180982
Sivu 63 / 102
A57 substantial time he has spent with Mr. Epstein, Dr. Alexander is able to state unequivocally that Mr. Epstein has learned his lesson, that he presents no threat to the community, and that there is negligible risk that he will ever reoffend. Accordingly, Mr. Epstein should be scored at zero for the Post-Offense Behavior factors (factors 12-13). Release Environment Factor 14 contemplates that the risk level assessment will be made, as required under New York law, prior to the offender's release from incarceration. Here, as the preceding section shows, Mr. Epstein was released from jail more than a year ago and was subject to close supervision for a period of one year afterwards. During the same time, he continued to meet with Dr. Alexander. The score for factor 14- should, accordingly, be zero. Mr. Epstein maintains a vacation residence in Manhattan, which he owns, as well as residences in Florida and the Virgin Islands. Mr. Epstein's interactions in connection with both his employment and philanthropic work are with adult business professionals, scientists, and educators. There is nothing in either Mr. Epstein's living or employment situations which could even remotely be considered "inappropriate." The score on factor 15 too should be zero. Overrides None of the listed factors are of any relevance or applicability to Mr. Epstein's risk level designation. Conclusion Based on all the relevant factors, Mr. Epstein should be classified as a level 1 sex offender. Even should the Board somehow conclude that Mr. Epstein's risk assessment guidelines score exceeds 70, the circumstances addressed in this letter differentiate this case so markedly from the norm of level 2 sex offenders that the Board should recommend a level 1 classification, as it is empowered to do under the Sex Offender Guidelines. The ultimate issue is the risk that the offender will reoffend, and the information provided to the Board with this letter persuasively demonstrates that such a risk is virtually nonexistent in this case. truly yours, L. Martin einberg EFTA00180983
Sivu 64 / 102
A58 Letter from Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D. to Jack Goldberger Regarding Opinion of Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated August 16, 2010 [pp. A58-A611 Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D. Clinical Psychologist 1825 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 204 West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 561-433-2355 August 16, 2010 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss, P.A. 250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re.: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: Since my initial assessment of Mr. Epstein he has been extremely cooperative with all of the services provided to him. He has spent a great deal of time and energy focusing on his behavior and the attitudes, beliefs and expectations that undergird his approach to life. He has examined his priorities and undergone a comprehensive self-exploration on more than one occasion, primarily because of the vast changes that have occurred in his life and the upheaval these events have caused. Throughout it all Mr. Epstein has remained willing to focus on himself and how to turn even the most dire personal circumstances into productive experiences to the fullest extent possible. In my opinion Mr. Epstein has been highly cooperative with and benefited from the treatment provided. Relying upon my 25 years of experience as a forensic psychologist and the plethora of data gathered by me, I state with confidence that Mr. Epstein poses no threat to himself or the community. his abundantly clear that he has teamed his lesson and the probability of his reoffending is negligible. Mr. Epstein poses no threat to either himself or the general community, and he requires no additional intervention or treatment for his no-risk/low-risk status to be maintained into the future. If any questions remain or I can be of additional assistance, please contact my office. Sincerely, Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D. Clinical Psychologist SRA/bl Epstein-O60374.2A EFTA00180984
Sivu 65 / 102
A59 Stephen R. Alexander, Psy.D. Clinical Psychologist 1825 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 204 West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 561433.2355 EDUCATION Psy.D. Florida Institute of Technology; Clinical Psychology, 1985 M.S. Eastern Kentucky University; Clinical Psychology, 1980 B.A. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 1977 LICENSURE Florida Board of Psychological Examiners: Psychologist, PY0003713 CERTIFICATIONS Supreme Court ofFlorida: Family Court Mediator 19355 CF Supreme Court of Florida: County Court Mediator 19355 CF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Clinical Psychologist: Private practice providing services to children, adolescents, adults and families. Specialization in psychodiagnostic evaluations (personality, forensic, psychoeducational), forensic psychology, and psychotherapy. July 1989 to present. Chief Psychologist: Juvenile and Family Divisions of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit and Division of Youth Affairs, Palm Beach County, Florida. September 1987 to July 1989. Duties: Supervise Psychological Services provided to Juvenile and Family Court including psychological evaluations of children, adolescents and adults in delinquency, dependency, custody, and sex abuse cases; testimony as Expert Witness. Program Supervision of Sable Palm Youth Service Center, a 48 bed residential treatment program for emotionally and behaviorally disturbed adolescents; family therapy approach to treatment. Program Supervision of the Youth Service Bureau, a community based family counseling/delinquency prevention program. Directing program evaluation and basic research within the Division of Youth Affairs. Directing APA Approved continuing education office for professional staff under the Chief Psychologist (S Psy.D./Ph.D. psychologists, and 20 M.A./M.S.W. counselors). EFTA00180985
Sivu 66 / 102
A60 Court Psychologist: Juvenile and Family Divisions of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit and the Division of Youth Affairs, Palm Beach County, Florida. October 1985 to September 1987. Duties: Psychodiagnostic evaluations of children, adolescents and adults for the court in delinquency, dependency, custody and sex abuse cases. Clinical Supervisor of the Sable Palm Youth Service Center. Staff Psychologist: Scotland County Mental Health Center, Laurinberg, North Carolina. February to August 1982. Duties: Individual and family psychotherapy (60% child services, 40% adult outpatient). Consultant to Scotland County School system. Competency evaluations for courts. Staff Psychologist: Robeson County Mental Health Center, Lumberton, North Carolina. August 1980 to July 1981. Duties: Outpatient Individual and family psychotherapy (60% child services, 40% adult outpatient). Psychodiagnostic evaluations for Center patients, local courts, and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Program evaluation of 15 Head Start Centers in a four county area for H.E.W. Consultant to Red Springs City School system, Southeastern Sheltered Workshop, and Robeson County Group Homes. INTERNSHIP Louisiana State University Medical School (APA Approved): New Orleans, Louisiana. September 1984 to August 1985. Training consisted of equal time spent in three rotations: Adult, Child and Neuropsychology. Year long training in outpatient psychotherapy and community mental health services at West Jefferson Mental Health Center (1 day per week), psychoanalytic treatment of adults at LW Medical Center, weekly psychoanalytic psychotherapy seminars and weekly psychodiagnostics seminars. PRACTICUM PLACEMENTS Neuropsychiatry Unit: WuesthofF Memorial Hospital, Rockledge, Florida. 20 hours per week (200 total hours); January to March, 1984. EFTA00180986
Sivu 67 / 102
A61 Center for Student Development: Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida 10 hours per week (200 total hours); June to December 1981 Melbourne Head Start Center: Melbourne, Florida. 10 hours per week (100 total hours); September to December 1983. Robeson County Mental Health Center: Lumberton, North Carolina. 40 hours per week (1040 total hours); January to June 1980. University of Kentucky Medical Center (Outpatient Psychiatry): Lexington, Kentucky. 20 hours per week (640 total hours); January to December 1979. PUBLICATIONS & RESEARCH PAPERS Alexander, S. & Wiatrowski, M. (1989). Delinquency prevention in a Youth Service Bureau. Unpublished manuscript. Alexander, S. (1992). Choosing and using experts. In, Child Custody and Visitation in Florida. Eau Claire, WI: National Business Institute, Inc. AWARDS 1993 Special Service Award presented by the Legal Aid Society and the Palm Beach County Bar Association for pro bono services to the community. PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS Education Chair of the Palm Chapter of the Florida Psychological Association, 1994. President of the Palm Chapter of the Florida Psychological Association, 1995. COMMUNITY SERVICE POSITIONS Board of Directors Fern House, West Palm Beach, Florida. Fern House is a residential rehabilitation center for male alcoholics and drug addicts. 2004 to present. EFTA00180987
Sivu 68 / 102
Offender Name: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN NYSID O51909 1ST Reviewer Initials: '' .C31.h) The following is the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders' recommendation pursuant to Section 168-I of Article 6-C of the NYS Correction Law as to whether the offender shall be designated a Sexually Violent Offender, Predicate Sex Offender, or Sexual Predator as defined in subdivision seven of Section 168-a or whether the offender does not fit any of those categories due to his conviction. 5 re O !g. O A 00 ?i•' n Please check all that apply: 1. D Sexually Violent Offender -a sex offender who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense defined In Correction Lew section 168-a (3). Please check which conviction(s) apply, also please indicate whether the conviction was for an attempt at an offense: &IOW SLettl...2 130.35 - Rape 1st degree 130.50 - Sodomy 1st degree/Criminal Sexual Act 1st degree 130.65 -Sexual Abuse 1st degree 130.66 - Aggravated sexual abuse 3rd degree 130.67- Aggravated sexual abuse 2nd degree 130.70 - Aggravated sexual abuse I st degree 170.75 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 1st degree 130.80 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 2nd degree 130.53 - Persistent sexual abuse 130.65-a - Aggravated sexual abuse 4th degree 130.90 - Facilitating a sex offense with a controlled substance a conviction of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any provisions of the foregoing sections committed or attempted as a hate crime defined in section485.05 of the penal law or as a crime of terrorism defined in section 490.25 of such law. 7 7 --, a.., *CI e.,, 7 i ; ' f, o (9 a conviction of an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes all of the essential elements of any such felony provided for above or conviction of a felony in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is required to register as a sex offender in the jurisdiction which the conviction occurred. 2. O Predicate Sex Offender - a sex offender who has been convicted of an offense set forth in subdivision 2 or 3 of Correction Law Section 168-a when the offender has been previously convicted of an offense set forth in subdivision 2 or 3 of Section 168-a, regardless of the date of the prior conviction and regardless of whether the offender was required to register for the previous conviction, Please identify below the offenders previous qualifying conviction(s) as well as the offender's current qualifying conviction, also please indicate whether the conviction was for an attempt at an offense: erevious MI S= 130/0 - Sexual Misconduct 130.25 - Rape 3rd degree 130.30 - Rape 2nd degree 130.40 - Sodomy 3rd degree! Criminal Sexual Act 3rd 130.45 - Sodomy 2nd degree/ Criminal Sexual Act 2nd Current Previous MIMPJ 130.60 - Sexual Abuse tad degree 255.25 - Incest Article 263 offense - Sexual Performance by a Child 135.05 - Unlawful Imprisonment 2nd degree 135.10 - Unlawful Imprisonment 1st degree Gan PreSm Ail= ( •C C >. CP% 0 • C ICJ 7 n 2 a7 Q. a Yet • Y!.., C. = g. mi• z . b.1 ? bi es v) 135.20 - Kidnapping 2nd deg: S' 9 13515 - Kidnapping 1st degree (*Note: 135.05, 135.10.175.20, t35.25 - the victim must be less than 17 yews old and the offender must not be the parent of the victim) Continued on the oat page. er er• C C en EFTA00180988
Sivu 69 / 102
2. (Cont'd) Current Previous Attempt 230.04 - Patronizing a prostitute 3rd degree (victim <17 years old) 230.05 - Patronizing a prostitute 2nd degree 230.06 - Patronizing a prostitute 1st degree 23030 (2) - Promoting prostitution 2nd degree 230.32 - Promoting prostitution 1st degree 235.22 - Disseminating indecent material to minors 1st degree a conviction of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any provisions of a — listed sex offense committed or attempted as a hate crime defined in section 485.05 of the penal law or as a crime of terrorism defined in section 490.25 of such law. 130.52 - Forcible touching (victim<18 years old) 130.55 - Sexual abuse 3rd degree (victim<I8 years old) Conviction/Attempt to commit any provision of 130.52 or 130.55 of the — penal law regardless of age of victim and the offender has previously been convicted of: (i) a sex offense listed in Correction Law Section 168-a (2), or (ii) a sexually violent offense listed in Correction Law Section I68-a (3), or (iii) any of the provisions of section 130.52 or 130.55 of the penal law or an attempt thereof. A conviction of (i) an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes all of the — essential elements of any such crime provided for in Correction Law Section 168-a (2) (a), or (ii) a felony in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is required to register as a sex offender in the jurisdiction in which the conviction occurred, or (iii) any of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 2251. 18 U.S.C. 2251 A. 18 U.S.C. 2252, IS U.S.C. 2252A, or 18 U.S.C. 2260 provided the elements of such crime of conviction are substantially the same as those which are part of such offense as of March 11, 2002. Current Previous Attempt 130.35 - Rape 1st degree 130.50 - Sodomy 1st degree/Criminal Sexual Act 1st degree 130.65 • Sexual Abuse 1st degree 130.66 - Aggravated sexual abuse 3rd degree 130.67- Aggravated sexual abuse 2nd degree 130.70 - Aggravated sexual abuse 1st degree 130.75 • Course of sexual conduct against a child 1st degree 130.80 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 2nd degree 130.53 - Persistent sexual abuse 130.65-a • Aggravated sexual abuse 4th degree 130.90 - Facilitating a sex offense with a controlled substance a conviction of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any provisions of a sexually violent offense as sea forth in Correction Law Section 168-a (3) committed or attempted as a hate crime defined in section 485.05 of the penal law or as a crime of terrorism defined in section 490.25 of such law. a conviction of an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes — all of the essential elements of any such felony provided for above or conviction of a felony in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is required to register as a sex offender in the jurisdiction which the conviction occurred. 250.45(2),(3)and(4) - Unlawful surveillance 2nd degree 250.50 - Unlawful surveillance 1st degree 3. El Sexual Predator - a sex offender who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense defined in Correction Law Section 168-a (3) and who suffers from a mental abnormality or personality disorder that makes him or her likely to engage in predatory sexually violent offenses. 4. None of the above. EFTA00180989
Sivu 70 / 102
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ACT RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT RISK FACTOR VALUE SCORE 1. CURRY-NI OFFERS'S) I. Use of Violence Used forcible compulsloo Inflicted physical injury Armed with a dangerous instrument +10 X 10 +15 +30 2. Sexual Contact with Victim Contact over clothing Contact Linda clothing Sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse or aggravated sexual abase +5 25 +10 +25 x 3. Number of Victims Two Three or more +20 30 +30 X 4. Mirada of offense conduct with victim Continuing COIN= of sexual misconduct +20 X 20 5. Age of victim II through 16 . I0 or less, 63 or more +20 X 20 +30 6. Other victim clisracteristics Victim suffered from mental disability or incapacity or fiord physical kelplessmsS +20 0 7. Rciationskip with victim Stranger or established for purpose of victimizing or professional relationship +2.0 X 20 II. CRIMINAL HIS WRY g. Age at fin! act of sexual misconduct 20 or less . +10 0 9. Number and nature of prior crimes Prior history/no sex crimes or felonies Prior history/non-violent felony Prior violent felony, or misclancanor scx crime or endangaing welfare of a child +5 X 5 +15 +30 M. Recency of prior offense Less dun 3 yeas +10 0 IL Drug or Alcohol abuse History of abuse. + l 5 0 COLUMNS I- II SUBTOTAL 130 SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ACT RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT • RISK FACTOR VALUE SCORE IlL POSI.OFFsISE BEHAVIOR 12. Acceptance of Responsibility Not accepted responsibility Not accepted responsibility/ refused or expelled from treatment +10 0 +15 13. Conduct while confined / supervised Unsatisfactory Unsatisfactory with sexual misconduct +10 +20 IV. RELEASE ENVIRONMENT N. Supervision Relent with specialized supervision Release with supervision Release without supervision 0 0 t5 -4.15 15. Living/ employment siltation Living or employment inappropriate +10 0 COLUMNS 12-IS SUBTOTAL ' 0 COLUMNS I-11 SUBTOTAL 130 TOTAL RISK FACTOR SCORE (add 2 subtotals) 130 1 2 X Offender Name: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN NYSID OS1909 Docket N: RISK LEVEL 3 Assessor's Signature Date: A. Overrides (If any override is circled, offender is presumptively a Level 3) 1. Offender has a prior felony conviction fora sex crime 2. Offender inflicted serious physical injury or caused death 3. The offender has made a recent threat that he will reoffend by committing a sexual or violent crime 4. There has been a clinical assessment that the offender has a pSyChOlOgiCal, physical, or oqpnic abnormality that decreases ability to control impulsive sexual behavior B. Departure I. A departure from the risk level is warranted Yes ®No Level I (low) 0 to +70 Level 2 (moderate ) - +75 to +105 2. If yes, circle the appropriate risk level I 2 3 Level 3 (high) + +Ile to .300 3. If yes, explain the basis for departure ( See Summary) Note: The Sex Offender Registration Ad retinal:Ste court or Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders to consider any victim impact statement in determining a sex offender's level of risk. a' EFTA00180990
Sivu 71 / 102
A65 RE: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN NYSID #: OS1909 DATE: 8/23/2010 CASE SUMMARY This assessment is based upon a review of the inmate's file which may include but is not limited to the pre-sentence investigation, prior criminal history and post-offense behavior. Jeffrey Epstein is a 57-year-old sex offender who pled guilty in the state of Florida on 6/30/2008 to two felony sex offenses, Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution. He was sentenced tol 2 months in jail followed by 12 months of Community Control. It would appear he was convicted in London England of Unlawful Possession of an Offensive Weapon, a Sword Stick, and was sentenced to a Conditional Discharge on 1/4/1973. Regarding the instant offense, Epstein was approximately 51 years of age on or about the year 2005 when he sexuallyassaulted numerous females between the approximate ages of 14 and 17. Most of the victims were recruited by one of Epstein's female employees from a local high school in the Palm Beach Florida area. Some of the female participants were age 18 or older. The contact included vaginal intercourse, mouth to vagina sodomy, the touching of the breasts and vagina, placing his fingers inside the vagina and Epstein using a vibrator on the victim's vaginal area. The available police reports from the Palm Beach Police Department include conversations with numerous female victims who in most cases, did not know Epstein when they were victimized. Most of the females were embarrassed to speak with police regarding what had happened to them while they were at Epstein's home. Sworn statements were taken from at least five victims and seventeen witnesses concerning massages and unlawful sexual activity that took place at the residence of Jeffrey Epstein. Most of the victims were paid at least $200.00 each time they performed a massage. The victims were told they would be giving Epstein a massage and they were escorted to his bedroom. Most victims noted numerous pictures of naked young females, (some of the photos depicted females who would be eventually interviewed by police), on display throughout the home. The offender would enter the room only wearing a towel. In most cases he would remove the towel and ask the victim to remove her clothing. In some cases he would masturbate into a towel while receiving a massage. In other cases he would touch the breasts or vagina of the victim with his hands or use the vibrator. One 14 year old.described how Epstein touched her vaginal area with a vibrator and thereafter, when contacted by law enforcement, she had to identify the offender through the use of a photo array. Another 16-year-old victim described giving Epstein massages for two years and at times, he grabbed her buttocks and caressed her butt checks as she gave him a massage. Another 16-year-old described going to the offender's home at least 100 times. He would touch her breasts, insert his fingers into her vagina and sometimes use the vibrator on her while masturbating. He would also pay this underage victim to have sex with a female friend while he watched. Occasionally, he would join both girls and perform oral sex on both. This 16-year-old victim described for police how one time, Epstein turned her over on the massage table and forcibly raped her. When she screamed, "NO," he stopped and subsequently apologized for his actions. The offenders conduct while on Community Control will be considered satisfactory and he does not have a history of substance abuse. Based upon his plea of guilty, Epstein will be credited with accepting responsibility for his actions. He will be scored for sexual and deviate sexual intercourse, forcible compulsion, numerous victims and their ages, a continued course of sexual misconduct, a prior misdemeanor conviction in England absent specific information, for his stranger relationship to most victims and for establishing a relationship with these underage girls for the purpose of victimization. The Board acknowledges correspondence received from the offender's attorney. EFTA00180991
Sivu 72 / 102
A66 RE: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN NYSID #: O81909 DATE: 8/23/2010 CASE SUMMARY Jeffrey Epstein used his wealth and power in such a way so that he could take advantage of many teenage girls to satisfy his own sexual perversions. He scores as a Level III Sex Offender with absolutely no basis for downward departure. EFTA00180992
Sivu 73 / 102
A67 Letter from Supreme Court attaching Notification, Recommendation and Notice of Right to Appeal, dated August 26, 2010 Supreme Court -- of -Hit- Slab of Leto nrk t00 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK. N.Y. 10013 TO: PART 66 FROM: CORRESPONDENCE UNIT SUBJECT: SEX OFFENDER RISK ASSESSMENT RE: Jeffrey Epstein SCID. # 30129-2010 Please refer to the attached: I) Notification to sex offender, defense attorney and D.A.'s office of the scheduled risk assessment; 2.) Recommendation from Board of Examiners 3.) Notice of Right to Appeal and Appeal Application. Please be advised that theabove named defendant. his assigned counsel, Sex Crimes Unit of(he D.A.'s office, City and State Correctional Facilities have been notified of the sex offender risk level assessment hearing which has been scheduled in your part. Upon completion of the risk assessment, you must endorse the calendar and worksheet and forward the COURT FILE AND ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS to this office. BE ORME ADVISED THAT L E MAY HOI411 11ft DEFENDANT UNTIL A RISK LEVEL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED. A REQUEST FOR 18B ASSIGNMENT HAS BEEN MADE. ONCE YOU AR SEND THE ATTACHED NOTIFICATION LETTER AND BOARD OF EXAMINER'S PACKAGE TO HIM/HER IGNED PC EASE EFTA00180993
Sivu 74 / 102
A68 Letter from Supreme Court to Jeffrey E. Epstein Informing of SORA Level Determination Hearing, dated August 26, 2010 $uprerne Cunt of life 531zde ofpght link August 26. 2010 • 100 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK. N.Y. 10013 Mr. Jeffrey (Epstein 9 East 71' Street New York. N.Y. 10021 Re: SOD # 30129-2010 Dear Mr. Epstein: Please be advised that pursuant to the I996 Sex Offender Registration Act. the court must conduct a hearing to determine whether you wil l be classi lied as a level 1, 2 or 3 sex offender and i you will he designated as a sexual predator. a sexually violent offender or a predicate sex offender. l'he court 's decision will detennine how long you must register as a sex offenderand how much in 'Murillo() can he provided to the public concerning your mgistration. Thecoutfsdeterminationmaybehigher.howrorthe same as the one recommended by the Board of Examiners. 'Your hearing has been scheduled for September 15.2010 at 9:30 a.m.. berme the Hon. Ruth Pickholz in part 66 located at III Centre Street. New York, N.Y. You have a right to attend this hearing. Ilyou wish to waive your appearance liw the hearing enclosed is a waiver form which must he nou -lied and returned to this office within ten days of receipt. A request has been made for an attorney to represent you at this hearing. Ilyou fail to appear at this proceeding, without sufficient excuse, it shall be held in your absence. Failure to appear may result in a longer period of registration or a higher level ofcommunity notification because you are not present to offer evidence or contest evidence offered by the District Attorney. Enclosed please find the Board of Examiners summary with their recommendation that you be assigned a risk level oil and a document which describes what yourduties will be after you are assigml a risk level. At the conclusion of the detenui nation hearing you will receive a copy oldie corm 's final recommelklaiit on with a notice to appeal. cues. Very truly yours. Mary A. Price. CCS Supreme Court - Criminal Term. Nr.m York t Mu, EFTA00180994
Sivu 75 / 102
FI
A69
Order Sheet for Jeffrey Epstein, dated August 26, 2010
[pp. A69-A70]
ORDER SHEET
Court
Supreme Court. Criminal Tenn
Date
August 26, 2010
County
New York
Part
C'onespoodeoce
People of the Slate of New York,
vs.
Jeffrey lipstein
lkfendani
I h/IlliCidt
I lighest Charge (Penal law)
Felony
Special Proceeding
x
Docket Ind.{(
30129-2010
Misdemeanor
Sex Offender I:haring
III
Being satisfied :dux a review of the financial status of the defendant named, that he is financially unable x. ,drain
counsel, and upon his request for the apponument of counsel. it is,
/Meted that the following member of the Bar be and hereby is appointed to represent such defendim in all
matters pertaining to this action:
IRAreant;±5_41a.4...- 1,444-fcr./Asizt-t-
.\djourned Date
lkfendant's Status:
Iklenrlatit's Arklress:
COIMIXIIht
Adjourned Parr
on
Assijoung Judge
Paroled
9 Ram i t
Ruth Plekhulz
517
Bailed
Incarcerated
New Volk. N.Y.
Stmt,
Prior Monty:
tiering Name.
Teleplumw
646-386-3860
Maly A. Price, eCS
EFTA00180995
Sivu 76 / 102
A70 TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION FEPOR1 TIME : 09/26/2010 10:58 NAME : CORRESP UNIT FAX TEL SER.a EROK5J356431 DATE.TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 09/26 10:59 198 ASSIGNED 010: 9 00:19 OK STANDARD ECM ORDER SHEET Court Supreme Court, Criminal Term Dale August 26,2010 County New York the People of tilt titare of >IOW York. vs. Jeffrey Elpstein Defendant i(tIllidric Highest Chtuge ( 1,;,1,11 In) Felnny Special %weeding Part Correspondence Unit Docket Ind.# 30129-2010 Misdemeanor Sea Offender Ideating Being satisfied sifter a review of the financial antes of the defendant named, that he is 6naneially unable to oldain counsel. and upon his requital for the appointment of counsel, it is. < >Meted that the following member of the Paw be and hereby is appointed to represent such defendant in nil marten pertaining to this action: Ate. radii..if/Ls/a"- IG 7010 AtliourncdPart 66 EFTA00180996
Sivu 77 / 102
A71 Letter from Supreme Court to Counsel Informing of SORA Level Determination Hearing (with attachments), dated August 26, 2010 (pp. A71-A761 'arrow flood of the - Able of pen 'fork 100 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK. N.Y. 10013 Defense Attorney 18B To Be Assigned Ms. Inn-Young Park NYC District Attorneys 0Mee I Hogan Place. Room 831 New York. N.Y. 10013 Re: Jeffrey Epstein SC ID N 30129-2010 Dear Sir/Madam: August 26. 2010 The above named defendant is scheduled for a Sex Offender Risk Level Determination hclon the Hon. Ruth Pickholz in part 66 on September 15.2010 at 9:30 a.m. The defendant has been notified under separate cover of this hearing and forwarded a copy of the Board of Examiners recommendation. advised of his/her right to appear. advised of the name and address of the attorney assigned to represent him or that one is being assigned. risk level guidelines, and of his right to waive his appearance. Enclosed please find a copy of the Board oflixaminers recommendation. Very truly yours. Mary A. Price. CCS Supreme Court - Criminal Tenn New York County • Clle. EFTA00180997
Sivu 78 / 102
Offender Name: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN NYSID N: OS1909 1ST Reviewer Initials: be following is the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders' recommendation pursuant to Section 168-I of Article 6-C of the NYS Correction Law as to whether the offender shall be esignated a Sexually Violent Offender. Predicate Sex Offender, or Sexual Predator as defined in subdivision seven of Section 168-a or whether the offender does not fit any of those ategories due to his conviction. 'lease check all that apply: . D Sexually Violent Offender - a sex offender who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense defined in Correction Law section 168-a Pk Please check which conviction's) apply. also please indicate whether the conviction was for an attempt at an offense: 6tiempt 130.35 - Rupc 1st degree 130.50 - Sodomy ISE degree/Criminal Sexual Act 1st degree 130.65 - Sexual Abuse 1st degree 130.66 - Aggravated sexual abuse 3rd degree 130.67- Aggravated sexual abuse 2nd degree 130.70 - Aggravated sexual abuse 1st degree 130.75 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 1st degree 130.80 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 2nd degree 61tO1P.: 130.53 - Persistent sexual abuse 130.654 - Aggravated sexual abuse 4th degree 130.90 • Facilitating a sex offense with a controlled substance a conviction of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any provisions of the foregoing sections committed or attempted as a hate crime defined in section 485.05 of the penal law or as a crime of terrorism defined in section 490.25 of such law. a conviction of an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes all of the essential elements of any such felony provided for above or conviction of a felony in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is required to register as a sex offender in the jurisdiction which the conviction occurred. Predicate Sex Offender - a sex offender who has been convicted of an offense set forth in subdivision 2 or 3 of Correction Law Section 168-a when the offender has been previously convicted of an offense set forth in subdivision 2 or 3 of Section 168-a, regardless of the date of the prior conviction and regardless of whether the offender was required to register for the previous conviction. Please identify below the offenders previous qualifying conviction(s) as well as the offender's current qualifying conviction, also please indicate whether the conviction was for an attempt at an offense: :orrent Previous a 130.20 • Sexual Misconduct 130.25 - Rape 3rd degree 130.30- Rape 2nd degree 130.40 - Sodomy 3rd degree/ — Criminal Sexual Act 3rd 130.45 - Sodomy 2nd degree; Criminal Sexual Act 2nd Current Previous Attempt 130.60 - Sexual Abuse 2nd degree 255.25 - Incest Article 263 offense - Sexual Performance by a Child 135.05 - Unlawful Imprisonment 2nd degree 135.10 - Unlawful Imprisonment 1st degree Current Previous Anemm 135.20 • Kidnapping 2nd degree 135.25 - Kidnapping 1st degree (*Note; 135.05.135.10.135.20.13525 -the victim must be less than 17 years old and the offender must not he the parent of the victim) Continued on the next page. EFTA00180998
Sivu 79 / 102
L (Conn!) tlfrelll Previnti. Attempt 230.04 - Patronizing a prostitute 3rd degree (victim <I7 years old) 230.05 • Patronizing a prostitute 2nd degree 230 06 • Patronizing a prostitute 1st degree 230.30 (2) • Promoting prostitution 2nd degree 230.32 - Promoting prostitution 1st degree 235.22 - Disseminating indecent material to minors 1st degree a conviction of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any provisions of a — listed sex offense committed or attempted as a hate crime defined in section 485.05 of the penal law or as a crime of terrorism defined in section 490.25 of such law. 130.52 - Forcible touching (victim<18 years old) 130.55 • Sexual abuse 3rd degree (victim<113 years old) Conviction/Attempt to commit any provision of 130.52 or 130.55 of the penal law regardless of age of victim and the offender has previously been convicted of: (i) a sex offense listed in Correction Law Section 168-a (2). or (ii) a sexually violent offense listed in Correction Law Section 168-a (3). or (iii) any of the provisions of section 130.52 or 130.55 of the penal law or an attempt thereof A conviction of (i) an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes all of the — essential elements of any such crime provided for in Correction Law Section 168-a (2) (a). or (ii) a felony in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is required to register as a sex offender in the jurisdiction in which the conviction occurred, or (iii) any of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 2251, IS U.S.C. 2251A, 18 U.S.C. 2252, 18 U.S.C. 2252A. or 18 U.S.C. 0160 provided the elements of such crime of conviction are substantially the same as those which are part of such offense as of March 11, 2002. Curran Previous Attempt 130.35 - Rape 1st degree 130.50 • Sodomy 1st degree/Criminal Sexual Act 1st degree 130. 65 - Sexual Abuse 1st degree 130.66 • Aggravated sexual abuse 3rd degree 130.67- Aggravated sexual abuse 2nd degree 130.70 - Aggravated sexual abuse 1st degree 130.75 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 1st degree 130.80 - Course of sexual conduct against a child 2nd degree 130.53 - Persistent sexual abuse 130.65-a - Aggravated sexual abuse 4th degree 130.90 - Facilitating a sex offense with a controlled substance a conviction of or a conviction for an attempt to commit any provisions of a sexually violent offense as set forth in Correction Liw Section 168-a (3) committed or attempted as a hate crime defined in section 485.05 of the penal law or as a crime of terrorism defined in section 490.25 of such law. a conviction of an offense in any other jurisdiction which includes all of the essential elements of any such felony provided for above or conviction of a felon• in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is required to register as a sex offender in the jurisdiction which the conviction occurred. 250.45(2).(3)and(4) - Unlawful surveillance 2nd degree 250.50 - Unlawful surveillance 1st degree Sexual Predator - a sex offender who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense defined in Correction Law Section 168-a (3) and who suffers from a mental abnormality or personality disorder that makes him or her likely to engage in predatory sexually violent offenses. Loa None of the above. EFTA00180999
Sivu 80 / 102
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ACT RISK ASSESSNIENT INSTRUMENT RISK FACTOR VALUE SCORE I. CURREN I U1-FENS (S) I. Use of Violence Used forcible compulsion +10 X Inflicted physical injury +15 10 Armed with a dangerous instrument +30 2. Sexual Contact with Victim Contact ova clothing +5 Contact under clothing +10 Sexual immunise. deviate sexual intercourse or aggravated sexual abuse 25 4-25 X 3. Number of Victims. Two +20 30 Three or nut: +30 a. Duration of offense conduct with victim X • Continuing course of sexual misconduct +20 X 20 . . 5. Age of victim I I through 16 +20 X 20 10 or lees. 63 or more +30 6. Other victim characteristics Victim from +20 0 suffered mental disability os incapacity or fmm physical helplessness 7. Relationship with victim . Stranger or established for purpose of victimizing or professional relationship +20 X 20 li. CRIMINAL HISTOR1 S. Age at hest act of sexual misconduct 20 or less +10 0 j 9. Number and nature of prior crimes Prior history/no set crimes or felonies +5 X Prior history/non-violent felony +15 Prior violas felony. or misdemeanor sec crime or endangering welfare of a child +30 . 3 W. Recency of prior offense. - . .. ........._ _._ . • Less than 3 years +10 0 - -• I. Drug or Alcohol abuse History of abuse +15 0 • • • • . . COLUMNS I- II SUBTOTAL 130 SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ACT i RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT RISK FACTOR VALUE SCORE III. POST-OFFENSE BEHAVIOR 12. Acceptance of Responsibility Not accepted responsibility +10 Not accepted responsibility / refused or 0 expelled from treatment +15 13. Conducrw:iiite icon/rid /- sane —rt./Ned • • • • . . " • Unsatisfactory +10 Unsatisfactory with sexual misconduct 0 +20 IV. RELEASE ENVIRONMENT 14. Supervision Release with specialized supervision 0 Release with supervision 4:5 0 Release without supervision _ . --. — — ..._ +IS - Is. LiriviiiiiiirriaimeMiliiiiliitr. Living or employment inappropriate +10 0 ._.. . ...— —. ...... ._ _.....--.. _ _ .— ... . ....._ COLUMNS 12-15 SUBTOTAL 0 .-. .... . - ..._.. ....._ - .- COLUMNS I-11 SUBTOTAL___ _ . .... ____. __ _ ___ 130 TOTAL RISK FACTOR SCORE (add 2 subtotals) 130 1 2 X Offender Name. JEFFREY E EPSTEIN NYSID OSI909 Docket sr: RISK LEVEL: Assessor's Signature Date: 3 A. Overrides (If any override is cuckd offender is presumptively a Level 1. Offender has a prior felony conviction for a sex crime 2. Offender inflicted serious physical injury or caused death 3. The offender has made a recent threat that he will reoffend by committing a sexual or violent come 4. There has been a clinical assessment that the offender has a psychological, physical. or organic abnormaliry that decreases ability to control impulsive sexual behavior B. Departure 1. A departure from the risk level is warranted ED Yes El No Level I (low) 0 to -, 70 Level 2 (moderate ) .75 to 4 105 2. If yes. circle the appropriate risk level I 2 3 Level 3 (high) +110 to •,300 3. If yes, explain the bests for departure See Summary) Note: The Sex Offender Registration Act requires the court or Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders to consider any victim impact statement in determining a sex offender's level of risk -4 EFTA00181000